RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a new targeted therapy for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited real-world evidence. OBJECTIVE: Explore our experience with dupilumab for AD in clinical practice at a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Unicentric observational retrospective study including adult and pediatric patients with severe AD receiving dupilumab between December 2017 and December 2021. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS) were recovered to assess severity and response. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 and 13 patients reached 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, respectively. The EASI-75 response rates were 94.2%, 95.8%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI-90 response rates were 63.5%, 72.9%, 84.6% and 92.3% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI <7 response rates were 92.3%, 91.7%, 88.5% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The P-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 86%, 87.5%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The S-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 82.7%, 85.4%, 100% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. Adverse events were mild and occurred in 20.3% of patients, all of them adults. CONCLUSION: Our findings support dupilumab's favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in clinical practice. Dupilumab offers a rapid and sustained response, regardless of combined therapy. Longer follow-ups are still required to adequately assess its performance.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Prurido/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a new targeted therapy for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited real-world evidence. OBJECTIVE: Explore our experience with dupilumab for AD in clinical practice at a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Unicentric observational retrospective study including adult and pediatric patients with severe AD receiving dupilumab between December 2017 and December 2021. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS) were recovered to assess severity and response. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 and 13 patients reached 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, respectively. The EASI-75 response rates were 94.2%, 95.8%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI-90 response rates were 63.5%, 72.9%, 84.6% and 92.3% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI <7 response rates were 92.3%, 91.7%, 88.5% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The P-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 86%, 87.5%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The S-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 82.7%, 85.4%, 100% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. Adverse events were mild and occurred in 20.3% of patients, all of them adults. CONCLUSION: Our findings support dupilumab's favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in clinical practice. Dupilumab offers a rapid and sustained response, regardless of combined therapy. Longer follow-ups are still required to adequately assess its performance.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Prurido/induzido quimicamente , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prediction of the response to a biological treatment in psoriasis patients would allow efficient treatment allocation. OBJECTIVE: To identify polymorphisms associated with secukinumab response in psoriasis patients in a daily practice setting. METHODS: We studied 180 SNPs in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis recruited from 15 Spanish hospitals. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated by absolute PASI ≤3 and ≤1 at 6 and 12 months. Individuals were genotyped using a custom Taqman array. Multiple logistic regression models were generated. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were studied at 6 months, (67% achieved absolute PASI ≤ 3 and 65% PASI ≤ 1) and 162 at 12 months (75% achieved absolute PASI ≤ 3 and 64% PASI ≤ 1). Multivariable analysis showed the association of different sets of SNPs with the response to secukinumab. The model of absolute PASI≤3 at 6 months showed best values of sensitivity and specificity. Four SNPs were associated with the capability of achieving absolute PASI ≤ 3 at 6 months. rs1801274 (FCGR2A), rs2431697 (miR-146a) and rs10484554 (HLCw6) were identified as risk factors for failure to achieve absolute PASI≤3, while rs1051738 (PDE4A) was protective. AUC including these genotypes, weight of patients and history of biological therapy was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), with a sensitivity of 48.6% and specificity of 95.7% to discriminate between both phenotypes. CONCLUSION: We have identified a series of polymorphisms associated with the response to secukinumab capable of predicting the potential response/non-response to this drug in patients with plaque psoriasis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Genital warts are caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV), whose genotypes have traditionally been classified as low risk or high risk (oncogenic). The first 2 prophylactic vaccines included the most common genotypes at the time: HPV-6, HPV-11, HPV-16, and HPV-18. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of HPV types in our setting 10 years after the introduction of HPV vaccines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive, observational, retrospective study of patients diagnosed with genital warts at the sexually transmitted infection unit of a dermatology department between January 2016 and June 2019. RESULTS: In total, 362 patients were diagnosed with genital warts during the study period, and 212 (58.6%) underwent genotyping. Thirty-two distinct HPV types were observed, the most common being HPV-6, HPV-11, HPV-16, and HPV-42. HPV DNA was detected in 93.9% of the samples analyzed, and there were 299 genotypes (mean, 1.5 per patient). Overall, 26.6% of patients had more than a single HPV genotype, while 24.1% had at least 1 high-risk type. No significant associations were found between the presence of high-risk HPV types and any of the study variables. At least 2 of the 4 HPV types targeted in the original vaccines were detected in 94.1% of lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 10 years ago, the prevalences of HPV types included in the first 2 prophylactic vaccines have decreased, while the proportion of patients with at least 1 of the 4 most common types has remained unchanged. We also observed a slight increase in infections with multiple HPV types or at least 1 high-risk type.
Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Condiloma Acuminado , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Condiloma Acuminado/diagnóstico , Condiloma Acuminado/epidemiologia , Condiloma Acuminado/prevenção & controle , Genótipo , Humanos , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with severe psoriasis have an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk and prevalence of subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing can detect subclinical CAD and improve cardiovascular risk assessment beyond clinical scores. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the presence and magnitude of subclinical CAD determined by CAC score among the different ESC/EAS CV risk categories, as well as the potential for risk reclassification, in patients with severe psoriasis from a low CV risk population. METHODS: Unicentric cross-sectional study in 111 patients with severe chronic plaque psoriasis from a low CV risk population in the Mediterranean region. Patients were classified into four CV risk categories according to the ESC/EAS guideline recommendations and HeartScore/SCORE calibrated charts. Patients underwent coronary computed tomography to determine their CAC scores. Patients in the moderate-risk category with a CAC score of ≥100 were considered to be reclassified as recommended by the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Reclassification was also considered for patients in the low-risk category with a CAC score>0. RESULTS: Presence of subclinical CAD was detected in 46 (41.4%) patients. These accounted for 86.2% of patients in high/very-high-risk categories and 25.6% of patients in non-high-risk categories. Fourteen (17.1%) of the patients in non-high-risk categories were reclassifiable due to their CAC score. This percentage was higher (25%) when considering the moderate-risk category alone and lower (13.8%) in the low-risk category. Age was the only variable associated with presence of subclinical CAD and reclassification. CONCLUSIONS: Over 40% of patients with severe psoriasis from a low-risk region and up to 25% of those in non-high-risk categories have subclinical CAD. CAC appears to be useful for reclassification purposes in CV risk assessment of patients with severe psoriasis. Further research is required to elucidate how CAC could be implemented in everyday practice at outpatient dermatology clinics dedicated to severe psoriasis.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Psoríase , Cálcio , Angiografia Coronária , Estudos Transversais , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To generate an operational definition to adequately reflect the construct 'Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)' in psoriasis. METHODS: A systematic review of domains included in clinical trials of psoriasis was presented to a panel of dermatologists and patients. Further domains were elicited by panel discussions. Domains (and instruments measuring these) were items of two consecutive Delphi rounds targeting dermatologists from the Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and patients from the Acción Psoriasis association. The instruments selected were used to generate 388 patient vignettes. The expert group then classified these vignettes as 'No MDA/MDA/Unclassifiable'. The items were further reduced by factorial analysis. Using the classification variable as gold standard, several operational constructions were tested in regression models and ROC curves and accuracy was evaluated with area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The following domains were included: itching, scaling, erythema and visibility by 0-10 scales, extension by BSA, impact on quality of life by DLQI, special location and presence of arthritis as yes/no. The definition with the highest AUC and best balance between sensitivity and specificity was the one including no presence of arthritis plus at least three others below the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (AUC, 0.897; sensitivity, 95.2%, specificity, 84.1%). CONCLUSION: This study provides, for the very first time, the construct of 'Minimal Disease Activity' in psoriasis as agreed by dermatologists and patients. MDA is defined as absence of active arthritis plus 3 out of 6: itching ≤ 1/10; scaling ≤ 2/10; redness ≤ 2/10; visibility ≤ 2/10; BSA ≤ 2; DLQI ≤ 2; and no lesions in special locations. By design, domains are representative of disease impact. This MDA definition may be used as a measure of adequate management and replace other subjective or restrictive tools.
Assuntos
Psoríase , Venereologia , Humanos , Prurido , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current psoriasis guidelines do not usually include recommendations about first line classical or biologic treatment. The objectives of this study were: to describe shifts in the prescription of the first biological treatment, and to compare treatment withdrawal and rates of adverse events over ten years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Biobadaderm registry was analyzed to describe: first biological prescription in bio-naïve patients, adverse events rate and reasons for drug withdrawal comparing three periods of time (2008-2010, 2011-2014, 2015-2018). RESULTS: Anti-TNF drugs were the most prescribed biological drug from 2008 to 2010. Ustekinumab has become the most prescribed first biologic since 2014. The main reasons for drug discontinuation were adverse events, lack of efficacy and remission. In each period any treatment was less likely to be discontinued due to any of these three reasons comparing to the previous period. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identifies trends in prescription of the first biological antipsoriatic drug in clinical practice from 2008 to 2018. It suggests that we have become more comfortable with the safety profile and more exigent with the efficacy of the drugs.
Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Psoríase , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose TumoralRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The association between dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and bullous pemphigoid (BP) has been demonstrated in several studies. The main aim of this study was to estimate the use of DPP-4i treatment in patients diagnosed with BP in our setting. METHODS: We selected patients histologically diagnosed with BP in our department between October 2015 and October 2018 and performed a retrospective chart review to assess clinical and epidemiological data and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) patterns. RESULTS: Of the 70 patients diagnosed with BP during the study period, 50% were diabetic and 88.57% of these were being treated with a DPP-4i when diagnosed with BP. The most common DPP-4i was linagliptin (used in 18.6% of patients), followed by vildagliptin (17.1%). The median latency period between initiation of DPP-4i treatment and diagnosis of BP was 27.5 months for all treatments, 16 months for linagliptin, and 39 months for vildagliptin (log rank < 0.01). A negative DIF result was significantly more common in patients not being treated with a DPP-4i. The DIF pattern most strongly (and significantly) associated with DPP-4i treatment was linear immunoglobulin G deposits along the dermal-epidermal junction. DPP-4i treatment was withdrawn in 87% of patients and 96% of these achieved a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: DPP-4i treatment is very common in patients with BP in our setting. The latency period between start of treatment and onset of BP seems to be shorter with linagliptin than with other types of gliptins. Patients receiving DPP-4i treatment may show different DIF patterns to those not receiving treatment.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV , Penfigoide Bolhoso , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Linagliptina/efeitos adversos , Penfigoide Bolhoso/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , VildagliptinaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The epidemiology of genital herpes has changed in recent years with an increase in the incidence of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients diagnosed with genital herpes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was designed. All patients diagnosed with genital herpes between January 2016 and January 2019 in a Sexually Transmitted Infections Unit (ITS) in Valencia, Spain, were included. RESULTS: We identified 895 STI diagnoses. Of these, 126 (14%) were genital herpes; 68 (54%) of these cases were in women and 58 (46%) in men. Diagnosis was confirmed by molecular detection of HSV DNA in 110 cases (87.3%). Of these, 52 were cases of HSV-1 infection (47.3%) and 58 were HSV-2 infection (52.7%). HSV-2 was more common in men (69.5%), while HSV-1 was more common in women (59.3%). In the subgroup of women, mean age at diagnosis was 26 years for HSV-1 and 34 years for HSV-2 (P=.015). Recurrent genital herpes rates were 13% for HSV-1 and 40% for HSV-2. CONCLUSIONS: There has been an increase in the number of cases of genital herpes caused by HSV-1 in our setting, with young women in particular being affected. This has important prognostic implications because genital herpes caused by HSV-1 is less likely to recur.
Assuntos
Herpes Genital/epidemiologia , Herpes Genital/virologia , Herpesvirus Humano 1 , Herpesvirus Humano 2 , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis is one of the most often used measures for assessing severity, but this method has shortcomings. OBJECTIVE: To validate a new way to estimate BSA. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective, multicenter study in 56 patients with psoriasis. Each patient was evaluated by 2 dermatologists in 2 visits to the same hospital. Each dermatologist used 2 methods for estimating BSA: the traditional visual estimation in which the area of the palm equals 1% of the total body surface and an optical pencil (OP) method in which the affected area is drawn on a touch screen. Software in the application then calculates the BSA. RESULTS: Overall concordance between the 2 methods was acceptable according to an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.87. However, the limits of agreement were unacceptably large and there was systematic bias: traditional estimates were consistently greater than OP calculations. Concordance between the methods was better (ICC>0.8) on the trunk and lower extremities. Intraobserver reliability was excellent with both methods (ICCs, 0.97 and 0.98 for the traditional and OP estimates, respectively). Interobserver reliability was also high (ICCs, 0.91 and 0.94 for the traditional and OP methods), although the mean BSA differed significantly between observers. The ICCs were much lower for BSA estimates on the head. CONCLUSIONS: This study to validate the OP method for estimating the affected BSA in patients with psoriasis shows good agreement between the OP and traditional approaches. The OP calculations also showed less variance and better interobserver reliability.
Assuntos
Superfície Corporal , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Psoríase/patologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Análise de Variância , Feminino , Mãos/anatomia & histologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Portugal , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Software , EspanhaAssuntos
Gangrena de Fournier/etiologia , Hidradenite Supurativa/complicações , Adulto , Desbridamento , Gangrena de Fournier/diagnóstico , Gangrena de Fournier/cirurgia , Hidradenite Supurativa/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Transplante de Pele , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment persistence is becoming a useful measure to evaluate long-term effectiveness and safety of biological therapies in real-world settings. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to explore the scientific opinion of a panel of dermatologists and hospital pharmacists to reach a consensus about the impact, causes, and best strategies and interventions that might be associated with improved drug persistence in patients with psoriasis in Spain. METHODS: This research was conducted using a modified Delphi method organized in two rounds and involving a panel of 90 dermatologists and 34 hospital pharmacists. A questionnaire of 70 items was developed. The items proposed to reach a consensus included topics such as definitions and measures in the treatment of psoriasis, analysis of treatment persistence, factors that may influence treatment persistence, impact of treatment persistence and economic cost of treatment. RESULTS: Dermatologists reached a consensus on 77.1% of the items proposed, and hospital pharmacists reached a consensus on 71.4%. Both groups agreed that it is important to use standardized measures in the evaluation of treatment maintenance over time. Dermatologists agreed that treatment survival, persistence and retention are synonymous, but hospital pharmacists considered only treatment persistence as a valid term. In addition, panelists agreed that drug persistence is an indicator of success in the treatment of psoriasis that may be influenced by a drug's effectiveness and safety profile, as well as by patient satisfaction. They agreed that the different causes of treatment discontinuation should be considered in Kaplan-Meier analysis of treatment persistence. Moreover, treatment persistence was agreed to decrease the cost of therapy. CONCLUSION: This Delphi consensus highlights the different perspectives of dermatologists and hospital pharmacists regarding the interpretation of treatment persistence, and the challenge of harmonizing the results obtained.
Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Dermatologistas , Adesão à Medicação , Farmacêuticos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Produtos Biológicos/economia , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Satisfação do Paciente , Psoríase/economia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Espanha , Terminologia como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Artrite Psoriásica/psicologia , Fertilidade , Psoríase/psicologia , Autoimagem , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artrite Psoriásica/epidemiologia , Artrite Psoriásica/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Prevalência , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Psoríase/terapia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Espanha/epidemiologia , Estereotipagem , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ixekizumab has proven efficacy and safety for the treatment of psoriasis in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate its effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Retrospective study of all patients treated with ixekizumab in 2 dermatology departments in the city of Valencia, Spain. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (53.3% men and 46.7% women) with a mean age of 48.61 years were studied; 77.3% (n = 58) had plaque psoriasis and 22.7% (n = 17) had psoriasis predominantly affecting a specific area. The most common comorbidity was obesity (present in 48% of patients) and 40% of the overall group had not been previously treated with a biologic drug. Mean psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) fell from 9.99 at baseline to 1.5 at week 16. PASI-75 and PASI-90 (improvements of at least 75% and 90% in PASI) were independent of sex, age, baseline PASI, and the comorbidities analyzed. Responses at week 16 and 52 were significantly better in biologic-naïve patients for the overall group and the subgroup of patients with localized psoriasis. Adverse effects were reported for 25.7% of patients and the most common effect was injection-site reaction. There were no serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that ixekizumab is both effective and safe in the treatment of psoriasis in routine clinical practice.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/patologia , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Fasciite Necrosante/diagnóstico por imagem , Diester Fosfórico Hidrolases/toxicidade , Picada de Aranha/complicações , Venenos de Aranha/toxicidade , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoce , Fasciite Necrosante/induzido quimicamente , Fasciite Necrosante/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeAssuntos
Doença de Darier/patologia , Exantema/patologia , Dermatopatias/patologia , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Acitretina/administração & dosagem , Acitretina/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Doença de Darier/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Darier/genética , Exantema/etiologia , Humanos , Ceratolíticos/administração & dosagem , Ceratolíticos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Prurido/diagnóstico , ATPases Transportadoras de Cálcio do Retículo Sarcoplasmático , Estações do Ano , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Biologic drugs are usually prescribed as second-line treatment for psoriasis, that is, after the patient has first been treated with a conventional psoriasis drug. There are, however, cases where, depending on the characteristics of the patient or the judgement of the physician, biologics may be chosen as first-line therapy. No studies to date have analyzed the demographics or clinical characteristics of patients in this setting or the safety profile of the agents used. The main aim of this study was to characterize these aspects of first-line biologic therapy and compare them to those observed for patients receiving biologics as second-line therapy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted an observational study of 181 patients treated in various centers with a systemic biologic drug as first-line treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis between January 2008 and November 2016. All the patients were registered in the Spanish Registry of Adverse Events Associated with Biologic Drugs in Dermatology. RESULTS: The characteristics of the first- and second-line groups were very similar, although the patients receiving a biologic as first-line treatment for their psoriasis were older. No differences were observed for disease severity (assessed using the PASI) or time to diagnosis. Hypertension, diabetes, and liver disease were all more common in the first-line group. There were no differences between the groups in terms of reasons for drug withdrawal or occurrence of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: No major differences were found between patients with psoriasis receiving biologic drugs as first- or second-line therapy, a finding that provides further evidence of the safety of biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis.
Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Comorbidade , Substituição de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidoresRESUMO
The advances in psoriasis management currently allow achieving a good control of the disease. In particular, with the latest developed molecules, available evidence suggests that it is possible to pose an ambitious therapeutic goal, such as a Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1, a Physician Global Assessment 0/1, or a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90/100 response. However, patients often fail to achieve the complete clearance of their cutaneous lesions or the improvement of disease factors that impair their quality of life. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis, it is not enough to define precisely the therapeutic objective, but also to adapt the therapeutic strategy to make the necessary modifications in case of not achieving it at the time point (at the end of the induction phase, or every 3-6 months) to be agreed with the patient (the so-called treat-to-target approach). In the present report, based on the Delphi methodology, 11 dermatologists from the Spanish Psoriasis Group addressed key issues that could be involved in the achievement and maintenance of the therapeutic goals of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. The document provides 27 consensus statements intended to support clinical decision-making by healthcare professionals for patients who might be candidates to receive biologic therapy.