Translating plasma citrulline concentration in clinical practice: Role of cross-sectional assessment in adult patients with short bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional plasma citrulline concentration (CIT) is considered a marker of enterocyte mass. The role of CIT in clinical practice in patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) is not clearly defined. AIM: To assess the accuracy of CIT to discriminate SBS from healthy controls (HC) and SBS with intestinal failure (SBS-IF), requiring intravenous supplementation (IVS), from SBS with intestinal insufficiency (SBS-II). METHODS: Cross-sectional study on unselected outpatients (31 SBS-II, 113 SBS-IF) and 19 healthy controls (HC). Demographic data, SBS characteristics, nutritional status, oral intake, intestinal fat absorption, renal function and IF severity, categorized by the volume of the required IVS, were collected at time of CIT evaluation (µmol/L). Data as mean±SD. RESULTS: CIT was 36.6 ± 6.0 in HC, 30.2 ± 14.0 in SBS-II and 18.8 ± 12.3 in SBS-IF (p < 0.001). CIT cutoff was 31 for the diagnosis of SBS (sensitivity 79 %, specificity 89 %), and 14 for the discrimination between SBS-IF and SBS-II (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 51 %). Wide ranges of CIT were observed in all SBS-IF severity categories. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected SBS patients, CIT was accurate to diagnose SBS, had high sensitivity to diagnose SBS-IF but showed low specificity for SBS-II. In SBS-IF, CIT was not an accurate marker of IF severity.

Malnutrition independently predicts mortality at 18 months in patients hospitalised for severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-coV-2).

RATIONALE: To investigate the association between malnutrition and patient outcome following hospitalisation for Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: In April 2020, 268 adult patients (235 included in the follow-up) hospitalised for COVID-19 infection were evaluated for malnutrition risk and diagnosis using modified Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and modified Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria (GLIM), respectively. An 18-month follow-up was carried out to assess the incidence and the associated risk factors for death and re-hospitalization. RESULTS: The outcome was unknown for 33 patients. Death occurred in 39% of the 235 patients included in the follow-up. The risk of death was independently associated with malnutrition risk or diagnosis of malnutrition, whereas the male sex showed a protective association. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients with diagnosis of malnutrition had lower survival rate. The re-hospitalization rate was 31% and was negatively associated with BMI≥25, and positively associated with length of hospitalisation for COVID-19 and with cancer comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized patients for SARS-CoV-2 disease, both malnutrition risk (p = 0.050) and diagnosis of malnutrition (p = 0.047 with modified GLIM and C-reactive protein >0.5 mg/dL; p = 0.024 with modified GLIM and C-reactive protein >5 mg/dL) were predictive risk factors for mortality, whereas male sex was associated with lower risk of death. Overweight at time of hospitalization and the length of hospitalisation were respectively protective and risk factor for re-hospitalization after discharge.

Metformin and the Liver: Unlocking the Full Therapeutic Potential.

Metformin is a highly effective medication for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent studies have shown that it has significant therapeutic benefits in various organ systems, particularly the liver. Although the effects of metformin on metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis are still being debated, it has positive effects on cirrhosis and anti-tumoral properties, which can help prevent the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, it has been proven to improve insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia, commonly associated with liver diseases. While more studies are needed to fully determine the safety and effectiveness of metformin use in liver diseases, the results are highly promising. Indeed, metformin has a terrific potential for extending its full therapeutic properties beyond its traditional use in managing diabetes.

Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine status of sixty-seven adult patients affected by inherited metabolic diseases: a phone survey.

BACKGROUND: The Covid pandemic seems to have had several detrimental effects on managing patients affected by inherited metabolic diseases (IMD), although published data about the impact of COVID-19 on patients suffering from IMD are very scarce. The scope of our work was to evaluate adherence to the vaccination plan, the side effects experienced by our adult IMD patients, and the symptoms of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients agreed to respond to a phone interview. The mean age was 36.5 (± 11.6 SD). Regarding the vaccination campaign, fifty-five patients (82%) joined it, of whom ten had received two doses and the remaining forty-five, three. Forty-two patients (76%) reported adverse events following vaccination, the most frequent being local reaction, fever, and asthenia, which lasted an average of two days and resolved without sequelae. Regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection, twenty-seven out of sixty-seven patients (40%) tested positive for the virus; seven of them were not vaccinated at the time of infection; on the other hand, twenty had already had at least two doses. Regarding the prevalence of long-Covid, as many as 12 patients (44%) reported symptoms that persisted after the nasopharyngeal swab tested negative and lasted an average of 81 (± 74 SD) days. There were no statistically significant differences in BMI of patients who contracted the infection and patients who did not (25.15 vs. 25.20, p = .861), between those who had adverse reactions to the vaccine and those who did not (24.40 vs. 25.75, p = .223), between those who had long-Covid and those who did not (25.9 vs. 27.7, p = .183). No relation was observed between metabolic inherited disease, SARS-CoV-2 infection symptoms and adverse vaccine reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that IMD patients adhered to the vaccination campaign comparably to the general Italian population. Adverse events to the vaccine were negligible. SARS-CoV-2 infection, which occurred in most cases after receiving at least two doses of the vaccine, did not cause serious symptoms and never required hospitalisation. A non-negligible share of patients suffered from long-Covid symptoms.

Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes in young women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcome. The main purpose and research question of the study is to determine the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes. METHODS: Prospective study: 67 breast cancer patients between 18 and 40 years old, undergoing a fertility preservation by means of oocyte storage were considered. Inclusions criteria for the study were age between 18 and 40 years old, BMI between 18 and 28, breast cancer neoplasm stage I and II according to American Joint Committee on Cancer classification (2017) and no metastasis. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: age over 40 years old, BMI < 18 and > 28, breast cancer neoplasm stage III and IV and do not performed the BRCA test. A total of 21 patients had not performed the test and were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups: Group A was composed by 11 breast cancer patients with BRCA 1 mutations, Group B was composed by 11 breast cancer patients with BRCA 2 mutations, Group C was composed by 24 women with breast cancer without BRCA mutations, and Group D (control) was composed by 181 normal women. RESULTS: Group A showed significant lower AMH levels compared to Group C and D (1.2 ± 1.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.1 p < 0.05 and 1.2 ± 1.1 vs 3.8 ± 2.5 p < 0.05). BRCA1 mutated patients showed a significant lower rate of mature oocytes (MII) compared to Group C (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.2 ± 4.4 p < 0,05) and Group D (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.3 ± 3.4; p < 0,05). Breast cancer patients needed a higher dose of gonadotropins compared to controls (Group A 2206 ± 1392 Group B2047.5 ± 829.9 Group C 2106 ± 1336 Group D 1597 ± 709 p < 0,05). No significant differences were found among the groups considering basal FSH levels, duration of stimulation, number of developed follicles, and number of total retrieved oocytes. Regarding BRCA2 mutation, no effect on fertility was shown in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that BRCA1 patients had a higher risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) confirmed by a diminished ovarian reserve and a lower number of mature oocytes suitable for cryopreservation.