Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Minerva Surg ; 77(4): 348-353, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35856886

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals changed visitation policy to limit the infection spread. We aimed to evaluate the impact of evolving visitation policy on short-term surgical outcomes. METHODS: All adult patients who underwent colorectal surgery between January 1st, 2020, and May 12th, 2020, at our institution were included. Patients were divided into: before implementing the no visitor allowed policy (VA) or no visitor allowed policy (NVA) groups, based on the hospital admission date.. The primary outcomes were 30-day readmission rate and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: A total of 439 patients were included. Of them, 128 (29.2%) patients had surgery during the NVA policy, and 311 (70.8%) patients underwent surgery during VA policy. Patients who had surgery during the NVA policy were more likely to have emergency surgery and a longer operation time. However, the other baseline characteristics, surgical approach, underlying disease, extent of resection, and the need for intraoperative blood transfusion were comparable between the two groups. There was no difference between both groups regarding the 30-day readmission rate (10.3% vs. 7.8% in the NVA group; P>0.05) and median LOS (4 days vs. 3 days in the NVA group; P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Restricting inpatient visitors for patients undergoing colorectal surgery was not associated with increased postoperative complications and readmission rates. LOS was similar between the two groups. This strategy can be safely implemented in cases of crisis. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Colorretais , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Humanos , Pandemias , Isolamento Social , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Robot Surg ; 16(3): 601-609, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34313950

RESUMO

To date, there is no cohort in the literature focusing on the impact of the type of anastomosis in robotic ileocolonic resections for Crohn's Disease (CD). We aimed to compare short-term postoperative outcomes of robotic ileocolic resection for CD between patients who had intracorporeal (ICA) or extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA). We retrospectively included all consecutive robotic ileocolonic resections for CD at our institution between 2014 and 2020. We compared baseline, perioperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes between ICA and ECA. The analysis included 89 patients: 71% underwent ICA and 29% ECA. Groups were similar in age, sex, body mass index, smoking, CD duration, Montreal classification, surgical history, and previous CD medical treatments. Return to bowel function was achieved sooner in the ICA group (ICA 1.6 ± 0.7 day, ECA 2.1 ± 0.8 days; p = 0.026) despite longer operative time (ICA 235 ± 79 min, ECA 172 ± 51 min; p < 0.001), but no statistical difference was found regarding ileus rate and length of stay. Overall, 30-day postoperative complication rate was 23.6% (ICA 22.2%, ECA 26.9%; p = 0.635). There were no abdominal septic complications, anastomotic leaks, or severe postoperative complications. In conclusion, robotic ileocolic resection for CD shows acceptable 30 days outcomes for both ICA and ECA. ICA was associated with a faster return to bowel function without impact on the length of stay or 30-day complications. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of ICA in the setting of ileocolic resections for CD.


Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 47(9): 2436-2440, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33883088

RESUMO

There is limited data about the safety of colorectal surgery after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We aimed to share our experience about postoperative outcomes of colorectal surgery for patients treated with ICI. Overall, 31 patients were identified, 22 (71%) underwent elective and nine (29%) underwent emergent/urgent surgery. The 30-day Clavien Dindo class ≥ III complication rates were 27.3% (n = 6) for elective and 55.5% (n = 5) for emergent/urgent cases. Four patients underwent emergency surgery for immune-related colonic perforation and developed postoperative septic shock; two died. Considering patients' comorbidities, cancer stage, and surgical complexity, elective colorectal surgery after ICI seems relatively safe. However, emergent/urgent colorectal surgery was associated with high postoperative morbidity. Indeed, colonic perforation in the setting of ICI treatment has a significant risk of postoperative mortality. Therefore, for patients on ICI with any acute abdominal symptoms, surgical consult should be involved, and colon perforation should be ruled out.


Assuntos
Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Perfuração Intestinal/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Idoso , Colo/cirurgia , Doenças do Colo/imunologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Perfuração Intestinal/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reto/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA