Isolated thoracic and lumbar transverse process fractures: Do they need spine surgeon evaluation? a high volume level I trauma center experience with cost analysis.

Background: Transverse process fractures (TPF) of the thoracic and lumbar spine have become increasingly identified due to CT imaging. Spine service consultation is common for further evaluation and management. There are several studies that demonstrate no difference in clinical outcome with or without spine service intervention. However, no study to our knowledge provides an additional cost analysis. We hypothesize that isolated thoracolumbar TPF are stable injuries. Furthermore, spine service consultation and evaluation results in increased health care costs. Methods: Patients were identified using trauma registry data at Saint Louis University (SLU) from January 2012 to August 2018. Chart and imaging review was performed to determine if additional spine fractures were identified by the spine team which were not included in the initial radiology report. TPF associated with other spinal injuries were defined as one or more thoracic and/or lumbar TPF in addition to any other acute fracture or dislocation in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine. A separate cost analysis with institution-specific charges was also performed. Results: Six hundred eighty-two patients with TPF from January 2012 to August 2018 were identified. Two hundred twenty-eight patients met the criteria to be included in this study. Additional spinal pathology that was not included in the initial radiology report was identified in 5 (2.19%) patients, none of which required surgical intervention. Cost analysis demonstrated additional costs associated with spine service intervention totaled $1,725,360.28. Average cost per patient in our cohort summed to $2,529.85. Conclusions: These data support that isolated TPF of the thoracic and lumbar spine are stable injuries that likely do not require spine service intervention and in fact may represent unnecessary financial burden. Foregoing unnecessary consultation can alleviate time constraints within spine service practices and reduce health care costs by eliminating costly extraneous interventions from the patient's care.

Treatment of Early-onset Scoliosis: Similar Outcomes Despite Different Etiologic Subtypes in Traditional Growing Rod Graduates.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether traditional growing rod (TGR) treatment outcomes vary by early-onset scoliosis (EOS) subtype. The goal of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes and complications of TGR treatment by EOS subtype. METHODS: We queried an international database of EOS patients from 20 centers to identify "graduates" who had (1) undergone primary TGR treatment from 1993 to 2014; (2) completed TGR treatment; and (3) had an uneventful clinical examination within 6 months after completion of TGR treatment with no anticipated further intervention. We included 202 patients in 4 etiologic subgroups: neuromuscular (n=65), syndromic (n=57), idiopathic (n=52), and congenital (n=28). Mean age at surgery was 7.1 years (range, 1.6 to 14.9 y); mean duration of follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 to 18.6 y). The groups did not differ by mean age, body mass index, sex, number of lengthenings, or duration of follow-up. The following preoperative differences were significant: (1) greater mean major curve in the neuromuscular versus idiopathic subgroup; (2) shorter spinal height (T1-S1) in the congenital versus idiopathic subgroup; and (3) smaller proportion of ambulatory patients in the neuromuscular subgroup versus all other subgroups. RESULTS: We found no significant differences among subgroups in mean major curve correction or changes in thoracic height (T1-T12), spinal height, or global kyphosis at any point. Rates of deep surgical site infection, implant-related complications, and neurological complications were not different among subgroups. The medical complication rate was significantly lower in the idiopathic group compared with the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Major curve correction and spinal and thoracic height increases did not differ significantly at any point by EOS subtype. Rates of deep surgical site infection, implant-related complications, and neurological complications did not differ by subtype. Except for the lower rate of medical complications in the idiopathic group, our findings suggest that, after TGR treatment, patients can expect similar outcomes regardless of their EOS subtype. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.

Surgical removal of a migrating intraspinal bullet: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Management of gunshot wounds to the spine with subsequent spinal cord injury is a controversial topic among spine surgeons. Possible complications of retained intradural bullets include delayed neurological deficits, spinal instability, and lead toxicity. The authors' purpose is to review the potential complications of retained intraspinal bullets and the surgical indications for intraspinal bullet removal. OBSERVATIONS: The authors describe a case of a patient who developed cauda equina symptoms following a gunshot wound to the lumbar spine with a migrating retained intraspinal bullet. Because of neurological changes, the patient underwent surgical removal of the bullet. At the postoperative clinic visit 2 weeks following bullet removal, the patient reported resolution of her symptoms. LESSONS: Gunshot wounds to the spine are challenging cases. The decision to proceed with surgical management in the event of retained bullet fragments is multifactorial and relies heavily on the patient's neurological status. A current review of the literature suggests that, in cases of cauda equina injuries and the development of neurological deficits in patients with retained intraspinal fragments, there is benefit from surgical decompression and bullet removal. Careful preoperative planning is required, and consideration of spinal alignment with positional changes is crucial.

A radiographic zone-based approach to predict meniscus injury in lateral tibial plateau fracture.

OBJECTIVES: There is limited data regarding meniscal injury and it's association to fracture location and articular impaction/displacement (AID) in tibial plateau fractures. The purpose of this study was to predict lateral meniscal injury in tibial plateau fractures, based on location and extent of AID as visualized on pre op CT images. DESIGN: Retrospective review study. SETTING: Level I academic trauma center. PATIENTS: We retrospectively reviewed lateral tibia plateau fracture patients that were treated operatively using CPT codes 27535 and 27536. Two hundred patients were identified. Inclusion criteria were lateral tibia plateau fracture, age of 18 years or older, and documented direct examination of lateral meniscus integrity intraoperatively. Seventy patients met inclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: The injured lateral tibial plateau was divided into four quadrants on pre-operative CT and maximum AID was measured. The zone of fracture was defined as the location of largest AID (Image-1). All patients had an arthrotomy at the time of surgery to evaluate the integrity of the meniscus. Intra operative data regarding meniscal integrity and preoperative CT data were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to estimate what effect zone and amount of AID had on predicting the meniscal injury. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine cut off points for high sensitivity/specificity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Amount and area of depression in the lateral tibial plateau as relates to meniscal injury. RESULTS: Mean age was (45.1 ± 12.9) years. Twelve had Schatzker type I and 58 had type II fractures. Twenty-two patients had meniscus injury (MI) and forty-eight patients did not have a meniscus injury (NMI). Mean AID for MI was 12.48 mm ± 7.17 mm and 6.4 mm ± 4.3 mm for NMI (p<0.01). In MI group, largest AID was in Posterolateral (PL) zone(17.58 mm ± 8.9 mm) followed by Anteromedial (AM) zone (13.3 mm ± 7.2 mm) and Anterolateral (AL) zone (9.4 mm ± 5.8 mm). In NMI group largest AID was in AL zone (8.52 mm ± 2.6 mm) followed by AM zone (8.04 mm ± 5.4 mm) and PL zone (7.75 mm ± 2.35 mm). Patients with PL zone involvement had a lower meniscus tear rate compare to other zones. Logistic regression revealed that for every 1 mm increase in AID there is a 21% increase chance of meniscus tear (p<0.01). Comparison of the zones indicated that for the same AID, AL and AM zone fractures have 7.3 and 5.6 times increase risk of meniscus tear, respectively, as compared to PL zone (p<0.05). ROC analysis revealed that AID of 4.3 mm as a cut off point provides 100% sensitivity for diagnosis of meniscus tear. CONCLUSION: With 1 mm increase in AID there is a 21% increase in chance of meniscal tear. With the same AID, AL and AM zone fractures have a significantly higher chance of having a meniscal tear. AID of 4.3 mm provides 100% sensitivity to predict meniscal tear in lateral tibia plateau fracture. These values are useful in predicting pre op meniscal tear without MRI.

Supplemental S1 fixation for type C pelvic ring injuries: biomechanical study of a long iliosacral versus a transsacral screw.

BACKGROUND: A single iliosacral screw placed into the S1 vertebral body has been shown to be clinically unreliable for certain type C pelvic ring injuries. Insertion of a second supplemental iliosacral screw into the S1 or S2 vertebral body has been widely used. However, clinical fixation failures have been reported using this technique, and a supplemental long iliosacral or transsacral screw has been used. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical effect of a supplemental S1 long iliosacral screw versus a transsacral screw in an unstable type C vertically oriented sacral fracture model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A type C pelvic ring injury was created in ten osteopenic/osteoporotic cadaver pelves by performing vertical osteotomies through zone 2 of the sacrum and the ipsilateral pubic rami. The sacrum was reduced maintaining a 2-mm fracture gap to simulate a closed-reduction model. All specimens were fixed using one 7.0-mm iliosacral screw into the S1 body. A supplemental long iliosacral screw was placed into the S1 body in five specimens. A supplemental transsacral S1 screw was placed in the other five. Each pelvis underwent 100,000 cycles at 250 N, followed by loading to failure. Vertical displacements at 25,000, 50,000, 75,000, and 100,000 cycles and failure force were recorded. RESULTS: Vertical displacement increased significantly (p < 0.05) within each group with each increase in the number of cycles. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in displacement or load to failure. CONCLUSIONS: Although intuitively a transsacral screw may seem to be better than a long iliosacral screw in conveying additional stability to an unstable sacral fracture fixation construct, we were not able to identify any biomechanical advantage of one method over the other.

Do asymptomatic patients have normal function after percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring? A case-control pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Following treatment of a posterior pelvic disruption, residual deformity or associated injuries can adversely affect functional recovery. No study has been performed on gait and functional outcome after closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation (CRPSF) of posterior pelvic disruption in clinically asymptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if gait and functional outcome are different from normal in asymptomatic patients with a posterior pelvic injury after CRPSF, serving as a pilot study in this regard. METHODS: Six asymptomatic patients with no grossly evident gait abnormality, treated by CRPSF for a posterior pelvic disruption, were included in the study (SG). A control group (CG) of six healthy volunteers was created. All participants completed the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2), the Majeed Pelvic Score (MPS), and the Iowa Pelvic Score (IPS). In addition, the participants' gait was analyzed. RESULTS: Pelvic drop was significantly smaller on the uninjured side in the SG when compared to the injured side in the SG. There was no significant difference between the injured and uninjured side for other gait parameters within the SG. Knee angle at initial contact was significantly greater on the injured side when compared to the CG. The SG scored statistically worse than the CG on the Physical Component Summary part of the SF-12v2. However, when evaluated by age group using national mean scores, the SG differences were minimal. All six patients in our study scored "excellent" on both MPS and IPS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having subclinical alterations in gait, asymptomatic pelvic ring injured patients show minimal, if any, evidence of impaired functional outcome following successful reduction of a posterior pelvic disruption treated by CRPSF.

How does thoracic kyphosis affect patient outcomes in growing rod surgery?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a multicenter series. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to specifically identify the complication rate of growing rod surgery in patients with normal (10°-40°) versus abnormal thoracic kyphosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical treatment options for progressive early onset scoliosis include spinal fusion versus growth-sparing techniques. The current most commonly employed growing rod technique involves short fusions at the foundation sites using either hooks or screws as anchors and placement of dual growing rods spanning the deformity. Although the coronal deformity in these patients has been studied extensively, the sagittal profile has received less attention as a possible factor in complication rates and patient outcomes. METHODS: Out of 387 patients who underwent surgical placement of growing rods, 90 patients had complete clinical and radiographical data, with 2-year follow-up after initial surgery. Patients were categorized into 3 groups on the basis of preoperative thoracic kyphosis magnitude: less than 10° (K- group), 10°-40° (N group), and more than 40° (K+ group). Patient diagnosis, demographics, surgical information, radiographical measurements, and complication types were tabulated and analyzed. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant for all statistical tests. RESULTS: The K- group experienced 27 total complications including 15 general medical complications, the N group had 20 total and 4 general complications, and the K+ group had 55 total and 22 general complications. Patients in the K+ group were 3.1 times more likely to experience a complication than those in the N group, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). When considering all types of complications, length of follow-up, T2-T5 proximal kyphosis, postoperative Cobb angle, and rod diameter were identified as confounding variables. When the confounding variables were taken into consideration in the analysis, the odds ratios were no longer significant between the N and K+ groups. Patients in the K+ group and K- group were 2.95 and 2.89 times more likely to experience a general medical complication than those in the N group, respectively (P > 0.05). The rate of implant-related complications between the groups did not reach statistical significance, although the K+ group had the most implant complications (n = 34), including 25 rod breakages in 16 patients. Syndromic patients had 2.9 times the risk of having an overall complication when compared with the entire patient series (P < 0.05). The number of patients who experienced multiple complications was higher in the K- and K+ groups than in the N group. CONCLUSION: Patients with thoracic hyperkyphosis present even more of a challenge with respect to complications, specifically implant-related complications. Our study shows that growing rod surgery in patients with kyphosis more than 40° has significantly more general and implant complications than that in patients with normal thoracic kyphosis. Implant complications were more common in hyperkyphotic (>40°) patients and increased linearly with increasing kyphosis. The most common implant complication was rod breakage. Patients with hyperkyphotic thoracic spines, particularly syndromic patients, must be monitored closely and parents should be counseled regarding the likelihood of future adverse events.

Innovation in growing rod technique: a study of safety and efficacy of a magnetically controlled growing rod in a porcine model.

STUDY DESIGN.: Prospective in vivo randomized study. OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a distraction-based magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) in a porcine model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: A high number of complications related to frequent surgical rod lengthenings has been a generally accepted outcome in growing rod surgery for early-onset scoliosis. A potentially safer technique is a system that does not require repetitive surgery. METHODS.: Seven-month-old pigs were randomly assigned to an experiment group (EG; n = 6) and a sham group (SG; n = 3). One animal in the EG became paralyzed because of a misplaced pedicle screw and was killed per the study protocol. Therefore, a total of 8 animals completed the study. The EG underwent weekly spine distraction using the MCGR. Spinal height was assessed by vertebral unit height measurements on weekly lateral radiographs. RESULTS.: A total of 49 mm of distraction across the unfused vertebral levels was planned during a 7-week period (7 mm per wk). Radiographical analysis of the MCGR device revealed an average distraction of 39 mm (range, 32-46 mm), resulting in achievement of 80% of predicted spinal height. Prior to removal of implants, spinal height for the EG was similar to the SG. However, accelerated increase in vertebral unit height was noted in the EG during the 3-week period after implant removal, which resulted in significantly greater overall spinal height in the EG (32.2% vs. 11.7%, P ≤ 0.05). No MCGR-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION.: The MCGR provided 80% of predicted spinal height by noninvasive remote distraction in this animal model. The accelerated increase in spinal height of the experimental animals after implant removal was an unexpected finding which requires additional research to better understand the effect of distraction on spinal growth. This study establishes a foundation for future research in an attempt to use a less invasive technique in distraction-based correction of early-onset scoliosis.

Growing rod fractures: risk factors and opportunities for prevention.

STUDY DESIGN: Review of a prospectively collected growing rod database. OBJECTIVE: To define risk factors for and characterize the nature of growing rod fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rod fracture is a common complication of growing rod treatment. The project sought to analyze risk factors for rod breakage and develop preventive strategies. METHODS: Records of 327 patients in a prospectively collected growing rod database were studied. Risk factors studied were studied as patient-related and rod-related. Multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-six rod fractures occurred in 49 patients (49 of 327, 15%). Sixteen patients had repeat fractures with eight patients having more than two fractures (maximum six). The most common fracture locations were above or below the tandem connectors (34 of 86) and near the thoracolumbar junction (35 of 86). Other locations were adjacent to anchors (12 of 86) and cross-links (2 of 86). Syndromic diagnoses had the highest rate of fracture; significantly greater than neuromuscular diagnoses (14% vs. 2%, P = 0.01). Patients who were ambulatory had a higher fracture rate (21% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.01). Single rods had a higher fracture rate than dual rods (36% vs. 11%, P < 0.001). Repeat fracture was also more common in patients with single rods (13% vs. 2%, P = 0.0002). In dual-rod constructs, the incidence of both rods breaking at the same time was 26% (7 of 27). Stainless steel rods had a higher fracture rate than titanium rods (29% vs. 18%, P = 0.02). The nonfracture group had larger diameter rods than the fracture group (P = 0.01). The fracture group had shorter tandem connectors than the nonfracture group (P < 0.001). Neither the size of preoperative scoliosis (P = 0.2) nor kyphosis (P = 0.4) was a risk factor for fracture. Length of instrumentation (P = 0.9), anchor type (P = 0.6), and pelvic fixation (P = 0.38) had no significant effect on fracture rates. Eight wound complications were reported, including three cases of skin breakdown at the rod fracture site. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for rod fractures include prior fracture, single rods, stainless steel rods, small diameter rods, proximity to tandem connectors, short tandem connectors, and preoperative ambulation. Repeat fractures are common, especially with single rods. Rod replacement, with larger diameter rods if appropriate, may be a preferred strategy over connecting the broken rods as fractures signal fatigue of the rod.

Growing rods for spinal deformity: characterizing consensus and variation in current use.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Growing rods are a commonly used form of growth guidance for patients with early onset scoliosis, but no studies exist to characterize their use among a large group of surgeons. METHODS: A survey regarding growing rod use preferences and a case-based survey regarding early onset scoliosis were completed by an international group of surgeons. Two hundred and sixty-five growing rod patients treated over 4.7+/-2.1 years in the Growing Spine Study Group database were analyzed to characterize actual practice and compare it with the survey results. All patients had at least 2 years of treatment. RESULTS: In the case-based survey, there was correlation (P=0.04, r=0.58) between increasing curve size and choice of growing rods over nonoperative treatment, rib-based distraction (vertically expandable prosthetic titanium rib), growth guidance (Shilla), and primary fusion. In practice, growing rods were used for most types of early onset spine deformity. Most surgeons stated that their indication for growing rod treatment was a curve over 60 degrees (10/13) in a patient younger than 8 to 10 years (14/17). In practice, mean curve at rod insertion was 73+/-20 degrees and age was 6.0+/-2.5 years. Other factors favoring growing rods included curve rigidity (8/17), brace intolerance (6/17) and syndromic diagnoses (2/17). In the database, idiopathic scoliosis represented <50% of diagnoses. The most common preferred surgical lengthening interval was 6 months. However, in practice, lengthening actually occurred at a mean of 8.6+/-5.1 months. In the database, the number of growing rod insertions per year (P=0.02, r=0.96) and percentage of surgeons using dual rods over single rods (P=0.065, r=0.93) increased over time. Insertion age (P=0.075, r=-0.87) and lengthening interval (P=0.006, r=-0.69) decreased as time progressed. The most common stated indication on the survey for final fusion was skeletal maturity (13/17), and 7/13 surgeons used Risser 3 or more. Indications to stop lengthening included complications such as infection or implant failure (14/17), curves progressing past 90 degrees (8/17), and failure to distract (6/13). The most common method of final fusion was replacement of implants with more intermediate anchors. CONCLUSIONS: Significant practice variation exists in growing rod treatment, but there is some consensus on indications for surgery including curve size, diagnosis and age, and lengthening intervals and final fusion methods. Mean curve size and lengthening interval are greater in practice than in surgeons' stated aims. In principle and in practice, most growing rods are used for curves over 60 degrees in patients under 10, in all diagnoses. This information may form a starting point as practice variation is studied.

Related factors to disparity of diabetes care in Iran.

BACKGROUND: We determined, in Iranian patients with diabetes mellitus, the prevalence of inadequate glycemic control and its predictors. MATERIAL/METHODS: The data from a national population-based survey that included a random sample of 89 404 Iranian individuals in 2005 were analyzed. In that sample, 2923 diabetic subjects (age range, 25-64 years) were identified. We linked the results of their fasting plasma glucose levels with demographic and behavioral variables to determine predictors of poor glycemic control. RESULTS: About 57% of the subjects had a fasting plasma glucose level of > or =130 mg/dL. That percentage was comparable in male and female subjects and in literate and illiterate subjects. However, inhabitants in rural areas controlled their fasting plasma glucose level about 11% better than did subjects who lived in an urban area. We also found that control of the fasting plasma glucose level was much better in relatively younger diabetic patients. Diabetic subjects with a family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus exhibited a higher uncontrolled fasting plasma glucose level than those without positive family history of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of uncontrolled type 2 diabetes found in our study suggests that the Iranian healthcare system should devote more attention to that disorder, particularly in elderly individuals, who are more vulnerable to the complications of diabetes and control their disorder less well than do younger diabetic patients. The recent integration of diabetic care in primary healthcare systems in Iranian rural areas was found to have a promising effect on community health.