RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Intravenous administration of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) to expectant individuals before childbirth, has been evaluated to reduce the likelihood of mortality and occurrence cerebral palsy in their offspring. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis conducted to determine if were the prophylactic use of magnesium sulfate in women at risk for preterm delivery leads to decrease in the incidence of death or cerebral palsy. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was done to identify relevant studies. Selection of eligible studies was based on predetermined inclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed, and the methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using appropriate evaluative tools. A meta-analysis was carried out to estimate the overall effect of intravenous administration of magnesium sulfate on the incidence of death or cerebral palsy. RESULTS: A total of 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. No significant publication bias was observed. The risk of fetal neurological impairment was significantly lower in the MgSO4 group compared to the control group relative risk (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.87; I20%). However, neonatal mortality was not significantly associated with MgSO4 injection. (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.21; I2 = 42%). Subgroup analysis was done based on the bolus dosage of MgSO4 and the duration of the trial follow-up. revealing a non-significant differences between-group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that MgSO4 administration can improve fetal neurological impairment and cerebral palsy but is not linked to reducing mortality. Further studies are necessary to strengthen the evidence and clarify the underlying mechanisms.
Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral , Sulfato de Magnésio , Fármacos Neuroprotetores , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Paralisia Cerebral/etiologia , Paralisia Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Sulfato de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/administração & dosagem , Nascimento PrematuroRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing concern, the literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis of the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances among dental students. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following Cochrane Manual for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA guidelines. Our search, spanning databases like Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus, covered data until June 5, 2023. A random effect model was utilized for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: From 508 initially identified articles, 45 studies met eligibility criteria. The pooled prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders among dental students was estimated as follows: depression [38%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 32%-44%; I2 = 98%], anxiety [48%, 95% CI: 41%-55%; I2 = 97.7%], and sleep disorders [31%, 95% CI: 24%-38%; I2 = 85.7%]. Subgroup analyses based on geographical regions and assessment scales revealed significant between-subgroup differences. Meta-regression identified associations between the prevalence of depression and the year of publication and between the prevalence of anxiety and total sample size, participant age, and year of publication. Publication bias assessments demonstrated a lack of significant bias, strengthening the validity of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in dental students is significant. This study highlighted the need for targeted interventions and support systems within dental education to alleviate the mental health challenges students face, ultimately ensuring their well-being and competence as future healthcare providers. Further research should explore the effectiveness of interventions in this population.
Assuntos
Ansiedade , Depressão , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília , Estudantes de Odontologia , Humanos , Estudantes de Odontologia/psicologia , Estudantes de Odontologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/psicologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Ansiedade/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a type of Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) characterized by necrotizing vasculitis affecting small and medium-sized blood vessels. GPA affects various organs, with respiratory tract, vasculitis and glomerulonephritis being the most common triad. Remission induction and maintenance therapy for GPA traditionally involves corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide. However, treatment with rituximab, a monoclonal antibody that depletes B-cells involved in autoimmune disease, has been successful in inducing remission in several studies. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the efficacy of rituximab in treating various clinical manifestations of GPA. METHODS: In adherence to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we carried out a comprehensive review to investigate the effectiveness of rituximab on particular organ involvement in GPA. We searched three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) up until November 6, 2022, for case reports on the topic. To ensure all relevant studies were included, we manually screened the first 50 pages of Google Scholar's search results. RESULTS: The review identified a total of 64 case reports and a case series of 113 cases, highlighting the effectiveness of rituximab in treating refractory organ involvement in GPA. The review also analyzed the effectiveness of rituximab in treating ocular, CNS, cardiac, pulmonary, cutaneous, gastrointestinal, renal, and other organ involvements in GPA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that rituximab can be a promising therapy for treating specific clinical manifestations of several organ involvements. However, more research is needed to determine the long-term efficacy of rituximab in treating GPA.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The reactivation of herpesviruses (HHV) in COVID-19 patients is evident in the literature. Several reports have been published regarding the reactivation of these viruses (HSV, VZV, EBV, and CMV) among those who got COVID-19 vaccines. In this study, we aimed to review the current evidence to assess whether HHVs reactivation has any association with the prior administration of COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on 25 September 2022 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE. We included all observational studies, case reports, and case series which reported the reactivation of human herpesviruses following administration of COVID-19 vaccines. RESULTS: Our systematic search showed 80 articles that meet the eligibility criteria. Among the evaluated COVID-19 vaccines, most of the vaccines were mRNA based. Evidence from observational studies showed the possible relation between COVID-19 vaccine administration and VZV and HSV reactivation. The results of our proportion meta-analysis showed that the rate of VZV reactivation among those who received the COVID-19 vaccine was 14 persons per 1000 vaccinations (95% CI 2.97-32.80). Moreover, our meta-analysis for HSV reactivation showed the rate of 16 persons per 1000 vaccinations (95% CI 1.06-46.4). Furthermore, the evidence from case reports/series showed 149 cases of HHV reactivation. There were several vaccines that caused reactivation including BNT162b2 mRNA or Pfizer-BioNTech (n = 76), Oxford-AstraZeneca (n = 22), mRNA-1273 or Moderna (n = 17), Sinovac (n = 4), BBIBP-CorV or Sinopharm (n = 3), Covaxin (n = 3), Covishield (n = 3), and Johnson and Johnson (n = 1). Reactivated HHVs included varicella-zoster virus (VZV) (n = 114), cytomegalovirus (CMV) (n = 15), herpes simplex virus (HSV) (n = 14), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (n = 6), and HHV-6 (n = 2). Most cases reported their disease after the first dose of the vaccine. Many patients reported having comorbidities, of which hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, chicken pox, and atrial fibrillation were common. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study showed the possible association between COVID-19 vaccination and herpesvirus reactivation. The evidence for VZV and HSV was supported by observational studies. However, regarding other herpesviruses (EBV and CMV), further research especially from observational studies and clinical trials is required to elucidate the interaction between COVID-19 vaccination and their reactivation.