Retrolaminar block for opioid-free anaesthesia and enhanced recovery after posterior lumbar discectomy: A randomised controlled study.

Background and Aims: Intraoperative regional analgesia and enhanced recovery are standard care models aimed at reducing perioperative opioid use following spine surgeries. This study aimed to examine the analgesic effect of retrolaminar block in promoting recovery and pain relief after posterior lumbar discectomy. Methods: The patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar discectomy were randomised into the retrolaminar group (n = 36) (received an intra-operative bilateral retrolaminar block with 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%, 2 mL (8 mg) of dexamethasone, and 2 mL of magnesium sulphate 10% (200 mg) on each side) and control group (n = 36) (received standard general anaesthesia). Primary outcomes were recovery time (time from isoflurane discontinuation to the first response to verbal command) and time to discharge (time from admission to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) to discharge from the PACU, when Aldrete score was ≥9). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The extubation, recovery, and discharge times were significantly shorter in the retrolaminar group compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the retrolaminar group for up to 8 h compared to only 2 h in the control group (P < 0.001). The time to first administration of ketorolac post-operatively was significantly longer in the retrolaminar group compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The total consumption of ketorolac post-operatively was significantly reduced in the retrolaminar group compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Intra-operative retrolaminar block is an easy and effective opioid-free regional anaesthesia technique that improves recovery after posterior lumbar discectomy.

Phase II trial of metronomic chemotherapy as salvage therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

AIM OF WORK: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of metronomic chemotherapy (which is the continuous administration of chemotherapy at relatively low minimally toxic doses on a frequent schedule of administration at close regular intervals with no prolonged drug-free breaks) in metastatic breast cancer patients as salvage therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II study we evaluated the clinical efficacy and tolerability of low dose, oral Methotrexate (MTX) and Cyclophosphamide (CTX) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Between January 2004 and December 2005, 42 patients received MTX 2.5mg bid on day 1 and 2 each week and CTX 50mg/day administered continuously. RESULTS: Forty two patients were evaluable. The overall clinical benefit was 31% complete response, partial response and stable disease (CR+PR+SD >or=24 weeks), while the overall response rate was 16.7% (none of the patients attained CR). Toxicity was generally mild. The most common non hematological toxicity was elevation in transaminases level, it was reported in 40.4% of patients and was reversible, while mild grade 1 or 2 neutropenia was the most common hematological toxicity, (28.5% of patients). Median time to response was 3+/-0.18 while progression free survival (PFS) among patients with clinical benefit was 10 months (95% CI 6.65-13.44). CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study shows that, the combination of continuously low dose MTX and CTX is an active minimally toxic and significantly cost effective regimen for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients.

Assessment of Survival and Clinical Benefit in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) Patients Treated with Gemcitabine and Carboplatin.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical benefit of combined gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective phase II study was performed on 42 eligible patients with histologically or cytologically proven MPM presenting to Ain Shams University hospitals and Sohag Cancer Center between January 2002 and April 2006. They were assigned to receive combined gemcitabine (1250mg/m2) on days, 1 and 8 and carboplatin (AUC 6) on day 1. The regimen was repeated every 21 days. The treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable drug toxicity. RESULTS: The patients received a total of 227 cycles of chemotherapy (median 5.4 cycles and range from 2 to 9 cycles). The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia were the most severe (Grade 3 or 4) toxicities recorded during therapy and were reported in (14%), (9.5%), and (9.5%), respectively. Twelve patients (29%) achieved partial response, 18 patients (42%) had stable disease and the disease progressed in the remaining 12 patients (29%). The median follow-up duration was 11 months (range 5 from 20 months). The overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) at one year was 44.5% and 33.2%, respectively. The median survival and time to disease progression were 11 months and 8.5 months respectively. Of 32 patients assessed for clinical benefit, 20 patients (62.5%) were considered clinical benefit responders. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin is a safe and tolerable treatment with reasonable response rate, OS, and PFS compared with the historical phase II single agents and combined chemotherapy studies in patients with MPM. Key Words: Mesothelioma , Gemcitbine , Carboplatin.