Application of Cannabinoids in Neurosciences: Considerations and Implications.

Medicinal cannabinoid use continues to evolve across the United States, although legitimate federal recognition for medicinal purpose is lacking. Variability exists across states within the United States with respect to legislation, and health care institutions encounter challenges when patients present with a history of medicinal cannabinoid use. Emerging evidence in the field of neurosciences suggests a role of cannabinoids for neurologic medical conditions such as Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, and epilepsy. We aim to provide an overview of cannabinoids including a historical perspective, pharmacology, applications in neurosciences, and challenges in health care and academia. Knowledge of the appropriate role of cannabinoids in the clinical setting is essential for all health care practitioners including nursing.

Individualizing Glycemic Control in the Critically Ill.

Hyperglycemia is a common phenomenon in critically ill patients, even in those without diabetes. Two landmark studies established the benefits of tight glucose control (blood glucose target 80-110 mg/dL) in surgical and medical patients. Since then, literature has consistently demonstrated that both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality in a variety of critically ill patients. However, tight glycemic control has subsequently come into question due to risks of hypoglycemia and increased mortality. More recently, strategies targeting euglycemia (blood glucose ≤180 mg/dL) have been associated with improved outcomes, although the risk of hypoglycemia remains. More complex targets (ie, glycemic variability and time within target glucose range) and the impact of individual patient characteristics (ie, diabetic status and prehospital glucose control) have more recently been shown to influence the relationship between glycemic control and outcomes in critically ill patients. Although our understanding has increased, the optimal glycemic target is still unclear and glucose management strategies may require adjustment for individual patient characteristics. As glucose management increases in complexity, we realize that traditional means of using meters and strips and paper insulin titration algorithms are potential limitations to our success. To achieve these complex goals for glycemic control, the use of continuous or near-continuous glucose monitoring combined with computerized insulin titration algorithms may be required. The purpose of this review is to discuss the evidence surrounding the various domains of glycemic control and the emerging data supporting the need for individualized glucose targets in critically ill patients.

Medication-induced and spontaneous hypoglycemia carry the same risk for hospital mortality in critically ill patients.

PURPOSE: Hypoglycemia is associated with increased mortality, but the role of its etiology is unclear. This study aimed to examine the impact of hypoglycemia etiology on mortality risk among critically ill patients. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, cohort study evaluated adult patients admitted to the medical or surgical intensive care unit, who experienced medication-induced or spontaneous hypoglycemia (blood glucose <70 mg/dL) during intensive care unit admission. Patients who became hypoglycemic following receipt of glucose-lowering therapy within a predefined time period were categorized in the medication-induced group. Periods were determined for each agent based on expected pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. Patients who became hypoglycemic with no identifiable cause were categorized in the spontaneous group. Primary analysis compared medication-induced and spontaneous hypoglycemia with a primary endpoint of all-cause hospital mortality. Secondary analyses stratified patients by diabetes, severity of hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability. RESULTS: A total of 642 patients were eligible for inclusion (305 medication-induced and 337 spontaneous). When adjusted for covariates, no difference in hospital mortality was observed based on hypoglycemia etiology (odds ratio, 1.22 [0.77-1.93]; P=.39). Regardless of etiology, hypoglycemic severity, frequency, and glycemic variability were significantly associated with higher odds of hospital mortality. Hypoglycemic etiology did not impact hospital mortality when patients were stratified by presence or absence of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Medication-induced hypoglycemia appears to be equally harmful as spontaneous hypoglycemia during critical illness. Future studies should aim to identify strategies to minimize hypoglycemia regardless of etiology, while also minimizing glycemic variability associated with hypoglycemia treatment.

Association between in-hospital acute hypertensive episodes and outcomes in older trauma patients.

Although chronic hypertension is associated with long-term complications, few studies directly examine the effects of in-hospital acute hypertensive episodes in trauma patients. The aim was to determine whether there is an association between in-hospital acute hypertension and morbidity. We included trauma patients between 45 and 89 years who presented to a level I trauma center between January and September 2008. Patients were classified as either experiencing or not experiencing acute hypertensive episode(s) as defined by systolic blood pressure ≥180, or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg, or at least two readings of systolic blood pressure ≥160 or diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mmHg. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, new-onset atrial fibrillation, or acute kidney injury. At least one acute hypertensive episode occurred in 42.6% (69/162) of patients. A total of 10.5% patients developed the composite endpoint, 17.4% in the acute hypertensive episode group compared to 5.4% in the non-hypertensive group, p = 0.012. Patients in the acute hypertensive group were more likely to require an intensive care unit admission compared to the non-hypertensive group (33.3 versus 14.0%, p = 0.004). Of the 17 patients who developed an acute hypertensive episode and met the primary endpoint, 10 were on home antihypertensive medications. Of those, four were restarted on all medications initially, three on some, two were started on new medications, and one was not resumed on home medications. Development of acute hypertensive episode(s) in older trauma patients was associated with an increase in the composite endpoint. Prospective studies are needed.