Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Atherosclerosis ; 391: 117503, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447435

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acetylcholine (ACh) provocation testing can detect vasomotor disorders in patients with ischemia and non-obstructed coronary arteries (INOCA) or myocardial infarction and non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA). We aimed to derive and validate a simple risk score to predict a positive ACh test response. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive INOCA and MINOCA patients undergoing ACh provocation testing. Patients were split in two cohorts (derivation and validation) according to time of enrolment. The score was derived in 386 patients (derivation cohort) and then validated in 165 patients (validation cohort). RESULTS: 551 patients were enrolled, 371 (67.3%) INOCA and 180 (32.7%) MINOCA. ACh test was positive in 288 (52.3%) patients. MINOCA, myocardial bridge (MB), C-reactive protein (CRP) and dyslipidaemia were independent predictors of a positive ACh test in the derivation cohort. The ABCD (Acute presentation, Bridge, CRP, Dyslipidaemia) score was derived: 2 points were assigned to MINOCA, 3 to MB, 1 to elevated CRP and 1 to dyslipidaemia. The ABCD score accurately identified patients with a positive ACh test response with an AUC of 0.703 (CI 95% 0.652-0.754,p < 0.001) in the derivation cohort, and 0.705 (CI 95% 0.626-0.784, p < 0.001) in the validation cohort. In the whole population, an ABCD score ≥4 portended 94.3% risk of a positive ACh test and all patients with an ABCD score ≥6 presented a positive test. CONCLUSIONS: The ABCD score could avoid the need of ACh provocation testing in patients with a high score, reducing procedural risks, time, and costs, and allowing the implementation of a tailored treatment strategy. These results are hypothesis generating and further research involving larger cohorts and multicentre trials is needed to validate and refine the ABCD score.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Vasoespasmo Coronário , Dislipidemias , Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , Acetilcolina , Vasos Coronários , MINOCA , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Proteína C-Reativa , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38414273

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury is prevalent among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. However, the role of COVID-19 vaccines in modifying the risk of myocardial injury is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of vaccines in modifying the risk of myocardial injury in COVID-19. METHODS: We enrolled COVID-19 patients admitted from March 2021 to February 2022 with known vaccination status and ≥1 assessment of hs-cTnI within 30 days from the admission. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of myocardial injury (hs-cTnI levels >99th percentile upper reference limit). RESULTS: 1019 patients were included (mean age 67.7±14.8 years, 60.8% male, 34.5% vaccinated against COVID-19). Myocardial injury occurred in 145 (14.2%) patients. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, advanced age, chronic kidney disease and hypertension, but not vaccination status, were independent predictors of myocardial injury. In the analysis according to age tertiles distribution, myocardial injury occurred more frequently in the III tertile (≥76 years) compared to other tertiles (I tertile:≤60 years;II tertile:61-75 years) (p<0.001). Moreover, in the III tertile, vaccination was protective against myocardial injury (OR 0.57, CI 95% 0.34-0.94; p=0.03), while a previous history of coronary artery disease was an independent positive predictor. In contrast, in the I tertile, chronic kidney disease (OR 6.94, 95% CI 1.31-36.79, p=0.02) and vaccination (OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.28-15.34, p=0.02) were independent positive predictors of myocardial injury. CONCLUSIONS: In patients ≥76 years, COVID-19 vaccines were protective for the occurrence of myocardial injury, while in patients ≤60 years, myocardial injury was associated with previous COVID-19 vaccination. Further studies are warranted to clarify the underlying mechanisms.

3.
Atherosclerosis ; 390: 117393, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Air pollution is emerging as an important risk factor for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In this study, we investigated the association between short-term air pollution exposure and mechanisms of coronary plaque instability evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging in ACS patients. METHODS: Patients with ACS undergoing OCT imaging were retrospectively selected. Mechanism of culprit lesion instability was classified as plaque rupture (PR) or intact fibrous cap (IFC) by OCT. Based on each case's home address, the mean daily exposures to several pollutants, including particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5), on the same day of ACS and in the immediate days (up to 6 days) prior to the index ACS, were collected. RESULTS: 139 ACS patients were included [69 (49.6%) had PR and 70 (50.4%) IFC]. Patients with PR, compared to those with IFC, had higher PM2.5 exposure levels on the same day of ACS, without differences in the immediate 6 days before index ACS. At multivariate analysis, PM2.5 exposure on the same day of ACS was the only independent predictor of PR [OR = 1.912 per SD (8.6 µg/m3), CI95 % (1.087-3.364), p = 0.025]. Patients with PR presented a steady increase in PM2.5 daily exposure levels in the days preceding the occurrence of ACS, with a peak the day of ACS (p for trend = 0.042) CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that a higher short-term PM2.5 exposure, on the same day of ACS, is associated with an increased risk of PR as a pathobiological mechanism of coronary plaque instability.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Placa Aterosclerótica , Humanos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/etiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ruptura Espontânea/complicações , Ruptura Espontânea/patologia , Placa Aterosclerótica/complicações , Fibrose , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/patologia , Angiografia Coronária/métodos
5.
J Clin Med ; 11(19)2022 Oct 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36233830

RESUMO

Background: Cardiovascular sequelae after COVID-19 are frequent. However, the predictors for their occurrence are still unknown. In this study, we aimed to assess whether myocardial injury during COVID-19 hospitalization is associated to CV sequelae and death after hospital discharge. Methods: In this prospective observational study, consecutive patients who were admitted for COVID-19 in a metropolitan COVID-19 hub in Italy, between March 2021 and January 2022, with a ≥ 1 assessment of high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) were included in the study, if they were alive at hospital discharge. Myocardial injury was defined as elevation hs-cTnI > 99th percentile of the upper reference limit. The incidence of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, including cardiovascular death, admission for acute or chronic coronary syndrome, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke/transient ischemic attack) at follow-up were the primary outcomes. Arrhythmias, inflammatory heart diseases, and/or thrombotic disorders were analyzed as well. Results: Among the 701 COVID-19 survivors (mean age 66.4 ± 14.4 years, 40.2% female), myocardial injury occurred in 75 (10.7%) patients. At a median follow-up of 270 days (IQR 165, 380), all-cause mortality (21.3% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001), MACCE (25.3% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001), arrhythmias (9.3% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.034), and inflammatory heart disease (8.0% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001) were more frequent in patients with myocardial injury compared to those without. At multivariate analysis, myocardial injury (HR 1.95 [95% CI:1.05−3.61]), age (HR 1.09 [95% CI:1.06−1.12]), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.63 [95% CI:1.33−5.21]) were independent predictors of death. Myocardial injury (HR 3.92 [95% CI:2.07−7.42]), age (HR 1.05 [95% CI:1.02−1.08]), and diabetes (HR 2.35 [95% CI:1.25−4.43]) were independent predictors of MACCE. Conclusion: In COVID-19 survivors, myocardial injury during the hospital stay portends a higher risk of mortality and cardiovascular sequelae and could be considered for the risk stratification of COVID-19 sequelae in patients who are successfully discharged.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA