Synergies and gaps between circularity assessment and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).

This article evaluates the synergies between circularity assessment and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) by investigating their alignments, misalignments, and challenges in addressing sustainability. The analysis emphasizes the significance of a multi-level approach, positioning these methods at various levels, including philosophy, strategy, assessment, and communication. The findings demonstrate that both LCA and circularity assessment can serve as sustainability assessment methods for circularity strategies, despite existing gaps. However, neither approach can provide a complete picture of a system's environmental performance on its own. Data availability, diverse assumptions, spotlights and shadows (highlighted and neglected elements), multiple life cycles, products, functions, strategies, and as well as temporal aspects are identified as the main challenges in addressing sustainability. This article provides recommendations based on the lessons learned from each approach, suggesting the integration of their strengths and addressing challenges to achieve a comprehensive understanding of environmental sustainability and make informed decisions for a circular and sustainable future. These recommendations include using function-based models and the principles of prospective and dynamic LCAs for the development of future circularity assessments. Additionally, circularity assessment can be used to establish LCA models, aiding in identifying hotspots during the goal and scope definition, and determining allocation and weighting factors in both Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) and Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA).

Sustainability Assessment of the End-of-Life Technologies for Biocomposite Waste in the Aviation Industry.

Biocomposites have emerged as promising alternative materials for the aviation industry. However, there is a limited body of scientific literature addressing the end-of-life management of biocomposites. This article evaluated different end-of-life technologies for biocomposite recycling in a structured, five-step approach applying the innovation funnel principle. First, ten end-of-life (EoL) technologies were compared in terms of their circularity potential and technology readiness levels (TRL). Second, a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was carried out to find out the top four most promising technologies. Afterwards, experimental tests were conducted at a laboratory scale to evaluate the top three technologies for recycling biocomposites by analysing (1) three types of fibres (basalt, flax, carbon) and (2) two types of resins (bioepoxy and Polyfurfuryl Alcohol (PFA) resins). Subsequently, further experimental tests were performed to identify the top two recycling technologies for the EoL treatment of biocomposite waste from the aviation industry. Finally, the sustainability and economic performance of the top two identified EoL recycling technologies were evaluated through life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA). The experimental results, performed via the LCA and TEA assessments, demonstrated that both solvolysis and pyrolysis are technically, economically, and environmentally viable options for the EoL treatment of biocomposite waste from the aviation industry.