Vitamin D Receptor Regulates Liver Regeneration After Partial Hepatectomy in Male Mice.

Vitamin D signals through the vitamin D receptor (VDR) to induce its end-organ effects. Hepatic stellate cells control development of liver fibrosis in response to stressors and vitamin D signaling decreases fibrogenesis. VDR expression in hepatocytes is low in healthy liver, and the role of VDR in hepatocyte proliferation is unclear. Hepatocyte-VDR null mice (hVDR) were used to assess the role of VDR and vitamin D signaling in hepatic regeneration. hVDR mice have impaired liver regeneration and impaired hepatocyte proliferation associated with significant differential changes in bile salts. Notably, mice lacking hepatocyte VDR had significant increases in expression of conjugated bile acids after partial hepatectomy, consistent with failure to normalize hepatic function by the 14-day time point tested. Real-time PCR of hVDR and control livers showed significant changes in expression of cell-cycle genes including cyclins D1 and E1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 2. Gene expression profiling of hepatocytes treated with vitamin D or control showed regulation of groups of genes involved in liver proliferation, hepatitis, liver hyperplasia/hyperproliferation, and liver necrosis/cell death. Together, these studies demonstrate an important functional role for VDR in hepatocytes during liver regeneration. Combined with the known profibrotic effects of impaired VDR signaling in stellate cells, the studies provide a mechanism whereby vitamin D deficiency would both reduce hepatocyte proliferation and permit fibrosis, leading to significant liver compromise.

Antiviral Use in Mild-to-Moderate SARS-CoV-2 Infections during the Omicron Wave in Geriatric Patients.

(1) Background: Geriatric patients are at high risk of complications of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and are good candidates for antiviral drugs. (2) Methods: A retrospective study of electronic health records (EHRs) aiming to describe antiviral (nirmatrelvir and ritonavir (nirmatrelvir/r) or remdesivir) use, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in elderly patients (75 and over), hospitalized with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 between July 2022 and June 2023. (3) Results: Out of 491 patients (mean age: 86.9 years), 180 (36.7%) received nirmatrelvir/r, 78 (15.9%) received remdesivir, and 233 (47.4%) received no antiviral therapy. No association was found between the choice of antiviral and the demographic or medical data. No serious ADR was observed. Nirmatrelvir/r dosage adjustment was inadequate in 65% of patients with renal impairment. In total, 128 patients (71%) on nirmatrelvir/r had potential pharmacokinetic DDIs, with 43 resulting in a possibly related ADR. In the remdesivir group, pharmacodynamic DDIs were more frequent, with QTc prolongation risk in 56 patients (72%). Only 20 patients underwent follow-up ECG, revealing QTc prolongation in 4. (4) Conclusions: There is an underutilization of antivirals despite their justified indications. Nirmatrelvir/r dosage was rarely adjusted to renal function. Dose adjustments and closer monitoring are needed due to the high risk of drug interactions.

Clinical effects of cannabis compared to synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs): a retrospective cohort study of presentations with acute toxicity to European hospitals between 2013 and 2020.

INTRODUCTION: Cannabis is the most common recreational drug worldwide and synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists are currently the largest group of new psychoactive substances. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical features and outcomes of lone acute cannabis toxicity with lone acute synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist toxicity in a large series of presentations to European emergency departments between 2013-2020. METHODS: Self-reported drug exposure, clinical, and outcome data were extracted from the European Drug Emergencies Network Plus which is a surveillance network that records data on drug-related emergency department presentations to 36 centres in 24 European countries. Cannabis exposure was considered the control in all analyses. To compare the lone cannabis and lone synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist groups, univariate analysis using chi squared testing was used for categorical variables and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U- testing for continuous variables. Statistical significance was defined as a P value of <0.05. RESULTS: Between 2013-2020 there were 54,314 drug related presentations of which 2,657 were lone cannabis exposures and 503 lone synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist exposures. Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist presentations had statistically significantly higher rates of drowsiness, coma, agitation, seizures and bradycardia at the time of presentation. Cannabis presentations were significantly more likely to have palpitations, chest pain, hypertension, tachycardia, anxiety, vomiting and headache. DISCUSSION: Emergency department presentations involving lone synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist exposures were more likely to have neuropsychiatric features and be admitted to a psychiatric ward, and lone cannabis exposures were more likely to have cardiovascular features. Previous studies have shown variability in the acute toxicity of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists compared with cannabis but there is little comparative data available on lone exposures. There is limited direct comparison in the current literature between lone synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist and lone cannabis exposure, with only two previous poison centre series and two clinical series. Whilst this study is limited by self-report being used to identify the drug(s) involved in the presentations, previous studies have demonstrated that self-report is reliable in emergency department presentations with acute drug toxicity. CONCLUSION: This study directly compares presentations with acute drug toxicity related to the lone use of cannabis or synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists. It supports previous findings of increased neuropsychiatric toxicity from synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists compared to cannabis and provides further data on cardiovascular toxicity in lone cannabis use.

Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for CYP2B6 Genotype and Methadone Therapy.

Methadone is a mu (µ) opioid receptor agonist used clinically in adults and children to manage opioid use disorder, neonatal abstinence syndrome, and acute and chronic pain. It is typically marketed as a racemic mixture of R- and S-enantiomers. R-methadone has 30-to 50-fold higher analgesic potency than S-methadone, and S-methadone has a greater adverse effect (prolongation) on the cardiac QTc interval. Methadone undergoes stereoselective metabolism. CYP2B6 is the primary enzyme responsible for catalyzing the metabolism of both enantiomers to the inactive metabolites, S- and R-2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (S- and R-EDDP). Genetic variation in the CYP2B6 gene has been investigated in the context of implications for methadone pharmacokinetics, dose, and clinical outcomes. Most CYP2B6 variants result in diminished or loss of CYP2B6 enzyme activity, which can lead to higher plasma methadone concentrations (affecting S- more than R-methadone). However, the data do not consistently indicate that CYP2B6-based metabolic variability has a clinically significant effect on methadone dose, efficacy, or QTc prolongation. Expert analysis of the published literature does not support a change from standard methadone prescribing based on CYP2B6 genotype (updates at www.cpicpgx.org).

Consent as a compositional act - a framework that provides clarity for the retention and use of data.

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is one of the key principles of conducting research involving humans. When research participants give consent, they perform an act in which they utter, write or otherwise provide an authorisation to somebody to do something. This paper proposes a new understanding of the informed consent as a compositional act. This conceptualisation departs from a modular conceptualisation of informed consent procedures. METHODS: This paper is a conceptual analysis that explores what consent is and what it does or does not do. It presents a framework that explores the basic elements of consent and breaks it down into its component parts. It analyses the consent act by first identifying its basic elements, namely: a) data subjects or legal representative that provides the authorisation of consent; b) a specific thing that is being consented to; and c) specific agent(s) to whom the consent is given. RESULTS: This paper presents a framework that explores the basic elements of consent and breaks it down into its component parts. It goes beyond only providing choices to potential research participants; it explains the rationale of those choices or consenting acts that are taking place when speaking or writing an authorisation to do something to somebody. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that by clearly differentiating the goals, the procedures of implementation, and what is being done or undone when one consent, one can better face the challenges of contemporary data-intensive biomedical research, particularly regarding the retention and use of data. Conceptualising consent as a compositional act enhances more efficient communication and accountability and, therefore, could enable more trustworthy acts of consent in biomedical science.

Impact of a Mobile App (LoAD Calc) on the Calculation of Maximum Safe Doses of Local Anesthetics: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetics (LAs) are regularly used to alleviate pain during medical or surgical procedures. Their use is generally considered safe, but exceeding the maximum recommended doses can lead to LA systemic toxicity, a rare but potentially lethal complication. Determining maximum safe doses is therefore mandatory before performing local anesthesia, but rules are often unclear and the factors affecting dose calculation are numerous. Mobile health apps have been shown to help clinical decision-making, but most currently available apps present significant limitations. The Local Anesthetics Dose Calculator (LoAD Calc) app was designed to overcome these limitations by taking all relevant parameters into account. Before deploying this app in a clinical setting, it should be tested to determine its effectiveness and whether clinicians would be willing to use it. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective will be to evaluate the effectiveness of the LoAD Calc app through written simulated cases. The secondary objective will be to determine whether physicians find this app easier, faster, and safer than the methods they generally use. METHODS: We describe a parallel-group randomized controlled trial protocol. Anesthesiologists working at the Geneva University Hospitals will be invited to participate. Participants will be asked to compute the maximum dose of LA in 10 simulated clinical cases using 3 different LAs. The maximum safe dose will be determined manually using the same calculation rules that were used to develop LoAD Calc, without using the app itself. An overdose will be considered any dose higher than the correct dose, rounded to the superior integer, while an underdose will be defined as the optimal calculated dose minus 20%, rounded to the inferior integer. Randomization will be stratified according to current position (resident vs registrar). The participants allocated to the LoAD Calc (experimental) group will use the LoAD Calc app to compute the maximum safe LA doses. Those allocated to the control group will be asked to use the method they generally use. The primary outcome will be the overall overdose rate. Secondary outcomes will include the overdose rate according to ideal and actual body weight and to each specific LA, the overall underdose rate, and the time taken to complete these calculations. The app's usability will also be assessed. RESULTS: A sample size of 46 participants will be needed to detect a difference of 10% with a power of 90%. Thus, a target of 50 participants was set to allow for attrition and exclusion criteria. We expect recruitment to begin during the winter of 2023, data analysis in the spring of 2024, and results by the end of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: This study should determine whether LoAD Calc, a mobile health app designed to compute maximum safe LA doses, is safer and more efficient than traditional LA calculation methods. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/53679.

Local anaesthetics risks perception: A web-based survey.

Background: The use of local anaesthetics (LAs) is usually associated with few adverse effects, but local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) can result in serious harm and even death. However, practitioner awareness regarding this risk has been little studied. Methods: This was a closed, web-based study carried out at two Swiss university hospitals using a fully automated questionnaire. The main objective was to evaluate LAST awareness and LA use among various medical practitioners. The secondary objective was to determine whether these physicians felt that a tool designed to compute maximum safe LA doses should be developed. Results: The overall participation rate was 40.2 % and was higher among anaesthesiologists (154/249, 61.8 % vs 159/530, 30.0 %; P < .001). Anaesthesiologists identified the risk of LAST and the systems involved more frequently than non-anaesthesiologists (85.1 % vs 43.4 %, P < .001). After adjusting for years of clinical experience, age, country of diploma, frequency of LA use, clinical position and being an anaesthesiologist, the only significant associations were this latter factor (P < .001) and clinical position (P = .016 for fellows and P = .046 for consultants, respectively). Most respondents supported the development of a tool designed to compute maximum safe LA doses (251/313, 80.2 %) and particularly of a mobile app (190/251, 75.7 %). Conclusions: LAST awareness is limited among practitioners who use LAs on a regular basis. Educational interventions should be created, and tools designed to help calculate maximum safe LA doses developed. The actual frequency of unsafe LA doses administration would also deserve further study.

Stereoselective separation of omeprazole and 5-hydroxy-omeprazole using dried plasma spots and a heart-cutting 2D-LC approach for accurate CYP2C19 phenotyping.

Omeprazole (OME) is a widely used gastric proton pump inhibitor, marketed as a racemic mixture comprising (S)- and (R)-enantiomers, with distinct pharmacokinetic profiles. OME is primarily metabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzymes 2C19 (CYP2C19) and 3A4 (CYP3A4). OME is a conventional probe for CYP2C19 phenotyping. Accurate measurement of these enantiomers and their metabolites is essential for pharmacokinetic studies. This article presents a sensitive and accurate two-dimensional liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous quantification of OME enantiomers and its hydroxylated metabolite (5-hydroxyomeprazole) in human plasma. The method involves an online extraction using an achiral Discovery HS C18 trapping column for purification (20 × 2.1 mm ID, 5µm particle size, Supelco) and subsequent forward flush elution onto a chlorinated phenylcarbamate cellulose-based chiral column (150x2mm ID, 3 µm particle size, Lux Cellulose-4, Phenomenex). The assay was fully validated and met international validation criteria for accuracy, precision, and stability and ensured high selectivity and sensitivity within a short runtime (<8 min). Application of this method to clinical samples demonstrated its utility in studying OME enantiomer pharmacokinetics, particularly its potential for phenotyping the activity of the CYP2C19 isoenzyme. This robust analytical approach offers a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers studying OME's pharmacokinetics, providing insights into its metabolism and potential implications for personalized medicine.

Management of chronic pain associated with temporomandibular disorders: a clinical practice guideline.

CLINICAL QUESTION: What is the comparative effectiveness of available therapies for chronic pain associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMD)? CURRENT PRACTICE: TMD are the second most common musculoskeletal chronic pain disorder after low back pain, affecting 6-9% of adults globally. TMD are associated with pain affecting the jaw and associated structures and may present with headaches, earache, clicking, popping, or crackling sounds in the temporomandibular joint, and impaired mandibular function. Current clinical practice guidelines are largely consensus-based and provide inconsistent recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS: For patients living with chronic pain (≥3 months) associated with TMD, and compared with placebo or sham procedures, the guideline panel issued: (1) strong recommendations in favour of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with or without biofeedback or relaxation therapy, therapist-assisted mobilisation, manual trigger point therapy, supervised postural exercise, supervised jaw exercise and stretching with or without manual trigger point therapy, and usual care (such as home exercises, stretching, reassurance, and education); (2) conditional recommendations in favour of manipulation, supervised jaw exercise with mobilisation, CBT with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), manipulation with postural exercise, and acupuncture; (3) conditional recommendations against reversible occlusal splints (alone or in combination with other interventions), arthrocentesis (alone or in combination with other interventions), cartilage supplement with or without hyaluronic acid injection, low level laser therapy (alone or in combination with other interventions), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, gabapentin, botulinum toxin injection, hyaluronic acid injection, relaxation therapy, trigger point injection, acetaminophen (with or without muscle relaxants or NSAIDS), topical capsaicin, biofeedback, corticosteroid injection (with or without NSAIDS), benzodiazepines, and ß blockers; and (4) strong recommendations against irreversible oral splints, discectomy, and NSAIDS with opioids. HOW THIS GUIDELINE WAS CREATED: An international guideline development panel including patients, clinicians with content expertise, and methodologists produced these recommendations in adherence with standards for trustworthy guidelines using the GRADE approach. The MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation (MAGIC) provided methodological support. The panel approached the formulation of recommendations from the perspective of patients, rather than a population or health system perspective. THE EVIDENCE: Recommendations are informed by a linked systematic review and network meta-analysis summarising the current body of evidence for benefits and harms of conservative, pharmacologic, and invasive interventions for chronic pain secondary to TMD. UNDERSTANDING THE RECOMMENDATION: These recommendations apply to patients living with chronic pain (≥3 months duration) associated with TMD as a group of conditions, and do not apply to the management of acute TMD pain. When considering management options, clinicians and patients should first consider strongly recommended interventions, then those conditionally recommended in favour, then conditionally against. In doing so, shared decision making is essential to ensure patients make choices that reflect their values and preference, availability of interventions, and what they may have already tried. Further research is warranted and may alter recommendations in the future.

Apixaban and rivaroxaban's physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model validation in hospitalized patients: A first step for larger use of a priori modeling approach at bed side.

When used in real-world conditions, substantial interindividual variations in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) plasma concentrations are observed for a given dose, leading to a risk of over- or under-exposure and clinically significant adverse events. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models could help physicians to tailor DOAC prescriptions in vulnerable patient populations, such as those in the hospital setting. The present study aims to validate prospectively PBPK models for rivaroxaban and apixaban in a large cohort of elderly, polymorbid, and hospitalized patients. In using a model of geriatric population integrating appropriate physiological parameters into models first optimized with healthy volunteer data, observed plasma concentration collected in hospitalized patients on apixaban (n = 100) and rivaroxaban (n = 100) were adequately predicted (ratio predicted/observed area under the concentration curve for a dosing interval [AUCtau ] = 0.97 [0.96-0.99] geometric mean, 90% confidence interval, ratio predicted/observed AUCtau = 1.03 [1.02-1.05]) for apixaban and rivaroxaban, respectively. Validation of the present PBPK models for rivaroxaban and apixaban in in-patients represent an additional step toward the feasibility of bedside use.

Population pharmacokinetics of apixaban in a real-life hospitalized population from the OptimAT study.

This study aimed to characterize apixaban pharmacokinetics (PKs) and its variability in a real-world clinical setting of hospitalized patients using a population PK (PopPK) approach. Model-based simulations helped to identify factors that affect apixaban exposure and their clinical significance. A classic stepwise strategy was applied to determine the best PopPK model for describing typical apixaban PKs in hospitalized patients from the OptimAT study (n = 100) and evaluating the associated variability and influencing factors. Apixaban exposure under specific conditions was assessed using the final model. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the data. The developed PopPK model revealed a major role of renal function and a minor role of P-glycoprotein phenotypic (P-gp) activity in explaining apixaban variability. The final model indicated that a patient with stage 4 chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance [CLcr] = 15-29 mL/min) would have a 45% higher drug exposure than a patient with normal renal function (CLcr >90 mL/min), with a further 12% increase if the patient was also a poor metabolizer of P-gp. A high interindividual variability in apixaban PKs was observed in a real-life setting, which was partially explained by renal function and by P-gp phenotypic activity. Target apixaban concentrations are reached under standard dosage regimens, but overexposure can rapidly occur in the presence of cumulative factors warranting the development of a predictive tool for tailoring apixaban exposure and its clinical utility in at-risk patients.

Evaluation of Pupillometry for CYP2D6 Phenotyping in Children Treated with Tramadol.

Following the contraindication of codeine use in children, increasing use of tramadol has been observed in pain management protocols. However, tramadol's pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics are influenced by cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6 activity, similarly to codeine. Previous studies in adults have demonstrated a correlation between pupillary response and tramadol PK. Our objective was to evaluate pupillometry as a phenotyping method to assess CYP2D6 activity in children treated with tramadol. We included 41 children (mean age 11 years) receiving a first dose of tramadol (2 mg/kg) in the emergency room (ER) as part of their routine care. CYP2D6 phenotyping and genotyping were performed. The concentrations of tramadol and its active metabolite, M1, were measured, and static and dynamic pupillometry was conducted using a handheld pupillometer at the time of tramadol administration and during the ER stay. Pupillometric measurements were obtained for 37 children. Tramadol affected pupillary parameters, with a decrease in pupil diameter in 83.8% of children (p = 0.002) (mean decrease 14.1 ± 16.7%) and a decrease in reflex amplitude constriction in 78.4% (p = 0.011) (mean decrease 17.7 ± 34.5%) at T150 compared to T0. We were unable to identify a correlation between pupillometry measurements and CYP2D6 activity. Likely confounding factors include light intensity, pain, and stress, making the procedure less feasible in paediatric emergency settings.

Polygenic risk scores in pharmacogenomics: opportunities and challenges-a mini review.

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) aims at tailoring drug therapy by considering patient genetic makeup. While drug dosage guidelines have been extensively based on single gene mutations (single nucleotide polymorphisms) over the last decade, polygenic risk scores (PRS) have emerged in the past years as a promising tool to account for the complex interplay and polygenic nature of patients' genetic predisposition affecting drug response. Even though PRS research has demonstrated convincing evidence in disease risk prediction, the clinical utility and its implementation in daily care has yet to be demonstrated, and pharmacogenomics is no exception; usual endpoints include drug efficacy or toxicity. Here, we review the general pipeline in PRS calculation, and we discuss some of the remaining barriers and challenges that must be undertaken to bring PRS research in PGx closer to patient care. Besides the need in following reporting guidelines and larger PGx patient cohorts, PRS integration will require close collaboration between bioinformatician, treating physicians and genetic consultants to ensure a transparent, generalizable, and trustful implementation of PRS results in real-world medical decisions.

Case report: Hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity induced by methotrexate in a paediatric patient, what is the role of precision medicine in 2023?

Methotrexate is an immunosuppressant and chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of a range of autoimmune disorders and cancers. Its main serious adverse effects, bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal complications, arise from its antimetabolite effect. Nevertheless, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity are two widely described adverse effects of methotrexate. Its hepatotoxicity has been studied mainly in the low-dose, chronic setting, where patients are at risk of fibrosis/cirrhosis. Studies of acute hepatoxicity of high dose methotrexate, such as during chemotherapy, are scarce. We present the case of a 14-year-old patient who received high-dose methotrexate and subsequently developed acute fulminant liver failure and acute kidney injury. Genotyping of MTHFR (Methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase gene), ABCB1 (codes for P-glycoprotein, intestinal transport and biliary excretion), ABCG2 (codes for BCRP, intestinal transporter and renal excretion) and SLCO1B1 (codes for OATP1B1, hepatic transporter) identified variants in all the genes analysed that predicted a reduced rate of methotrexate elimination and thus may have contributed to the clinical situation of the patient. Precision medicine involving pharmacogenomic testing could potentially avoid such adverse drug effects.

Practice of CYP450 genotyping and phenotyping in children in a real-life setting.

Pharmacokinetics varies widely between children. Many factors play an important role in this variability, such as ontogeny, pharmacogenetics, gender, comorbidities, and drug-drug interactions. Significant work has already been done in adults to understand the impact of genetic polymorphisms on drug-metabolizing enzyme activity and drug response. Data remain poor in children due to ontogeny that impacts genotyping-phenotyping correlation and the difficulty enrolling children in prospective studies. Our study aimed to describe the use of cytochromes P450 (CYP) phenotyping and/or genotyping tests in children in a real-life setting and assess the correlation between the genotype and the phenotype. We reviewed the results of tests performed between January 2005 and December 2020. Fifty-two children were genotyped and/or phenotyped. Four patients were excluded from the present analysis as they only underwent ABCB1 genotyping, without CYP testing. Of the remainder, 18 underwent simultaneous CYP genotyping and phenotyping, while 17 underwent CYP genotyping only, and 13 underwent CYP phenotyping only. In all cases, investigations were performed after the following situations: insufficient clinical response to treatment, low plasma concentrations, and adverse drug reactions (ADR). The vast majority of cases were related to immunosuppressive or antipsychotic therapy. Genotyping and/or phenotyping explained or contributed to the aforementioned clinical events in 56% of cases. The correlation between the genotype and the phenotype showed variability depending on the assessed cytochrome. In several cases, the phenotype did not correspond to the genotype because of comedications. In conclusion, there is clearly value in guiding drug based on CYP activity in children.

REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the 'General Informed ConsENT'.

BACKGROUND: We assessed potential consent bias in a cohort of > 40,000 adult patients asked by mail after hospitalization to consent to the use of past, present and future clinical and biological data in an ongoing 'general consent' program at a large tertiary hospital in Switzerland. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all adult patients hospitalized between April 2019 and March 2020 were invited to participate to the general consent program. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from patients' electronic health records (EHR). Data of those who provided written consent (signatories) and non-responders were compared and analyzed with R studio. RESULTS: Of 44,819 patients approached, 10,299 (23%) signed the form. Signatories were older (median age 54 [IQR 38-72] vs. 44 years [IQR 32-60], p < .0001), more comorbid (2614/10,299 [25.4%] vs. 4912/28,676 [17.1%] with Charlson comorbidity index ≤ 4, p < .0001), and more often of Swiss nationality (6592/10,299 [64%] vs. 13,813/28,676 [48.2%], p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that actively seeking consent creates a bias and compromises the external validity of data obtained via 'general consent' programs. Other options, such as opt-out consent procedures, should be further assessed.

Electronic monitoring of potential adverse drug events related to lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine during the first wave of COVID-19.

During Switzerland's first wave of COVID-19, clinical pharmacy activities during medical rounds in Geneva University Hospitals were replaced by targeted remote interventions. We describe using the electronic PharmaCheck system to screen high-risk situations of adverse drug events (ADEs), particularly targeting prescriptions of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPVr) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the presence of contraindications or prescriptions outside institutional guidelines. Of 416 patients receiving LPVr and/or HCQ, 182 alerts were triggered for 164 (39.4%) patients. The main associated risk factors of ADEs were drug-drug interactions, QTc interval prolongation, electrolyte disorder and inadequate LPVr dosage. Therapeutic optimisation recommended by a pharmacist or proposals for additional monitoring were accepted in 80% (n=36) of cases. Combined with pharmacist contextualisation to the clinical context, PharmaCheck made it possible to successfully adapt clinical pharmacist activities by switching from a global to a targeted analysis mode in an emergency context.

Development and retrospective evaluation of a clinical decision support system for the efficient detection of drug-related problems by clinical pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can help identify drug-related problems (DRPs). However, the alert specificity remains variable. Defining more relevant alerts for detecting DRPs would improve CDSS. AIM: Develop electronic queries that assist pharmacists in conducting medication reviews and an assessment of the performance of this model to detect DRPs. METHOD: Electronic queries were set up in CDSS using "triggers" from electronic health records: drug prescriptions, laboratory values, medical problems, vital signs, demographics. They were based on a previous study where 315 patients admitted in internal medicine benefited from a multidisciplinary medication review (gold-standard) to highlight potential DRPs. Electronic queries were retrospectively tested to assess performance in detecting DRPs revealed with gold-standard. For each electronic query, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were computed. RESULTS: Of 909 DRPs, 700 (77.8%) were used to create 366 electronic queries. Electronic queries correctly detected 77.1% of DRPs, median sensitivity and specificity reached 100.0% (IQRs, 100.0%-100.0%) and 99.7% (IQRs, 97.0%-100.0%); median positive predictive value and negative predictive value reached 50.0% (IQRs, 12.5%-100.0%) and 100.0% (IQRs, 100.0%-100.0%). Performances varied according to "triggers" (p < 0.001, best performance in terms of predictive positive value when exclusively involving drug prescriptions). CONCLUSION: Electronic queries based on electronic heath records had high sensitivity and negative predictive value and acceptable specificity and positive predictive value and may contribute to facilitate medication review. Implementing some of these electronic queries (the most effective and clinically relevant) in current practice will allow a better assessment of their impact on the efficiency of the clinical pharmacist.