Stable closure of acute and chronic wounds and pressure ulcers and control of draining fistulas from osteomyelitis in persons with spinal cord injuries: non-interventional study of MPPT passive immunotherapy delivered via telemedicine in community care.

Background: Micropore particle technology (MPPT) is a topical wound treatment. It is a passive immunotherapy, acting via the skin and wound microbiome without the use of antimicrobial action. In a general patient population, it removed wound infections 60% and initiated tissue regeneration 50% quicker than antibiotics and antiseptics. As MPPT supports the immune system, the aim was to confirm that MPPT is also effective in immunocompromised individuals. People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are immunodeficient due to their injury and not an underlying disease and recruit 50% fewer immune cells to an injury. The study, therefore, determined the efficacy, safety, health economics, and sustainability of MPPT in acute and chronic wounds and pressure ulcers in this patient population. Methods: Pressure ulcers in SCI persons are an orphan indication, patient variability is high, and ICH E10 excludes comparators due to ethical concerns. The study design was, therefore, a single-arm, non-interventional, observational, post-market surveillance study of MPPT for treating wounds and pressure ulcers and removing soft tissue infection in connection with draining fistulas in SCI persons. The study was based on telemedicine in community care. Results: The study included 44 wounds. All acute and chronic grade 1-4 wounds and pressure ulcers reached stable closure. In wounds acting as fistulas draining from an underlying, primary focus of infection, e.g., osteomyelitis, MPPT removed the soft tissue infection in approx. 2.5 months and supported regeneration, considerably reducing fistula sizes. Compared to standard care, per-wound cost savings were 51 to 94% depending on wound grade and age, and substantial nursing resources were freed up. The telemedicine approach was well received by participants and supported independence and self-care. The use of antimicrobials, plastics, and synthetic polymers was essentially eliminated. MPPT did not require bed rest. Conclusion: The study confirmed that MPPT is safe and effective in treating acute and chronic wounds in immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals, including wounds with antimicrobial-resistant infections. MPPT also removes soft tissue infections caused by an underlying primary focus of infection, such as osteomyelitis. Non-healing wounds currently represent an unmet clinical need. The findings suggest that a therapy acting via the microbiome without antimicrobial actions is effective.

Micropore Particle Technology Promotes Wound Healing, Whereas Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Causes Tissue Degeneration: A Case Report.

CASE REPORT: A 72-year-old woman with a nontraumatic spinal cord injury developed eschar on her lower right back. An underlying abscess was identified, which upon surgical debridement left a large wound extending down to the hip bone. In addition, the hip suffered from chronic osteomyelitis and was exposed at the bottom of the wound. The wound was initially treated for 5 weeks with Manuka honey but deteriorated further. Next, micropore particle technology (MPPT) was used. It cleared the wound of necrotic tissue based on autolytic debridement and removed the soft tissue infection; over a 3-month period, the wound reduced 50% in volume. Treatment approach was changed to polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) and was applied as a gel once every second day to the wound. After 6 days, it was observed to cause tissue degeneration, disruption of the structure of the exposed bone, and the appearance of froth coming through the hip bone. A pain syndrome developed and the use of PHMB was terminated on day 10. After a wash-out period, the use of MPPT was reinitiated. Over the following 8 months, MPPT continued to control the infectious debris coming from the hip bone and promote healing without affecting the bone or causing side effects. CONCLUSIONS: It is generally assumed that the cytotoxic properties of antiseptics seen in cell culture experiments do not occur on wounds. The present case shows these cytotoxic properties are expressed on wounds, and they do disrupt tissues and tissue regeneration.

Time to Abandon Antimicrobial Approaches in Wound Healing: A Paradigm Shift.

Antimicrobial approaches (eg, antibiotics and antiseptics) have been used for decades in the treatment of infected wounds, ulcers, and burns. However, an increasing number of meta-analyses have raised questions regarding the therapeutic value of these approaches. Newer findings show that the body actively hosts an ecosystem of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and mites on its outer surfaces, known as the microbiome, as part of its defense against pathogens. Antimicrobials would disrupt this system and thereby work against the strategy the body has chosen. Recently, a new technology, micropore particle technology (MPPT), has been identified; it is not an antimicrobial but instead acts as a passive immunotherapy that disrupts the weaponry bacteria and fungi use to inhibit the immune system, allowing the immune system to recover. Clinical findings show MPPT removes wound infections 60% quicker than antibiotics and antiseptics and promotes the healing of chronic wounds that have not responded to antimicrobials. These effects are achieved without antimicrobial action and, considering the limited therapeutic benefits of antibiotics and antiseptics for wound infections, it is valid to question the use of antimicrobial approaches in wound care and the dogma that a reduction in microbial burden will lead to a reduction in infection. Instead, it may be time to consider a paradigm shift in wound healing away from antimicrobials and towards therapies that support the immune system and the microbiome. This review covers the increasing evidence that infections on external surfaces have to be treated fundamentally differently to internal infections.

Comparative Clinical Study of the Wound Healing Effects of a Novel Micropore Particle Technology: Effects on Wounds, Venous Leg Ulcers, and Diabetic Foot Ulcers

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the wound healing effects of Acapsil, a white, odorless powder based on micropore particle technology (MPPT) (Willingsford Ltd, Southampton, UK) by comparing it to Gentaxane (Gentaksan, Borshchagovsky CCP, Kyiv, Ukraine) (polydimethylsiloxane powder with gentamicin antibiotic) and Ioddicerin (Farmak, Kyiv, Ukraine) (iodine with dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 266 patients with primarily trophic ulcers caused by pancreatic diabetes and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities, carbuncles, phlegmons, infected third- or fourth-degree heat burns, and infiltrations of postoperative wounds. The products were applied once daily to the wound until it was clean (ie, free from necrosis, pus, and fibrinogenous thickenings). RESULTS: The number of days (mean ± standard deviation) to a clean wound was 3.0 ± 0.9 for MPPT (n = 88) compared with 7.0 ± 1.2 and 8.0 ± 1.1 for Gentaxane (n = 90) and iodine/DMSO (n = 88), respectively. Thus, MPPT reduced the time to reach a clean wound by 57% and 62%, respectively. Products were used once daily until a clean wound was reached, which also reflects the number of applications. Days to onset of granulation for MPPT, Gentaxane, and iodine/DMSO were 4.5 ± 0.8, 9.2 ± 1.4, and 10.3 ± 1.5 days, respectively; and days to onset of epithelialization were 7.8 ± 1.1, 14.1 ± 1.9, and 16.4 ± 2.7 days, respectively. Subgroup analysis of patients with diabetic foot and venous leg ulcers found that each of these demonstrated the same pattern of healing as the overall study. The number of hospitalization days was 14.6 ± 5.6 for MPPT, 21.0 ± 10.7 for Gentaxane, and 24.0 ± 7.9 for iodine/DMSO. Compared with Gentaxane, patients receiving MPPT had a 31% reduction in hospitalization duration and a 39% reduction compared with iodine/DMSO. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that MPPT represents a valuable new approach to wound care.

Is poor research the cause of the declining productivity of the pharmaceutical industry? An industry in need of a paradigm shift.

For the past 20 years target-based drug discovery has been the main research paradigm used by the pharmaceutical industry and billions of dollars have been invested into this approach. However, recent industry data strongly indicate that the target-based approach is not an effective drug discovery paradigm and is likely to be the cause of the productivity crisis the industry is experiencing. However, from a theoretical and scientific perspective the target-based approach appears sound, so why is it not more successful? The purpose of this paper is first to analyse the real-life implementation of the target-based approach to identify possible reasons for the high failure rate and second to suggest changes to the drug discovery approach, which can improve productivity.

Research & market strategy: how choice of drug discovery approach can affect market position.

In principal, drug discovery approaches can be grouped into target- and function-based, with the respective aims of developing either a target-selective drug or a drug that produces a specific biological effect irrespective of its mode of action. Most analyses of drug discovery approaches focus on productivity, whereas the strategic implications of the choice of drug discovery approach on market position and ability to maintain market exclusivity are rarely considered. However, a comparison of approaches from the perspective of market position indicates that the functional approach is superior for the development of novel, innovative treatments.

The selective mGlu5 receptor antagonist MTEP, similar to NMDA receptor antagonists, induces social isolation in rats.

It has repeatedly been shown that uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists can mimic certain aspects of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in human volunteers and laboratory animals. The purpose of the present study was to expand these findings and to determine whether the selective metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) antagonist, MTEP (3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine), could induce similar effects in Wistar rats. First, MTEP (1.0-10.0 mg/kg; intraperitoneally) after acute and subchronic (daily for 5 days) administration as well as the uncompetitive antagonists of the NMDA receptor of either high affinity, phencyclidine (0.5-4.0 mg/kg; subcutaneously (s.c.)) and (+)-MK-801 (0.03-0.25 mg/kg; s.c.), or low-moderate affinity, ketamine (2.0-16.0 mg/kg; s.c.) and memantine (0.15-20.0 mg/kg; s.c.), following daily administration for 3 days were tested in the social interaction test to determine their ability to reproduce the negative and positive symptoms measured by social isolation and stereotyped behavior, respectively. Second, the compounds were tested in the motility test following acute administration to determine their ability to induce locomotor hyperactivity reflecting the positive symptoms. In line with previous findings, all examined NMDA receptor antagonists produced social interaction deficits, locomotor hyperactivity, and stereotypy except memantine. Notably, this study found that MTEP following both acute and subchronic administration dose-dependently induced social isolation, but did not cause either locomotor hyperactivity or stereotypy. These data demonstrate that social behavior deficits in rats can be caused by both the blockade of the NMDA receptor and the inhibition of mGluR5, whereas mGluR5 antagonists may not independently be able to mimic the positive symptoms.

Expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor, activity-regulated cytoskeleton protein mRNA, and enhancement of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in rats after sub-chronic and chronic treatment with the triple monoamine re-uptake inhibitor tesofensine.

The changes of gene expression resulting from long-term exposure to monoamine antidepressant drugs in experimental animals are key to understanding the mechanisms of action of this class of drugs in man. Many of these genes and their products are either relevant biomarkers or directly involved in structural changes that are perhaps necessary for the antidepressant effect. Tesofensine is a novel triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor that acts to increase noradrenaline, serotonin, and dopamine neurotransmission. This study was undertaken to examine the effect of sub-chronic (5 days) and chronic (14 days) administration of Tesofensine on the expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and activity-regulated cytoskeleton protein (Arc) in the rat hippocampus. Furthermore, hippocampi from the same animals were used to investigate the effect on cell proliferation by means of Ki-67- and NeuroD-immunoreactivity. We find that chronic, but not sub-chronic treatment with Tesofensine increases BDNF mRNA in the CA3 region of the hippocampus (35%), and Arc mRNA in the CA1 of the hippocampus (65%). Furthermore, the number of Ki-67- and neuroD-positive cells increased after chronic, but not sub-chronic treatment. This study shows that Tesofensine enhances hippocampal gene expression and new cell formation indicative for an antidepressant potential of this novel drug substance.

Strategies to optimize the validity of disease models in the drug discovery process.

Models of human diseases are necessary for experimental research into the biological basis of disease and for the development of treatments. They have an enormous impact upon the success of biomedical research. However, in spite of this, a consistent system for evaluating, expressing and comparing the clinical validity of disease models is not available. The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to provide a theoretical discussion of the concepts behind disease models and to develop a terminology and a framework to analyze and express the clinical validity of disease models.

Drug discovery: selecting the optimal approach.

The target-based drug discovery approach has for the past 10-15 years been the dominating drug discovery paradigm. However, within the past few years, the commercial value of novel targets in licensing deals has fallen dramatically, reflecting that the probability of reaching a clinical drug candidate for a novel target is very low. This has naturally led to questions regarding the success of target-based drug discovery and, more importantly, a search for alternatives. This paper evaluates the strengths and limitations of the main drug discovery approaches, and proposes a novel approach that could offer advantages for the identification of disease-modifying treatments.

Optimizing the discovery organization for innovation.

Strategic management is the process of adapting organizational structure and management principles to fit the strategic goal of the business unit. The pharmaceutical industry has generally been expert at optimizing its organizations for drug development, but has rarely implemented different structures for the early discovery process, where the objective is innovation and the transformation of innovation into drug projects. Here, a set of strategic management methods is proposed, covering team composition, organizational structure, management principles and portfolio management, which are designed to increase the level of innovation in the early drug discovery process.

Target-based drug discovery: is something wrong?

For the past decade the pharmaceutical industry has experienced a steady decline in productivity and a striking observation is that the decline coincided with the introduction of target-based drug discovery. The target-based approach can very effectively develop novel treatments for a validated target, but the process of target validation is complex and associated with a high degree of uncertainty. The purpose of this paper is to analyse these aspects in detail to determine if weaknesses in this part of the drug discovery path might explain why this paradigm has not resulted in increased productivity over the traditional in vivo approach, considering its superiority in screening capacity and its ability to define rational drug discovery programs.

(+) MK-801 and phencyclidine induced neurotoxicity do not cause enduring behaviours resembling the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in the rat.

Studies in rats and primates have demonstrated that repeated phencyclidine treatment can produce enduring cognitive deficits that may resemble the cognitive deficits seen in schizophrenia, suggesting that neurodegeneration resulting from NMDA-receptor dysfunction may be a valid model of schizophrenia. The purpose of the present experiments was to expand these findings and to determine if medium and high doses of the NMDA-antagonists phencyclidine and (+)MK-801 could produce permanent behavioural changes in animal tests with face validity for some aspects of the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Rats were treated with dose regimens of (+)MK-801 and phencyclidine known to produce mild and severe irreversible levels of neurotoxicity, and were tested 7 or 10 days after the last drug administration in the social interaction test and in standard activity cages. The rats did not show any enduring behavioural changes as a result of the treatment. The present study could therefore not provide additional evidence for the face validity of this model of schizophrenia.