Safety and pharmacokinetics of oral and long-acting injectable cabotegravir or long-acting injectable rilpivirine in virologically suppressed adolescents with HIV (IMPAACT 2017/MOCHA): a phase 1/2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative, dose-finding study.

BACKGROUND: Combined intramuscular long-acting cabotegravir and long-acting rilpivirine constitute the first long-acting combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen approved for adults with HIV. The goal of the IMPAACT 2017 study (MOCHA [More Options for Children and Adolescents]) was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of these drugs in adolescents. METHODS: In this phase 1/2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative, dose-finding study, virologically suppressed adolescents (aged 12-17 years; weight ≥35 kg; BMI ≤31·5 kg/m2) with HIV-1 on daily oral ART were enrolled at 15 centres in four countries (Botswana, South Africa, Thailand, and the USA). After 4-6 weeks of oral cabotegravir (cohort 1C) or rilpivirine (cohort 1R), participants received intramuscular long-acting cabotegravir or long-acting rilpivirine every 4 weeks or 8 weeks per the adult dosing regimens, while continuing pre-study ART. The primary outcomes were assessments of safety measures, including all adverse events, until week 4 for oral cabotegravir and until week 16 for long-acting cabotegravir and long-acting rilpivirine, and pharmacokinetic measures, including the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve during the dosing interval (AUC0-tau) and drug concentrations, at week 2 for oral dosing of cabotegravir and at week 16 for intramuscular dosing of cabotegravir and rilpivirine. Enrolment into cohort 1C or cohort 1R was based on the participant's pre-study ART, meaning that masking was not done. For pharmacokinetic analyses, blood samples were drawn at weeks 2-4 after oral dosing and weeks 4-16 after intramuscular dosing. Safety outcome measures were summarised using frequencies, percentages, and exact 95% CIs; pharmacokinetic parameters were summarised using descriptive statistics. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03497676, and is closed to enrolment. FINDINGS: Between March 19, 2019, and Nov 25, 2021, 55 participants were enrolled: 30 in cohort 1C and 25 in cohort 1R. At week 16, 28 (97%, 95% CI 82-100) of the 29 dose-evaluable participants in cohort 1C and 21 (91%; 72-99) of the 23 dose-evaluable participants in cohort 1R had reported at least one adverse event, with the most common being injection-site pain (nine [31%] in cohort 1C; nine [39%] in cohort 1R; none were severe). One (4%, 95% CI 0-22) participant in cohort 1R had an adverse event of grade 3 or higher, leading to treatment discontinuation, which was defined as acute rilpivirine-related allergic reaction (self-limiting generalised urticaria) after the first oral dose. No deaths or life-threatening events occurred. In cohort 1C, the week 2 median cabotegravir AUC0-tau was 148·5 (range 37·2-433·1) µg·h/mL. The week 16 median concentrations for the every-4-weeks and every-8-weeks dosing was 3·11 µg/mL (range 1·22-6·19) and 1·15 µg/mL (<0·025-5·29) for cabotegravir and 52·9 ng/mL (31·9-148·0) and 39·1 ng/mL (27·2-81·3) for rilpivirine, respectively. These concentrations were similar to those in adults. INTERPRETATION: Study data support using long-acting cabotegravir or long-acting rilpivirine, given every 4 weeks or 8 weeks, per the adult dosing regimens, in virologically suppressed adolescents aged 12 years and older and weighing at least 35 kg. FUNDING: The National Institutes of Health and ViiV Healthcare.

Impact of CYP2B6 genotype, tuberculosis therapy, and formulation on efavirenz pharmacokinetics in infants and children under 40 months of age.

OBJECTIVE: Dosing efavirenz (EFV) in children less than 3 years of age is challenging due to large variability in drug levels. This study evaluated differences in pharmacokinetics with tuberculosis (TB) therapy, formulation, age, and CYP2B6 genotype. DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic data from three IMPAACT/PACTG studies (P382, P1021, and P1070) for children initiating therapy less than 40 months of age were evaluated. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic data were combined in a population pharmacokinetic model. Exposure from the 2-week pharmacokinetic visit was compared with changes in viral RNA between the Week 0 and Week 4 visits. RESULTS: The model included 103 participants (19 on TB therapy). CYP2B6 516 genotype information was available for 82 participants (TT: 15, GT: 28, GG: 39). Median age at the first pharmacokinetic visit was 17.0 months (range: 2.0-39.0 months). Liquid formulation led to a 42% decrease in bioavailability compared with opened capsules. TB therapy (isoniazid and rifampin) led to a 29% decreased clearance, however Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated the majority of participants on TB therapy receiving standard EFV dosing to be in the target area under the curve range. Clearance was 5.3-fold higher for GG than TT genotype and 3.3-fold higher for GT than TT genotype. Age did not have a significant effect on clearance in the final model. Initial viral RNA decay was lower for patients in the lowest quartile of exposures (area under the curves) than for higher quartiles (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: EFV dosing should account for CYP2B6 516 genotype and formulation, but does not require adjustment for concurrent TB therapy.

Abacavir dosing in neonates from birth to 3 months of life: a population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation study.

BACKGROUND: No evidence-based optimal dosing guidance is available for abacavir liquid formulation use from birth. We used abacavir pharmacokinetic data from neonates and infants to determine an exact abacavir dosing strategy (mg/kg) for infants aged 0-3 months and to propose dosing by WHO weight band for neonates. METHODS: Abacavir pharmacokinetic and safety data were pooled from three completed studies (1997-2020): PACTG 321 (USA), the Tygerberg Cohort (South Africa), and IMPAACT P1106 (South Africa). PACTG 321 and the Tygerberg Cohort were performed in neonates exposed to HIV receiving a single dose of abacavir. IMPAACT P1106 included predominantly low birthweight (<2500 g) infants on antiretroviral therapy enrolled when they were younger than 3 months. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model and performed simulations to achieve abacavir exposures (area under the curve for 0-12 h) within the target range of 3·2-25·2 µg·h/mL, previously reported in older children. FINDINGS: 45 infants contributed 308 abacavir concentrations; 21 neonates were younger than 15 days. At first pharmacokinetic assessment, median postnatal age for PACTG 321 was 1 day and median bodyweight was 3·1 kg; for the Tygerberg Cohort it was 10 days and 3·3 kg; and for IMPAACT P1106 it was 73 days and 3·8 kg. Our model predicted a slow abacavir clearance of 2·51 mL/min per kg at birth, which doubled by 4 weeks of age. Therapeutic targets were achieved with exact abacavir doses of 2·0 mg/kg twice daily from 0 weeks to 4 weeks and 4·0 mg/kg twice daily from 4 weeks to 12 weeks. A fixed weight-band dosing strategy of 8 mg (for 2-3 kg), 10 mg (3-4 kg), and 12 mg (4-5 kg) abacavir twice daily achieved target exposures throughout the first 4 weeks of life without the need for dose adjustment due to age or bodyweight changes. No adverse events of grade 3 or higher were related to abacavir. INTERPRETATION: Integration of these dosing strategies into national and international guidelines for the abacavir liquid formulation will expand antiretroviral options from birth and simplify the clinical management of neonates with HIV. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Mental Health, and the Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research Programme.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Raltegravir-Containing Regimen in Children Aged 4 Weeks to 2 Years Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Receiving Rifampin for Tuberculosis.

Pharmacological interactions limit treatment options for children living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB). We found that 12 mg/kg twice daily raltegravir chewable tablets (administered after crushing) safely achieved pharmacokinetic targets in children living with HIV aged 4 weeks to <2 years receiving concurrent rifampin to treat TB. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01751568.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of maraviroc in neonates.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and pharmacokinetics of maraviroc administered with standard antiretroviral prophylaxis to HIV-1 exposed infants and to determine the appropriate dose of maraviroc during the first 6 weeks of life. DESIGN: A phase I, multicentre, open-label study enrolling two sequential cohorts. METHODS: IMPAACT 2007 participants enrolled by day 3 of life and were stratified by exposure to maternal efavirenz. Cohort 1 participants received two single 8 mg/kg maraviroc doses 1 week apart with pharmacokinetic sampling after each dose. Cohort 2 participants received 8 mg/kg maraviroc twice daily through 6 weeks of life with pharmacokinetic sampling at weeks 1 and 4. Maraviroc exposure target was Cavg at least 75 ng/ml. Laboratory and clinical evaluations assessed safety. RESULTS: Fifteen Cohort 1 and 32 Cohort 2 HIV-exposed neonates were enrolled (median gestational age 39 weeks, 51% male). All 13 evaluable Cohort 1 infants met the pharmacokinetic target. Median exposure for the 25 evaluable Cohort 2 infants met the pharmacokinetic target but variability was high, with 17-33% of infants below target at Weeks 1 and 4. Pharmacokinetic target achievement was similar between efavirenz exposure strata. No Grade 3+ toxicities, early study or treatment discontinuations due to maraviroc occurred. CONCLUSION: Median maraviroc exposure met the Cavg target in neonates receiving 8 mg/kg twice daily, although exposures were variable. Maternal efavirenz use did not impact maraviroc exposure and no discontinuations were due to maraviroc toxicity/intolerance. No infants acquired HIV-1 infection during follow-up. Maraviroc 8 mg/kg twice daily appears well tolerated during the first 6 weeks of life.

Association of Virologic Failure and Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistance Found in Antiretroviral-Naive Children Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Given Efavirenz-Based Treatment.

Among 66 antiretroviral-naive children aged <3 years with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or coinfected with HIV and tuberculosis and initiating efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance was detected before ART in 5 (7.6%). Virologic failure occurred in 2 of these children; they were last tested at 16 and 24 weeks of ART. Pre-ART NNRTI resistance was not associated with virologic failure.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of a raltegravir-containing regimen in HIV-infected children aged 2-12 years on rifampicin for tuberculosis.

OBJECTIVES: Drug-drug interactions limit current antiretroviral treatment options for HIV-infected children with tuberculosis (TB). Rifampicin (RIF) induces UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity, accelerating the clearance of raltegravir (RAL). We sought to establish an optimal and well tolerated dose of RAL when administered with RIF to HIV and TB co-infected children. DESIGN: P1101 is a phase I/II open-label dose-finding study of RAL with RIF for children 2 to less than 12 years of age beginning treatment for HIV and active TB. SETTING: Four sites in South Africa. METHODS: Chewable RAL was given at 12 mg/kg per dose twice daily (twice the usual pediatric dose) with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Intensive RAL pharmacokinetic sampling was conducted 5 to 8 days after antiretroviral therapy was initiated; a fourth antiretroviral agent was then added. RESULTS: Children were recruited into two age-defined groups: cohort 1 (2 to <6 years old) and cohort 2 (6 to <12 years old). Pharmacological targets [geometric mean (GM) AUC12 h of 14-45 µmol/l h and GM C12 h ≥75 nmol/l) were reached in both cohort 1 (28.8 µmol/l h and 229 nmol/l) and cohort 2 (38.8 µmol/l h and 228 nmol/l). The RAL-based ART was well tolerated by most participants: one participant discontinued treatment because of grade 4 hepatitis that was possibly treatment-related. At week 8, 22 of 24 participants (92%) had HIV RNA concentrations below 400 copies/ml; 19 of 24 (79%) were below 50 copies/ml. CONCLUSION: Giving 12 mg/kg twice daily of the chewable RAL formulation achieved pharmacokinetic targets safely in HIV-infected children receiving RIF for TB.

Establishing Dosing Recommendations for Efavirenz in HIV/TB-Coinfected Children Younger Than 3 Years.

BACKGROUND: CYP2B6 516 genotype-directed dosing improves efavirenz (EFV) exposures in HIV-infected children younger than 36 months, but such data are lacking in those with tuberculosis (TB) coinfection. METHODS: Phase I, 24-week safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of EFV in HIV-infected children aged 3 to <36 months, with or without TB. CYP2B6 516 genotype classified children into extensive metabolizers (516 TT/GT) and poor metabolizers [(PMs), 516 TT]. EFV doses were 25%-33% higher in children with HIV/TB coinfection targeting EFV area under the curve (AUC) 35-180 µg × h/mL, with individual dose adjustment as necessary. Safety and virologic evaluations were performed every 4-8 weeks. RESULTS: Fourteen children from 2 African countries and India with HIV/TB enrolled, with 11 aged 3 to <24 months and 3 aged 24-36 months, 12 extensive metabolizers and 2 PMs. Median (Q1, Q3) EFV AUC was 92.87 (40.95, 160.81) µg × h/mL in 8/9 evaluable children aged 3 to <24 months and 319.05 (172.56, 360.48) µg × h/mL in children aged 24-36 months. AUC targets were met in 6/8 and 2/5 of the younger and older age groups, respectively. EFV clearance was reduced in PM's and older children. Pharmacokinetic modeling predicted adequate EFV concentrations if children younger than 24 months received TB-uninfected dosing. All 9 completing 24 weeks achieved viral suppression. Five/14 discontinued treatment early: 1 neutropenia, 3 nonadherence, and 1 with excessive EFV AUC. CONCLUSIONS: Genotype-directed dosing safely achieved therapeutic EFV concentrations and virologic suppression in HIV/TB-coinfected children younger than 24 months, but further study is needed to confirm appropriate dosing in those aged 24-36 months. This approach is most important for young children and currently a critical unmet need in TB-endemic countries.

CYP2B6 genotype-directed dosing is required for optimal efavirenz exposure in children 3-36 months with HIV infection.

OBJECTIVES: To determine safety-specific, efficacy-specific and genotypic-specific dose requirements of efavirenz (EFV) in children aged 3 to less than 36 months with HIV infection. DESIGN: IMPAACT P1070 was a 24-week prospective cohort trial of EFV (as open capsules) and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children with HIV infection 3 to less than 36 months without tuberculosis (Cohort 1). METHODS: CYP2B6 G516T genotype was determined, and intensive pharmacokinetics was performed at week 2. EFV dose was adjusted if outside the target area under the curve (AUC) 35-180 µg*h/ml. Pharmacokinetic and CYP2B6 G516T genotype data were used to model EFV exposures based on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved doses. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants, median age 19 months, initiated the study regimen with 24 weeks median follow-up; 38 516GG/GT and 9 516TT genotypes. Initially, median EFV AUC was higher in 516TT vs. 516GG/GT (median 490 vs. 107 µg*h/ml; P = 0.0001) with all 516TT above AUC target. Following an amendment that reduced the 516TT EFV dose by 75%, pharmacokinetic modeling predicted that 83% of participants met the AUC target (31/38 516GG/GT, 8/9 516TT). In contrast, modeling using P1070 data predicted that FDA-approved doses would produce subtherapeutic AUCs in almost one-third of participants with 516GG/GT and excessive AUCs in more than 50% with 516TT genotypes. CONCLUSION: CYP2B6 G516T genotype strongly influences EFV exposures in this age group. Genotype-directed dosing yields therapeutic EFV concentrations and appears to outperform other dosing approaches.

Towards early inclusion of children in tuberculosis drugs trials: a consensus statement.

Children younger than 18 years account for a substantial proportion of patients with tuberculosis worldwide. Available treatments for paediatric drug-susceptible and drug-resistant tuberculosis, albeit generally effective, are hampered by high pill burden, long duration of treatment, coexistent toxic effects, and an overall scarcity of suitable child-friendly formulations. Several new drugs and regimens with promising activity against both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant strains have entered clinical development and are either in various phases of clinical investigation or have received marketing authorisation for adults; however, none have data on their use in children. This consensus statement, generated from an international panel of opinion leaders on childhood tuberculosis and incorporating reviews of published literature from January, 2004, to May, 2014, addressed four key questions: what drugs or regimens should be prioritised for clinical trials in children? Which populations of children are high priorities for study? When can phase 1 or 2 studies be initiated in children? What are the relevant elements of clinical trial design? The consensus panel found that children can be included in studies at the early phases of drug development and should be an integral part of the clinical development plan, rather than studied after regulatory approval in adults is obtained.

Long-term safety and efficacy of atazanavir-based therapy in HIV-infected infants, children and adolescents: the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 1020A.

BACKGROUND: Atazanavir (ATV) is an attractive option for the treatment of Pediatric HIV infection, based on once-daily dosing and the availability of a formulation appropriate for younger children. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 1020A was a phase I/II open label study of ATV (with/without ritonavir [RTV] boosting)-based treatment of HIV-infected children; here we report the long-term safety and virologic and immunologic responses. METHODS: Antiretroviral-naïve and experienced children, ages 91 days to 21 years, with baseline plasma HIV RNA > 5000 copies/mL (cpm) were enrolled at sites in the United States and South Africa. RESULTS: Of 195 children enrolled, 142 (73%) subjects received ATV-based regimens at the final protocol recommended dose; 58% were treatment naive. Overall, at week 24, 84/139 subjects (60.4%) and at week 48, 83/142 (58.5%) had HIV RNA ≤ 400 cpm. At week 48, 69.5% of naïve and 43.3% of experienced subjects had HIV RNA ≤ 400 cpm; median CD4 increase was 196.5 cells/mm. The primary adverse event (AE) was increased serum bilirubin; 9% of subjects had levels ≥ 5.1 times upper limit of normal (ULN) and 1.4% noted jaundice. Three percent of subjects experienced grade 2 or 3 prolongation in PR or QTc intervals. At week 48, there was a 15% increase in total cholesterol (TC), with TC > 199 mg/dL increasing from 1% at baseline to 5.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Use of once-daily ATV, with/without RTV, was safe and well tolerated in children, with acceptable levels of viral suppression and CD4 count increase. The primary AE, as expected, was an increase in bilirubin levels.

Atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected infants, children, and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir (ATV) and ritonavir-boosted ATV (ATV/r) in children aged 91 days to 21 years. DESIGN: A phase I/II, open-label, multicenter study of once-daily ATV and ATV/r as part of combination antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected treatment-experienced and treatment-naive children. SETTING: Sites in the United States and South Africa. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and ninety-five children enrolled; 172 had evaluable ATV pharmacokinetics on day 7. INTERVENTION: Children were entered in age, dose, and formulation (powder or capsule) cohorts. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling occurred 7 days after starting ATV. ATV doses were increased or decreased if the 24-h area under the concentration time curves (AUC0-24hr) were less than 30 or more than 90 µg × h/ml, respectively. MAIN OUTCOMES: Cohorts satisfied protocol-defined pharmacokinetic criteria if the median ATV AUC0-24hr was 60 µg × h/ml or less, and AUC0-24hr and ATV concentrations 24-h postdose (C24) were more than 30 µg × h/ml and at least 60 ng/ml, respectively, in at least 80% of the children, with no individual AUC0-24hr less than 15 µg × h/ml. RESULTS: Unboosted ATV capsules satisfied pharmacokinetic criteria at a dose of 520 mg/m for those aged more than 2 to 13 years or less and 620 mg/m for those aged more than 13 to 21 years or less. ATV/r capsules satisfied criteria at a dose of 205 mg/m for those aged more than 2 to 21 years or less. ATV/r powder satisfied criteria at a dose of 310 mg/m for those aged more than 2 to 13 years or less, but pharmacokinetics in those aged 2 years or less were highly variable. CONCLUSION: Body surface area-determined doses of ATV capsules and of ATV/r powder and capsules provide ATV exposures in children of more than 2 years that approximate concentrations in adults receiving ATV/r.