Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) Trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial to compare three different strategies of mean arterial pressure management during cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: One of the main goals of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is targeting an adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP) during heart surgery, in order to maintain appropriate perfusion pressures in all end-organs. As inheritance of early studies, a value of 50-60 mmHg has been historically accepted as the "gold standard" MAP. However, in the last decades, the CPB management has remarkably changed, thanks to the evolution of technology and the availability of new biomaterials. Therefore, as highlighted by the latest European Guidelines, the current management of CPB can no longer refer to those pioneering studies. To date, only few single-centre studies have compared different strategies of MAP management during CPB, but with contradictory findings and without achieving a real consensus. Therefore, what should be the ideal strategy of MAP management during CPB is still on debate. This trial is the first multicentre, randomized, controlled study which compares three different strategies of MAP management during the CPB. METHODS: We described herein the methodology of a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial comparing three different approaches to MAP management during CPB in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: the historically accepted "standard MAP" (50-60 mmHg), the "high MAP" (70-80 mmHg) and the "patient-tailored MAP" (comparable to the patient's preoperative MAP). It is the aim of the study to find the most suitable management in order to obtain the most adequate perfusion of end-organs during cardiac surgery. For this purpose, the primary endpoint will be the peak of serum lactate (Lmax) released during CPB, as index of tissue hypoxia. The secondary outcomes will include all the intraoperative parameters of tissue oxygenation and major postoperative complications related to organ malperfusion. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the best strategy to target the MAP during CPB, thus further improving the outcomes of cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05740397 (retrospectively registered; 22/02/2023).

Neurological Consequences, Mental Health, Physical Care, and Appropriate Nutrition in Long-COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused a collapse of the world health systems. Now, vaccines and more effective therapies have reversed this crisis but the scenario is further aggravated by the appearance of a new pathology, occurring as SARS-CoV-2 infection consequence: the long-COVID-19. This term is commonly used to describe signs and symptoms that continue or develop after acute infection of COVID-19 up to several months. In this review, the consequences of the disease on mental health and the neurological implications due to the long-COVID are described. Furthermore, the appropriate nutritional approach and some recommendations to relieve the symptoms of the pathology are presented. Data collected indicated that in the next future the disease will affect an increasing number of individuals and that interdisciplinary action is needed to counteract it.

Ten-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of third-generation biological prostheses in the aortic position.

OBJECTIVES: PERIMOUNT Magna Ease (Carpentier-Edwards; PME) prostheses have been widely implanted during the past decade for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Although promising results at midterm follow-up were reported, long-term outcome has yet to be confirmed. On this study we aimed to evaluate long-term results in terms of structural valve degeneration (SVD), major clinical outcomes, long-term hemodynamic valve performance, and left ventricular remodeling. METHODS: From 2010 to 2012, 689 consecutive patients underwent AVR with PME. Complete clinical 10-year follow-up was obtained. The degree of SVD was categorized on the basis of the latest guidelines. Echocardiographic data were analyzed at 1, 5, and 10 years. Competing risk analysis was performed for major events. Cumulative incidence of SVD, reoperation, and endocarditis were also assessed according to prosthetic sizes (19-21-23 mm vs 25-27-29 mm) and age (<65 vs 65-75 vs >75 years old). RESULTS: The overall cumulative incidence reported for SVD ≥2 and reoperation were 3.6% and 1.9% at 10 years, respectively. An early left ventricular reverse remodeling was noted after implantation and confirmed at follow-up. Patients younger than 65 years showed higher cumulative incidence of SVD ≥2 at 10 years compared with patients aged 65 to 75 and older than 75 years (9.7% vs 2.6% vs 2.7%; P = .013), as well as of redo AVR (7.8% vs 3.3% vs 0.4%; P = .002). There was no difference in terms of SVD and redo AVR for different prosthetic size categories (P > .05). The risk of endocarditis was similar among age and size groups. CONCLUSIONS: PME provides very good durability at long-term and could be considered one of the high performing third-generation bioprostheses for AVR.

Comparative Prognostic Value of Parameters of Pulsatile Right Ventricular Afterload in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation.

Right ventricular pulsatile afterload (RVPA) demonstrated a strong impact on survival of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. The best prognostic parameter of RVPA is unknown. The aim of this work was to examine the prognostic relevance of pulmonary artery compliance (PAC), pulmonary artery elastance (PAE), and pulmonary artery pulsatile index (PAPi) in a consecutive cohort of patients with advanced HF evaluated for heart transplantation (HT). A total of 149 patients with end-stage HF underwent right-sided cardiac catheterization and were clinically followed up until death or any censoring events, including HT, left ventricular assist device, and hospitalization for acute HF. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (19.5%) during a median follow-up time of 12 (interquartile range 3 to 34) months. This cohort presented a worse hemodynamic profile than event-free survivors. PAC <1.9 mL/mm Hg (hazard ratio 3, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 6.0, p= 0.007) and PAE >0.9 mmHg/mL (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.2, p= 0.02) were associated with the adverse outcome. On the contrary, PAPi was not associated with the outcome. PAC demonstrated a superior predictive value for the composite adverse outcome compared with pulmonary vascular resistance (area under the curve comparison p= 0.019) and PAPi (p= 0.03) but similar compared with PAE (p= 0.19) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p= 0.51). PAC, but not PAE, showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index (p= 0.02). In conclusion, hemodynamic indexes of RVPA are associated with worse survival in patients with end-stage HF. PAC and PAE demonstrated superior prognostic value compared with PAPi and pulmonary vascular resistance. Moreover, PAC showed incremental prognostic value compared with cardiac index in patients awaiting HT.