Evaluating extraction sockets in the esthetic zone for immediate implant placement.

With the increasing demands of patients and the profession to maximize esthetic outcomes and minimize the number of procedures, clinicians must consider the use of immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets. Despite atraumatic extraction techniques, many cases present with a non-intact extraction socket, with bone deficiency in the coronal or apical aspect of the socket. In cases of immediate placement, an intact socket and guided bone regeneration procedures are often prerequisites to a successful esthetic outcome. In most cases, these grafting techniques can be performed at the time of immediate placement. Certain cases, however, have undergone such extensive bone and soft-tissue destruction that implants cannot be placed immediately and hard- and/or soft-tissue augmentation is required prior to implant placement. This article describes a classification system that considers both hard- and soft-tissue defects and the morphology of the extraction socket for immediate implant placement. Recommendations are made concerning the surgical technique required to treat the hard- and soft-tissue defects based on the socket morphology.

Therapeutic management for immediate implant placement in sites with periapical deficiencies where coronal bone is present: technique and case report.

A surgical approach is presented that enables the clinician to repair apical bony defects during immediate dental implant placement without compromising the integrity of the coronal bone and gingiva. This apical surgical technique retains the soft tissue form in the coronal aspect of the gingiva and allows the clinician to repair the apical bone loss or fenestration. A clinical case is presented to describe the technique. This technique is utilized in cases of immediate implant placement. After extraction of the tooth, the socket is evaluated. In cases where coronal bone is intact but apical bone is deficient, a flap technique is utilized to expose the defect. The implant osteotomy is prepared, and the implant is placed. A healing cap or gingival prosthetic component is connected. The bony defect is repaired with a bone graft and, where necessary, a membrane. The apicoectomy flap is sutured. The clinical results obtained using this technique will enable the clinician to accomplish the bone regenerative procedure without extending the flap to the coronal aspect of the socket during immediate implant placement. This technique assists in the maintenance and integrity of the soft tissue form, which is critical for optimal esthetic results.

A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up.

PURPOSE: In this prospective multicenter clinical study, 1,179 3i standard threaded and self-tapping implants were followed for up to 6 years and monitored according to established success criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 493 patients (240 men and 253 women) with a mean age of 45.1 years at implant surgery were enrolled at 6 research centers after being screened for exclusion criteria. Implants were placed according to a 2-stage surgical protocol with a minimum of 4 months of submerged healing in the mandible and 6 months in the maxilla. Restorations included 633 prostheses, the majority of which were fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible or maxilla or single-tooth replacements in the anterior maxilla. RESULTS: One hundred four implants (8.8%) did not meet success criteria and were designated as failures, and 222 implants (18.8%) were lost to follow-up. The cumulative success rate according to life table methods was 91.1% at 6 years. DISCUSSION: Sixty percent of the failed implants were short (< or = 10 mm long), and their cumulative success rate as a group at 6 years was 89.0%, compared to 93.1% for longer implants (P < .05). Thirty-three percent of all failures were implants placed in the posterior maxilla, for a 5-year cumulative success rate of 87.4%. CONCLUSION: It appears that limited bone dimensions and poor-quality bone have an impact on the performance of these machined-surface implants.