Results from the PRIMA Trial: Comparison of the STHLM3 Test and Prostate-specific Antigen in General Practice for Detection of Prostate Cancer in a Biopsy-naïve Population.

BACKGROUND: Current management of prostate cancer (PC) lacks biomarker tests and diagnostic procedures that can accurately distinguish clinically significant and clinically insignificant PCs at an early stage of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To compare the Stockholm 3 (STHLM3) test and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as entry tests for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a prospective study of PC diagnosis in general practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were biopsy-naïve men aged 50-69 yr who had a PSA test in general practice. Participants with PSA 1-10 ng/ml also had an STHLM3 test and were referred for MRI if the STHLM311 test was positive (risk ≥11%) and/or PSA ≥3 ng/ml, and to targeted MRI-guided biopsy (MRGB) if their Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score was ≥3. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was the number of International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2 (GG ≥2) cases detected with a positive STHLM311 test versus PSA ≥3 ng/ml. Post hoc analysis was performed using a higher STHLM3 test cutoff (risk ≥15%; positive STHLM315 test). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Between January 2018 and December 2021, we recruited 1905 men. The STHLM3 test was performed in 1134 participants. Of these, 437 underwent MRI and 117 underwent MRGB, which detected 38 (32.5%) GG ≥2 and 52 (44.4%) with GG 1 cases. In comparison to PSA ≥3 ng/ml, a positive STHLM311 test increased detection of GG ≥2 from 30 to 37 cases (23.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-52.2%) and detection of GG 1 from 37 to 50 cases (35.1%, 95%CI 11.6-66.7%). STHLM315 positivity did not differ from PSA ≥3 ng/ml regarding detection of GG ≥2 PC (30 vs 32; 6.6%, 95% CI -8.1% to 25.9%), GG 1 PC (37 vs 37; 0.0%, 95% CI -19.6% to 25.0%), or MRGB use (88 vs 83; -5.7%, 95% CI -17.9% to 7.4%), but reduced MRI scans from 320 to 236 (-26.2%, 95% CI -33.1% to -18.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The STHLM311 test improved sensitivity but not specificity for detection of GG ≥2 PC in the clinical setting of nonsystematic PC testing in general practice. Further studies are needed to validate a possible benefit of using a higher cutoff for STHLM3 positivity as an entry test for MRI. PATIENT SUMMARY: We used a test called STHLM3 for detection of prostate cancer in general practice and compared its performance to the conventional PSA (prostate-specific antigen) test. We found that STHLM3 test results of 11% or above were not better at selecting men for MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans than the PSA test with a cutoff of 3 ng/ml or above. Analysis suggested that a higher cutoff for a positive STHLM3 test may improve selection of men for MRI scans, but further validation is needed.

Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Manually Operated and Robot-assisted In-bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy.

Background: The diagnostic efficacy regarding prostate cancer (PC) detection by manually operated in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeted prostate biopsy (MO-MRGB) versus robot-assisted in-bore MRI targeted prostate biopsy (RA-MRGB) is lacking evidence. Objective: We hypothesized that the detection rates (DRs) for PC of MO-MRGB and RA-MRGB were similar and aimed to compare these. Design setting and participants: We prospectively included all patients who received in-bore MRI targeted prostate biopsy (MRGB) of the prostate in the Central Denmark Region from August 2014 to February 2020. From August 2014, MO-MRGB was used, and from March 2018, RA-MRGB was preferred. Referral to in-bore MRGB was based on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We compared PC DRs of MO-MRGB and RA-MRGB with Pearson's chi-square test. We made three binary regression models and calculated the risk difference (RD) of PC between the in-bore MRGB systems. Results and limitations: A total of 3107 patients were referred to mpMRI, and 884 (28%) patients went on to receive in-bore MRGB. The MO-MRGB and RA-MRGB systems were used in 505 (57%) and 379 (43%) patients, respectively. Taking clinically relevant covariates into account, we found no statistically significant difference in PC DRs between MO-MRGB and RA-MRGB (72% vs 73%, RD 1%, 95% confidence interval -4% to 7%, p = 0.6). The main limitation was a shift in population characteristics. Conclusions: We did not see evidence of an effect on the DR or the RD for PC when we compared MO-MRGB with RA-MRGB. Cost effectiveness should be considered carefully when choosing the MRGB system. Patient summary: We compared two magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate tissue sampling systems regarding prostate cancer (PC) detection. One system was manually operated, and the other system was robot assisted. Comparing the systems, we found no evidence of a difference in their ability to detect PC.

Risk stratification in men with a negative prostate biopsy: an interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a risk score for prostate cancer (PCa) lifetime risk can be used to optimise triaging of patients with a negative prostate biopsy, but under sustained suspicion of PCa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective clinical study, we included, and risk scored patients who had a PCa-negative transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy, but elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a suspicious prostate digital rectal examination and/or a positive family history (FH) of PCa. The risk score estimated individual lifetime risk of PCa, based on a polygenic risk score (33 single nucleotide polymorphisms), age, and FH of PCa. Patients were followed, under urological supervision, for up to 4 years with annual controls, always including PSA measurements. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and/or prostate biopsy was performed at selected annual controls depending on risk score and at the urologist's/patient's discretion, which means that the follow-up differed based on the risk score. RESULTS: We included 429 patients. After risk scoring, 376/429 (88%) patients were allocated to a normal-risk group (<30% PCa lifetime risk) and 53/429 (12%) to a high-risk group (≥30% PCa lifetime risk). The high-risk group had significantly different follow-up, with more biopsy and mpMRI sessions compared to the normal-risk group. PCa was detected in 89/429 (21%) patients, with 67/376 (18%) patients diagnosed in the normal-risk group and 22/53 (42%) in the high-risk group. There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of PCa between the normal-risk group and the high-risk group after 4 years of follow-up. Currently, 67/429 (16%) patients are still being followed in this ongoing study. CONCLUSION: In a 4-year perspective, our PCa lifetime risk score did not demonstrate significant prognostic value for triaging patients, with a negative TRUS-guided biopsy and sustained suspicion of PCa.

Breast cancer: comparison of quantitative dual-layer spectral CT and axillary ultrasonography for preoperative diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of quantitative dual-layer spectral computed tomography (DLSCT) and axillary ultrasound (US) for diagnosing lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. METHODS: DLSCT and axillary US were prospectively performed in 70 needle biopsy-verified breast cancer patients. Histopathology and imaging data were available for evaluation in 36 axillae from 34 patients. In each patient, ipsilateral, contralateral, and inguinal lymph nodes (LNs) were semiautomatically segmented, and iodine density, spectral slope, Z effective, virtual non-contrast (VNC), conventional CT HU values, and Δ contrast enhancement (ΔCE, conventional CT HU minus VNC) were measured. Using histopathology as reference, the diagnostic performance of DLSCT and axillary US was compared. RESULTS: Of 36 axillae, 23 had metastatic lymph nodes. Compared with non-metastatic LNs, metastatic LNs had significantly different iodine density (p = 0.021), spectral slope (p < 0.001), Z effective (p < 0.001), conventional CT HU values (p < 0.01), and ΔCE (p < 0.01). All DLSCT parameters were significantly different between arterial phase and portal-venous phase (p < 0.001) except for VNC (p = 0.092). ΔCE had the highest diagnostic performance (sensitivity 0.79, specificity 0.92, positive predictive value 0.95, negative predictive value 0.69) with a significantly increased sensitivity compared with conventional CT HU (p = 0.027). There were no significant differences between ΔCE and axillary US for sensitivity (p = 1.000) or specificity (p = 0.320). CONCLUSIONS: DLSCT is a promising quantitative technique for evaluating LN metastases and could potentially reduce the need for sentinel LN biopsy.

Milk Products in the Treatment of Hypophosphatemic Rickets: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment of hypophosphatemic rickets (HR) is oral phosphate tablets plus vitamin D. Due to the rapid absorption of phosphate tablets, frequent daily doses are necessary, which is cumbersome and may cause fluctuations in plasma phosphate and risk of secondary hyperparathyroidism. It was hypothesized that phosphate from milk or cheese is less rapidly absorbed, and reduces fluctuations in plasma phosphate. OBJECTIVES: The current randomized, multiple crossover study aimed at investigating if an equivalent phosphate dose given as milk or cheese is comparable to phosphate tablets in patients with HR. METHODS: Seven females with HR were included. They went through three different four-day treatment sessions of either oral phosphate tablets consisting of 800 mg elemental phosphorus divided into five doses over the day or an equivalent phosphorus dose ingested as skimmed milk or cheese divided over five daily doses. Blood and urine samples were taken from patients after each treatment session. Except the usual doses of vitamin D, no phosphate or calcium-modifying treatments were allowed. Statistical analyses were performed using mixed models. RESULTS: Treatment feasibility was independent of the phosphorus source. The study demonstrated reduced plasma levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), reduced fluctuations in plasma phosphate and plasma PTH, and reduced renal phosphate excretion when ingesting phosphorus supplementation as milk compared to phosphate tablets. The same trend was observed when administering phosphorus as cheese, though not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Phosphorus supplements can be administered as phosphate tablets, milk or cheese when given in equimolar doses. The current study findings indicated that milk may be superior to phosphate tablets as the phosphate source in patients with HR.