Assessing the effect of the cost-of-living crisis on hot water bottle-related burns in the United Kingdom, a single-centre retrospective observational study.

Background: The cost-of-living crisis (CoLC) is an economic climate that the United Kingdom (UK) has been experiencing since late 2021, characterized by an increase in the price of essential goods faster than real-term incomes. Food and fuel poverty has ensued. This study aimed to assess whether the CoLC is associated with an increase in hot water bottle (HWB)-related burns as patients seek alternative heating sources to keep warm. Methods: Records of patients treated for HWB burns between December 2019 and March 2023 were reviewed for patient demographics, burn depth and surface area, patient comorbidities, and patient index of multiple deprivation (IMD). The incidence of admissions, IMD, and severity of injury were compared prior to and during the CoLC using either independent t-test or Kruskal-Wallis H test. Results: Between December 2019 and March 2023, 177 patients were treated for HWB burns, 79 prior to the CoLC, and 98 during. Of the patients, 55 patients were male and 122 females. An independent t-test comparing average monthly admissions prior and during the CoLC identified a significant difference (p = 0.042), with a mean increase of 1.85 cases (95% CI: 0.71-3.63). Additionally, a Kruskal-Wallis H test showed statistically significant difference in the number of patients treated for HWB burns between the seasons (p = 0.001). An independent t-test comparing average patient IMD prior and during the CoLC identified no difference (p = 0.33). Conclusion: The increase in HWB burns coincides with the increase in energy costs and general cost of living that has occurred in the UK since October 2021.

Wound healing, scarring and management.

Understanding wound healing is imperative for the dermatological physician to optimize surgical outcomes. Poor healing may result in negative functional, cosmetic and psychological sequelae. This review briefly outlines the physiology of wound healing, with a view to improving the management of wounds and scars, and minimizing the long-term scarring complications.

The CLEFT Student Section: Engaging the future of cleft through fundraising; Structure of the section and results from inaugural year.

BACKGROUND: There is a disparity in access, quality, and sustainability of cleft care in low and middle income countries, where burden of disease is greatest. CLEFT-Bridging the Gap (registered charity number: 1194581) is a UK-based charity that aims is to solve this through teaching, empowerment and development of sustainable cleft services. A Student Section, composed of medical, dental and speech and language therapy students, was established to support these endeavours through fundraising. AIMS: 1) examine effectiveness of the Student Section, 2) explore students' perception of cleft care, 3) provide a framework for similar groups. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey study design. Likert-Scale responses to questions regarding organisation and experience of the section were collected. Data was analysed using Chi statistical test, ordinal data assessed using Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test. RESULTS: 40/64 ambassadors responded to the survey. 90% had a positive perception on the organisation of the section, this correlated with group size (p = 0.012) and number of fundraising events organised (p = 0.032). 85% had an overall positive experience, scores for consideration of a career in cleft significantly improved from 2.25 (95%CI: 1.95-2.55) to 3.30 (95%CI: 3.03-3.57) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study presents the first example of a nationwide student group involved with a charitable cleft organisation.

Orange palpebral spots: A case presentation.

Orange palpebral spots are described as bilateral, ovoid, poorly defined orange-yellow macules on the superior eyelid and are predominantly reported in Caucasian populations. Previous reports have found correlations with melatonin incontinence secondary to trauma, lipofuscin accumulation in patients with superficial fatty tissue and palpebral thinness, and vitamin E, carotenoid and beta-cryptoxanthin levels. We present, to our knowledge, the first case of orange palpebral spots reported in the United Kingdom, in a patient with a background of atopy, significant sun exposure, bilateral cataracts and retinal detachment. The 59-year-old male initially presented with a dorsal nasal lesion with the differential: basal cell/trichoblastic carcinoma. During his excisional Mohs surgery, bilateral orange-yellow discolourations of the superior palpebrae were noted. The history was not significant for consumption of dietary sources of pigmentation, such as carotenoids, xanthophylls and vitamin E - found in green leafy vegetables and nut oils, respectively. The age of onset was unknown. A diagnostic skin punch biopsy was suggestive of orange palpebral spots and showed thinning of the epidermis, high-situated superficial and mature fat cells, with minimal pigment incontinence and perivascular lymphocytic infiltration. In addition, solar elastoses were identified on histology. After review in our local clinic-pathological meeting and of the published literature, a diagnosis of orange palpebral spots was given. The pathogenesis of orange palpebral spots remains to be elucidated. The role of sun exposure as a contributing factor to the generation of orange palpebral spots is therefore discussed.

Axillary dissection versus axillary observation for low risk, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: 1. To systematically analyse studies comparing survival outcomes between axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) and axilla observation (Obs), in women with low-risk, clinically node-negative breast cancer. 2. To consider results in the context of current axillary surgery de-escalation trials and studies. METHODS: 9 eligible studies were identified, 6 RCTs and 3 non-randomized studies (4236 women in total). Outcomes assessed: overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The logged (ln) hazard ratio (HR) was calculated and used as the statistic of interest. Data was grouped by follow-up. RESULTS: Meta-analyses found no significant difference in OS at 5, 10 and 25-years follow-up (5-year ln HR = 0.08, 95% CI - 0.09, 0.25, 10-year ln HR = 0.33, 95% CI - 0.07, 0.72, 25-year ln HR = 0.00, 95% CI - 0.18, 0.19). ALND caused improvement in DFS at 5-years follow-up (ln HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.03, 0.29), this was not demonstrated at 10 and 25-years follow-up (10-year ln HR = 0.07, 95% CI - 0.09, 0.23, 25-year ln HR = - 0.03, 95% CI - 0.21, 0.16). Studies supporting ALND for DFS at 5-years follow-up had greater relative chemotherapy use in the ALND cohort. CONCLUSION: ALND does not cause a significant improvement in OS in women with clinically node-negative breast cancer. ALND may improve DFS in the short term by tailoring a proportion of patients towards chemotherapy. Our evidence suggests that when the administration of systemic therapy is balanced between the two arms, axillary de-escalation studies will likely find no difference in OS or DFS.