Renal Dysfunction is an Independent Risk Factor for Rebleeding After Endoscopic Hemostasis in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Despite the progress in endoscopic hemostasis and pharmacological treatment, the mortality rate of peptic ulcer bleeding remains at 5-10%. Rebleeding after peptic ulcer bleeding is believed to be a risk factor for mortality. This study aimed to evaluate whether renal dysfunction is a predictor of rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. METHODS: In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with peptic ulcer bleeding who underwent endoscopic hemostasis at our Hospital from January 2010 to December 2018 were enrolled. The relationship between rebleeding within 30 days after endoscopic hemostasis and the patients' admission and endoscopic characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Out of 274 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding, 17 (6.2%) patients experienced rebleeding. In the analysis of the patients' admission characteristics, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 was an independent risk factor for rebleeding (odds ratio 4.77, 95% confidence interval 1.168-18.211, p = 0.03). Patients with eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 with or without hemodialysis had the highest rebleeding rate at 36.8%. With respect to endoscopic characteristics, the rate of rebleeding was associated with combination therapy (p < 0.0001) and active bleeding (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Renal dysfunction might be an independent risk factor for rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

[Anaphylactic shock secondary to the use of macrogol 4000 as a bowel cleanser:a case report].

A 44-year-old man was administered Niflec® containing macrogol 4000 as a bowel cleanser for colonoscopic examination. Immediately after ingestion, he experienced oral cavity discomfort and nasal congestion, followed by acute urticaria and presyncope. His systolic blood pressure and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation dropped to 66mmHg and 89%, respectively. Fluid infusion, as well as steroid and epinephrine administration, improved his symptoms. Skin prick tests were then performed using Niflec®, macrogol 4000, and Actosin® ointment (containing macrogol 4000), all of which were positive. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with anaphylactic shock caused by macrogol 4000 included in Niflec®. Macrogol present in bowel cleansers used for colonoscopy rarely causes anaphylactic shock. However, clinicians need to be mindful of this risk. Prompt and appropriate treatment is needed should this condition occur.

Prophylactic clip closure may reduce the risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has a high en bloc resection rate and is widely performed for large superficial colorectal tumors, but delayed bleeding remains one of the most common complications of colorectal ESD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects for the prevention of delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients with colorectal lesions between January 2012 and May 2017 in this retrospective study. In the early part of this period, post-ESD mucosal defects were not closed (non-closure group); however, from January 2014, post-ESD mucosal defects were prophylactically closed with clips when possible (closure group). The main outcome measured was delayed bleeding. Variables were analyzed using the chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, or Student's t-test. RESULTS: Of 156 lesions analyzed, 61 were in the non-closure group and 95 in the closure group. Overall, delayed bleeding occurred in 5 cases (3.2 %). The delayed bleeding rate was 0 % (0/95) in the closure group and 8.2 % (5/61) in the non-closure group ( P  = 0.008). The mean procedure time for closure was 10.4 ±â€Š4.6 min (range 3 - 26 min). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects might reduce the risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD.

LINE-1 hypomethylation is associated with increased CpG island methylation in Helicobacter pylori-related enlarged-fold gastritis.

BACKGROUND: The molecular mechanism by which Helicobacter pylori infection leads to gastric cancer is not fully understood. Similarly, patients with enlarged-fold (EF+) gastritis, one cause of which is H. pylori infection, have an increased risk for gastric cancer, although again molecular mechanism is unclear. In the present study, we analyzed the methylation status of long interspersed nucleotide elements (LINE-1) and three cancer-related genes in a panel of gastric mucosae, with or without EF+ gastritis. METHODS: We used bisulfite pyrosequencing to assess the levels of LINE-1, CDH1, CDH13, and PGP9.5 methylation in 78 gastric mucosa specimens from 48 patients. RESULTS: Levels of LINE-1 methylation were significantly reduced in mucosae from patients with EF+ gastritis. This hypomethylation of LINE-1 was associated with increased methylation of the 5' CpG islands of the genes, which suggests that, in EF+ gastritis, the methylation of the promoter regions of certain genes is accompanied by global demethylation of repetitive sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that genomewide hypomethylation and regional hypermethylation occur in EF+ gastritis and may contribute to the tumorigenesis of diffuse-type gastric cancers.