Impact of Sodium Thiosulfate on Prevention of Nephrotoxicities in HIPEC: An Ancillary Evaluation of Cisplatin-Induced Toxicities in Ovarian Cancer.

PURPOSE: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin confers a survival benefit in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) but is associated with renal toxicity. Sodium thiosulfate (ST) is used for nephroprotection for HIPEC with cisplatin, but standard HIPEC practices vary. METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized, clinical trial evaluated safety outcomes of HIPEC with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with EOC (n = 34) and endometrial cancer (n = 6). Twenty-one patients received no ST (nST), and 19 received ST. Adverse events (AEs) were reported according to CTCAE v.5.0. Serum creatinine (Cr) was collected preoperatively and postoperatively (Days 5-8). Progression-free survival (PFS) was followed. Normal peritoneum was biopsied before and after HIPEC for whole transcriptomic sequencing to identify RNAseq signatures correlating with AEs. RESULTS: Forty patients had HIPEC at the time of interval or secondary CRS. Renal toxicities in the nST group were 33% any grade AE and 9% grade 3 AEs. The ST group demonstrated no renal AEs. Median postoperative Cr in the nST group was 1.1 mg/dL and 0.5 mg/dL in the ST group (p = 0.0001). Median change in Cr from preoperative to postoperative levels were + 53% (nST) compared with - 9.6% (ST) (p = 0.003). PFS did not differ between the ST and nST groups in primary or recurrent EOC patients. Renal AEs were associated with downregulation of metabolic pathways and upregulation of immune pathways. CONCLUSIONS: ST significantly reduces acute renal toxicity associated with HIPEC with cisplatin in ovarian cancer patients. As nephrotoxicity is high in HIPEC with cisplatin, nephroprotective agents should be considered.

BRCA germline mutations in multiethnic gynecologic patients: A 10-year retrospective analysis from a single cancer institute.

Histologic and genetic mutation information from racially and ethnically diverse populations is warranted to better inform future cancer predisposition and promote health equity. A single institutional, retrospective capture of patients with gynecologic conditions and genetic susceptibilities to malignant neoplasms of the breast or ovaries was performed. This was achieved with manual curation of the electronic medical record (EMR) from 2010-2020 with the use of ICD-10 code searches. Among 8983 consecutive women identified with gynecologic conditions, 184 were diagnosed with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutations. Median age was 54 (22-90). Mutations included insertion/deletion (majority frameshift, 57.4%), substitution (32.4%), large structural rearrangement (5.4%), and alteration in splice site/intronic sequence (4.7%). A total of 48% were non-Hispanic White, 32% Hispanic or Latino, 13% Asian, 2% Black, and 5% Other. The most common pathology was high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC, 63%), followed by unclassified/high grade carcinoma (13%). Additional multigene panels led to the detection of 23 additional BRCA-positive patients with germline co-mutations and/or variants of uncertain significance in genes functionally involved in DNA repair mechanisms. Hispanic or Latino and Asian individuals comprised 45% of patients with concomitant gynecologic condition and gBRCA positivity in our cohort, confirming that germline mutations are represented across racial and ethnic groups. Insertion/deletion mutations, the majority of which led to a frameshift change, occurred in approximately half of our patient cohort, which may have prognostic implication for therapy resistance. Prospective studies are needed to unravel the significance of germline co-mutations in gynecologic patients.

Niraparib-induced STAT3 inhibition increases its antitumor effects.

Recently, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), which induce synthetic lethality of tumor cells with DNA damage repair defects, have emerged as a promising therapy for ovarian, breast, and pancreatic cancer. Although the PARPi Olaparib is limited to treating cancer patients with DNA repair deficiencies, the PARPi Niraparib is FDA approved to treat ovarian cancer patients regardless of their status in DNA repair pathways. Despite differences in the affinity to PARP enzymes, the rationale behind the clinical use of Niraparib in patients without DNA repair deficiencies is still lacking. Moreover, only Olaparib has been approved for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with BRCA mutations, accounting for only 5-7% of total PDACs. It remains unclear whether Niraparib could be beneficial to PDACs without BRCA mutations. We found that Niraparib inhibits ovarian and PDAC tumor cell growth, regardless of BRCA mutational status, more effectively than Olaparib. Unlike Olaparib, which is known to activate STAT3, Niraparib inhibits STAT3 activity in ovarian and PDAC cancer cell lines and patient tumors. Moreover, Niraparib regulates the expression of several STAT3 downstream genes involved in apoptosis. Overexpression of a constitutively activated STAT3 mutant rescues Niraparib-induced cancer cell apoptosis. Our results suggest that Niraparib inhibits pSTAT3 by interfering with SRC tyrosine kinase. Collectively, our studies provide a mechanism underlying Niraparib's ability to induce tumor cell apoptosis without BRCA mutations, suggesting the potential use of Niraparib for treating PDAC patients regardless of BRCA status.