Endothelial cells are an important source of BDNF in rat skeletal muscle.

BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) is present in skeletal muscle, controlling muscular metabolism, strength and regeneration processes. However, there is no consensus on BDNF cellular source. Furthermore, while endothelial tissue expresses BDNF in large amount, whether endothelial cells inside muscle expressed BDNF has never been explored. The aim of the present study was to provide a comprehensive analysis of BDNF localization in rat skeletal muscle. Cellular localization of BDNF and activated Tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB) receptors was studied by immunohistochemical analysis on soleus (SOL) and gastrocnemius (GAS). BDNF and activated TrkB levels were also measured in muscle homogenates using Western blot analysis and/or Elisa tests. The results revealed BDNF immunostaining in all cell types examined with a prominent staining in endothelial cells and a stronger staining in type II than type I muscular fibers. Endothelial cells but not other cells displayed easily detectable activated TrkB receptor expression. Levels of BDNF and activated TrkB receptors were higher in SOL than GAS. In conclusion, endothelial cells are an important and still unexplored source of BDNF present in skeletal muscle. Endothelial BDNF expression likely explains why oxidative muscle exhibits higher BDNF levels than glycolytic muscle despite higher the BDNF expression by type II fibers.

Postprandial low-grade inflammation does not specifically require TLR4 activation in the rat.

BACKGROUND: Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), an innate immune receptor, is suspected to play a key role in the postprandial inflammation that is induced by a high-fat meal rich in saturated fatty acids (SFA). Our objective was to test this hypothesis by using a specific competitive inhibitor of TLR4 (INH) vs vehicle (VEH) administered immediately before a high-SFA meal in rats. METHODS: First, in a cross-over kinetic study of 12 rats receiving INH and VEH i.v. 10 min before the test meal, we measured plasma inflammatory and vascular markers for 6 h. Then, in 20 rats, 3 h after INH or VEH followed by the test meal (parallel study), we measured the mRNA level of a set of cytokines (Il1-ß, Il-6, Tnfα, Mcp-1, Pai-1), and of Tlr4 and Tlr2 in the adipose tissue and the liver, and that of adhesion molecules (Icam-1 and Vcam-1) in the aorta. RESULTS: Plasma IL-6 and PAI-1 increased >4-fold at 3-4 h after test-meals, very similarly after INH as compared to VEH. The expression of TLR2 and of all measured cytokine genes in the adipose tissue was dramatically higher after INH (vs VEH). In the liver, gene expression of Il1-ß, Tnfα, Mcp-1 and Tlr2, was also higher after INH, though more moderately, whereas that of Il-6 and Pai-1 was similar between groups. INH did not affect mRNA level of Icam-1 and Vcam-1 in the aorta. CONCLUSION: TLR4 activation is not specifically required to mediate systemic postprandial inflammation and we propose that TLR2 and TLR4 exert a dual and interdependent mediation of the postprandial inflammatory response, at least in the adipose tissue.