Circulating tumor necrosis factor-related biomarkers predict kidney function decline in Japanese patients with diabetes: An observational cohort study.

AIMS: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptors (TNFRs: TNFR1 and, TNFR2) are reportedly associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression chiefly in Caucasian patients with diabetes. We assessed the prognostic value of TNF-related biomarkers for CKD progression in Japanese patients with diabetes. METHODS: We estimated TNF-related biomarkers using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 640 patients with diabetes. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) per one standard deviation (SD) increase in a log-transformed biomarker. The kidney and the composite outcome were defined as a 30% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline, and kidney outcome plus death before kidney outcome, respectively. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 5.4 years, 75 (11.7%) patients reached the kidney outcome and 37 (5.8%) died before reaching the kidney outcome. Each SD increase in baseline circulating TNFR1, TNFR2, and ephrin type-A receptor 2 (EphA2) was associated with a higher risk of the kidney outcome independently from baseline eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. However, circulating osteoprotegerin was associated with the composite outcome only. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated TNFR1, TNFR2, and EphA2 were associated with both kidney and composite outcomes in Japanese patients with diabetes.

A Novel Case Report of Iatrogenic Tracheal Rupture Caused by a Laser-Resistant Endotracheal Tube Under Transoral Laser Laryngeal and Nasopharyngeal Surgery.

BACKGROUND Intraoperative tracheal rupture due to endotracheal intubation is a rare but serious complication that requires prompt responses. Transoral laser microsurgery is effective for dissection of laryngeal and nasopharyngeal lesions, and a laser-resistant endotracheal tube is therefore commonly used under general anesthesia. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 69-year-old man in whom a rare complication involving endotracheal tube tip dislodgement during transoral laser surgery led to iatrogenic tracheal rupture. We used a Laser-Flex cuffed endotracheal tube, which is a non-inflammable, armored stainless-steel tube with a Murphy eye. Repeated mobilization of the laryngoscope blade and excessive neck extension for adequate laryngeal exposure during surgery may have led to significant soft tissue swelling and tube tip displacement, inducing tracheal rupture with the keen edge of the Murphy eye. At the end of the surgical procedure, subcutaneous emphysema was observed in the right anterior neck. Computed tomography revealed subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum without esophageal injury or mediastinitis. The injury was 1 cm in length, with wall involvement to a depth to the muscular wall in the membranous trachea at a point 2 cm proximal to the carina, in which we could position the alternative endotracheal tube distal to the tracheal rupture. After conservative treatment, the patient was extubated and mechanical ventilation was ceased. CONCLUSIONS During transoral laser laryngeal and nasopharyngeal surgery, dislodgement of the laser-resistant endotracheal tube tip can lead to iatrogenic tracheal rupture. In this case, injury during application of a Laser-Flex cuffed endotracheal tube with a Murphy eye, was followed by conservative treatment. This treatment achieved a successful outcome.

Two-handed facemask technique effectively causes hyperventilation in electroconvulsive therapy: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains the mainstay treatment option for patients with psychiatric diseases, such as severe depression. Although various anesthetic techniques provide adequate therapeutic seizures, hyperventilation is a useful adjunct to augment seizure duration and improve seizure quality. We investigated how to efficiently use a facemask to accomplish protocolized hyperventilation and evaluate its effect on ECT seizure. METHODS: We studied 60 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent ECT. The patients were divided into two groups according to the technique of facemask ventilation used: the one-handed (n = 30) and two-handed (n = 30) groups. Following anesthesia induction under preoxygenation conditions, hyperventilation induced hypocapnia in the one-handed facemask group with manual bag ventilation was compared to that in the two-handed facemask group with assisted pressure-controlled ventilation. Ictal and peri-ictal electroencephalogram parameters and cardiovascular responses were monitored and compared between the one-handed and two-handed groups. RESULTS: The two-handed technique demonstrated better electroencephalogram regularity and minimized cardiovascular stress compared to the one-handed technique. These conclusions come from the fact that the one-handed technique induced a substantial volume of leaks around the facemask (201.7 ± 98.6 mL/breath), whereas minimal leaks (25.8 ± 44.6 mL/breath) with stabler and higher ventilation rate led to greater inhaled minute ventilation in the two-handed group (the one-handed group, 9.52 ± 3.94 L/min; the two-handed group, 11.95 ± 2.29 L/min; p <  0.005). At the end of ECT treatment, all parameters of blood pressure and heart rate increased significantly in both groups equally, with lower SpO2 and more ST-segment depression on the electrocardiogram in the one-handed group. Comparing baseline values before anesthesia, ECT treatment significantly depressed ST-segment in both groups, while the degree of depression in ST-segment increased significantly in the one-handed group compared to that in the two-handed group. CONCLUSIONS: End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring for hyperventilation can reliably ensure hypocapnia only in the two-handed group. In ECT, the two-handed technique assisted by pressure-controlled ventilation is an effective and practical method for hyperventilation to induce adequate therapeutic seizures. While, the two-handed group with sufficient preoxygenation did not cause more cardiovascular stress than the one-handed group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry 000046544, Date of registration 05/01/2022.

Factors affecting prolonged time to extubation in patients given remimazolam.

PURPOSE: To analyze the cause of prolonged recovery from general anesthesia with remimazolam. METHODS: We studied 65 patients under general anesthesia with remimazolam. According to time to extubation, patients were divided into short period (SP) (n = 34, < 15 min) and long period (LP) (n = 31, ≥ 15 min) groups. Variables affecting time to extubation such as age, sex, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), plasma albumin concentration, ASA class, duration of surgery, and total duration of general anesthesia, and total dose of remimazolam were compared between SP and LP groups. At the end of remimazolam infusion and upon extubation, predictive remimazolam concentrations were calculated using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic three compartment modeling. RESULTS: LP group showed significantly higher BMI, older age, and lower plasma albumin concentration compared with those of SP group. Logistic regression analysis showed that the probability of time to extubation of ≥ 15 min was higher in patients with BMI greater than 22.0 kg/m2 (AUC 0.668, 95% CI 0.533‒0.803), ages older than 79.0 years (AUC 0.662, 95% CI 0.526‒0.798), and plasma albumin concentrations lower than 3.60 g/dl (AUC 0.720, 95% CI 0.593‒0.847). LP group showed significantly lower predicted remimazolam concentration than SP group upon extubation despite no difference in concentration between both groups at the end of infusion. Pharmacological analysis estimates that LP group is more sensitive to remimazolam than SP group through amplified responses. CONCLUSIONS: Lower remimazolam doses should be considered for the overweight patients, elderly, and those with lower plasma albumin concentration.

An outcome study of adult in-hospital cardiac arrests in non-monitored areas with resuscitation attempted using AED.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the outcomes of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using an automated external defibrillator (AED) in non-monitored areas. Additionally, to detect correlated factors associated with rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival rate, among collected data. METHODS: This study included 109 patients. After investigating patient characteristics and resuscitation-related factors, the correlated factors associated with ROSC rates and survival rate were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The rate of survival to hospital discharge was 21.1%. CPR with AED performed since 2013 was associated with a higher ROSC rate (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21 to 9.52, p < 0.05), but not with the survival rate after ROSC. Tracheal intubation was significantly associated with a higher ROSC rate (AOR 3.62, 95% CI: 1.27 to 11.7, p < 0.05) and a lower survival rate after ROSC (hazard ratio 6.6, 95% CI: 1.2 to 43.3, p < 0.05). Dysrhythmia as the cause of cardiac arrest and intensive care unit (ICU) admission after ROSC were associated with higher survival rates (hazard ratio 0.056, 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.759, p < 0.05, and hazard ratio 0.072, 95% CI: 0.017 to 0.264, p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The factors associated with ROSC rate and those associated with the survival rate after ROSC were different. Although initial shockable rhythms on AED were not associated with the survival rate, dysrhythmia as the etiology of cardiac arrest, and ICU admission were significantly associated with higher survival rates after ROSC.

Falsely high patient state index during cardiopulmonary bypass with intra-aortic balloon pumping: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The patient state index (PSI) is a parameter of a four-channel electroencephalography (EEG)-derived variable used to assess the depth of anesthesia. A PSI value of 25-50 indicates adequate state of hypnosis, and a value of 100 indicates a fully awake state. Due to reduced interference from electronic devices like electrocautery, falsely high intraoperative PSI values are rarely reported. However, this case report cautions about falsely high PSI during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP). CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man was scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery with IABP. General anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane. Initial PSI was between 30 and 50 before CPB. Propofol was administered during CPB, and IABP provided pulsatile flow. IABP was stopped soon after the initiation of CPB, and the ascending aorta was partially clamped to anastomose the saphenous vein graft to the ascending aorta. The PSI value decreased drastically, but with resumption of IABP, the value increased to approximately 80, despite increasing the dose of anesthetics. Meanwhile, the EEG waveform was nearly flat. After discontinuing CPB, the PSI value returned to being extremely low. There was no evidence of intraoperative awareness or instrument trouble. After reviewing the anesthesia record, the high PSI value was almost consistent with ongoing IABP during CPB. We suspect that the oscillation noise created by IABP during CPB erroneously influences the PSI algorithm, resulting in a falsely high PSI. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiologists should note that adherence to pEEG-derived values without discretion may cause errors when monitoring the depth of anesthesia.

Changes in the incidence, case fatality rate, and characteristics of symptomatic perioperative pulmonary thromboembolism in Japan: Results of the 2002-2011 Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Perioperative Pulmonary Thromboembolism (JSA-PTE) Study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the incidence, case fatality rate, and characteristics of perioperative symptomatic pulmonary thromboembolism (PS-PTE) throughout Japan. METHODS: From 2002 to 2011, confidential questionnaires were mailed annually to all Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists-certified training hospitals for data collection to determine the incidence and case fatality rate of PS-PTE patients. Data from 10,537 institutions in which a total of 11,786,489 surgeries had been performed were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: In total, 3,667 PS-PTE cases were identified. The average incidence of PS-PTE was 3.1 (2.2-4.8) per 10,000 surgeries, and the average case fatality rate was 17.9% (12.9-28.8%). The incidence of PS-PTE began to significantly decrease in 2004 compared with that of 2002 (0.0036 vs. 0.0044%: p < 0.01). The case fatality rate temporarily increased toward 2005 (17.9 to 28.8%); however, it gradually decreased since 2008 (15.7%) and was the lowest (12.9%) in 2011. Regarding the trends in prophylaxis, the rate of mechanical prophylaxis increased significantly in 2003 compared with that of 2002 (59.5 vs. 35.0%: p < 0.01), and almost plateaued (73.1-83.1%) after 2004. Furthermore, the rate of pharmacological prophylaxis started increasing in 2008 (17.6%) and reached around 30% after 2009 (28.8-30.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our 10-year survey study show that the incidence of PS-PTE decreased significantly since 2004, and the case fatality rate seemed to show a downward trend since 2008. Major changes in the distribution of prophylaxis in PS-PTE patients were observed.

[Successful airway management using i-gel in 7 patients undergoing awake craniotomy].

In order to secure airway during awake craniotomy, we used i-gel to perform positive-pressure ventilation in 7 patients for their anesthetic management. During removal of a tumor around the motor speech center, anesthetic management including asleep-awake-asleep technique was applied for speech testing. The technique, insertion and re-insertion of i-gel, was needed and it was easy in all the patients. During positive-pressure ventilation, peak pressure, tidal volume both for inspiration and expiration, and endtidal-CO2 were not markedly altered. Leakage around i-gel, and its differences between inspiration and expiration were negligible, while the tidal volume was adequate. We conclude that i-gel is useful for anesthetic management for awake craniotomy procedure for both securing airway and ventilation.

[Incidence and characteristics of perioperative pulmonary thromboembolism in Japan from 2009 through 2011 -the results of perioperative pulmonary thromboembolism research by the Japanese society of anesthesiologists (JSA-PTE research) --].

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the annual incidence and characteristics of perioperative pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) in Japan from 2009 through 2011, and to compare the current trend with that observed in our previous studies conducted since 2002. METHODS: In the 3-year study period, a questionnaire was annually mailed to all institutions certified as training hospitals for anesthesiologists by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA). The survey included the parameters of age, sex, type of surgery, and the risk factors in patients who were operated upon. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent out to total of 3,556 institutions and obtained answers from 2,511 institutions (70.6%) in the 3-year study period. Total 4,432,538 surgeries were conducted and 1,300 cases (0.03%) of perioperative PTE were registered. The incidence of PTE in all the 3 years was significantly lower than that observed in 2002-2003 (P<0.01). In addition, the mortality in 2011 was also significantly lower than that in 2002-2003 (P<0.05). The incidence of PTE in females (0.04%) was twice of the incidence of males (0.02%). The types of surgery with higher incidence of perioperative PTE were "thoracotomy with laparotomy" (0.08%),"hip joint, limbs" (0.07%) and"craniotomy" (0.06%). Compared with the middle age group (19-65 year-old), the incidence of PTE was twice in the elderly's (66-85 year-old) and in the super-elderly (over 86 year-old) it was thrice. In this survey, most approved risk factors were obesity (44%), malignancy (35%) and long term bed-rest (26%), and the ratio of long term bed-rest was decreasing compared with 2008. In the PTE cases, the ratio of the patients who received anticoagulant drugs (29-30%) or IVC filters placement (4-5%) increased compared with the results of JSA-PTE research in 2008 (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and mortality of perioperative PTE decreased;although the factor of decrease in an incidence was considered to be the result of preventive method, as in the decrease in the mortality, the survey should be continued.

[Recent changes in the incidence of life-threatening events in the operating room: JSA surveys between 2001 and 2005].

BACKGROUND: In Japan, the number of medical staff charged with criminal liability has been increasing since 2000, and this medico-legal trend seems to be promoting topics of medical risk management in government, academic meetings and individual hospital. A survey conducted by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) has been widely accepted among JSA-certified training hospitals, and its denominator has exceeded one million since 2001. The purpose of this investigation is to examine changes in the incidence of life-threatening events in the operating theater between 2001 and 2005 based on the data of the surveys. METHODS: JSA has conducted annual surveys of life-threatening and neurological events in the operating theater by sending and collecting confidential questionnaires to all JSA certified training hospitals. Cases of life-threatening events between 2001 and 2005 were analyzed. The recovery rates ranged from 76.2% (in 2005) to 91.6% (in 2002), and the annual patient numbers available for analysis ranged from 1,051,245 (in 2005) to 1,367,790 (in 2003) during the study period. The patients with ASA PS 1 or 2 were classified as having good physical status, and those with ASA PS 3 or 4 were classified as having poor physical status. Because mortalities (within 7 postoperative days) are more common in patients with poor physical status, in emergency patients, in neonate, in the elderly, and in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, the mortality rate in these patients were investigated. The recovery rate from cardiac arrest without any sequelae was also investigated. The causes of events were classified as follows: totally attributable to anesthetic management (AM), mainly to intraoperative pathological events (IP), to preoperative co-morbidity (PC), and to surgical management (SM). IP consists of pulmonary thromboembolism, acute coronary syndrome, anaphylaxis and so on. The incidence of cardiac arrest and mortality are indicated per 10,000 patients. Odds ratio and 95% confidential interval are shown in comparison with the incidence in 2001 to that in 2005. RESULTS: The incidences of cardiac arrest were 6.12 in 2001, 5.79 in 2002, 5.89 in 2003, 5.09 in 2004, and 4.24/10,000 patients in 2005, respectively (odds ratio 0.69; CI 0.62-0.78). The incidences of death within 7 postoperative days due to intraoperative life-threatening events were 6.41 in 2001, 6.31 in 2002, 6.61 in 2003, 5.88 in 2004, and 4.91/10,000 patients in 2005, respectively (OR 0.77; CI 0.69-0.85). The incidences of death in patients with poor physical status (from 35.48 to 26.87/10,000 patients; OR 0.76; CI 0.66-0.86), in emergency patients (from 37.25 to 30.55/10,000 patients; OR 0.82; CI 0.72-0.93), in neonates (from 70.09 to 31.70/10,000 patients; OR 0.45; CI 0.22-0.91) and in the elderly (from 11.03 to 8.75/10,000 patients; OR 0.79; CI 0.68 to 0.92) decreased. The incidence of death in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery ranged between 61.22 and 76.88/10,000 patients, and has not shown any significant decline. The incidences of death due to IP (from 0.65 to 0.42/10,000 patients; OR 0.64; CI 0.44-0.92), PC (from 4.14 to 3.30/10,000 patients; OR 0.80; CI 0.70-0.91) and SM (from 1.49 to 1.02/10,000 patients; OR 0.68; CI 0.54-0.87) decreased. However, the incidence of death due to AM ranged between 0.07 and 0.11/10,000 patients, and has not shown any significant decline partly because of the small number of deaths from this cause. Although recent trends in life-threatening events seemed to be favorable, the recovery rate from cardiac arrest decreased from 40.3% in 2001 to 30.7% in 2005 (OR 0.66; CI 0.51-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of life-threatening events in the operating room and mortality due to these events seemed to have decreased during the recent five years, probably because of progress in risk management in JSA-certified training hospitals. The decrease was obvious in the recent two years. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously, because the response rate to the questionnaire in 2005 was the lowest. To confirm this trend, we should perform a follow-up survey for 2006 and continue the survey. The reasons for the deterioration in the recovery rate from cardiac arrest should also be examined.

[Cerebrovascular accidents developing in the operating theater: a JSA survey for the year 2004].

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) developing in the operating theater has not been investigated on a large scale. In 2004, the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) started to survey neurological as well as life-threatening events in the operating theater. The incidence of CVA developing in the operating theater was examined using data obtained by the 2004 survey. METHODS: JSA has conducted annual surveys of life-threatening and neurological events in the operating theater by sending and collecting confidential questionnaires to all JSA certified training hospitals. The recovery rate was 91% (874/960 hospitals) in 2004. Seven hundred fourteen hospitals sent valid responses, and 1,218,371 anesthesias were registered. Among these cases, 123 patients were reported to have developed CVA in the operating theater. Incidences according to age class, ASA PS and surgical sites, causes, and their outcome were investigated. The patients with ASA PS 1 or 2 were classified as having good physical status, and those with ASA PS 3-5 were classified as having poor physical status. The causes of events were classified as follows: totally attributable to anesthetic management (AM), mainly to intraoperative pathological events (IP), to preoperative co-morbidity (PC), and to surgical management (SM). RESULTS: Overall incidence of CVA was 1.01/10,000 anesthesias. The incidence in patients aged 66 years or above was 2.00/10,000 anesthesias, which was 3.83-(95% confidential interval 2.57-5.71) fold higher than that in patients aged between 19 and 65 years. The incidences in elective and emergency patients with poor physical status were 3.27 and 7.91/10,000 anesthesias, respectively, which was 7.04- (4.56-10.87) and 17.06-(10.90-26.69) fold higher than that in elective patients with good physical status, respectively. The incidences in patients undergoing thoracotomy combined with laparotomy, craniotomy, or cardiovascular surgery were 2.76, 5.96 and 11.65/10,000 anesthesias, respectively, which were 7.22- (1.64-31.76), 15.59- (8.14-29.86), and 30.52- (16.80-55.44) fold higher than that in patients undergoing laparotomy alone. Among cardiovascular surgery, thoracic aortic surgery showed the highest number of incidents (57.98/10,000 anesthesias), followed by on-pump coronary artery bypass (11.07/10,000 anesthesias). Only one patient undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass developed CVA, resulting in an 8.14- (1.00-66.18) fold lower incidence of CVA compared to that of on-pump coronary artery bypass. AM, IP, PC and SM were responsible for 4.1%, 24.4%, 27.6% and 35.0% of CVA. The incidence of CVA caused by AM or IP was calculated to be 0.29/ 10,000 anesthesias. If patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery or craniotomy were excluded, the incidence of CVA caused by AM or IP was calculated to be 0.13/ 10,000 anesthesias (15/ 1,134,398 anesthesias). The overall outcome of CVA was as follows: uneventful recovery 9.8%, death within 30 post-operative days 26.0%, vegetative state 6.5%, and sequelae involving deficits in the central nervous system 52.0%. The outcome of CVA caused by AM or IP was as follows: uneventful recovery 20.0%, death within 30 post-operative days 22.9%, vegetative state 8.6%, or sequelae involving deficits in central nervous system 45.7%. Twenty-seven point six percent of reported CVA were considered to have been preventable. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of CVA developing in the operating theater in Japan was reported to be 123 among 1.2 million anesthesias. The incidence was high in elderly patients, in patients with poor physical status, and in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Because the prognosis of CVA developing in the operating theater was poor, clinical strategies for prevention, early detection, prompt diagnosis, and appropriate treatment of CVA should be established.

[Perioperative management for cesarean section in a patient with pulmonary thromboembolism due to deep venous thrombosis].

It has been estimated in Japan that Western-life style increases maternal mortality because of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). We report a 29-year-old primipara who suffered PTE due to deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in her 29th weeks' gestation. Except for slight tachypnea, she was relatively stable. Anticoagulation with heparin was started immediately. The retrievable inferior vena cava filter (IVC-F) was inserted. Four hours before surgery with discontinuation of heparin, the cesarean section was performed under general anesthesia. We used transesophageal echocardiography, a pulmonary artery catheter and end tidal CO2 monitoring for early detection and rapid management of recurrent PTE. She had no trouble during operation and her baby was born without serious symptoms. After recovery from anesthesia, she was admitted to the intensive care unit. Heparin was restarted after confirmation of hemostasis. On the 3rd postoperative day, we started thrombolytic therapy with urokinase which was tapered off during a week. Heparin was switched to warfarine gradually. On the 10th postoperative day, IVC-F could not be removed because of remaining DVT. She was discharged on daily warfarine. We experienced the perioperative management for cesarean section at 29 weeks' gestation following PTE due to DVT.

[Survey of nerve injury associated with epidural/spinal anesthesia in Japan which occurred in the year 2004].

BACKGROUND: The incidence of nerve injury associated with epidural/spinal anesthesia has not been sufficiently investigated in Japan. PURPOSE: The incidence of nerve injury caused by inappropriate epidural/spinal puncture or catheter placement was examined using data obtained by a survey conducted by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists for the year 2004. METHODS: In a survey for the year 2004, 1,218,371 anesthetic procedures were registered, among which 548,819 patients were estimated to be anesthetized under epidural/spinal procedures with or without general anesthesia. Twenty nine patients were reported to have incurred nerve injury due to inappropriate epidural/spinal puncture or catheter placement. RESULTS: Seven cases of spinal cord and 22 cases of peripheral nerve injury were reported, with estimated incidences of 1/78,000 and 1/25,000 procedures, respectively. Spinal cord injury developed before the start of surgery in 4 cases, intraoperatively in 1 case, and after the end of surgery in 2 cases. Permanent nerve damage developed in 4 patients with spinal cord injury and 7 patients with peripheral nerve injury. Eighty three percent of these events were reported to be preventable. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of nerve injury caused by regional anesthesia in Japan seems to be comparable to those reported in the developed countries. To reduce the incidence of this complication, cautious evaluation of the risk/benefit balance in performing regional anesthesia, improving education and supervision of the procedures, and establishing better communication between anesthesiologists and surgeons concerning the timing of catheter removal and the postoperative coagulation state seem to be important.

[The state of pediatric anesthesia in Japan: an analysis of the Japanese society of anesthesiologists survey of critical incidents in the operating room].

BACKGROUND: The Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) survey of critical incidents in the operating room and other reports have shown that pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia are at an increased risk. Purpose was to examine the state of pediatric anesthesia in Japan. This might clarify the role of children's hospitals for pediatric anesthesia, and the relationship between critical incidents and volume of pediatric anesthetic procedures. METHODS: The JSA has conducted annual surveys of critical incidents in the operating room by sending to and collecting confidential questionnaires from all JSA Certified Training Hospitals. From 1999 to 2003, 342,840 pediatric (0-5 yr) anesthetic procedures were registered. During this period, only 15 cardiac arrests and 3 deaths within 7 postoperative days totally attributable to anesthetic management were reported. Therefore, we analyzed cardiac arrests and deaths due to all etiologies. The hospitals were classified as children's hospitals, university hospitals, and other hospitals, and the incidence of cardiac arrest, the recovery rate from cardiac arrest without any sequelae, and the mortality rate were compared according to types of the hospitals. The relationship between death due to intraoperative critical incidents and the volume of pediatric anesthetic procedures was examined using data from the 2003 survey, the recovery rate of which was 85.7%. In 2003, 739 JSA Certified Training Hospitals responded to the survey: 7 children's hospitals, 109 university hospitals, and 623 other hospitals. Among these hospitals, 707 and 270 hospitals conducted pediatric and newborn (<1 mo) anesthesia, respectively. In 2003, 4,630 newborn, 17,890 infant (<1 yr), and 60,524 child (1-5 yr) anesthetic procedures were registered. Odds ratios were determined to compare the risks among the hospital groups, and the 95% confidential interval (CI) was shown. The Chi square test was used to compare the background of patients with cardiac arrest. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: In 2003, 95.7% and 36.5% of JSA Certified Training Hospitals which responded to the survey had conducted pediatric and newborn anesthesia, respectively. Children's hospitals, university hospitals, and other hospitals were responsible for 10.7%, 31.0%, and 58.3% of pediatric anesthetic procedures, respectively. Seven children's hospitals (100.0%), 54 university hospitals (50.5%), and 54 other hospitals (9.1%) conducted more than 201 annual pediatric anesthetic procedures, respectively, and these 115 hospitals conducted 62.5% of all pediatric anesthetic procedures in Japan. There was no significant difference between the overall mortality rate in hospitals with an annual pediatric anesthetic volume of less than 200 and that in hospitals with an annual pediatric anesthetic volume of more than 201 (5.46 versus 7.12/10,000 anesthetic procedures). However, the overall mortality rate was 4.87 times higher (95% confidential interval: 1.53-15.66) in hospitals with an annual pediatric anesthetic volume of more than 101 (7.91/10,000 anesthetic procedures) than in those with an annual pediatric anesthetic volume of less than 100 (1.62/10,000 anesthetic procedures). The situation was quite different when we focused on newborn anesthetic procedures : the overall mortality was 2.63 times higher (95% confidential interval : 1.19-5.84) in hospitals with an annual newborn anesthetic volume of less than 12 (126.6/ 10,000 anesthetic procedures) than those with an annual newborn anesthetic volume of more than 13 (48.5/10,000 anesthetic procedures). Between 1999 and 2003, the incidences of cardiac arrest in children's hospitals, university hospitals, and other hospitals were 9.54 (1.89 times higher than the other hospitals; CI 1.31-2.67), 10.30, and 5.11/10,000 anesthetic procedures, respectively. Among the children who developed cardiac arrest, the ratio of poor preoperative conditions with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification of more than 3 was significantly lower in the children's hospitals (68.9%) than the university hospitals (84.3%) and the other hospitals (84.0%). The recovery rate from cardiac arrest was 51.1% (2.49 times higher than the university hospitals; CI 1.23-5.06, and 3.05 times higher than the other hospitals ; CI 1.45-6.43), 29.6%, and 25.5%, respectively. The mortality rate was 9.54 (1.77 times higher than the other hospitals; CI 1.25-2.52), 8.87, and 5.38/10,000 anesthetic procedures in children's hospitals, university hospitals and other hospitals, respectively. CONCLUSION: Almost all JSA Certified Training Hospitals conducted pediatric anesthesia, although only 15.6% of them had an annual pediatric anesthetic volume of more than 200. It was suggested that general pediatric anesthesia was conduced safely in JSA Certified Training Hospitals, even if they had a low annual pediatric anesthetic volume. The exception was newborn anesthetic procedures : the mortality was high in hospitals with an annual newborn anesthetic volume of less than 12. Analysis of critical incidents in the operating room failed to show the superiority of children's hospitals in comparison with the university hospitals and other hospitals. Collecting and analyzing data including the patients without critical incidents are required for further analysis.

[Critical events in the operating room among 1,440,776 patients with ASA PS 1 for elective surgery].

BACKGROUND: The Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) survey of critical incidents in the operating room has shown that preoperative complications are the leading causes of critical incidents, and affect the occurrence, severity and outcome of critical incidents which are due to causes other than preoperative complications. Causes of critical events in the operating room were examind in patients for elective surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) 1. METHODS: JSA has conducted annual surveys of critical incidents in the operating room by sending and collecting confidential questionnaires to all JSA Certified Training Hospitals. From 1999 to 2002, 3,855,384 anesthesia patients were registered. Among these, 1,440,776 patients with ASA PS 1 for elective surgery were analyzed. The causes of critical incidents were classified as follows: totally attributable to anesthetic management (AM), mainly to intraoperative pathological events (IP), to preoperative complications (PC), and to surgical management (SM). IP consists of coronary ischemia mainly due to coronary vasospasm, arrhythmias, pulmonary embolism, and other conditions. RESULTS: The incidences of cardiac arrest, critical incidents other than cardiac arrest and subsequent death were 9.86, 59.41 and 3.12 per 100,000 anesthesia cases, respectively. IP and SM were responsible for 36.6% and 34.5% of cardiac arrest, respectively. AM and SM were responsible for 46.7% and 26.8% of critical incidents other than cardiac arrest, respectively. SM, IP and AM were responsible for 66.7%, 22.2% and 4.4% of subsequent deaths (within 7 postoperative days), respectively. Coronary ischemia and pulmonary embolism were the main causes of death due to IP. The incidences of cardiac arrest and death totally attributable to AM were 1.87 and 0.14 per 100,000 anesthesia cases, respectively. Medication problems were responsible for 48.1% of arrests, while airway/ventilation problems were for 57.2% of critical incidents other than arrest. Human factors (SM combined with AM) were responsible for 53.5%, 73.5%, and 71.1% of cardiac arrest, critical incidents other than arrest and death, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Even in elective patients with good physical status, non-lethal incidents were not rare, and lethal incidents were also reported. We should pay significant attention to the following findings, and take some measures to overcome these problems especially related to human factors. Firstly, SM badly harmed some operative patients. Secondly, coronary vasospasm and pulmonary embolism were the main causes of death due to IP. Thirdly, drug administration and airway/ventilation management were the major causes of critical incidents totally attributable to AM. Human factors were responsible for 70.6% of critical incidents and 71.1% of deaths.

[Critical incidents during regional anesthesia in Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists-Certified Training Hospitals: an analysis of responses to the annual survey conducted between 1999 and 2002 by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists].

BACKGROUND: Recently, a national survey in France including 35,439 patients who had received spinal anesthesia showed that the incidences of cardiac arrest and mortality associated with spinal anesthesia were 2.5 and 0.8 per 10,000 anesthetics, respectively. In this study, we investigated these values using data obtained from annual surveys conducted by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologist (JSA). METHODS: Since 1994, JSA has conducted annual surveys concerning critical incidents in the operating theater by sending confidential questionnaires to JSA-certified training hospitals, then collecting and analyzing the responses. We investigated critical incidents associated with regional anesthesia using data from annual surveys between 1999 and 2002. The questionnaire was identical in each survey conducted during these years. The total number of anesthetics available for this analysis was 3,855,384, of which spinal anesthesia, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia were performed in 409,338, 146,282, and 69,001 patients, respectively. In patients receiving regional anesthesia, 628 critical incidents including 108 cardiac arrests, and 45 subsequent deaths were reported. The causes of critical incidents were classified as follows: totally attributable to anesthetic management, due mainly to intraoperative pathological events, preoperative complications, and surgical management. IP consists of coronary ischemia including coronary vasospasm not suspected preoperatively, arrhythmias including severe bradycardia, pulmonary thromboembolism, and other conditions. Mortality was determined by postoperative day 7. Statistical analysis was performed by chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The incidences of cardiac arrest and mortality due to all etiologies were 1.69 and 0.76 with spinal anesthesia, 1.78 and 0.68 with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, and 1.88 and 0.58/10,000 anesthetics with epidural anesthesia, respectively. The incidences of cardiac arrest and mortality due to anesthetic management were 0.54 and 0.02 with spinal anesthesia, 0.55 and 0.00 with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, and 0.72 and 0.14/10,000 anesthetics with epidural anesthesia, respectively. These values did not significantly differ among regional anesthesia. Death attributable to anesthetic management was reported in 2 patients: both patients were classified as ASA-PS 3 E, and developed cardiac arrest; one due to inadvertent high spinal anesthesia with spinal anesthesia, and the other due to local anesthetic intoxication with epidural anesthesia. Anesthetic management and intraoperative pathological events comprised 33 and 43% of cardiac arrests, respectively. The distribution of causes of death was as follows: anesthetic management, 5%; intraoperative pathological events, 34%; preoperative complications, 35%; surgical management, 26%. Among the causes of anesthetic management-induced critical incidents, inadvertent high spinal anesthesia was the leading cause of cardiac arrest in spinal and combined spinalepidural anesthesia: 90% of arrests occurred in patients with ASA-PS 1+2; 88% in patients below 65 years of age; 45 and 25% in patients undergoing hip or lower extremities surgery, and cesarean section, respectively. Among the causes of intraoperative pathological event-induced critical incidents, pulmonary thromboembolism was the leading cause of cardiac arrest in spinal and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: 59% of arrests occurred in patients with ASA-PS 1+2; 81% in patients above 66 years of age; 91% in patients undergoing hip or lower extremity surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cardiac arrest and mortality associated with spinal anesthesia in Japan was shown to be in the same order as in France by analyzing a larger population. In patients with good ASA-PS, critical incidents occurred more often under regional anesthesia than under general anesthesia. Inadvertent high spinal anesthesia should be carefully avoided. We should also pay much attention to subclinical deep vein thrombosis in patients who were scheduled for hip or lower extremity surgery, and tourniquet- or bone cement-associated pulmonary embolism in these patients.

[Supplemental survey in 2003 concerning life-threatening hemorrhagic events in the operating room].

BACKGROUND: We previously showed that pre-operative hemorrhagic shock and surgical hemorrhage were the major causes of life-threatening events in the operating room and subsequent fatality. We investigated the background of these events. METHODS: The Subcommittee on Surveillance of Anesthesia-Related Critical Incidents, Japanese Society of Anesthesiologist (JSA) sent confidential questionnaires to all JSA-certified training hospitals (n=862). The questionnaires were composed of two parts: one for examining all life-threatening events in the operating room and the other for examining the background of massive hemorrhage in the operating room. The number of patients registered between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2003 was 1,367,790 from 782 hospitals. Life-threatening hemorrhagic events were reported in 1,011 patients, of whom 876 patients were available for further analysis of the background of the events. Fatality within 7 postoperative days following these events was 45.4%. RESULTS: In patients who developed life-threatening events due to hemorrhage, 35.2% had blood loss of more than 12 l x 60 kg(-1) of body weight, 44.9% had a maximal hemorrhagic speed of more than 240 ml x min(-1) x 60 kg(-1) of body weight, and 39.1% had a minimal hemoglobin concentration of less than 5 g x dl(-1). The main sources of hemorrhage were as follows: the abdominal aorta, 15.4%; the thoracic aorta, 14.0%; the liver, 12.6%; intra-cranium, 8.2%; the pelvic organs, 8.0%; celiac or mesenteric artery, 7.8%; the lung, 7.1%. Of patients who developed life-threatening events due to preoperative hemorrhagic shock, 18.3% underwent cardiac massage preoperatively, 50.0% lost consciousness, 58.5% were intubated, and 16.4% were retrospectively judged to have had no operative indications. Human factors also affected the life-threatening events due to preoperative hemorrhagic shock: delayed decision making concerning indications for surgical treatment, 15.6%; delayed admission to the operating room, 16.6%; delayed supply of blood products, 25.5%; problems in surgical management, 16.3%; problems in anesthetic management, 28.1%. These problems in anesthetic management included shortage of supportive anesthesiologists. This was partly explained by the time of their admission to the operating room: 67.0% of the patients admitted during the week end or at night. Of the patients who developed life-threatening events due to surgical hemorrhage, 58.0% were predicted preoperatively to develop massive hemorrhage by anesthesiologists, and 66.7% were informed of the risks of massive hemorrhage and associated complications. The main causes of surgical hemorrhage were as follows: adhesion or invasion, 44.7%; and problems in surgical judgments or techniques, 43.7%. Anesthetic management affected the development of life-threatening events in these patients: lack of infusion prior to hemorrhage, shortage of supportive anesthesiologists, delay in ordering additional blood products, delayed judgment to start blood transfusion, and shortage of rapid infusion/transfusion apparatus. Delay for hospitals in obtaining blood supply from blood banks was reported in 13.0% of cases, and delayed supply from inhospital blood transfusion service to the operating room in 16.0%. Despite massive hemorrhage, ABO cross-matching was omitted only in 13.4% of patients, and transfusion of ABO-compatible, instead of ABO-identical red blood cells, was performed only in 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce life-threatening hemorrhagic events in the operating theater, reorganization of emergency medical service and blood supply, improvement of surgical techniques, improved triage of patients with hemorrhagic shock, flexible application of compatible blood products in emergency situations, and improvement of the quality and number of anesthesiologists should be considered.

[Accidental severance of epidural catheter used in a patient with postoperative delirium].

A 79-year-old man with an abdominal aortic aneurysm had a lumbar epidural catheter inserted for postoperative pain control of bypass graft surgery with continuous epidural analgesia. Five days after the operation, we noticed that forced traction by the patient with delirium had led to the catheter tip being separated and left behind in his body. The remaining portion of the catheter was detected using a lateral lumbar roentgenogram and CT imaging, and it was later removed surgically. We conclude that it was necessary to change the method of analgesia in this patient, since it was difficult to maintain the epidural catheter.

[Critical incidents due to drug administration error in the operating room: an analysis of 4,291,925 anesthetics over a 4 year period].

BACKGROUND: Wrong drugs, overdose of drugs, and incorrect administration route remain unsolved problems in anesthetic practice. We determined the incidence and outcome of drug administration error in the operating room of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Certified Training Hospitals. METHODS: Data were obtained from annual surveys conducted by Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists between 1999 and 2002. There were 4,291,925 cases of anesthetic delivery for this analysis. RESULTS: Incidence of critical incidents due to drug administration error was 18.27/100,000 anesthetics. Cardiac arrest occurred in 2.21 patients per 100,000 anesthetics. Causes of these critical incidents were as follows: overdose or selection error involving non-anesthetic drugs, 42.1%; overdose of anesthetics, 28.7%; inadvertent high spinal anesthesia, 17.9%; local anesthetic intoxication, 6.4%; ampule or syringe swap, 4.3%; blood mismatch, 0.6%. Incidence of death following these incidents was 0.44/100,000. Causes of death were as follows: overdose or selection error involving non-anesthetic drugs, 47.4%; overdose of anesthetics, 26.3%; inadvertent high spinal anesthesia, 15.8%; local anesthetic intoxication, 5.3%. Ampule or syringe swap did not lead to any fatalities. Death following inadvertent high spinal anesthesia and local anesthetic intoxication was reported only in patients who had developed cardiac arrest. It should be noted that 88 percent of ampule or syringe swap occurred in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status 1 or 2, who did not seem to require complex anesthetic management. CONCLUSIONS: We should increase awareness that drug administration is generally performed with limited objective monitoring, although "To error is human". Increased vigilance is required to avoid drug administration error in the operating room. Additional anesthesia resident education, adequate supervision, and improved organization are necessary. Bar-coding technology might be useful in preventing drug administration error.