Role, Cost, and Availably of Urinary pH Monitoring for Kidney Stone Disease-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Urinary pH is an important factor related to renal stone disease, and it plays an essential role in stone prevention. Monitoring of urinary pH by patients at home provides information that can help to assess the treatment needed by each patient. We conducted a systematic review is to assess the available evidence concerning urinary pH monitoring methods along with their accuracy, cost, and usefulness by patients with urolithiasis. RECENT FINDINGS: A total of 9 articles were included (1886 urinary pH measurements). They reported information about urinary dipsticks, portable electronic pH meters and electronic strip readers, amongst other methods. Accuracy was compared with a laboratory pH meter (gold standard). Urinary dipsticks were found to be not accurate enough to guide clinical decision making and portable electronic pH meters showed promising results. Urinary dipsticks are neither precise nor accurate enough. Portable electronic pH meters seem to be more accurate, easy to use, and cost-effective. They are a reliable source for patients to use at home in order to prevent future episodes of nephrolithiasis.

Sequential Treatment With Bacillus Calmette-Güerin (BCG) and Mitomycin C Administered With Electromotive Drug Administration (EMDA) in Patients With High-Risk Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer After BCG Failure.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, there is no standard non-surgical treatment for patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in whom Bacillus Calmette-Güerin (BCG) therapy has failed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical and oncological outcomes of sequential treatment with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and Mitomycin C (MMC) administered with Electromotive Drug Administration (EMDA) in patients with high-risk NMIBC who fail BCG immunotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients with NMIBC who failed BCG and received alternating BCG and Mitomycin C with EMDA between 2010 and 2020. Treatment schedule consisted in an induction therapy with 6 instillations (BCG, BCG, MMC + EMDA, BCG, BCG, MMC + EMDA) and a 1-year maintenance. Complete response (CR) was defined as the absence of high-grade (HG) recurrences during follow-up, and progression was defined as the occurrence of muscle invasive or metastatic disease. CR rate was estimated at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Progression rate and toxicity were also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included with a median age of 73 years. Fifty percent of tumors were single, 90% were smaller than 1.5cm, 40% were GII (HG) and 40% were Ta. CR rate was 95.5%, 81% and 70% at 3 and 6 months, 12 months and 24 months, respectively. With a median follow-up of 28.8 months, 6 patients (27%) presented HG recurrence and only 1 patient (4.5%) progressed and ended in cystectomy. This patient died due to metastatic disease. Treatment was well tolerated and 22% of the patients presented adverse effects, being dysuria the most frequent one. CONCLUSION: Sequential treatment with BCG and Mitomycin C with EMDA achieved good responses and low toxicity in selected patients who did not respond to BCG. Only 1 patient ended in cystectomy and died due to metastatic disease, therefore, cystectomy was avoided in most cases.

To drain or not to drain in uro-oncological robotic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of routine drainage insertion vs. no drainage in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was conducted through April 2022 using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eleven studies comprising 8447 RARPs and 1890 RAPNs met our inclusion criteria. Our search strategy did not identify any studies within the RARC framework. In RARP, patients without postoperative drainage had lower rate of postoperative ileus (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.74; P<0.001) and similar low-grade (Clavien 1-2, P=0.41) and high-grade (Clavien ≥3; P=0.85) complications, urinary leakage (P=0.07), pelvic hematoma (P=0.35), symptomatic lymphocele (P=0.13), fever (P=0.25), incisional hernia (P=0.31), reintervention (P=0.57), length of hospital stay (P=0.22), and readmission (P=0.74) compared with routinely drained patients. In RAPN, patients without postoperative drainage had shorter length of hospital stay (mean difference: -0.84 days, 95% CI: -1.06 to -0.63; P<0.001) and similar low-grade (P=0.94) and high-grade (P=0.31) complications, urinary leakage (P=0.49), hemorrhage (P=0.39), reintervention (P=0.69), and readmission (P=0.20) compared with routinely drained patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, patients without drainage had similar perioperative course to patients with prophylactic drain insertion after RARP and RAPN. Omission of drain insertion was associated with a lower rate of postoperative ileus for RARP and a shorter hospital stay for RAPN. In the era of robotic surgery, routine drain placement is no longer indicated in unselected patients.