RESUMO
We present a case of dichorionic-diamniotic twin females who developed hypoxemic respiratory failure. They were ultimately diagnosed by lung biopsy with alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins. This case highlights a practical approach to reaching a diagnosis in infants with suspected developmental lung disease.
Assuntos
Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal , Alvéolos Pulmonares , Veias Pulmonares , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Pulmão , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal/diagnóstico , Síndrome da Persistência do Padrão de Circulação Fetal/terapia , Alvéolos Pulmonares/irrigação sanguínea , Alvéolos Pulmonares/anormalidades , Veias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary hamartomas have a characteristic heterogeneous radiological appearance. However, when composed predominantly of undifferentiated mesenchymal fibromyxoid component, their homogeneous appearance on computed tomography is indeterminate for malignancy. Rendering an accurate preoperative diagnosis in these cases can alter management. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and accuracy of cytodiagnosis for hamartomas 'indeterminate' by imaging. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records for hamartomas diagnosed by transthoracic fine needle aspiration (FNA) including immediate impressions and final diagnoses. Cytological features evaluated included the presence of fibromyxoid stroma, bronchioloalveolar cell hyperplasia, fibroadipose tissue, cartilage and smooth muscle. RESULTS: Eighteen (1.3%) hamartomas were identified from 1355 transthoracic FNAs. The immediate impression was hamartoma in 13 (72%), carcinoid in one (6%), mucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinoma in two (11%) and non-diagnostic in two (11%). The final diagnosis of hamartoma in cases diagnosed as carcinoid, mucinous bronchioloalaveolar carcinoma and non-diagnostic on immediate impression was rendered following assessment of all cytological material. CONCLUSION: Overall, FNAs are highly reliable for diagnosing hamartomas even when composed principally of undifferentiated mesenchymal fibromyxoid stroma, especially with the aid of all available preparations including Diff-Quik smears, Papanicolaou smears, ThinPreps and cell block material.
Assuntos
Hamartoma/diagnóstico , Hamartoma/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Biópsia por Agulha Fina , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesize that differences in the expression of selected tumor suppressor genes, cell surface adhesion molecules, and multidrug resistance glycoproteins could account for some of the reported differences between uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and extrauterine serous carcinomas (ESC), including ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma (OSC and PSC, respectively). METHODS: We studied the expression of the following antigens in 20 USCs, 20 OSCs, and 10 PSCs: p53 and mdm-2 (tumor suppressor genes), CD44 and CD44v6 (cell surface adhesion molecules), and the p-glycoprotein (a multidrug resistance protein recognized by two antibodies, C494 and JSB1). We further studied chemotherapeutic drug resistance by examining reports prepared using the Oncotech Extreme Drug Resistance Assay from 24 of the 50 study patients. Clinical data were obtained from medical record review. RESULTS: USC, OSC, and PSC patients were similar with respect to mean age at diagnosis, mean gravidity, mean parity, personal history of breast cancer, percentage treated with chemotherapy, and survival at 3 and 5 years postdiagnosis. Significant clinical differences included a high prevalence of nulliparity in OSC (P = 0.05), a low prevalence of Caucasian race in USC (P = 0.008), a paucity of stage I patients in OSC and PSC (P = 0.03), a high prevalence of familial breast cancer in OSC (P = 0.06), and superior 2-year survival in OSC (P = 0.02). Seventy-five percent of USCs, 52% of OSCs, and 60% of PSCs expressed p53. Five percent of USCs, 19% of OSCs, and 0% of PSCs expressed mdm-2. Forty percent of USCs, 33% of OSCs, and 10% of PSCs expressed CD44. None of the USCs, OSCs, or PSCs expressed CD44v6. Sixty-one percent of USCs and OSCs and 82% of PSCs expressed C494 while 17% of USCs, 19% of OSCs, and 20% of PSCs expressed JSB1. None of these apparent differences was statistically significant. USC, OSC, and PSCs patients did not demonstrate significant differences with respect to extreme drug resistance. However, the following trends were noted (P = 0.06): more prevalent low drug resistance for cyclophosphamide in OSC compared with USC and more prevalent extreme drug resistance for etoposide in OSC compared with USC. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, despite significant clincial differences, the USCs and ESCs in our series do not differ significantly with respect to the expression of the tumor suppressor genes, cell surface adhesion molecules, and drug resistance proteins studied. It is premature, however, to recommend that USCs and ESCs should be treated identically.
Assuntos
Moléculas de Adesão Celular/biossíntese , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/metabolismo , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos , Genes Supressores de Tumor , Tumor Mulleriano Misto/metabolismo , Proteínas Nucleares , Neoplasias Ovarianas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Peritoneais/metabolismo , Neoplasias Uterinas/metabolismo , Subfamília B de Transportador de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP/biossíntese , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/genética , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/imunologia , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Feminino , Expressão Gênica , Glicoproteínas/biossíntese , Humanos , Receptores de Hialuronatos/biossíntese , Imuno-Histoquímica , Imunofenotipagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tumor Mulleriano Misto/genética , Tumor Mulleriano Misto/imunologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/imunologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/genética , Neoplasias Peritoneais/imunologia , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/biossíntese , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-mdm2 , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/biossíntese , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/genética , Neoplasias Uterinas/genética , Neoplasias Uterinas/imunologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a rare, aggressive, malignant neoplasm that has recently been characterized. It has not been associated with a primary visceral organ. In women, cases are even more rare and often have some ovarian involvement. CASE: An 11-year-old girl presented with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. A CT scan revealed a large heterogeneous pelvic mass with cystic components and an 8-cm midabdominal mass. During exploratory laparotomy, the patient was found to have a pelvic mass measuring 12. 9 cm replacing normal ovarian tissue. The midabdominal mass was also removed. Pathology, cytology, and immunohistochemistry confirmed a desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Even with aggressive surgical and medical intervention, the patient died 11 months after initial diagnosis. CONCLUSION: We present a rare small cell tumor that is associated with ovarian involvement. The prognosis in these patients is extremely poor and very few survivals have been reported.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Criança , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias de Anexos e de Apêndices Cutâneos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnósticoRESUMO
Duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a malignant neoplasm of the breast that is limited to the glandular component. The introduction of mammographic screening allows for earlier detection of carcinoma, at the stage of DCIS, before it invades the surrounding stroma. Although DCIS has been studied extensively, its quantification remains a dilemma. Several methods for measuring DCIS exist, including clinical measurement, radiographic assessment, and gross pathologic assessment. Other methods have been employedfor this purpose, such as counting the number of tissue sections involved, direct measuring of DCIS from glass slides, and even counting the number of ducts involved. Furthermore, there is no consensus for assessing adequacy of margins. The myriad of techniques for quantifying DCIS has profound implications for treatment and for prognostic evaluation. The inherent difficulties in quantifying DCIS are multifactorial, and the need to establish a standardized approach for reporting the extent of DCIS by correlating radiographic, clinical, gross, and histologic findings is imperative.