Prediction of adverse cardiac outcomes in high-risk Mexican patients with chest pain in the emergency department / Desenlaces adversos cardiovasculares en pacientes mexicanos de alto riesgo con dolor torácico en el servicio de urgencias

Abstract Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the discriminative power and accuracy for prediction of MACE of five commonly used scoring tools in Mexican patients with chest pain who present to the ED. Methods: A single-center, prospective, observational, and comparative study of patients admitted to the ED with chest pain as the chief complaint. Five chest pain scoring systems were calculated. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or readmission for cardiovascular causes within 30 days. Results: A total of 168 patients were studied. The score which provided the highest area under the curve of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.85) was history, ECG, age, risk factors, and troponin (HEART) score. In addition, the integrated discrimination index for the HEART score was 6% higher when compared to the other four scores. Conclusions: The HEART score provided the best classification tool for identifying those patients at highest risk for MACE, either alone or by adding their results to other classification scores, even in a comorbid population.

Resumen Objetivo: Comparar el poder discriminativo y precisión diagnóstica de Eventos Cardiovasculares Mayores (ECVM) de cinco escalas de clasificación de dolor torácico de uso común en pacientes mexicanos con dolor torácico que acuden al servicio de urgencias. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo, observacional y comparativo que incluyó a pacientes ingresados en urgencias que presentaban dolor torácico como síntoma cardinal. Se calcularon cinco escalas de puntuación de dolor torácico. El desenlance principal fue el compuesto de muerte cardiovascular, infarto de miocardio, intervención coronaria, injerto de derivación de arteria coronaria o reingreso por causas cardiovasculares dentro de los 30 días. Resultados: Se estudió un total de 168 pacientes. La escala de puntuación que proporcionó el área bajo la curva más alta de 0.76 (IC de 95%: 0.70-0.85) fue la escala de historia clínica, ECG, edad, factores de riesgo y troponina (HEART, por sus siglas en inglés). Además, el indice de discriminación efectiva para la puntuación HEART fue un 6% más alto en comparación con las otras cuatro escalas de puntuación. Conclusiones: La escala de HEART proporcionó la mejor herramienta de clasificación para idenfiticar a los pacientes con mayor riesgo de ECVM, ya sea solo a agregando sus resultados a otros puntajes de clasificación, incluso en una población comórbida.

Prediction of adverse cardiac outcomes in high-risk Mexican patients with chest pain in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the discriminative power and accuracy for prediction of MACE of five commonly used scoring tools in Mexican patients with chest pain who present to the ED. METHODS: A single-center, prospective, observational, and comparative study of patients admitted to the ED with chest pain as the chief complaint. Five chest pain scoring systems were calculated. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or readmission for cardiovascular causes within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were studied. The score which provided the highest area under the curve of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.85) was history, ECG, age, risk factors, and troponin (HEART) score. In addition, the integrated discrimination index for the HEART score was 6% higher when compared to the other four scores. CONCLUSIONS: The HEART score provided the best classification tool for identifying those patients at highest risk for MACE, either alone or by adding their results to other classification scores, even in a comorbid population.

OBJETIVO: Comparar el poder discriminativo y precisión diagnóstica de Eventos Cardiovasculares Mayores (ECVM) de cinco escalas de clasificación de dolor torácico de uso común en pacientes mexicanos con dolor torácico que acuden al servicio de urgencias. MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo, observacional y comparativo que incluyó a pacientes ingresados en urgencias que presentaban dolor torácico como síntoma cardinal. Se calcularon cinco escalas de puntuación de dolor torácico. El desenlance principal fue el compuesto de muerte cardiovascular, infarto de miocardio, intervención coronaria, injerto de derivación de arteria coronaria o reingreso por causas cardiovasculares dentro de los 30 días. RESULTADOS: Se estudió un total de 168 pacientes. La escala de puntuación que proporcionó el área bajo la curva más alta de 0.76 (IC de 95%: 0.70-0.85) fue la escala de historia clínica, ECG, edad, factores de riesgo y troponina (HEART, por sus siglas en inglés). Además, el indice de discriminación efectiva para la puntuación HEART fue un 6% más alto en comparación con las otras cuatro escalas de puntuación. CONCLUSIONES: La escala de HEART proporcionó la mejor herramienta de clasificación para idenfiticar a los pacientes con mayor riesgo de ECVM, ya sea solo a agregando sus resultados a otros puntajes de clasificación, incluso en una población comórbida.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Antiplatelet Monotherapy Plus Oral Anticoagulation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Coronary Artery Ectasia: Design and Rationale of OVER-TIME Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal anti-thrombotic therapy to prevent recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome and coronary artery ectasia (CAE) remains unclear. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet plus anticoagulant therapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery ectasia. METHODS: OVER-TIME is an investigator initiated, exploratory, open label, single center, randomized clinical trial comparing dual antiplatelet therapy (acetyl-salicylic acid plus a P2Y12 inhibitor) with the combination of an antiplatelet monotherapy (a P2Y12 inhibitor) plus a low dose anticoagulant (rivaroxaban, 15mg oral dose) for the prevention of recurrent ischemic events among patients with CAE. We aim to enroll approximately 60 patients with CAE and acute coronary syndromes. After recruitment, patients are randomized to (a) standard of care (dual antiplatelet regimen) or (b) the combination of antiplatelet monotherapy and low dose anticoagulant. Patients will be followed for at least 12 months. The OVER-TIME study aims to assess the efficacy of the regimen in prevention of major cardiovascular events and its security in bleeding events in acute coronary syndromes among patients with CAE. Expected results and conclusions: OVER-TIME is the first randomized controlled trial to assess different antithrombotic strategies in patients with CAE and acute coronary syndrome, and its results will offer preliminary data for the prevention of major cardiovascular events and bleeding events in this group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05233124 (ClinicalTrials.gov), date of registration: February 10, 2022.

Pulmonary Congestion Assessed by Lung Ultrasound and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Lung ultrasound (LUS) shows a higher sensitivity when compared with physical examination for the detection of pulmonary congestion. The objective of our study was to evaluate the association of pulmonary congestion assessed by LUS after reperfusion therapy with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-segment Elevation acute Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) who received reperfusion therapy. Methods: A prospective observational study including patients with STEMI from the PHASE-Mx study. LUS was performed in four thoracic sites (two sites in each hemithorax). We categorized participants according to the presence of pulmonary congestion. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite of death for any cause, new episode or worsening of heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock at 30 days of follow-up. Results: A total of 226 patients were included, of whom 49 (21.6%) patients were classified within the "LUS-congestion" group and 177 (78.3%) within the "non-LUS-congestion" group. Compared with patients in the "non-LUS-congestion" group, patients in the "LUS-congestion" group were older and had higher levels of blood urea nitrogen and NT-proBNP. Pulmonary congestion assessed by LUS was significantly associated with a higher risk of the primary composite endpoint (HR: 3.8, 95% CI 1.91-7.53, p = 0.001). Differences in the primary endpoint were mainly driven by an increased risk of heart failure (HR 3.91; 95%CI 1.62-9.41, p = 0.002) and cardiogenic shock (HR 3.37; 95%CI 1.30-8.74, p = 0.012). Conclusion: The presence of pulmonary congestion assessed by LUS is associated with increased adverse cardiovascular events, particularly heart failure and cardiogenic shock. The application of LUS should be integrated as part of the initial risk stratification in patients with STEMI as it conveys important prognostic information.