Epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in commercially insured myopes in the United States.

Myopia is a known risk factor for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Given global trends of increasing myopia, we aimed to determine the absolute risk (incidence rate) of RRD in non-myopes, myopes and high myopes in the United States over ten years. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 85,476,781 commercially insured patients enrolled in the Merative™ Marketscan® Research Database. The incidence rate of RRD in phakic patients in the United States was 39-fold higher in high myopes than non-myopes (868.83 per 100,000 person-years versus 22.44 per 100,000 person-years) and three-fold higher in myopes than non-myopes (67.51 per 100,000 person-years versus 22.44 per 100,000 person-years). The incidence rate was significantly higher in males in each category (P < 0.01). Combined, the incidence rate of RRD in phakic patients in the United States from 2007 to 2016 was 25.27 RRDs per 100,000 person-years, a rate higher than those in prior published studies in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. The absolute risk of myopia and high myopia increased from 2007 to 2016. The risk of RRD in phakic high myopes rose with increasing age. Notably, the magnitude of increased risk of RRD in myopes varied substantially according to the minimum follow-up period in our models and should be accounted for when interpreting data analyses.

Evaluating the Effect of Hypoglycemic Agents on Diabetic Retinopathy Progression.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Newer hypoglycemics such as dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have been increasingly used in diabetes. This study aimed to assess the relationship between usage of these hypoglycemic agents and effect on diabetic retinopathy (DR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Vestrum Health Retina Database, patients with DR with 1 year follow-up after use of a hypoglycemic agent were included and stratified by agent, including no pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Of 60,649 eyes, in 1 year after hypoglycemic agent usage, progression rates from severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were the following: DPP-4 (17%), SGLT-2 (12%), GLP-1 (21%), metformin (18%), and none (20%). Progression rates from moderate NPDR to severe NPDR or PDR were the following: DPP-4 (11%), SGLT-2 (10%), GLP-1 (11%), metformin (10%), none (13%). Progression rates from mild NPDR to moderate/severe NPDR or PDR were the following: DPP-4 (6%), SGLT-2 (9%), GLP-1 (9%), metformin (7%), and none (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Within a large real-world database, patients prescribed GLP-1 agonists were found to have DR progression rates comparable to those of patients receiving no hypoglycemic agents. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023; 54(3):158-165.].

Incidence of Retinal Artery and Vein Occlusions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To examine whether new cases of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO) increased during the coronavirus 209 (COVID-19) pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients visiting retina clinics with a new diagnosis in two time periods: between January 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020 (the pre-COVID-19 period), and between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020 (the COVID-19 period). The key outcome was the percentage of newly diagnosed central RAO (CRAO), branch RAO (BRAO), central RVO (CRVO), and branch RVO (BRVO) seen in each period. RESULTS: The study population included 285,759 new patients in the pre-COVID-19 period and 156,427 new patients in the COVID-19 period. The overall number of new patients dropped dramatically during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic (24%, 66%, and 51% less new patients in March, April, and May 2020 than in the same months in 2019; P < .0001 for all 3 months). However, the decrease in the number of newly diagnosed patients with CRAO, CRVO, and BRAO during these months was less dramatic. As most states reopened in June and the number of patients in retina clinics started to increase, the newly diagnosed patients with these conditions as a percentage of all new diagnoses returned to similar trends as seen in the pre-COVID-19 period. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of new cases of RAO and RVO with respect to all new diagnoses in retina clinics remained stable for the majority of the COVID-19 period. There was an increase in these percentages during the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for CRAO, CRVO, and BRAO, which may have led to the presumption that more patients presented with these conditions during the COVID-19 period evaluated in this study. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:22-30.

Quantifying burden of intravitreal injections: questionnaire assessment of life impact of treatment by intravitreal injections (QUALITII).

AIM: To quantify the areas of burden experienced by patients requiring repeated intravitreal injections (IVI) in the management of exudative retinal diseases. METHODS: The validated Questionnaire to Assess Life Impact of Treatment by Intravitreal Injections survey was administered to patients at four retina clinical practices across four US states. The primary outcome measure was Treatment Burden Score (TBS), a single score assessing overall burden. RESULTS: Of 1416 (n=657 age-related macular degeneration; n=360 diabetic macular oedema/diabetic retinopathy; n=221 retinal vein occlusion; n=178 other/uncertain) patients, 55% were women with an average age of 70 years. Patients most frequently reported receiving IVI every 4-5 weeks (40%). The mean TBS was 16.1±9.2 (range 1-48; scale of 1-54), and the TBS was higher in patients with diabetic macular oedema and/or diabetic retinopathy (DMO/DR) (17.1) compared with those with age-related macular degeneration (15.5) or retinal venous occlusive (15.3) (p=0.028). Though the mean level of discomfort was quite low (1.86) (scale 0-6), 50% of patients reported experiencing side effects more than half of the visits. Patients having received fewer than 5 IVI reported higher mean anxiety levels before (p=0.026), during (p=0.050) and after (p=0.016) treatment compared with patients having received more than 50 IVI. After the procedure, 42% of patients reported restrictions from usual activities due to discomfort. Patients reported a high mean satisfaction rating of 5.46 (scale 0-6) with the care of their diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The mean TBS was moderate and highest among patients with DMO/DR. Patients with more total injections reported lower levels of discomfort and anxiety but higher disruption to daily life. Despite the challenges related to IVI, the overall satisfaction with treatment remained high.

Rates of Suspected Endophthalmitis Following Intravitreal Injections in Clinical Practices in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates of suspected endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections of aflibercept, bevacizumab, ranibizumab (vial and pre-filled), dexamethasone implant, and triamcinolone in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of aggregated electronic medical records from the Vestrum Health Database. Eyes with a diagnosis of suspected endophthalmitis based on billing codes between January 2013 and June 2019 were included. RESULTS: Total number of injections, suspected endophthalmitis cases, and medication rate, respectively, were: aflibercept (1,412,699; 687; 0.049%); bevacizumab (1,467,722; 379; 0.026%); ranibizumab vial (884,061; 233; 0.026%), ranibizumab pre-filled (427,763; 96; 0.022%); dexamethasone implant (49,464; 53; 0.107%); and triamcinolone (75,038; 110; 0.147%). Rates were lower for bevacizumab and ranibizumab (vial and pre-filled) compared to aflibercept, dexamethasone implant, and triamcinolone (P < .05). Triamcinolone had a higher rate compared to all of the other medications (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Suspected endophthalmitis rates following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in clinical practice were similar to reported rates in clinical trials. Rates of suspected endophthalmitis following steroid injections trended higher with significantly higher rates with triamcinolone. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:312-318.].

Characterizing Progression to Neovascular AMD in Fellow Eyes of Patients Treated With Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the real-world incidence of conversion to bilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) following treatment initiation of nAMD in the initial eye. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of electronic health records from retinal centers across the United States (Vestrum Database) of all patients with unilateral nAMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. RESULTS: A total of 22,553 patients with unilateral nAMD were included. Fellow eyes of 8,522 patients (38%) converted to nAMD. Among these, 2,639 (12%), 2,030 (9%), and 1,802 (8%) patients converted in Years 1, 2, and 3, respectively, after diagnosis in the first eye. Fellow eyes had better vision at conversion and 1 year following conversion. CONCLUSIONS: The fellow eye should be monitored at regular intervals to detect signs of neovascularization. Fellow eyes presented with significantly better vision at diagnosis than the initial eye and maintained better visual acuity with less injections. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:123-128.].

Questionnaire to Assess Life Impact of Treatment by Intravitreal Injections (QUALITII): Development of a patient-reported measure to assess treatment burden of repeat intravitreal injections.

OBJECTIVE: To understand patient burden of treatment of repeated intravitreal injections (IVI) in the management of exudative retinal diseases. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants were sampled from a large urban retina specialty practice in Houston, Texas, USA, based on history of ongoing receipt of IVI. The 50-item Questionnaire to Assess Life Impact of Treatment by Intravitreal Injections questionnaire was developed to evaluate the patient experience including discomfort, anxiety, inconvenience and satisfaction. Categorial principal components analysis (CATPCA) was performed to assess construct validity and internal consistency. A subset of these items was used to establish a measure of total treatment burden, referred to as the IVI Treatment Burden Score (TBS). RESULTS: 142 patients participated in this study. CATPCA analysis revealed five dimensions of patient burden: disruption of normal routine or capacity, anxiety, frequency of visits, chronicity of disease and perceived treatment value or satisfaction. Together, these dimensions accounted for 67% of variance explained. Cronbach's alpha was 0.97. The most frequently cited cause of discomfort was the feeling after anaesthetic wore off. The most common source of anxiety was fear of injection and associated discomfort or pain. Regarding inconvenience, patients reported temporary postinjection debilitation, requiring an average of 8 hours for recovery per treatment. The most frequently identified sources of satisfaction were confidence in the provider or treatment and interactions with staff. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding and quantifying the patient burden associated with repeated IVI for exudative retinal diseases can reveal opportunities to improve delivery methods. The TBS could serve to inform strategies to maximise treatment adherence and optimise patient experiences.

Characterizing New-Onset Exudation in the Randomized Phase 2 FILLY Trial of Complement Inhibitor Pegcetacoplan for Geographic Atrophy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical characteristics of eyes in which investigator-determined new-onset exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD) developed during the FILLY trial. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the phase 2 study of intravitreal pegcetacoplan in geographic atrophy (GA). SUBJECTS: Patients with GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), n = 246. INTERVENTION: Either 15 mg intravitreal pegcetacoplan or sham given monthly or every other month for 12 months followed by a 6-month off-treatment period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time of new eAMD onset in the study eye, history of eAMD in the fellow eye, presence of double-layer sign (DLS) on structural OCT in the study eye, changes in retinal anatomic features by structural OCT and fluorescein angiography (FA), and changes in visual acuity. RESULTS: Exudation was reported in 26 study eyes across treatment groups over 18 months. Mean time to eAMD diagnosis was 256 days (range, 31-555 days). Overall, a higher proportion of patients with a baseline history of eAMD in the fellow eye (P = 0.016) and a DLS in the study eye (P = 0.0001) demonstrated eAMD. Among study eyes in which eAMD developed, 18 of 26 (69%) had history of fellow-eye eAMD and 19 of 26 (73.1%) had DLS at baseline, compared with 76 of 217 study eyes (35%; P = 0.0007) and 70 of 215 study eyes (32.5%; P < 0.0001), respectively, in which eAMD did not develop. All 21 patients with structural OCT imaging at the time of eAMD diagnosis demonstrated subretinal fluid, intraretinal cysts, or both consistent with exudation. Among 17 patients who underwent FA at eAMD diagnosis, 10 showed detectable macular neovascularization (MNV), all occult lesions. Development of eAMD did not have an appreciable impact on visual acuity, and all patients responded to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal pegcetacoplan slowed the rate of GA growth and was associated with an unexpected dose-dependent increased incidence of eAMD with no temporal clustering of onset. Exudative AMD seemed to be associated with baseline eAMD in the contralateral eye and a DLS, suggestive of nonexudative MNV, in the study eye. The safety profile of pegcetacoplan was acceptable to proceed to phase 3 studies without adjustments to enrollment criteria.

Impact of Baseline Characteristics on Geographic Atrophy Progression in the FILLY Trial Evaluating the Complement C3 Inhibitor Pegcetacoplan.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of select baseline characteristics on geographic atrophy (GA) progression in eyes receiving intravitreal pegcetacoplan or sham. DESIGN: Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, single-masked, sham-controlled trial. METHODS: Patients with GA received 15 mg pegcetacoplan monthly or every other month (EOM), or sham injection monthly or EOM for 12 months. Primary efficacy endpoint was change in GA lesion size (square root) from baseline. Post hoc analysis evaluated the effects of age; gender; lesion size, focality, and location (extrafoveal vs foveal); pseudodrusen status; best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); and low-luminance deficit (LLD) on GA progression at Month 12. RESULTS: Of 246 randomized patients, 192 with 12-month data were included in this analysis. Overall mean (standard deviation) change in lesion size (mm) was 0.26 (0.17) (P < .01), 0.27 (0.27) (P < .05), and 0.36 (0.21) in the monthly pegcetacoplan (n = 67), EOM pegcetacoplan (n = 58), and sham (n = 67) groups, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with extrafoveal lesions (P < .001), BCVA ≥20/60 (P = .001), and larger LLD (P = .002) had greater mean changes in lesion size. Multivariate analysis confirmed significant association of extrafoveal lesions (P = .001) and larger LLD (P = .023) with GA progression. Monthly and EOM pegcetacoplan significantly reduced progression (P < .05) when controlling for these risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Extrafoveal lesions and larger LLD are potential risk factors for GA progression. Pegcetacoplan treatment significantly controlled GA progression even after accounting for these risk factors.

Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection vs Sham as Prophylaxis Against Conversion to Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration in High-risk Eyes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents may provide a prophylactic effect in high-risk eyes with intermediate dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) against conversion to exudative AMD (eAMD), lowering the risk of vision loss. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) as prophylaxis against the conversion to eAMD in high-risk eyes at 24 months. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-masked, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial performed at 4 US clinical sites enrolled patients with intermediate AMD in 1 eye (study eye), defined as presence of more than 10 medium drusen (≥63 to <125 µm), at least 1 large druse (≥125 µm), and/or retinal pigmentary changes, and eAMD in the fellow eye. Patients were treated from June 23, 2015, to March 13, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Intravitreal aflibercept injection (2 mg) or sham quarterly injection for 24 months (1:1 randomization). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the proportion of patients with conversion to eAMD at month 24 characterized by development of choroidal neovascularization, as assessed by leakage on fluorescein angiography and fluid on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography by an independent masked reading center. RESULTS: Of 128 patients enrolled, 127 (63 in the IAI group and 64 in the sham group) were included in the primary analysis (68 men [53.5%]; mean [SD] age, 76.5 [8.1] years). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were balanced between the groups. By month 24, 6 patients (9.5%) in the IAI group and 7 (10.9%) in the sham group developed eAMD (P = .98). Patients with a history of eAMD for longer than 2 years in their fellow eye at baseline showed a lower rate of conversion to eAMD in the study eye compared with those with a history of eAMD for 2 years or less in the fellow eye. Safety was consistent with previous studies involving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this evaluation of quarterly anti-VEGF exposure as prophylaxis to reduce conversion of eyes with high-risk dry AMD to eAMD, the rates of conversion were not lower in the IAI group compared with the sham treatment group at month 24. Understanding the mechanism of conversion to eAMD and therapies that could prevent this event remains an important unmet need. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02462889.

Increasing Incidence and Prevalence of Common Retinal Diseases in Retina Practices Across the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated estimate of incidence and prevalence of the foremost retinal diseases in the U.S. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of the Vestrum Health Database evaluating eyes with diagnoses of wet or dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), diabetic retinopathy (DR), branch or central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO; CRVO) from January 2014 to December 2019 across 58 retina practices. RESULTS: Of the 3,086,791 eyes examined, 490,881 (15.9%) had dry AMD, 294,041 (9.5%) wet AMD, 270,703 (8.8%) DME, 254,690 (8.3%) DR without DME, 73,617 (2.4%) BRVO, and 50,670 (1.6%) CRVO. Dry AMD had the highest incidence. These diseases comprised 61.0% of total prevalence and 54.3% of incidence among patients at the retina practices analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a diverse database, these diseases comprised the majority of U.S. retina practice cases, with increasing annual incidences. AMD is the most common diagnosis, then diabetic eye disease. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:29-36.].

Visual Acuity Outcomes in Patients Receiving Frequent Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Clinical Practice.

Purpose: This work evaluates dosing frequency with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents over 2 years and visual acuity (VA) outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: This retrospective analysis assesses electronic medical record data (Vestrum Health treatment and outcomes database) of newly diagnosed nAMD in patients who were initiated on intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment at US clinical sites. Eyes were divided into 2 injection frequency subcohorts (≤ 6 or > 6 injections/y); treatment frequency and change in mean VA (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) were evaluated. Results: Overall, 8127 of 213 824 eyes met inclusion criteria in year 1 and 4968 in year 2. During year 1, 77% of the eyes received more than 6 injections (n = 6287), the majority of which received injections at the same frequency during year 2. Mean VA gain from baseline at year 1 was lower in the ≤ 6 than > 6 injections/y subcohort (2.2 vs 6.5, P < .001). Decrease in mean VA from the end of year 1 to year 2 was significantly greater for eyes administered 6 or fewer injections in year 2 than those that received more frequent injections, irrespective of the frequency of injections in the first year. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, most eyes with nAMD that completed at least 1 year of follow-up were treated with more than 6 injections of anti-VEGF agents during the first year of treatment, resulting in better VA gains than eyes treated less frequently during the same period.

Evaluation of Patients Receiving Intravitreal Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor for Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice in the United States.

Purpose: We assessed the effect of treatment frequency with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents on visual acuity (VA) in diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This retrospective analysis assessed electronic medical records of eyes newly diagnosed with DME and treated with an anti-VEGF agent at US clinics using the Vestrum Health (Naperville, Illinois) treatment and outcomes database. Eyes were divided into 2 injection frequency subcohorts (≤ 6 vs > 6 injections/y); treatment frequency and change in mean VA (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) were evaluated. Results: Among 155 240 eyes assessed, 3028 met inclusion criteria for analysis in year 1 and 1292 in year 2. During year 1 of treatment, 57% (n = 1725) received > 6 injections; most continued to receive the same injection frequency during year 2. Mean VA gain from baseline at year 1 was lower in the ≤ 6 than in the > 6 injections/year subcohort (3.7 vs 8.0 letters, respectively; P < .001). Mean VA change from the end of year 1 to year 2 for eyes receiving ≤ 6 injections in year 1 generally remained unchanged, irrespective of year 2 dosing frequency. In eyes that received > 6 injections in year 1, mean VA loss was significantly greater for eyes receiving less-frequent dosing in year 2 than in those maintained on > 6 injections. Conclusions: More than 50% of eyes with DME in routine clinical practice that completed at least 1 year of follow-up received > 6 injections of an anti-VEGF agent during the first year, resulting in better VA gains than eyes treated less frequently.

Outcomes by Baseline Choroidal Neovascularization Features in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Post Hoc Analysis of the VIEW Studies.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of baseline choroidal neovascularization (CNV) features on visual change and fluid resolution after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of 52-week data from the phase 3 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Studies (VIEW) 1 and 2 clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand eight hundred four patients with nAMD. METHODS: Integrated data from VIEW 1 and 2 of 1804 eyes receiving intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAIs) 2 mg every 4 weeks, IAIs 2 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly doses, and ranibizumab every 4 weeks with documented baseline CNV type, total area, and leakage area were analyzed. Time to an event and cumulative incidence were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and relative risks were estimated using proportional hazards analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Cumulative incidence of time to first sustained vision gain of 15 or more Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, vision loss of more than 5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters from baseline, as well as first sustained absence of retinal fluid and intraretinal fluid as evaluated by OCT with respect to CNV type, total CNV, and leakage area. RESULTS: Eyes with predominantly classic CNV (mean best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], 48.2 letters at baseline) showed a higher incidence rate of first sustained gain of 15 letters or more than eyes with occult CNV (mean BCVA, 57.9 letters at baseline; P < 0.01). Eyes with occult CNV at baseline showed higher incidence rates of first sustained absence of retinal fluid and of intraretinal fluid than eyes with predominantly classic CNV (both P < 0.01). With increasing baseline CNV total area and leakage area, the incidence rate of first sustained gain of 15 letters or more decreased. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis provided additional evidence for the role of baseline CNV features (CNV type, total area, and leakage area) in influencing visual and anatomic outcomes in eyes with nAMD after anti-VEGF treatment.

Impact of Systemic Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use in Diabetic Macular Edema.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate impact of baseline systemic dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor use in diabetic macular edema (DME). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a post hoc exploratory analysis of previously completed randomized, controlled clinical trials (VISTA and VIVID) in patients with DME evaluating intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2q4) or every 8 weeks (2q8) or macular laser photocoagulation. RESULTS: Overall, a small number of patients (12.2% [n = 35], 9.7% [n = 28], and 15.4% [n = 44]) in the laser control, 2q4, and 2q8 groups reported baseline DPP-4 inhibitor use. There were no differences in changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield thickness, or rates of 2-or-greater-step improvement in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score based on DPP-4 inhibitor use within each treatment group. CONCLUSION: DPP-4 inhibitor use at baseline did not influence the magnitude of visual and anatomic benefit in patients with DME being treated with IAI or laser. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:226-234.].

Prevention of Macular Edema in Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy Undergoing Cataract Surgery: The PROMISE Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the prevention of macular edema (ME) following cataract surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase 2, prospective, interventional, single-masked, randomized trial at a single academic center included 30 patients who were 18 years of age or older with nonproliferative DR and undergoing cataract surgery with phacoemulsification. Patients received 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (0.05 mL) or sham injection during cataract surgery. Main outcome measures included treatment adverse events (AEs), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and incidence of ME (defined as presence of cystoid abnormalities as detected by optical coherence tomography at any follow-up visit), a 30% or greater increase from preoperative baseline in central subfield macular thickness, or a BCVA decrease of more than 5 ETDRS letters from Day 7 due to retinal thickening. RESULTS: There were similar incidences of AEs between the two groups and no clinically serious ocular AEs in either group. The IAI group had fewer ME events at Day 14 (13% vs. 53%; P = .022), but there was no significant difference in ME events at Day 30 (27% vs. 60%; P = .057), Day 60 (27% vs. 60%; P = .057), or Day 90 (40% vs. 67%; P = .161). Compared to the study group, the control group had a significantly greater increase in central subfield thickness (CST) at Day 30 (50.05 µm vs. 7.95 µm; P = .040) and Day 60 (56.45 µm vs. 3.02 µm; P = .010). However, the difference in CST between groups was no longer significant at Day 90 (50.31 µm vs. 18.48 µm; P = .12). There were no significant differences in BCVA gains between the IAI and sham group at the end of the follow-up period (Day 90, ETDRS letters: 9.88 vs. 8.52; P = .66). CONCLUSIONS: Use of IAI in patients with DR for prevention of ME following cataract surgery showed no significant AEs. Although there were significant differences in ME incidence and retinal thickness at periods of time, there was no clinically meaningful benefit in terms of VA. Further larger trials are needed to validate these findings. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:170-178.].

Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Requiring Cataract Surgery in VISTA and VIVID Studies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of cataract surgery on visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or laser control and who did not require rescue therapy. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of 2 phase 3 trials, Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema (VISTA) and Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Vision Impairment Due to DME (VIVID). PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four patients (laser treatment, n = 11; IAI, n = 43) who underwent cataract surgery during the study period. METHODS: In VISTA and VIVID, patients received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks, IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses, or laser control through week 100. Starting at week 24, if rescue treatment criteria were met, IAI patients received laser therapy, and laser therapy patients received IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks (after 5 monthly doses). Patients who received rescue treatment before cataract surgery were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in the laser control and pooled IAI groups before and after cataract surgery. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of cataract surgery did not depend on treatment group assignment (rate ratio, = 1.517; 95% confidence interval, 0.782-2.944; P = 0.2174). At the last study visit before surgery, BCVA was 62.2 and 56.9 letters and CRT was 342 µm and 301 µm in the laser control and IAI groups, respectively. At the first study visit after cataract surgery, BCVA was improved significantly in both the laser control and IAI groups to 73.5 letters (P = 0.010 compared with last visit before surgery) and 67.2 letters (P < 0.001 compared with last visit before surgery), respectively. Corresponding change in CRT was a modest increase to 364 µm (P > 0.05 compared with last visit before surgery) and 359 µm (P = 0.013 compared with last visit before surgery), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of cataract surgery was similar in both treatment groups. Despite a modest worsening in CRT after cataract surgery, BCVA was improved in both treatment groups.