Increasing Gram-Negative Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Cancer Patients.

Background: We aimed to assess the incidence, etiology and outcomes of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in onco-hematological patients, to assess the differences between patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) and solid tumors (STs) and to identify the risk factors for Gram-negative (GN) CRBSI. Methods: All consecutive episodes of BSI in adult cancer patients were prospectively collected (2006-2020). The etiology of CRBSI was analyzed in three different 5-year periods. Risk factors for GN CRBSI were assessed in the whole cohort and separately in patients with HMs and STs. Results: Among 467 episodes of monomicrobial CRBSI, 407 were Gram-positive (GP) (87.1%), 49 GN (10.5%) and 11 fungal (2.4%). Hematological patients (369 episodes) were more frequently neutropenic and were more likely to carry central venous catheters and develop GP CRBSI. Patients with STs (98 episodes) had more comorbidities, more frequently carried port reservoirs and commonly presented more GN CRBSI. GN CRBSI significantly increased over the study period, from 5.2% to 23% (p < 0.001), whereas GP CRBSI decreased from 93.4% to 73.3% (p < 0.001). CRBSI episodes involving port reservoirs and peripherally-inserted central catheters were significantly increased (p < 0.001). The most frequent GPs were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (57.8%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common GN (3%). Multidrug-resistant (MDR) GN represented 32.7% of all GN CRBSIs and increased over time (p = 0.008). The independent risk factors for GN CRBSI in the whole cohort were solid tumor, chronic kidney disease and carrying a port reservoir. Carrying a port reservoir was also a risk factor in patients with STs. Health-care acquisition was identified as a risk factor for GN CRBSI in the whole cohort, as well as in patients with STs and HMs. Inadequate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) occurred regardless of the etiology: 49% for GNs and 48.6% for GPs (p = 0.96). In GP CRBSI, IEAT was mainly due to inadequate coverage against CoNS (87%), whereas in GN CRBSI, IEAT was associated with multidrug resistance (54.2%). Early (48 h and 7-day) and 30-day case-fatality rates were similar when analyzed according to the type of underlying disease and etiology, except for the 30-day case-fatality rate, which was higher in the group of patients with STs compared to those with HMs (21.5% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.027). The 48 h case-fatality rate was significantly higher in patients in whom the catheter had not been removed (5.6% vs. 1%; p = 0.011), and it remained significant for GP CRBSI (6% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.023). Conclusions: GNs are an increasing cause of CRBSI in cancer patients, particularly in solid tumor patients carrying port reservoirs. Multidrug resistance among GNs is also increasing and is associated with higher rates of IEAT. Decreased 48 h survival was associated with the non-removal of the catheter. These findings should be considered when deciding on early therapeutic management for cancer patients with suspected CRBSI.

Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Regimens on Mortality in Neutropenic Patients with Bloodstream Infection Presenting with Septic Shock.

We analyzed risk factors for mortality in febrile neutropenic patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) presenting with septic shock and assessed the impact of empirical antibiotic regimens. A multicenter retrospective study (2010 to 2019) of two prospective cohorts compared BSI episodes in patients with or without septic shock. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality in episodes with septic shock. Of 1,563 patients with BSI, 257 (16%) presented with septic shock. Those patients with septic shock had higher mortality than those without septic shock (55% versus 15%, P < 0.001). Gram-negative bacilli caused 81% of episodes with septic shock, Gram-positive cocci caused 22%, and Candida species caused 5%. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) was administered in 17.5% of septic shock episodes. Empirical ß-lactam combined with other active antibiotics was associated with the lowest mortality observed. When amikacin was the only active antibiotic, mortality was 90%. Addition of empirical specific Gram-positive coverage had no impact on mortality. Mortality was higher when IEAT was administered (76% versus 51%, P = 0.002). Age of >70 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 4.7), IEAT for Candida spp. or Gram-negative bacilli (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 11.1), acute kidney injury (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.9), and amikacin as the only active antibiotic (OR, 15.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 134.5) were independent risk factors for mortality, while the combination of ß-lactam and amikacin was protective (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.57). Septic shock in febrile neutropenic patients with BSI is associated with extremely high mortality, especially when IEAT is administered. Combination therapy including an active ß-lactam and amikacin results in the best outcomes.

Do high MICs predict the outcome in invasive fusariosis?

BACKGROUND: Invasive fusariosis (IF) affects mostly severely immunocompromised hosts and is associated with poor outcome. Since Fusarium species exhibit high MICs for most antifungal agents, this could explain the poor prognosis. However, a clear-cut correlation between MIC and outcome has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between MIC and outcome (6 week death rate) in patients with IF. METHODS: We performed a multicentre retrospective study of patients with IF who received treatment and had MIC levels determined by EUCAST or CLSI for the drug(s) used during treatment. We compared the MIC50 and MIC distribution among survivors and patients who died within 6 weeks from the diagnosis of IF. RESULTS: Among 88 patients with IF, 74 had haematological diseases. Primary treatment was monotherapy in 52 patients (voriconazole in 27) and combination therapy in 36 patients (liposomal amphotericin B + voriconazole in 23). The MIC50 and range for the five most frequent agents tested were: voriconazole 8 mg/L (range 0.5-64), amphotericin B 2 mg/L (range 0.25-64), posaconazole 16 mg/L (range 0.5-64), itraconazole 32 mg/L (range 4-64), and isavuconazole 32 mg/L (range 8-64). There was no difference in MIC50 and MIC distribution among survivors and patients who died. By contrast, persistent neutropenia and receipt of corticosteroids were strong predictors of 6 week mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not show any correlation between MIC and mortality at 6 weeks in patients with IF.

Misdiagnosis of resistant hypertension: Real frequency of true resistant hypertension in patients with suspected resistance to treatment. / Diagnóstico erróneo de la hipertensión resistente: frecuencia real de la hipertensión resistente en los pacientes con sospecha de resistencia al tratamiento.

INTRODUCTION: Resistant hypertension(RH) has been defined as failure to control office blood pressure (BP) despite the use of≥3 different antihypertensive agents at optimal doses, including, ideally, a diuretic. Apparent RH, defines patients with an incorrect diagnosis of RH due to different causes. The objective was to determine whether most patients with RH in fact have apparent but not true RH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational study involving 93 patients with suspected RH, being 60 patients finally included. Screening for secondary causes of hypertension was perfomed. True RH was defined as office BP>140/90mmHg despite full doses of 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic. RESULTS: Mean age 63.7±9.8years, 68.3%were male. Office BP 154.3±14.4/84.4±13.7mmHg. Of the 60 patients, 23.3% had white coat effect, 3.3% didn't have a diuretic and 8.3% were non-adherent-to-treatment. Accordingly, 58.3% were classified as true RH. Spironolactone was added in 62.5% of patients of whom 78.4% achieved ambulatory BP control. DISCUSSION: Almost half of the patients with suspected RH were not really true RH. We provide more evidence of excess of fluid retention as an underlying cause of lack of BP control in patients with RH, reinforce the relevant paper of spironolactone for the management in those patients.