Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 26(12): 2245-2251, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32717437

RESUMO

Cyclosporine (CsA) combined with short-course methotrexate is considered standard-of-care graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for patients with severe aplastic anemia (AA) who undergo transplantation using cyclophosphamide (Cy) plus anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) conditioning. However, there is no consensus on optimal post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis for patients undergoing matched related donor (MRD) transplantation using fludarabine (Flu)-based conditioning. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with acquired AA (n = 106) undergoing MRD transplantation from July 2007 through January 2019. All patients received Flu-Cy-ATG conditioning and single-agent CsA as GVHD prophylaxis. Median age of the study cohort was 20 years (range, 3 to 52) and male to female ratio was 3.8:1. Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 11.5 months (range, 2.8 to 62). Graft source was bone marrow harvest in 71 (68%), combined bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells in 34 (31%), and peripheral blood alone in 1 (1%) patient. Cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment at day 28 was 93.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.3% to 97.1%) while that of platelet engraftment at day 100 was 90.5% (95% CI, 84% to 96%). Cumulative incidence of primary graft failure at day 28 was 6.6% (95% CI, 4% to 8%) while secondary graft failure occurred at a median of 190 days (range, 90 to 415) at a cumulative incidence of 3.7% (95% CI, 2% to 5%). Cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 3.8% (95% CI, 1.4% to 9.9%), while a 1-year probability of chronic GVHD was calculated as 7.5% (95% CI, 2.6% to 15%). Median follow-up post-transplant was 61 months (range, 6 to 144). Overall survival was 84.9%, disease-free survival was 80.2%, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival was 76.3%. This study indicates that single-agent cyclosporine is a feasible option for GVHD prophylaxis in MRD hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using Flu-Cy-ATG conditioning and is associated with very low rates of acute and chronic GVHD.


Assuntos
Anemia Aplástica , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anemia Aplástica/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad ; 30(Suppl 1)(4): S647-S651, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30838824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients are at high risk of opportunistic infections. Little international and no national data is available comparing noble metal coated versus uncoated central venous catheters (CVC) in this special population of severely immunocompromised patients. Objective of the study is to compare infectious and non-infectious complications of noble metal coated versus uncoated central venous catheters in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation and receiving chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. METHODS: This is a prospective, cross-sectional, randomized study (January to December 2016), enrolling 45 consecutive patients undergoing stem cell transplantation or chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. Patients were randomized in 2 groups. Twenty 23 patients received standard CVC and 22 patients received CVC catheters coated with three noble metals (Gold, Silver, Palladium). Patients were observed for catheter related infectious and noninfectious complications. Data was analysed using SPSS. RESULTS: Mean age was 24.3 (±4.91) in uncoated and 25.09 (±5.22) in coated CVL group. CRBSI infection was detected in 2 (8.6%) and 3 (13.6%) patients in uncoated and coated group respectively with p-value of .279. There was no statistically significant difference in febrile episodes between coated (95.4%) and uncoated (91.3%) group. While we considered non-infectious complications, 2 patients in coated (8.6%) and 1 in uncoated CVCs group (4.3%) had CVC thrombosis which was not significant statistically. CONCLUSION: There was no efficacy of BG-thin noble metal coated CVCs in reducing infectious and non-infectious complications (thrombosis) in our study.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Metais , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Doenças Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA