Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet J ; 307: 106208, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39074542

RESUMO

Acute diarrhoea is a common presentation in dogs, and a common reason for antimicrobial prescription and nutraceutical use. This evidence-based guideline provides recommendations for antimicrobial and probiotic treatment of canine acute diarrhoea (CAD). A multidisciplinary panel developed the recommendations by adhering to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The opinions of stakeholders (general veterinary practitioners and dog owners) were collected and incorporated to ensure the applicability of this guideline. Four strong recommendations informed by high certainty evidence, and three conditional recommendations informed by very low or low certainty evidence, were drafted by the panel, along with an ungraded section on diagnostic work-up of dogs with acute diarrhoea. The ENOVAT guidelines initiative encourages national or regional guideline makers to use the evidence presented in this document, and the supporting systematic review, to draft national or local guidance documents.


Assuntos
Diarreia , Doenças do Cão , Animais , Cães , Diarreia/veterinária , Diarreia/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Cão/tratamento farmacológico , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Europa (Continente) , Doença Aguda
2.
Vet J ; 304: 106101, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490359

RESUMO

Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is widely used to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI), but there is uncertainty as to what the proportion of SSI reduction is. Therefore, it is difficult for surgeons to properly weigh the costs, risks and benefits for individual patients when deciding on the use of SAP, making it challenging to promote antimicrobial stewardship in primary practice settings. The objective of this study was to map the veterinary evidence focused on assessing the effect of SAP on SSI development and in order to identify surgical procedures with some research evidence and possible knowledge gaps. In October 2021 and December 2022, Scopus, CAB Abstracts, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase and MEDLINE were systematically searched. Double blinded screening of records was performed to identify studies in companion animals that reported on the use of SAP and SSI rates. Comparative data were available from 34 out of 39123 records screened including: eight randomised controlled trials (RCT), 23 cohort studies (seven prospective and 16 retrospective) and three retrospective case series representing 12476 dogs and cats in total. Extracted data described peri- or post-operative SAP in nine, and 25 studies, respectively. In the eight RCTs evaluating SAP in companion animals, surgical procedure coverage was skewed towards orthopaedic stifle surgeries in referral settings and there was large variation in SAP protocols, SSI definitions and follow-up periods. More standardized data collection and agreement of SSI definitions is needed to build stronger evidence for optimized patient care.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Animais , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/veterinária , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Gatos/cirurgia , Cães , Antibioticoprofilaxia/veterinária , Animais de Estimação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Gato/cirurgia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Europa (Continente) , Doenças do Cão/prevenção & controle , Doenças do Cão/cirurgia , Doenças do Cão/tratamento farmacológico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos
3.
Vet J ; 303: 106054, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049062

RESUMO

Systemic antimicrobial treatments are commonly prescribed to dogs with acute diarrhoea, while nutraceuticals (prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics) are frequently administered as an alternative treatment. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of antimicrobials and nutraceutical preparations for treatment of canine acute diarrhoea (CAD). The results of this study will be used to create evidence-based treatment guidelines. PICOs (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) were generated by a multidisciplinary expert panel taking into account opinions from stakeholders (general practitioners and dog owners). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. The systematic search yielded six randomised controlled trials (RCT) for antimicrobial treatment and six RCTs for nutraceutical treatment meeting the eligibility criteria. Categories of disease severity (mild, moderate, and severe) were created based on the presence of systemic signs and response to fluid therapy. Outcomes included duration of diarrhoea, duration of hospitalization, progression of disease, mortality, and adverse effects. High certainty evidence showed that antimicrobial treatment did not have a clinically relevant effect on any outcome in dogs with mild or moderate disease. Certainty of evidence was low for dogs with severe disease. Nutraceutical products did not show a clinically significant effect in shortening the duration of diarrhoea (based on very low to moderate certainty evidence). No adverse effects were reported in any of the studies.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Probióticos , Cães , Animais , Diarreia/tratamento farmacológico , Diarreia/veterinária , Hidratação/veterinária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA