Cytokines Removal During Ex-Vivo Lung Perfusion: Initial Clinical Experience.

Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion (EVLP) can be potentially used to manipulate organs and to achieve a proper reconditioning process. During EVLP pro-inflammatory cytokines have been shown to accumulate in perfusate over time and their production is correlated with poor outcomes of the graft. Aim of the present study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of cytokine adsorption during EVLP. From July 2011 to March 2020, 54 EVLP procedures have been carried out, 21 grafts treated with an adsorption system and 33 without. Comparing the grafts perfused during EVLP with or without cytokine adsorption, the use of a filter significantly decreased the levels of IL10 and GCSFat the end of the procedure. Among the 38 transplanted patients, the adsorption group experienced a significant decreased IL6, IL10, MCP1 and GCSF concentrations and deltas compared to the no-adsorption group, with a lower in-hospital mortality (p = 0.03) and 1-year death rate (p = 0.01). This interventional study is the first human experience suggesting the safety and efficacy of a porous polymer beads adsorption device in reducing the level of inflammatory mediators during EVLP. Clinical impact of cytokines reduction during EVLP must be evaluated in further studies.

A multicentric evaluation of pediatric lung transplantation in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric lung transplantation is performed in highly experienced centers due to the peculiar population characteristics. The literature is limited and not representative of individual countries' differences. The purpose of this study was to analyze the Italian experience. METHODS: A multicentric retrospective analysis was performed on 110 pediatric patients (<18 years old) who underwent lung transplantation from 1992 to 2019 at 9 Italian centers. Heart-lung transplantations and lung retransplantations were excluded. RESULTS: The population was composed of 44 male and 66 female patients, with a median age of 15 years. The most frequent indication was cystic fibrosis (83%). One quarter of patients were transplanted in an emergency setting. Median donors' Oto score and age were 1 and 15 years, respectively, with 43% of adult donors. In 17% of patients a graft reduction was performed. Postoperatively, the median duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit, and in-hospital stay were 48 hours, 11 and 35 days, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 6%, and 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 72%, 52%, and 33%, respectively. Risk factors for mortality were Oto score and recipients' body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of pediatric lung transplantation in Italy are comparable with current literature. Particular attention should be paid to the Oto score and recipient body mass index. Conversely, adult donors and graft reductions can be safely used to expand the donor pool.

Is there life on the airway tree? A pilot study of bronchial cell vitality and tissue morphology in the ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) era of lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a relevant procedure to increase the lung donor pool but could potentially increase the airway tree ischemic injury risk. METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate the direct effect of EVLP on the airway tree by evaluating bronchial cell vitality and tissue signs of injury on a series of 117 bronchial rings collected from 40 conventional and 19 EVLP-treated lung grafts. Bronchial rings and related scraped bronchial epithelial cells were collected before the EVLP procedure and surgical anastomosis. RESULTS: The preimplantation interval was significantly increased in the EVLP graft group (p < 0.01). Conventional grafts presented cell viability percentages of 47.07 ± 23.41 and 49.65 ± 21.25 in the first and second grafts which did not differ significantly from the EVLP group (first graft 50.54 ± 25.83 and second graft 50.22 ± 20.90 cell viability percentage). No significant differences in terms of histopathological features (edema, inflammatory infiltrate, and mucosa ulceration) were observed comparing conventional and EVLP samples. A comparison of bronchial cell viability and histopathology of EVLP samples retrieved at different time intervals revealed no significant differences. Accordingly, major bronchial complications after lung transplant were not observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, we observed that EVLP did not significantly impact bronchial cell vitality and airway tissue preservation nor interfere with bronchial anastomosis healing, further supporting it as a safe and useful procedure.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after lung transplantation: risk factors and outcomes analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage pulmonary disease in selected patients. However, severe primary graft dysfunction is a significant complication of transplant and requires the implantation of an extracorporeal support. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after transplant in our center. METHODS: From January 2008 till June 2018, 195 consecutive unselected patients receiving a lung transplant were considered. Mean age was 49±15 years. Main indications for transplant were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 72 patients, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 60 patients, and cystic fibrosis in 40 patients. Prior to transplant, 18 patients were on mechanical ventilation and 14 were on ECMO. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients required venous-venous ECMO after transplant. Vascular disease as cause of transplant [relative risk (RR) 7.8, 95% CI: 1.5-41, P=0.02], donor age (RR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.03-2.3, P=0.03) and need for cardiopulmonary by-pass during transplant (RR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.02-9, P=0.04) were associated with ECMO implantation. Patients requiring post-transplant ECMO received more transfusions (P<0.01), had a longer mechanical ventilation (P<0.01) and ICU stay (P<0.01) and had a higher hospital mortality (P<0.01). Post-transplant ECMO significantly influenced one- and five-year survival [hazard ratio (HR) 5.5, 95% CI: 3-10, P<0.001 and HR 3.5, 95% CI: 2-6, P<0.001, respectively]. However, conditional survival after t months is similar for patients with or without post-transplant ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, although ECMO is a reliable and effective strategy to support pulmonary function, severe graft dysfunction after lung transplantation still has a significant impact on early and late results.