Fixed combination of manidipine and delapril in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

This present study assessed the antihypertensive efficacy of the fixed combination of manidipine and delapril by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled by monotherapy with either component. After a 2-week placebo period, 55 mild to moderate hypertensive patients were randomized to manidipine 20 mg o.d. or delapril 30 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks. After this period, 30 patients, aged 30-76 years (18 males and 12 females) whose diastolic blood pressure was not adequately controlled (> or = 90 mmHg) by monotherapy were treated with the fixed combination of manidipine 10 mg plus delapril 30 mg o.d. for 8 weeks. A 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recording was performed at the end of the placebo washout, of the monotherapy and of the combination therapy. Blood pressure control over the 24 h was quantified by the trough-to-peak ratio and the smoothness index. As compared to placebo, the fixed combination of manidipine and delapril produced a statistically significant (p<0.01) decrease in sitting clinic (18 +/- 9/14 +/- 5 mmHg) and 24-h blood pressure (12 +/- 7/10 +/- 5 mmHg) without affecting heart rate. This reduction was greater than that observed with single components. At the end of the 8-week combination treatment period, the rate of normalilized patients was 73%. Treatment with the fixed combination was associated with a positively high smoothness index (1.2 +/- 0.7/13.8 +/- 0.8) and with a relatively good trough-to-peak ratio (0.46/0.60). The combination of manidipine and delapril produced significant and smooth reductions in blood pressure values, which persisted over the 24-h dosing interval. These results support the use of fixed manidipine-delapril combination in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by monotherapy.

Genetic polymorphisms of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and renal insufficiency in essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays an important role in the control of renal function both in physiological and pathological conditions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relation between four genetic polymorphisms of the RAAS and renal insufficiency in a population of patients with essential hypertension living in north-east Italy. DESIGN AND METHODS: Eighty-six hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency and 172 hypertensive patients without renal damage matched for age and hypertension duration to within 2 years were evaluated. Genotyping for insertion/deletion of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE I/D), angiotensinogen (AGT) M235T, angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) A1166C and aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) -344C/T polymorphisms were performed using polymerase chain reaction, with further restriction analysis when required. RESULTS: Each of the genetic polymorphisms of the RAAS genes was associated with renal failure; the adjusted odds ratios were 1.47 and 1.89 for ACE D allele, assuming a co dominant and a recessive mode of inheritance, respectively; 1.51 for AGT T235 allele assuming a co dominant, and 1.98 assuming a recessive, pattern of inheritance; 1.79 for AT1R C1166 allele considering a dominant pattern; and 3.89 for CYP11B2 -344C allele as a recessive effect. However, CYP11B2 genotypes were not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium among controls. The associations AGT TT-AT1R AC and CYP11B2 CC-ACE DD showed a possible positive interaction in the development of renal insufficiency among hypertensive subjects. The association AGT MM-AT1R AA and AGT MM-AT1R AA-CYP11B2 TT or TC combinations were associated with a reduced risk for renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that in patients with essential hypertension an unfavorable genetic pattern of RAAS may contribute to the increased risk for the development of renal failure.

Efficacy and tolerability of manidipine in the treatment of hypertension in patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease without glomerular disease. Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of parallel groups in comparison with enalapril.

BACKGROUND: Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are effective blood pressure lowering agents, giving rise to a prevalent dilation of the afferent arteriole. Manidipine, a long-lasting dihydropyridine CCB, demonstrates its action not only on the afferent arteriole, but also on the efferent one. This suggests theoretically a renoprotective effect in patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKD). METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study, to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of manidipine (M; 10-20 mg/day), in comparison with enalapril (E; 10-20 mg/day) in the treatment of hypertension in 136 patients with CKD secondary to primary renoparenchymal disease. Changes in blood pressure values from baseline were considered as the primary outcome of the study. Proteinuria changes and the rate of renal function decline were also evaluated. RESULTS: During a 48-week follow-up, mean SBP decreased from 155+/-11.7 to 138.7+/-13.9 mmHg in M and from 157.3 +/-11.8 to 134.2+/-13.9 mmHg in E; mean DBP decreased from 100.3+/-4.2 to 86.1+/-6.5 mmHg in M and from 100.3+/-4.2 to 84.7+/-6.3 mmHg in E. Proteinuria remained unchanged in M (from 1.6+/-1.59 to 1.62+/-1.79 g/24h), and decreased significantly in E (from 1.37+/-1.45 g/24h to 1+/-1.55 g/24h). No significant difference was observed in the rate of renal function decline in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Manidipine was safe and effective, obtaining a significant reduction in SBP and DBP from baseline. Although patients treated with enalapril showed a better antiproteinuric response, the two treatments were equally effective in reducing the rate of CRF progression in patients without glomerular disease.