Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Neurooncol ; 144(2): 303-311, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31392595

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current bevacizumab-based regimens have failed to improve survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. To improve treatment efficacy, we evaluated bevacizumab + BKM120, an oral pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, in this patient population. METHODS: A brief phase I study established the optimal BKM120 dose to administer with standard-dose bevacizumab. BKM120 60 mg PO daily + bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks in 28-day cycles was then administered to patients with relapsed/refractory glioblastoma in the phase II portion. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients enrolled (phase I, 12; phase II, 76). In phase I, BKM120 80 mg PO daily produced dose limiting toxicity in 3 of 6 patients; a BKM120 dose of 60 mg PO daily was established as the maximum tolerated dose. In phase II, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.4, 5.4), PFS at 6 months was 36.5%, and the overall response rate was 26%. Forty-two patients (57%) experienced one or more serious treatment related toxicities. The most common CNS toxicities included mood alteration (17%) and confusion (12%); however, these were often difficult to classify as treatment- versus tumor-related. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy seen in this study is similar to the efficacy previously reported with single-agent bevacizumab. This regimen was poorly tolerated, despite the low daily dose of BKM120. Further development of this combination for the treatment of glioblastoma is not recommended.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases/química , Terapia de Salvação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aminopiridinas/administração & dosagem , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glioblastoma/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfolinas/administração & dosagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias/patologia , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 33(2): 119-27, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21285907

RESUMO

Children with cancer experience repeated invasive and painful medical procedures. Pain and distress does not decrease with repeated procedures and may worsen if pain is not adequately managed. In 1990, the first recommendations on the management of pain and anxiety associated with procedures for children with cancer were published. Guiding principles described in the recommendations continue to hold true today: maximize comfort and minimize pain, use nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions, prepare the child and family, consider the developmental age of the child, support family and child involvement, assure provider competency in performing procedures and sedation, and use appropriate monitoring to assure safety. This article reviews these key components for managing painful procedures in children and reviews the latest pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions most effective in minimizing pain and discomfort.


Assuntos
Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/complicações , Dor/prevenção & controle , Criança , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Neoplasias/psicologia , Dor/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA