Pressure Time Dose as a Representation of Intracranial Pressure Burden and Its Dependency on Intracranial Pressure Waveform Morphology at Different Time Intervals.

Intracranial pressure (ICP) burden or pressure time dose (PTD) is a valuable clinical indicator for pending intracranial hypertension, mostly based on threshold exceedance. Pulse frequency and waveform morphology (WFM) of the ICP signal contribute to PTD. The temporal resolution of the ICP signal has a great influence on PTD calculation but has not been systematically studied yet. Hence, the temporal resolution of the ICP signal on PTD calculation is investigated. We retrospectively analysed continuous 48 h ICP recordings with high temporal resolution obtained from 94 patients at the intensive care unit who underwent neurosurgery due to an intracranial haemorrhage and received an intracranial pressure probe (43 females, median age: 72 years, range: 23 to 88 years). The cumulative area under the curve above the threshold of 20 mmHg was compared for different temporal resolutions of the ICP signal (beat-to-beat, 1 s, 300 s, 1800 s, 3600 s). Events with prolonged ICP elevation were compared to those with few isolated threshold exceedances. PTD increased for lower temporal resolutions independent of WFM and frequency of threshold exceedance. PTDbeat-to-beat best reflected the impact of frequency of threshold exceedance and WFM. Events that could be distinguished in PTDbeat-to-beat became magnified more than 7-fold in PTD1s and more than 104 times in PTD1h, indicating an overestimation of PTD. PTD calculation should be standardised, and beat-by-beat PTD could serve as an easy-to-grasp indicator for the impact of frequency and WFM of ICP elevations on ICP burden.

No Gender Differences in Pain Perception and Medication after Lumbar Spine Sequestrectomy-A Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Gender issues have received increasing attention in clinical research of the past years, and biological sex has been introduced as a moderating variable in experimental pain perception. However, in clinical studies of acute pain and gender, there are conflicting results. In particular, there are limited data on the impact of gender differences after spinal sequestrectomy. The aim of this work is to examine gender differences in postoperative pain and pain medication consumption in an inpatient clinical setting. METHODS: Data of a completed double-blind RCT was subdivided by gender and reanalyzed by means of an analysis of variance in repeated measures. Outcomes included pain severity measured on a VAS, affective (SES-A) and sensory pain perception (SES-S) and morphine equivalent doses (MED) of analgesics after spinal sequestrectomy. RESULTS: In total, 42 female (47.73%) and 46 male (52.27%) patients were analyzed. No differences in pain severity (VAS: Gender × Time F = 0.35; (df = 2, 86); p = 0.708), affective and sensory pain perception (SES-A: Gender × Time F = 0.08; (df = 2, 86); p = 0.919; SES-S: Gender × Time F = 0.06; (df = 2, 86); p = 0.939) or post-operative opioid use between men and women (MEDs: Gender × Time F = 1.44; (df = 2, 86); p = 0.227) could be observed. CONCLUSIONS: This reanalysis of an RCT with respect to gender differences is to our knowledge the first attempt to investigate the role of gender in pain perception and medication after lumbar spine sequestrectomy. In contrast to other studies, we were not able to show significant differences between male and female patients in all pain-related outcomes. Apart from well-established pain management, psychological reasons such as gender-specific response biases or the observer effect might explain our results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered as a regulatory phase IV study at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), an open-access online register for clinical trials conducted in Germany (Reg-No: DRKS00007913).

Comparison of Two Algorithms Analysing the Intracranial Pressure Curve in Terms of the Accuracy of Their Start-Point Detection and Resistance to Artefacts.

OBJECTIVES: For further insight into the possibly predictive quality of the intracranial pressure (ICP) waveform morphology a definite and reliable identification of its components is a prerequisite but presents the problem of artefacts in physiological signals. METHODS: ICP and electrocardiogram (ECG) data were recorded to depict not only their numerical value but also their respective waveforms and were analysed by two algorithms, which were then compared for their artefact resistance.The algorithms in question identify the start point of every ICP wave, one (AR[SA]) by scale analysis, the other (AR[ECG]) by analysing the ICP wave linked to the ECG. RESULTS: Start-point identification accuracy in rhythmic patients showed sensitivity of 95.14% for AR[SA] and 99.99% for AR[ECG], with a positive predictive value (ppv) of 98.30% for AR[SA] and 99.76% for AR[ECG].In arrhythmic patients sensitivity was 98.05% for AR[SA] and 99.73% for AR[ECG], with a ppv of 100% for AR[SA] and 99.78% for AR[ECG]. CONCLUSIONS: AR[ECG] has proven to be more resistant to artefacts than AR[SA], even in cases such as cardiac arrhythmia. It facilitates reliable, three-dimensional visualisation of long-term changes in ICP-wave morphology and is thus suited for analysis in cases of more complex or irregular vital parameters.