Compression Modulus and Apparent Density of Polymeric Excipients during Compression-Impact on Tabletability.

The present study focuses on the compaction behavior of polymeric excipients during compression in comparison to nonpolymeric excipients and its consequences on commonly used Heckel analysis. Compression analysis at compaction pressures (CPs) from 50 to 500 MPa was performed using a compaction simulator. This study demonstrates that the particle density, measured via helium pycnometer (ρpar), of polymeric excipients (Kollidon®VA64, Soluplus®, AQOAT®AS-MMP, Starch1500®, Avicel®PH101) was already exceeded at low CPs (<200 MPa), whereas the ρpar was either never reached for brittle fillers such as DI-CAFOS®A60 and tricalcium citrate or exceeded at CPs above 350 MPa (FlowLac®100, Pearlitol®100SD). We hypothesized that the threshold for exceeding ρpar is linked with predominantly elastic deformation. This was confirmed by the start of linear increase in elastic recovery in-die (ERin-die) with exceeding particle density, and in addition, by the applicability in calculating the elastic modulus via the equation of the linear increase in ERin-die. Last, the evaluation of "density under pressure" as an alternative to the ρpar for Heckel analysis showed comparable conclusions for compression behavior based on the calculated yield pressures. However, the applicability of Heckel analysis for polymeric excipients was questioned in principle. In conclusion, the knowledge of the threshold provides guidance for the selection of suitable excipients in the formulation development to mitigate the risk of tablet defects related to stored elastic energy, such as capping and lamination.

Transformation of Ritonavir Nanocrystal Suspensions into a Redispersible Drug Product via Vacuum Drum Drying.

The present study explored vacuum drum drying (VDD) as potential drying technique for the solidification of crystalline ritonavir nanosuspensions prepared by wet-ball milling. In detail, the impact of drying protectants (mannitol, lactose, trehalose) added to the ritonavir nanosuspension was assessed in dependence of the drum temperature with respect to processibility via VDD, resulting intermediate powder properties, remaining nanoparticulate redispersibility and crystallinity. A clear impact of the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the drying protectant on the redispersibility/crystallinity of the VDD intermediate was observed. Increased Tg of the drying protectant was associated with improved redispersibility/crystallinity at a defined drum temperature. Consequently, the high Tg-substance trehalose and lactose showed a better performance than mannitol at higher drum temperatures. However, the processability and related powder properties were not in accordance with this observation. Mannitol containing formulations showed superior processibility to those containing trehalose/lactose. Moreover, the impact of the tableting and encapsulation process on the redispersibility of the VDD intermediate was studied for a selected formulation. Neither process demonstrated a negative impact on redispersibility. In conclusion, vacuum drum drying is a promising drying technique for the solidification of nanosuspensions to result in dried powder still containing ritonavir nanoparticles while demonstrating acceptable to good downstream processibility to tablets/capsules.

Compression of amorphous solid dispersions prepared by hot-melt extrusion, spray drying and vacuum drum drying.

The present study explored vacuum drum drying (VDD) as an alternative technology for amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) manufacture compared to hot-melt extrusion (HME) and spray drying (SD) focusing on downstream processability (powder properties, compression behavior and tablet performance). Ritonavir (15% w/w) in a copovidone/sorbitan monolaurate matrix was used as ASD model system. The pure ASDs and respective tablet blends (TB) (addition of filler, glidant, lubricant) were investigated. Milled extrudate showed superior powder properties (e.g., flowability, bulk density) compared to VDD and SD, which could be compensated by the addition of 12.9% outer phase. Advantageously, the VDD intermediate was directly compressible, whereas the SD material was not, resulting in tablets with defects based on a high degree of elastic recovery. Compared to HME, the VDD material showed superior tabletability when formulated as TB, resulting in stronger compacts at even lower solid fraction values. Despite the differences in tablet processing, tablets showed similar tablet performance in terms of disintegration and dissolution independent of the ASD origin. In conclusion, VDD is a valid alternative to manufacture ASDs. VDD offered advantageous downstream processability compared to SD: less solvents and process steps required (no second drying), improved powder properties and suitable for direct compression.