Esophageal safety in CLOSE-guided 50 W high-power-short-duration pulmonary vein isolation: The PREHEAT-PVI-registry.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using high-power-short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RF) is emerging as the standard of care for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). While procedural short-term to midterm efficacy and efficiency are very promising, this registry aims to investigate esopahgeal safety using an optimized ablation approach. METHODS: In a single-center experience, 388 consecutive standardized first-time AF ablation were performed using a CLOSE-guided-fixed-50 W-circumferential PVI and substrate modification without intraprocedural esophageal temperature measurement. Three hundred patients underwent postprocedural esophageal endoscopy to diagnose and grade endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) and were included in the analysis. RESULTS: EDEL were detected in 35 of 300 patients (11.6%), 25 of 35 were low-grade Kansas-city-classification (KCC) 1 lesions with fast healing tendencies. Six patients suffered KCC 2a lesions, 4 patients had KCC 2b lesions (1.3% of all patients). No esophageal perforation or fistula formation was observed. Patient baseline characteristics, especially patients age, gender, and body mass index did not influence EDEL incidence. Additional posterior box isolation did not increase the incidence of EDEL. In patients diagnosed with EDEL, mean catheter contact force during posterior wall ablation was higher (11.9 ± 1.8 vs. 14.7 ± 3 g, p < .001), mean RF duration was shorter (11.9 ± 1 vs. 10.7 ± 1.2 s, p < .001), while achieved ablation index was not different between groups (434 ± 4.9 vs. 433 ± 9.5, n.s.). CONCLUSION: Incidence of EDEL after CLOSE-guided-50 W-HPSD PVI is lower compared to historical cohorts using standard-power RF settings. Catheter contact force during posterior HPSD ablation should not exceed 15 g.

Reconnection patterns after CLOSE-guided 50 W high-power-short-duration circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and substrate modification-PV reconnection might no longer be an issue.

INTRODUCTION: Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) with high-power-short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) technology is emerging as a new standard of care in many electrophysiology laboratories. While procedural short-term efficacy and efficiency is very promising, little is known about mid- to long-term effects of HPSD ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and left atrial substrate modification. METHODS: In a single-center registry, 412 AF procedures were performed in 400 individual patients using a standardized CLOSE protocol-guided fixed 50 W HPSD ablation, aiming for an ablation index (AI) of 400 on the posterior and 550 on the anterior wall. Additional substrate-tailored lines were performed when required. RESULTS: After a mean clinical follow-up of 337 ± 134 days, 15 patients suffered from AF recurrence beyond the blinding period. Twelve gave consent to the indicated reablation. Here, 11 of 12 patients had chronic isolation of all four pulmonary veins (PV). In three of six patients, a reconnection of additional left atrial ablation lines was revealed. Ten out of 12 patients showed progressive fibrous atrial cardiomyopathy and required additional left atrial substrate modification or reisolation of left-atrial lines. During the follow-up no clinical case of atrioesophageal fistula was registered. No PV stenosis after initial HPSD PVI was documented. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring reablation of AF or other atrial tachycardia after a fixed 50 W HPSD circumferential PVI and substrate modification predominantly suffer from progressive fibrous atrial cardiomyopathy, while PV reconnection appears to be a rare cause of AF recurrence.

Procedural efficacy and safety of standardized, ablation index guided fixed 50 W high-power short-duration pulmonary vein isolation and substrate modification using the CLOSE protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Ablation index (AI)-guided ablation according to the CLOSE protocol is very effective in terms of chronic pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, the optimal radiofrequency (RF) power remains controversial. Here, we thought to investigate the efficiency and safety of an AI-guided fixed circumferential 50 W high-power short-duration (HPSD) PVI using the CLOSE protocol. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a single-center trial, 40 patients underwent randomized PVI using AI-guided ablation without esophageal temperature monitoring. In 20 patients a CLOSE protocol guided fixed 50 W HPSD was followed irrespective of the anatomical localization. Twenty subjects were treated according to the CLOSE protocol with standard power settings (20 W posterior and 40 W roof and anterior wall). In addition, 80 consecutive patients were treated according to the HPSD protocol to gather additional safety data. All patients underwent postprocedural esophagogastroduodenoscopy to reveal esophageal lesions (EDELs). The mean total procedural time was 80.3 ± 22.5 in HPSD compared to control 109.1 ± 27.4 min (p < .001). The total RF-time was significantly lower in HPSD with 1379 ± 505 s versus control 2374 ± 619 s (p < .001). There were no differences in periprocedural complications. EDEL occurred in 13% in the HPSD and 10% in the control group. EDEL occurring in the 50 W HSDP patients were smaller, more superficial, and had a faster healing tendency. CONCLUSION: A fixed 50 W HPSD circumferential PVI relying on the AI and CLOSE protocol reduce the total procedure time and the total RF time, without increasing the complication rates. The incidence of EDELs was similar using 50 W at the posterior atrial wall.

Rotor mapping: black box or very simple? The FIRM approach.

Catheter ablation has become the most common therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, despite significant advances in technology and operators' experience, ablation outcomes remain suboptimal, especially in patients with persistent AF. Focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM) represents a new technology for mapping and ablation of patient-specific AF sources. This approach is based on the concept of localized sources, which can be understood as organized rotational waves or focal impulses driving disorganized AF. Several studies, mainly single-center case series, have shown an incremental benefit in long-term outcome when adding FIRM-guided ablation to conventional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Therefore, the results of ongoing multicenter randomized trials are needed to support this data.

Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with second-generation multipolar catheter in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation: Procedural and one-year follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of procedural and follow-up data on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the second-generation pulmonary vein ablation catheter® (PVAC Gold) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study provides data on PVI procedures and 1-year follow-up results with PVAC Gold in patients with AF treated in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty four patients with documented symptomatic paroxysmal (n=198) or persistent (n=186) AF were included in a non-randomized prospectively designed database. Patients were enrolled consecutively at 2 high-volume centers. Procedural as well as 1year follow-up data were systematically analyzed. Average procedure times±standard deviations were 94±23min and 97±23min, respectively, in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. Average fluoroscopy times were 14.7±5.4min and 15.2±5.6min and total application times 18.1±5.0min and 18.8±5.2min, respectively, in the 2 patient cohorts. At 12months, 70.7% (70/99) and 61.9% (70/113) of patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively, were free from AF. Four early complications occurred. In the group with persistent AF, 1 posterior cerebral infarction occurred 2days after the procedure during initiation of anticoagulation. There was no phrenic nerve palsy or esophageal injury associated with the procedures. No thromboembolic events were recorded during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF, second generation multi-electrode-phased radiofrequency ablation delivers favorable mid-term PVI success rates with few procedure-related or follow-up complications.

Treatment of Recurrent Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using Focal Impulse and Rotor Mapping (FIRM)-Guided Rotor Ablation: Early Recurrence and Long-Term Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: A patient-tailored ablation approach focused on the elimination of both pulmonary vein triggers as well as substrate drivers may result in favorable outcomes in recurrent persistent AF patients. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the long-term outcomes of rotor ablation combined with conventional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with recurrent nonparoxysmal AF. METHODS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent FIRM-guided rotor ablation followed by conventional PVI for the treatment of recurrent nonparoxysmal AF. A software algorithm was used to display rotational activity at rotor sites by creating propagation maps from unipolar electrograms recorded using a 64-electrode basket catheter. These rotor sites were targeted for ablation, followed by conventional PVI. RESULTS: All patients had nonparoxysmal AF (83% longstanding persistent) and a previously failed conventional ablation procedure. Stable rotors were identified in all patients (mean of 3.0 ± 1.6 per patient), with 55.2% having right atrial rotors and 96.6% left atrial rotors, respectively. Complications occurred in 5.2% of patients, none related to the FIRM procedure. The median follow-up was 12 months. At 6 and 12 months of follow-up, 73.2% and 76.9% of patients remained free from AF/AT, respectively. Excluding 2 patients who underwent a successful redo ablation procedure/electrical cardioversion, at 12 months of follow-up, 69.2% were free from any AF/AT and 73.1% were free from AF after a single FIRM-guided ablation procedure. CONCLUSION: A high degree of success was observed in this cohort of primarily longstanding persistent AF patients treated for recurrent AF with FIRM-guided rotor ablation. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed.