RESUMO
Dexamethasone use during hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) conditioning varies between pediatric centers. This study aimed to estimate the difference in 1-year treatment-related mortality (TRM) between patients who did or did not receive dexamethasone during HCT conditioning. Secondary objectives were to estimate the difference between dexamethasone-exposed and dexamethasone-unexposed groups in 1-year event-free survival (EFS), time to neutrophil engraftment, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and invasive fungal disease (IFD) at day + 100. This was a seven-site, international, retrospective cohort study. Patients < 18 years old undergoing their first allogeneic or autologous myeloablative HCT for hematologic malignancy or aplastic anemia between January 1, 2012, and July 31, 2017, were included. To control for potential confounders, propensity score weighting was used to calculate the standardized mean difference for all endpoints. Among 242 patients, 140 received dexamethasone during HCT conditioning and 102 did not. TRM was unaffected by dexamethasone exposure (1.7%; 95% CI - 7.4, 10.2%). Between-group differences in secondary outcomes were small. However, dexamethasone exposure significantly increased possible, probable, and proven IFD incidence (9.0%, 95% CI 0.8, 17.3%). TRM is not increased in pediatric patients who receive dexamethasone during HCT conditioning. Clinicians should consider potential IFD risk when selecting chemotherapy-induced vomiting prophylaxis for pediatric HCT patients.
Assuntos
Dexametasona , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Pontuação de Propensão , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Humanos , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Criança , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Lactente , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidade , Estudos de CoortesRESUMO
Acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) grading systems that use only clinical symptoms at treatment initiation such as Minnesota risk identify standard and high risk categories but lack a low risk category suitable to minimize immunosuppressive strategies. We developed a new grading system that includes a low risk stratum based on clinical symptoms alone and determined whether the incorporation of biomarkers would improve the model's prognostic accuracy. We randomly divided 1863 patients in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) who were treated for GVHD into training and validation cohorts. Patients in the training cohort were divided into 14 groups based on similarity of clinical symptoms and similar NRM; we used a classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm to create three Manhattan risk groups that produced a significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for 6-month NRM than the Minnesota risk classification (0.69 vs. 0.64, P=0.009) in the validation cohort. We integrated serum GVHD biomarker scores with Manhattan risk using patients with available serum samples and again used a CART algorithm to establish three MAGIC composite scores that significantly improved prediction of NRM compared to Manhattan risk (AUC, 0.76 vs. 0.70, P=0.010). Each increase in MAGIC composite score also corresponded to a significant decrease in day 28 treatment response (80% vs. 63% vs. 30%, P<0.001). We conclude that the MAGIC composite score more accurately predicts response to therapy and long term outcomes than systems based on clinical symptoms alone and may help guide clinical decisions and trial design.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Algorithms containing either the gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD biomarker amphiregulin (AREG) or a combination of 2 GI GVHD biomarkers (suppressor of tumorigenicity-2 [ST2] + regenerating family member 3 alpha [REG3α]) when measured at GVHD diagnosis are validated predictors of NRM risk but have never been assessed in the same patients using identical statistical methods. We measured the serum concentrations of ST2, REG3α, and AREG by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at the time of GVHD diagnosis in 715 patients divided by the date of transplantation into training (2004-2015) and validation (2015-2017) cohorts. The training cohort (n = 341) was used to develop algorithms for predicting the probability of 12-month NRM that contained all possible combinations of 1 to 3 biomarkers and a threshold corresponding to the concordance probability was used to stratify patients for the risk of NRM. Algorithms were compared with each other based on several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, proportion of patients correctly classified, sensitivity, and specificity using only the validation cohort (n = 374). All algorithms were strong discriminators of 12-month NRM, whether or not patients were systemically treated (n = 321). An algorithm containing only ST2 + REG3α had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.757), correctly classified the most patients (75%), and more accurately risk-stratified those who developed Minnesota standard-risk GVHD and for patients who received posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis. An algorithm containing only AREG more accurately risk-stratified patients with Minnesota high-risk GVHD. Combining ST2, REG3α, and AREG into a single algorithm did not improve performance.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Anfirregulina , Biomarcadores , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Proteína 1 Semelhante a Receptor de Interleucina-1 , Proteínas Associadas a Pancreatite , Humanos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/sangue , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/diagnóstico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/mortalidade , Proteína 1 Semelhante a Receptor de Interleucina-1/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Proteínas Associadas a Pancreatite/sangue , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Anfirregulina/sangue , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Prognóstico , Antígenos de Neoplasias/sangue , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a common and serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in children but overall clinical grade at onset only modestly predicts response to treatment and survival outcomes. Two tools to assess risk at initiation of treatment were recently developed. The Minnesota risk system stratifies children for risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) according to the pattern of GVHD target organ severity. The Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) algorithm of 2 serum biomarkers (ST2 and REG3α) predicts NRM in adult patients but has not been validated in a pediatric population. We aimed to develop and validate a system that stratifies children at the onset of GVHD for risk of 6-month NRM. We determined the MAGIC algorithm probabilities (MAPs) and Minnesota risk for a multicenter cohort of 315 pediatric patients who developed GVHD requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids. MAPs created 3 risk groups with distinct outcomes at the start of treatment and were more accurate than Minnesota risk stratification for prediction of NRM (area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), .79 versus .62, P = .001). A novel model that combined Minnesota risk and biomarker scores created from a training cohort was more accurate than either biomarkers or clinical systems in a validation cohort (AUC .87) and stratified patients into 2 groups with highly different 6-month NRM (5% versus 38%, P < .001). In summary, we validated the MAP as a prognostic biomarker in pediatric patients with GVHD, and a novel risk stratification that combines Minnesota risk and biomarker risk performed best. Biomarker-based risk stratification can be used in clinical trials to develop more tailored approaches for children who require treatment for GVHD.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Proteínas Associadas a Pancreatite , Humanos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/sangue , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/diagnóstico , Criança , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Masculino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Proteínas Associadas a Pancreatite/sangue , Doença Aguda , Medição de Risco , Lactente , Proteína 1 Semelhante a Receptor de Interleucina-1/sangue , Algoritmos , Transplante Homólogo/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
ABSTRACT: Defining prognostic variables in T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LL) remains a challenge. AALL1231 was a Children's Oncology Group phase 3 clinical trial for newly diagnosed patients with T acute lymphoblastic leukemia or T-LL, randomizing children and young adults to a modified augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster backbone to receive standard therapy (arm A) or with addition of bortezomib (arm B). Optional bone marrow samples to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of induction (EOI) were collected in T-LL analyzed to assess the correlation of MRD at the EOI to event-free survival (EFS). Eighty-six (41%) of the 209 patients with T-LL accrued to this trial submitted samples for MRD assessment. Patients with MRD <0.1% (n = 75) at EOI had a superior 4-year EFS vs those with MRD ≥0.1% (n = 11) (89.0% ± 4.4% vs 63.6% ± 17.2%; P = .025). Overall survival did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Cox regression for EFS using arm A as a reference demonstrated that MRD EOI ≥0.1% was associated with a greater risk of inferior outcome (hazard ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-12.40; P = .032), which was independent of treatment arm assignment. Consideration to incorporate MRD at EOI into future trials will help establish its value in defining risk groups. CT# NCT02112916.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasia Residual , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células T Precursoras , Humanos , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células T Precursoras/mortalidade , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células T Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células T Precursoras/patologia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células T Precursoras/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Adulto , Lactente , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Primary objective was to determine if a patient informational brochure describing potentially useful strategies could help manage specific taste changes. Secondary objective was to describe the specific strategies used and whether the strategies were perceived as being helpful. PROCEDURE: This single-center study included pediatric patients with cancer or hematopoietic cell transplant recipients receiving active treatment who experienced bothersome taste changes in the last month. Participants participated in baseline and follow-up interviews conducted 14-21 days apart. A brochure that listed 16 potentially helpful strategies was provided at baseline. At follow-up, we asked about brochure use and whether it helped. At both interviews, we asked about experienced taste changes, strategies used, and whether strategy helped. RESULTS: Of 100 enrolled participants, different (87%) and bad (72%) taste were most common at baseline. Following the brochure intervention, statistically significant reductions were observed in food tasting different, bad, bland, bitter, sour, and metallic. For most strategies, the proportion of patients who used specific strategies or found them helpful was not significantly different between baseline and follow-up. However, "eating foods you like" was considered helpful in significantly more participants who used the strategy in follow-up (72 out of 89, 80.9%) compared with baseline (55 out of 95, 57.9%; p = .008). Between visits, 81.2% looked at the brochure. Among participants, 53.1% found the brochure helpful, very helpful, or extremely helpful. CONCLUSIONS: A brochure that offered strategies to manage changes in taste helped participants cope with them. Further research should evaluate the brochure using randomized and multicenter trials.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Folhetos , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Criança , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Distúrbios do Paladar/etiologia , Distúrbios do Paladar/induzido quimicamente , Distúrbios do Paladar/terapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Seguimentos , Paladar , Lactente , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are often associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IEI can be corrected by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); however, peritransplantation intestinal inflammation may increase the risk of gut graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Vedolizumab inhibits the homing of lymphocytes to the intestine and may attenuate gut GVHD, yet its role in preventing GVHD in pediatric patients with IEI-associated IBD has not been studied. Here we describe a cohort of pediatric patients with IEI-associated IBD treated with vedolizumab before and during allogeneic HSCT. The study involved a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients with IEI-associated IBD treated with vedolizumab at 6 weeks, 4 weeks, and 1 week before undergoing HSCT. The conditioning regimen consisted of treosulfan, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide with rabbit antithymocyte globulin, and GVHD prophylaxis included tacrolimus and steroids. Eleven patients (6 females) with a median age of 5 years (range, 0.4 to 14 years) with diverse IEI were included. IBD symptoms were characterized by abdominal pain, loose stools, and blood in stools. Four patients had developed a perianal fistula, and 1 patient had a rectal prolapse. One patient had both a gastrostomy tube and a jejunal tube in situ. Treatment of IBD before HSCT included steroids in 11 patients, anakinra in 2, infliximab in 4, sulfasalazine in 2, mesalazine in 2, and vedolizumab. IBD symptoms were considered controlled in the absence of abdominal pain, loose stools, or blood in stools. Graft sources for HSCT were unrelated donor cord in 5 patients (2 with a 5/8 HLA match, 2 with a 7/8 match, and 1 with a 6/8 match), peripheral blood stem cells in 5 patients (2 haploidentical, 1 with a 9/10 HLA match, and 2 with a 10/10 match), and bone marrow in 1 patient (10/10 matched sibling donor). The median number of vedolizumab infusions was 4 (range, 3 to 12) before HSCT and 1 (range, 1 to 3) after HSCT, and all were reported to be uneventful. All patients had engrafted. Acute GVHD occurred in 4 patients and was limited to grade I skin GVHD only. Chronic GVHD occurred in 1 patient and again was limited to the skin. There was no gut GVHD. Three patients experienced cytomegalovirus viremia, and 2 patients had Epstein-Barr virus viremia. At the time of this report, all patients were alive with no evidence of IBD at a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 3 to 39 months). Administration of vedolizumab pre- and post-HSCT in pediatric patients with IEI-associated IBD is well tolerated and associated with a low rate of gut GVHD. These findings provide a platform for the prospective study and use of vedolizumab for GVHD prophylaxis in pediatric patients with known intestinal inflammation as a pre-HSCT comorbidity.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Transplante Homólogo , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Criança , Masculino , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Lactente , Imunomodulação , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodosRESUMO
ABSTRACT: The absence of a standardized definition for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) flares and data on its clinical course are significant concerns. We retrospectively evaluated 968 patients across 23 Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) transplant centers who achieved complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) within 4 weeks of treatment. The cumulative incidence of flares within 6 months was 22%, and flares were associated with a higher risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.19-7.36; P < .001). Flares were more severe (grades 3/4, 41% vs 16%; P < .001) and had more frequent lower gastrointestinal (LGI) involvement (55% vs 32%; P < .001) than the initial GVHD. At CR/VGPR, elevated MAGIC biomarkers predicted the future occurrence of a flare, along with its severity and LGI involvement. In multivariate analyses, higher Ann Arbor (AA) biomarker scores at CR/VGPR were significant risk factors for flares (AA2 vs AA1: aHR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.32-2.48; P = .001]; AA3 vs AA1: aHR, 3.14 [95% CI, 1.98-4.98; P < .001]), as were early response to initial treatment (aHR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21-2.80; P = .004) and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (aHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.00-3.02; P = .049). MAGIC biomarkers also stratified the risk of NRM both at CR/VGPR and at the time of flare. We conclude that GVHD flares are common and carry a significant mortality risk. The occurrence of future flares can be predicted by serum biomarkers that may serve to guide adjustment and discontinuation of immunosuppression.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Aguda , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Adulto Jovem , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The overall response rate (ORR) 28 days after treatment has been adopted as the primary endpoint for clinical trials of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, physicians often need to modify immunosuppression earlier than day (D) 28, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) does not always correlate with ORR at D28. We studied 1144 patients that received systemic treatment for GVHD in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) and divided them into a training set (n=764) and a validation set (n=380). We used a recursive partitioning algorithm to create a Mount Sinai model that classifies patients into favorable or unfavorable groups that predicted 12 month NRM according to overall GVHD grade at both onset and D14. In the Mount Sinai model grade II GVHD at D14 was unfavorable for grade III/IV GVHD at onset and predicted NRM as well as the D28 standard response model. The MAGIC algorithm probability (MAP) is a validated score that combines the serum concentrations of suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) and regenerating islet-derived 3-alpha (REG3α) to predict NRM. Inclusion of the D14 MAP biomarker score with the D14 Mount Sinai model created three distinct groups (good, intermediate, poor) with strikingly different NRM (8%, 35%, 76% respectively). This D14 MAGIC model displayed better AUC, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value, and net benefit in decision curve analysis compared to the D28 standard response model. We conclude that this D14 MAGIC model could be useful in therapeutic decisions and may offer an improved endpoint for clinical trials of acute GVHD treatment.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Biomarcadores , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Transplante HomólogoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Primary objectives were to determine the relationship between prevalence of symptom documentation and intervention provision, and increasing severity of bothersome symptoms, as identified by guardians using guardian-reported Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (proxy-SSPedi), which is validated and measures the extent of bothersome symptoms in paediatric patients with cancer. METHODS: We included guardians of children 2-7 years of age receiving cancer treatments and seen in hospital daily for 4 consecutive days. Guardians reported proxy-SSPedi at study enrolment and 3 days later. Chart review was performed between the day prior and the day following proxy-SSPedi completion. Symptom documentation and intervention provision were determined by two independent abstractors. RESULTS: We enrolled 190 guardians who provided 371 proxy-SSPedi assessments in 190 children. The most common severely bothersome symptoms were 'feeling tired', 'feeling more or less hungry than they usually do' and 'feeling cranky or angry'. Among those with increasing severity of bother, documentation was significantly more common for 12 symptoms while intervention was significantly more common for 7 symptoms. Intervention was not significantly more common with increasing severity of bother due to 'feeling tired', 'feeling more or less hungry than they usually do' and 'feeling cranky or angry'. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom documentation was generally more common in patients with severely bothersome symptoms. Intervention was not more common among those with increasing severity of bother due to fatigue, changes in hunger or anger, which were the most common severely bothersome symptoms. Future efforts should focus on facilitating intervention provision to patients with bothersome symptoms.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Criança , Humanos , Documentação , Fadiga , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Pré-EscolarRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Co-Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (co-SSPedi) is a dyadic (child-guardian) approach to symptom assessment. Objectives were to evaluate the reliability and validity of co-SSPedi for pediatric patients receiving cancer treatments. METHODS: This multicenter study included dyads of patients aged 4-18 years of age with cancer or undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant and their guardians. Two groups were enrolled. The more symptomatic group included those receiving active treatment for cancer or undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant where patients were in hospital or clinic for 4 consecutive days. The less symptomatic group included those receiving maintenance therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia or who had completed cancer treatments. At baseline, all dyads completed co-SSPedi, and guardians completed measures of mucositis, nausea, pain, quality of life, and overall symptoms. In the more symptomatic group, dyads completed co-SSPedi and a global symptom change scale on day 4. RESULTS: There were 501 dyads included: 301 in the more symptomatic group and 200 in the less symptomatic group. Median time to complete co-SSPedi was less than 3 minutes in both groups. Test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77 to 0.90). For internal consistency, total co-SSPedi Cronbach alpha was 0.81 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.83). For known groups validation, mean difference in total co-SSPedi scores between the more symptomatic and less symptomatic groups was 7.8 (95% CI = 6.7 to 8.8; P < .0001). For convergent validation and responsiveness, all hypothesized relationships were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Co-SSPedi is a novel approach to dyadic symptom assessment that is reliable, valid, and responsive in pediatric patients aged 4-18 years.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Qualidade de Vida , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Psicometria , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Avaliação de Sintomas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a well-documented risk of secondary cutaneous malignancies following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), but data on risk in pediatric populations are limited. The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review of reported features and outcomes of skin cancers in pediatric allogeneic HSCT recipients. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science were systematically searched (Prospero CRD42022342139). Studies reporting cutaneous cancer outcomes were included if the age at transplant was ≤19 years. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened in duplicate. RESULTS: Out of 824 citations that were screened, 12 articles were selected for analysis. The final sample included 67 pediatric HSCT recipients, comprising 65 allogeneic transplant recipients and 2 cases of HSCT with an unknown donor type. The median age at transplant and skin cancer diagnosis were 7.4 and 13 years, respectively. Out of the 67 pediatric HSCT recipients, some patients developed more than one lesion, resulting in 71 lesions. The most common skin cancer type was cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (32 lesions), followed by basal cell carcinoma (25 lesions). The median latency period between HSCT and skin cancer diagnosis ranged from 0 to 29 years. Identified risk factors for skin cancers included younger age at the time of transplant, exposure to total body irradiation, prolonged post-transplant immunosuppression, graft versus host disease, and sunburn. CONCLUSION: Skin cancers are reported in pediatric allogeneic HSCT recipients, and the risk appears to be increased. More data are needed to better characterize this risk.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/complicações , Transplante Homólogo/efeitos adversos , Progressão da DoençaRESUMO
After primary infection, Varicella Zoster (VZV) persists in sensory dorsal root ganglia and may be reactivated in periods of diminished T-cell immunity. Varicella Zoster reactivation post allogenic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be challenging to diagnose as it does not always present with characteristic skin lesions. We describe a pediatric patient who presented with isolated severe abdominal pain with no other symptoms. Cutaneous lesions appeared only 10 days later resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment. He was successfully treated with intravenous acyclovir and recovered after a prolonged hospital stay with post-herpetic neuralgia. Abdominal pain in children post HSCT has a broad differential and VZV reactivation should be considered even in absence of cutaneous lesions. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to reduce VZV-related morbidity and mortality. In this article we present a case report and review clinical presentation and outcome of similar cases in the literature.
Assuntos
Varicela , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Herpes Zoster , Humanos , Criança , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Herpes Zoster/tratamento farmacológico , Herpes Zoster/etiologia , Herpesvirus Humano 3/fisiologia , Ativação Viral , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Dor Abdominal/complicações , Transplante de Células-Tronco/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We validated different approaches to symptom assessment for pediatric cancer patients based on the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) for self-report (SSPedi and mini-SSPedi), proxy-report (proxy-SSPedi), and structured dyadic-report (co-SSPedi). The objective was to compare co-SSPedi scores vs proxy-report (proxy-SSPedi) and self-report (SSPedi or mini-SSPedi) scores for pediatric patients receiving cancer treatments. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized crossover study enrolling English-speaking dyads of pediatric patients with cancer or hematopoietic cell transplant recipients 4-18 years old and their guardians. Dyads were randomized to first complete the dyadic-report (co-SSPedi) or self-report (patients: SSPedi or mini-SSPedi) and proxy-report (guardians: proxy-SSPedi). Dyads then crossed over to the alternate approach. Primary analysis compared total SSPedi scores between randomized groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 420 dyads that were randomized to co-SSPedi first (n = 213) or proxy-SSPedi and self-report SSPedi first (n = 207). Mean total SSPedi scores (± standard deviation) were co-SSPedi (9.6 ± 7.1), proxy-SSPedi (9.7 ± 7.5; P = .950 for comparison vs co-SSPedi), and self-report SSPedi (9.7 ± 8.2; P = .981 for comparison vs co-SSPedi). Co-SSPedi scores were significantly different from proxy-SSPedi for feeling disappointed or sad, feeling cranky or angry, feeling tired, mouth sores, and changes in taste. Co-SSPedi scores were significantly different from self-report SSPedi scores for problems with thinking or remembering things, feeling tired, mouth sores, tingly or numb hands or feet, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Total co-SSPedi scores were not significantly different compared with proxy-report or self-report scores, although there were differences in specific symptom scores. If different reporter types are used during clinical implementation, specifying reporter type will be important. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT #05012917). Symptoms are common and frequently severely bothersome in pediatric patients with cancer and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients (1). To measure the extent of bothersome symptoms, the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) suite of symptom assessment tools was developed for pediatric patients receiving cancer treatments and currently consists of multiple validated instruments. SSPedi was developed for self-report by patients 8-18 years of age (2,3). Mini-SSPedi was developed for self-report by patients 4 to 7 years of age (4). Proxy-SSPedi was developed for proxy-report by guardians of pediatric patients 2-18 years of age (5). These 3 instruments can be categorized as either self-report (SSPedi or mini-SSPedi) or proxy-report (proxy-SSPedi).
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Autorrelato , Avaliação de Sintomas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Cross-Over , Psicometria , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary hemorrhage (PH) is a serious complication posthematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). In view of limited available pediatric data, we performed a retrospective study to describe epidemiology, management, and outcomes of PH post-HSCT in children in our national center. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Academic children's hospital (2000-2015). SUBJECTS: Children (< 18 yr) with PH and requiring PICU care post-HSCT. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The historical prevalence of PH in our center was 2.7% (31/1,148). Twenty patients had a concomitant infection, 15 had bacterial infection, 8 had viral infection, and 3 patients had a fungal infection. With a median follow-up time of 60 months, 7 of 31 patients were alive. Early PH (< 40 d post-HSCT) was associated with improved survival (6/15 vs 1/16, p = 0.035). Patients who received high-dose pulsed corticosteroid had improved survival when compared with those who did not (7/22 vs 0/9, p = 0.0012); this also applied to the subgroup of patients with a concomitant infection (5/15 vs 0, p = 0.001). None of the patients who survived had measurable respiratory sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: PH is a rare but serious complication after HSCT. Corticosteroids were associated with improved survival even in patients with a concomitant infection.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-TroncoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine if individualised yoga for hospitalised children receiving intensive chemotherapy was associated with less fatigue using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (PedsQL MFS) compared with iPad control. METHODS: This was a multicentre randomised controlled trial of individualised yoga in paediatric patients aged 8-18 years who were inpatients receiving intensive chemotherapy for leukaemia, lymphoma or haematopoietic cell transplantation. Participants were randomised to yoga or iPad groups; allocated programme was delivered individually by trained yoga instructors 5 days/week for 21 days. The primary outcome was day 21 guardian-reported general fatigue using the PedsQL MFS. Secondary outcomes included day 21 PedsQL sleep/rest and cognitive fatigue, Fatigue Scale and PedsQL Acute Cancer Module, and systemic opioid administration. RESULTS: The study was closed early for poor accrual when 125/210 planned participants had been enrolled and randomised to yoga (n=62) or iPad (n=63). Guardian-reported PedsQL MFS general fatigue scores on day 21 were not significantly different between groups (adjusted difference 7.2, 95% CI -2.6 to 16.9) in favour of yoga. However, day 21 cognitive fatigue (adjusted difference 9.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 17.1), cognitive problems (adjusted difference 11.2, 95% CI 3.5 to 19.0) and communication (adjusted difference 10.6, 95% CI 0.8 to 20.4) were significantly better in the yoga compared with the iPad group. There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes including PedsQL sleep/rest fatigue (adjusted difference 4.9, 95% CI -3.5 to 13.3). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of individualised yoga on general fatigue is uncertain in paediatric patients receiving intensive chemotherapy. However, yoga significantly improved cognitive fatigue and cognitive problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02134782.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Changes in taste is a common symptom in paediatric patients receiving cancer therapies. The primary objective was to describe the prevalence of taste changes longitudinally over a 6-month time frame among paediatric patients with newly diagnosed cancer. Secondary objective was to identify factors associated with taste changes over time. METHODS: In this longitudinal, single centre study, we included paediatric patients newly diagnosed with cancer within the previous 8 weeks who were 4-18 years of age. Interviews were conducted once monthly for 6 months. We asked participants about their experience with taste changes, whether potential interventions were successful and whether taste changes influenced eating. Risk factors were evaluated using generalised linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Overall, 60 participants were included. At baseline, 23 (38.3%) participants reported experiencing changes in taste, with the proportion significantly declining over time to 13 (21.7%) at 6 months. The most common specific taste changes were food tasting different, bad or bland. The most common helpful strategies were eating liked foods only, brushing teeth or using mouthwash, drinking more liquids and eating food with strong flavour. Taste change was commonly associated with eating less than usual and reduced enjoyment in eating. Nausea, dry mouth and recent vincristine were independent risk factors for taste changes. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in taste were common within 8 weeks of cancer diagnosis and declined significantly over time. Nausea, dry mouth and recent vincristine were independent risk factors. Future studies should develop and evaluate interventions for managing taste changes in paediatric patients with cancer.
RESUMO
Late acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is defined as de novo acute GVHD presenting beyond 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) without manifestations of chronic GVHD. Data are limited regarding its characteristics, clinical course, and risk factors because of underrecognition and changes in classification. We evaluated 3542 consecutive adult recipients of first HCTs at 24 Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) centers between January 2014 and August 2021 to better describe the clinical evolution and outcomes of late acute GVHD. The cumulative incidence of classic acute GVHD that required systemic treatment was 35.2%, and an additional 5.7% of patients required treatment for late acute GVHD. At the onset of symptoms, late acute GVHD was more severe than classic acute GVHD based on both clinical and MAGIC algorithm probability biomarker parameters and showed a lower overall response rate on day 28. Both clinical and biomarker grading at the time of treatment stratified the risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in patients with classic and late acute GVHD, respectively, but long-term NRM and overall survival did not differ between patients with classic and late acute GVHD. Advanced age, female-to-male sex mismatch, and the use of reduced intensity conditioning were associated with the development of late acute GVHD, whereas the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based GVHD prevention was protective mainly because of shifts in GVHD timing. Because overall outcomes were comparable, our findings, although not definitive, suggest that similar treatment strategies, including eligibility for clinical trials, based solely on clinical presentation at onset are appropriate.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Incidência , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/diagnóstico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/epidemiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Doença Aguda , Biomarcadores , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Primary objective was to determine the feasibility of three times weekly symptom reporting by pediatric cancer patients for eight weeks. METHODS: We included English-speaking patients 8-18 years of age with cancer. Patients were sent reminders by text or email to complete Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) three times weekly for eight weeks. When patients reported at least one severely bothersome symptom, the symptom report was emailed to the primary healthcare team. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained at baseline, week 4 ± 1 and week 8 ± 1. Symptom documentation, intervention provision for symptoms and unplanned healthcare encounters were determined by chart review at weeks 4 and 8. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as at least 75% patients achieving adherence with at least 60% of SSPedi evaluations. We planned to enroll successive cohorts until this threshold was met. RESULTS: Two cohorts consisting of 30 patients (cohort 1 (n = 20) and cohort 2 (n = 10)) were required to meet the feasibility threshold. In cohort 1, 11/20 (55%) met the SSPedi completion threshold. Interventions applied after cohort 1 included engaging parents to facilitate pediatric patient self-report, offering mechanisms to remember username and password and highlighting potential benefits of symptom feedback to clinicians. In cohort 2, 9/10 (90%) met the SSPedi completion threshold and thus feasibility was met. Patient-reported outcomes and chart review outcomes were obtained for all participants in cohort 2. CONCLUSIONS: Three times weekly symptom reporting by pediatric patients with cancer for eight weeks was feasible. Mechanisms to enhance three times weekly symptom reporting were identified and implemented. Future studies of longitudinal symptom screening can now be planned.
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias , Humanos , Criança , Estudos de Viabilidade , Avaliação de Sintomas , Psicometria , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/diagnósticoRESUMO
The National Institutes of Health Consensus criteria for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) diagnosis can be challenging to apply in children, making pediatric cGVHD diagnosis difficult. We aimed to identify diagnostic pediatric cGVHD biomarkers that would complement the current clinical criteria and help differentiate cGVHD from non-cGVHD. The Applied Biomarkers of Late Effects of Childhood Cancer (ABLE) study, open at 27 transplant centers, prospectively evaluated 302 pediatric patients after hematopoietic cell transplant (234 evaluable). Forty-four patients developed cGVHD. Mixed and fixed effect regression analyses were performed on diagnostic cGVHD onset blood samples for cellular and plasma biomarkers, with individual markers declared relevant if they met 3 criteria: an effect ratio ≥1.3 or ≤0.75; an area under the curve (AUC) of ≥0.60; and a P value <5.814 × 10-4 (Bonferroni correction) (mixed effect) or <.05 (fixed effect). To address the complexity of cGVHD diagnosis in children, we built a machine learning-based classifier that combined multiple cellular and plasma biomarkers with clinical factors. Decreases in regulatory natural killer cells, naïve CD4 T helper cells, and naïve regulatory T cells, and elevated levels of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, ST2, ICAM-1, and soluble CD13 (sCD13) characterize the onset of cGVHD. Evaluation of the time dependence revealed that sCD13, ST2, and ICAM-1 levels varied with the timing of cGVHD onset. The cGVHD diagnostic classifier achieved an AUC of 0.89, with a positive predictive value of 82% and a negative predictive value of 80% for diagnosing cGVHD. Our polyomic approach to building a diagnostic classifier could help improve the diagnosis of cGVHD in children but requires validation in future prospective studies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02067832.