Long-term efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes: pooled 52-week outcomes from the DEPICT-1 and -2 studies.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunct dapagliflozin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: DEPICT-1 and -2 were randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 24-week studies, with 28-week extension periods. Adults with T1D and HbA1c 7.5%-10.5% were randomized (1:1:1) to receive dapagliflozin 5 mg, 10 mg or placebo. The short- and long-term efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin were examined in an exploratory pooled analysis of both studies. RESULTS: Efficacy analyses included 530, 529 and 532 and safety analysis included 548, 566 and 532 patients in the dapagliflozin 5 mg, 10 mg and placebo groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. At week 24, reductions were seen with dapagliflozin 5 and 10 mg compared with placebo in HbA1c (-0.40%, -0.43% vs. 0.00%) and body weight (-2.45, -2.91 vs. 0.11 kg). HbA1c and body weight reductions versus placebo were also seen after 52 weeks of treatment. There was no imbalance in occurrence of severe hypoglycaemic events between groups. The proportion of patients experiencing definite diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) was higher with dapagliflozin 5 mg (4.0%) and 10 mg (3.5%) compared with placebo (1.1%) over 52 weeks; most events were of mild or moderate severity, and all resolved with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Over 52 weeks, dapagliflozin provided glycaemic and weight benefits, with no increased frequency of severe hypoglycaemia compared with placebo. More DKA events were reported with dapagliflozin than placebo, highlighting the importance of appropriate patient selection, education and risk-mitigation strategies.

Benefit/risk profile of dapagliflozin 5 mg in the DEPICT-1 and -2 trials in individuals with type 1 diabetes and body mass index ≥27 kg/m2.

AIM: The DEPICT-1 and -2 studies (NCT02268214, NCT02460978) evaluated the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in individuals with type 1 diabetes who were receiving intensive insulin therapy. The DEPICT-1 and -2 studies (NCT02268214, NCT02460978) evaluated the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in individuals with type 1 diabetes. This post-hoc study investigated the safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin in individuals with BMI ≥27 kg/m2 to assess if the benefit/risk ratio associated with dapagliflozin treatment can be further improved than that observed in the overall DEPICT population. METHODS: Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight, percentage change in daily insulin dose and proportion of participants achieving HbA1c reduction ≥0.5% without severe hypoglycaemia were evaluated at weeks 24 and 52. Changes in mean interstitial glucose, mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions and time in target glycaemic range were evaluated at week 24. Safety was assessed until week 56. RESULTS: Week-52 adjusted mean (SE) change from baseline for HbA1c was -0.26% (0.05) with dapagliflozin versus +0.08% (0.05) with placebo and for body weight was -2.74 kg (0.25) with dapagliflozin versus +0.81 kg (0.26) with placebo. Mean (SE) percentage change in daily insulin dose was -10.5% (1.23) with dapagliflozin versus -1.4% (1.36) with placebo. Time spent in target glycaemic range increased by 2.2 h/day versus placebo. Dapagliflozin was well tolerated, with fewer participants experiencing diabetic ketoacidosis (dapagliflozin, 1.7%; placebo, 1.0%) than dapagliflozin 5 mg receiving participants in the pooled DEPICT populations. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the pooled DEPICT population, the benefit/risk profile of adjunct dapagliflozin therapy was more favourable in individuals with type 1 diabetes with body mass index ≥27 kg/m2 because of the reduced risk of diabetic ketoacidosis in this population.

Adverse Changes in HbA1c, Body Weight and Insulin Use in People with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Following Dapagliflozin Discontinuation in the DEPICT Clinical Trial Programme.

INTRODUCTION: Dapagliflozin is an orally active inhibitor of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) that is indicated for use in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) (with a body mass index (BMI) of at least 27 kg/m2 in Europe, no such BMI limit in Japan), when insulin alone does not provide adequate glycaemic control. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight and insulin dose following discontinuation of dapagliflozin for the management of T1DM in the DEPICT clinical trial programme. METHODS: The interrelationship between treatment discontinuation, insulin requirement and outcomes post-discontinuation was evaluated using descriptive summary statistics and linear regression modelling. Data were analysed from individuals with T1DM discontinuing dapagliflozin in DEPICT-1 or DEPICT-2 (unplanned or end of study). HbA1c and body weight were measured over the 56-week study period (consisting of a 52-week treatment period and a 4-week follow-up period) at 4-8 weekly intervals. Following discontinuation of dapagliflozin, 1-year change in HbA1c (%) and weight (kg) following discontinuation of dapagliflozin was estimated; total daily insulin doses were descriptively summarised. RESULTS: Of the 1059 individuals that received dapagliflozin during the DEPICT trials 91 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analyses of HbA1c and body weight. The mean duration of follow-up was 209 days in both analyses. Following dapagliflozin discontinuation, estimated annualised changes in HbA1c and body weight were + 0.99% (95% CI 0.39, 1.59) and + 3.75 kg (1.65, 5.86), respectively. An increase in insulin dose was observed around the time of discontinuation; insulin dose in the 2-week post-discontinuation was + 3.6 IU and + 4.4 IU higher with dapagliflozin 5 mg and 10 mg than 2 weeks pre-discontinuation, respectively. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of dapagliflozin is predicted to lead to clinically meaningful increases in HbA1c and body weight, in addition to higher insulin doses. These findings are important in the management of people with T1DM among whom insulin is the only existing pharmacological treatment option.