RESUMO
Despite major advances in molecular profiling and classification of primary brain tumors, personalized treatment remains limited for most patients. Here, we explored the feasibility of individual molecular profiling and the efficacy of biomarker-guided therapy for adult patients with primary brain cancers in the real-world setting within the molecular tumor board Freiburg, Germany. We analyzed genetic profiles, personalized treatment recommendations, and clinical outcomes of 102 patients with 21 brain tumor types. Alterations in the cell cycle, BRAF, and mTOR pathways most frequently led to personalized treatment recommendations. Molecularly informed therapies were recommended in 71% and implemented in 32% of patients with completed molecular diagnostics. The disease control rate following targeted treatment was 50% and the overall response rate was 30%, with a progression-free survival 2/1 ratio of at least 1.3 in 31% of patients. This study highlights the efficacy of molecularly guided treatment and the need for biomarker-stratified trials in brain cancers.
RESUMO
Background: Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) both represent frequent intracranial malignancies with differing clinical management. However, distinguishing PCNSL from GBM with conventional MRI can be challenging when atypical imaging features are present. We employed advanced dMRI for noninvasive characterization of the microstructure of PCNSL and differentiation from GBM as the most frequent primary brain malignancy. Methods: Multiple dMRI metrics including Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging, and Diffusion Microstructure Imaging were extracted from the contrast-enhancing tumor component in 10 PCNSL and 10 age-matched GBM on 3T MRI. Imaging findings were correlated with cell density and axonal markers obtained from histopathology. Results: We found significantly increased intra-axonal volume fractions (V-intra and intracellular volume fraction) and microFA in PCNSL compared to GBM (all Pâ <â .001). In contrast, mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (aD), and microADC (all Pâ <â .001), and also free water fractions (V-CSF and V-ISO) were significantly lower in PCNSL (all Pâ <â .01). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed high predictive values regarding the presence of a PCNSL for MD, aD, microADC, V-intra, ICVF, microFA, V-CSF, and V-ISO (area under the curve [AUC] in all >0.840, highest for MD and ICVF with an AUC of 0.960). Comparative histopathology between PCNSL and GBM revealed a significantly increased cell density in PCNSL and the presence of axonal remnants in a higher proportion of samples. Conclusions: Advanced diffusion imaging enables the characterization of the microstructure of PCNSL and reliably distinguishes PCNSL from GBM. Both imaging and histopathology revealed a relatively increased cell density and a preserved axonal microstructure in PCNSL.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The utility of liquid biopsies is well documented in several extracranial and intracranial (brain/leptomeningeal metastases, gliomas) tumors. METHODS: The RANO (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology) group has set up a multidisciplinary Task Force to critically review the role of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-liquid biopsy in CNS lymphomas, with a main focus on primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL). RESULTS: Several clinical applications are suggested: diagnosis of PCNSL in critical settings (elderly or frail patients, deep locations, and steroid responsiveness), definition of minimal residual disease, early indication of tumor response or relapse following treatments, and prediction of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Thus far, no clinically validated circulating biomarkers for managing both primary and secondary CNS lymphomas exist. There is need of standardization of biofluid collection, choice of analytes, and type of technique to perform the molecular analysis. The various assays should be evaluated through well-organized central testing within clinical trials.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central , Linfoma , Humanos , Biópsia Líquida/métodos , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/patologia , Linfoma/sangue , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Available treatments for older patients with primary diffuse large B-cell CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) offer progression-free survival of up to 16 months. We aimed to investigate an intensified treatment of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in older patients with PCNSL. METHODS: MARTA was a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study done at 15 research hospitals in Germany. Patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed, untreated PCNSL were enrolled if they had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and were fit for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT. Induction treatment consisted of two 21-day cycles of high-dose intravenous methotrexate 3·5 g/m2 (day 1), intravenous cytarabine 2 g/m2 twice daily (days 2 and 3), and intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 (days 0 and 4) followed by high-dose chemotherapy with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 (day -8), intravenous busulfan 3·2 mg/kg (days -7 and -6), and intravenous thiotepa 5 mg/kg (days -5 and -4) plus autologous HSCT. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 12 months in all patients who met eligibility criteria and started treatment. The study was registered with the German clinical trial registry, DRKS00011932, and recruitment is complete. FINDINGS: Between Nov 28, 2017, and Sept 16, 2020, 54 patients started induction treatment and 51 were included in the full analysis set. Median age was 71 years (IQR 68-75); 27 (53%) patients were female and 24 (47%) were male. At a median follow-up of 23·0 months (IQR 16·8-37·4), 23 (45%) of 51 patients progressed, relapsed, or died. 12-month progression-free survival was 58·8% (80% CI 48·9-68·2; 95% CI 44·1-70·9). During induction treatment, the most common grade 3-5 toxicities were thrombocytopenia and leukopenia (each in 52 [96%] of 54 patients). During high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT, the most common grade 3-5 toxicity was leukopenia (37 [100%] of 37 patients). Treatment-related deaths were reported in three (6%) of 54 patients, all due to infectious complications. INTERPRETATION: Although the primary efficacy threshold was not met, short induction followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT is active in selected older patients with PCNSL and could serve as a benchmark for comparative trials. FUNDING: Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation, Riemser Pharma, and Medical Center-University of Freiburg.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucopenia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Estudos Prospectivos , Rituximab , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare two novel electrode montages for ocular, vestibular evoked myogenic potential using single-nasion reference electrodes with the clinical standard montage. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover experiment. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty healthy participants. INTERVENTION: Normal hearing and vestibular function were confirmed with an extensive test-battery. All ocular, vestibular evoked myogenic potential settings were measured with air-conducted tone bursts at 100-dB normal hearing level and a frequency of 500 Hz. Three electrode montages were measured in randomized order: the clinical standard montage ("S"), the nasion reference montage ("N"), and the nasion reference montage with a more lateral active electrode ("L"). Upgaze was standardized to 35 degrees. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detection rate, latency of N1 and P1, peak-to-peak amplitude of N1 and P1, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), asymmetry ratio (AR), concordance of expert assessment, and reliability. RESULTS: All electrode montages showed detection rates greater than 90%. Latencies for "L" were shorter than for "S" and "N." Amplitudes and SNR for "S" and "N" were higher than for "L," whereas the values for "S" and "N" did not differ significantly. For AR, no significant differences between the montages were assessed. Concordance of experts ranged from 78% for "L" and 89.8% for "N." All montages provided excellent day-to-day reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.9) for amplitudes and SNR. CONCLUSIONS: Montage N could be a useful alternative to the clinical standard montage: although results are roughly equivalent, montage N requires one less electrode to do so.