Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Interprof Care ; 37(sup1): S53-S62, 2023 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29641943

RESUMO

Assessment of interprofessional education (IPE) frequently focuses on students' learning outcomes including changes in knowledge, skills, and/or attitudes. While a foundational education in the values and information of their chosen profession is critical, interprofessional learning follows a continuum from formal education to practice. The continuum increases in significance and complexity as learning becomes more relationship based and dependent upon the ability to navigate complex interactions with patients, families, communities, co-workers, and others. Integrating IPE into collaborative practice is critical to enhancing students' experiential learning, developing teamwork competencies, and understanding the complexity of teams. This article describes a project that linked students with a hospital-based quality-improvement effort to focus on the acquisition and practice of teamwork skills and to determine the impact of teamwork on patient and quality outcome measures. A hospital unit was identified with an opportunity for improvement related to quality care, patient satisfaction, employee engagement, and team behaviours. One hundred and thirty-seven students from six health profession colleges at the Medical University of South Carolina underwent TeamSTEPPS® training and demonstrated proficiency of their teamwork-rating skills with the TeamSTEPPS® Team Performance Observation Tool (T-TPO). Students observed real-time team behaviours of unit staff before and after staff attended formal TeamSTEPPS® training. The students collected a total of 778 observations using the T-TPO. Teamwork performance on the unit improved significantly across all T-TPO domains (team structure, communication, leadership, situation monitoring, and mutual support). Significant improvement in each domain continued post-intervention and at 15-month follow-up, improvement remained significant compared to baseline. Student engagement in TeamSTEPPS® training and demonstration of their reliability as teamwork-observers was a valuable learning experience and also yielded an opportunity to gather unique, and otherwise difficult to attain, data from a hospital unit for use by quality managers and administrators.


Assuntos
Relações Interprofissionais , Estudantes de Ciências da Saúde , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Currículo , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente
2.
Front Health Serv Manage ; 33(4): 3-15, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28538053

RESUMO

Healthcare has enthusiastically embraced quality and safety improvement. Yet, more radical transformation is clearly needed to make a more significant impact on error reduction and to ensure consistent quality. This need for transformation is leading healthcare to examine how other industries, such as nuclear power and aviation, improve safety to achieve a high degree of reliability and avoid potential catastrophes. Research has shown that successful organizations in high-risk industries achieve high reliability by maintaining a cultural mindfulness that allows them to continually reinvent themselves in complex environments. Healthcare faces similar challenges and could greatly benefit from instilling high-reliability principles in its operations. The Medical University of South Carolina, an academic health system, has been on a quest to improve safety and quality by implementing a high-reliability culture.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Atenção Plena , Cultura Organizacional , Organizações , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
4.
Am J Med Qual ; 21(1): 18-29, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16401702

RESUMO

Inpatient pneumococcal vaccination remains underutilized, and little data exist to guide hospital personnel in improving their performance. The authors report their experience with a stepwise program to improve vaccination assessment rates for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. They assessed barriers to vaccination and applied a stepwise educational and intranet-based decision support implementation program for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Preintervention vaccination rates were 0%. Primary nursing and physician barriers were assessed. An educational intervention increased vaccination assessment rates to 35%, a nursing decision-support tool to 42%, and approval of a standing order policy to 96%. For patients older than 65 years, vaccination assessment rates increased 33%, 67%, and 100%, respectively. An educational program combined with a decision support tool and a standing order policy can improve vaccination assessment rates to high levels. This study suggests that a multidimensional intervention is required to improve compliance with inpatient vaccination best clinical practices.


Assuntos
Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Internados , Infecções Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Idoso , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , South Carolina
5.
South Med J ; 98(6): 607-10, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16004167

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In the hospitalist literature, most studies have focused on outcomes related to cost savings for individual hospital systems. This study sought to determine if hospitalists could improve cost savings at a state level. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a statewide database for inpatients in 2002 with bacterial pneumonia. The primary outcomes measured were mean length of stay (LOS) and mean charges per patient between hospitalists and nonhospitalists. The secondary outcome measured was percentage of patients by severity of illness between the groups. RESULTS: The difference of LOS in the moderate illness category was 4.9 days for hospitalists and 5.2 for nonhospitalists (P = 0.04). The major illness category was 7.4 and 8 (P = 0.03), and the extreme illness category was 10.6 and 12.9 (P = 0.02). The difference of mean charges per patient in the major category were dollars 20,950 and dollars 23,259 (P = 0.03) and dollars 42,045 and dollars 56,867, respectively (P = 0.002), in the extreme category. Patients in the major/extreme categories of illness accounted for 41% of hospitalist patients versus 32% of nonhospitalist patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalists have shorter LOS, lower charges per patient, and admit a larger proportion of high acuity patients at a state level.


Assuntos
Médicos Hospitalares/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/economia , Adulto , Redução de Custos , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Preços Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pneumonia Bacteriana/classificação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , South Carolina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA