Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
Biomolecules ; 14(5)2024 Apr 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785920

RESUMO

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder, affecting a growing number of elderly people. In order to improve the early and differential diagnosis of AD, better biomarkers are needed. Glycosylation is a protein post-translational modification that is modulated in the course of many diseases, including neurodegeneration. Aiming to improve AD diagnosis and differential diagnosis through glycan analytics methods, we report the glycoprotein glycome of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) isolated from a total study cohort of 262 subjects. The study cohort consisted of patients with AD, healthy controls and patients suffering from other types of dementia. CSF free-glycans were also isolated and analyzed in this study, and the results reported for the first time the presence of 19 free glycans in this body fluid. The free-glycans consisted of complete or truncated N-/O-glycans as well as free monosaccharides. The free-glycans Hex1 and HexNAc1Hex1Neu5Ac1 were able to discriminate AD from controls and from patients suffering from other types of dementia. Regarding CSF N-glycosylation, high proportions of high-mannose, biantennary bisecting core-fucosylated N-glycans were found, whereby only about 20% of the N-glycans were sialylated. O-Glycans and free-glycan fragments were less sialylated in AD patients than in controls. To conclude, this comprehensive study revealed for the first time the biomarker potential of free glycans for the differential diagnosis of AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Biomarcadores , Polissacarídeos , Doença de Alzheimer/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Humanos , Biomarcadores/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Polissacarídeos/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Polissacarídeos/química , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Glicosilação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Glicoproteínas/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Estudos de Casos e Controles
2.
Neurodegener Dis Manag ; 13(5): 269-280, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38063885

RESUMO

Aim: Thorough diagnostics are a prerequisite for the optimal treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Biomarker-based diagnostics are standard in academia, data on practitioners' diagnostic workups is scarce. Materials & methods: Surveys in German and US healthcare providers (HCP) were conducted regarding diagnostics in presumed AD patients. A subsample of 153 German and 88 US professionals was analyzed in detail. Results: Fewer German physicians conduct AD diagnostics themselves compared with US colleagues (67% vs 99%; p < 0.0001). German doctors more often order diagnostics at other institutions (65% vs 45%; p < 0.005). No significant differences were found regarding the type of diagnostics ordered at other institutions. Conclusion: Diagnostic routines for suspected AD patients differ between German and US-American healthcare providers.


It is important to conduct the best-possible tests to come to a correct diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This ensures choosing the optimal treatment. In academic surroundings such as specialized memory clinics, so called biomarkers (found for example in blood) are an important component in finding the correct diagnosis. However, there is limited data on the methods healthcare providers (HCP) use in their everyday clinical practice. With this study, we aimed to get a clearer picture of the differences in the diagnostic routines for potential AD patients implemented by HCPs in two high-income countries, Germany and the USA. We conducted two surveys in 500 German and 100 US HCPs on their AD-diagnostic routines. A comparable subsample of 153 German and 88 US professionals was analyzed in detail. We found that fewer German physicians conduct AD diagnostics themselves compared with their US­American colleagues (67% vs 99%). The other way around, German doctors more often order diagnostics at other institutions (65% vs 45%). However, there were no significant differences in the type of diagnostic procedures ordered at other institutions. In conclusion, diagnostic routines for suspected AD patients differ between German and US­American healthcare providers, such as biomarker-based diagnostics, which German physicians significantly perform less often.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Médicos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde
3.
Bioanalysis ; 15(19): 1157-1167, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37650497

RESUMO

Background: We analyzed differences in protein concentrations in human blood serum depending on the tube material and the immunoassay platform used. Materials & methods: Blood samples from study participants were collected in glass and polypropylene tubes (n = 292). Serum concentrations of six proteins (BDNF, IGF-1, VEGF-A, TGF-ß1, MCP-1 and IL-18) were assessed by using ELISAs (all biomarkers), as well as a novel fully automated immunoassay platform (all but IGF-1, n = 211). Bland-Altman analyses were conducted to investigate intrasample variability of protein concentrations. Results: Tube comparison resulted in mean biases of between -0.45 and -70.64%. Platform comparison revealed mean biases of between 21.04 and -128.10%. Conclusion: Protein concentrations can vary significantly depending on the types of tube and immunoassay used, with protein-specific differences.


This study investigated the impact of blood tube materials and measuring platforms on protein concentrations in blood samples. We collected blood serum from up to 292 study participants using glass and polypropylene tubes. The concentrations of six proteins were analyzed using a common laboratory technique called ELISA, as well as an automated platform, Ella™. The choice of tube material had small effects on two proteins (IGF-1 and IL-18), with differences of less than 1%. However, the concentrations of four other proteins (VEGF-A, MCP-1, TGF-ß1 and BDNF) varied significantly more depending on the tube material used, with differences ranging from -32.17 to -70.64%. With the two testing methods, two proteins (VEGF-A and TGF-ß1) showed only small differences, with variations of -7.68 and 11.74%, respectively. For the other four proteins, the differences were larger, from 21.04 to -128.10%. The study demonstrates the importance of having consistent, standardized methods for measuring protein levels in blood samples. The tubes and testing methods used can both change the results significantly, depending on the specific protein being measured. To make sure the measurements are accurate, we suggest creating specific guidelines for each testing method and protein. By following these guidelines, scientists can ensure that the measurements of protein levels in liquid biopsy samples are dependable and consistent.

4.
Biomark Med ; 16(7): 511-521, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35272476

RESUMO

Aim: The development of biomarker-based diagnostic procedures often relies on samples stored for several years. We aimed to investigate the influence of storage time and patient age on six neuroregulatory and immunoregulatory serum biomarkers. Materials & methods: We quantified six biomarkers in serum from 151 individuals using ELISA. Serum was stored at -80°C for up to 9.5 years. Results: When associating storage time with biomarker values, BDNF, VEGF-A and TGF-ß1 showed a significant increase over time; IGF-1, MCP-1 and IL-18 did not. Associating participant age with biomarkers, only IL-18 in Alzheimer's disease patients showed a significant increase. Conclusion: Storage time can influence results of biomarkers in human serum. This needs to be considered when assessing samples stored for several years.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Biomarcadores , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Humanos
5.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol ; 37(2): 521-530, 2022 Feb 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34427587

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study describes a 44-year-old German male with early-onset Alzheimer's disease as a result of a M139V presenilin 1 mutation. The patient has at least seven affected family members, spanning at least four generations. METHOD: We performed a complete demographic, genetic, neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, neuroradiological, and neuropathological characterizations of this patient. The findings were compared with previous reports of patients with the same mutation. Demographic, neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, neuroradiological, and neuropathological data from several affected members of the patient's family were also addressed. RESULTS: We describe similarities shared with other cases, including age at onset, rapid disease progression, severe deficits in arithmetic and visuo-constructive abilities with relative preservation of naming skills, and the presence of predominant frontal behavioral symptoms. Differences with respect to previously described cases, including the absence of positive neurological or radiological findings, psychotic symptoms, or a depressive disorder, are also identified and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity in symptoms between affected patients from the same or from different families suggests that individual, genetic, or epigenetic factors most likely modulate the phenotype of patients carrying the M139V mutation.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Adulto , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Mutação , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Linhagem , Presenilina-1/genética
6.
Neurodegener Dis Manag ; 11(2): 167-176, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596691

RESUMO

Alzheimer's disease is the most common neurodegenerative process leading to dementia. To date, there is no curative approach; thus, establishing a diagnosis as early as possible is necessary to implement preventive measures. However, today's gold standard for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease is high in both cost and effort and is not readily available. This defines the need for low-effort and economic alternatives that give patients low-threshold access to testing systems at their general practitioners or even at home for an independent retrieval of a biologic specimen. This perspective gives an overview of established and novel approaches in the field and speculates on the future of test strategies eventually technically implementable at home.


Lay abstract Alzheimer's disease is a common cause for dementia. While there is no cure yet, finding a diagnosis as early as possible is necessary to slow down worsening of cognitive abilities as much as possible. The commonly administered diagnostic tools for Alzheimer's disease are high in both cost and effort. This emphasizes the need for low-effort and economic alternatives, that give patients a low-threshold access to testing systems at their general practitioners or at home in a self-application. This perspective gives an overview of today's diagnostic standard and reviews novel approaches in the field. It also speculates on the future of strategies that might potentially be suitable for taking a diagnostic test at home.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Autoteste , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
7.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 78(2): 819-826, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33074230

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms often co-occur with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and can impact neuropsychological test results. In early stages of AD, disentangling cognitive impairments due to depression from those due to neurodegeneration often poses a challenge. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify neuropsychological tests able to detect AD-typical pathology while taking into account varying degrees of depressive symptoms. METHODS: A battery of neuropsychological tests (CERAD-NP) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were assessed, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers were obtained. After stratifying patients into CSF positive or negative and into low, moderate, or high GDS score groups, sensitivity and specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for each subtest. RESULTS: 497 participants were included in the analyses. In patients with low GDS scores (≤10), the highest AUC (0.72) was achieved by Mini-Mental State Examination, followed by Constructional Praxis Recall and Wordlist Total Recall (AUC = 0.714, both). In patients with moderate (11-20) and high (≥21) GDS scores, Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B) revealed the highest AUCs with 0.77 and 0.82, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neuropsychological tests showing AD-typical pathology in participants with low GDS scores are in-line with previous results. In patients with higher GDS scores, TMT-B showed the best discrimination. This indicates the need to focus on executive function rather than on memory task results in depressed patients to explore a risk for AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/psicologia , Progressão da Doença , Testes Neuropsicológicos/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
8.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 34(4): 318-324, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32649324

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence suggesting that inflammatory responses may be involved in the neurodegenerative cascade of Alzheimer disease (AD). Blood-based biomarker analysis of inflammatory markers indicative of dementia could serve as a minimally invasive and easy-to-administer diagnostic tool in primary care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors quantified 6 markers (brain-derived neurotrophic factor, insulin-like growth factor 1, vascular endothelial growth factor, transforming growth factor-beta type 1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, and interleukin-18) in blood serum of 68 healthy blood donors (controls), 42 patients with AD at the dementia stage, 55 patients with AD at the stage of mild cognitive impairment (MCI-AD), and 25 patients with MCI non-AD. All patients have been fully characterized, including AD biomarker analyses in cerebrospinal fluid. Data were analyzed in an algorithm that was trained, validated, and then used for dichotomous classification of unknown data into data sets suspicious and not suspicious of AD. RESULTS: Using this algorithm, 47 of 55 MCI-AD (85.5%) and 20 of 25 MCI non-AD (80%) cases were classified as suspicious of AD. CONCLUSIONS: This panel of 6 markers in blood serum may indicate underlying neurodegenerative processes in patients with AD at the MCI stage. The authors assume that a deranged equilibrium of neuroprotective and inflammatory processes is an overall major cause for neurodegeneration and cognitive decline.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Progressão da Doença , Idoso , Demência/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
9.
Alzheimers Dement ; 16(9): 1248-1258, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32588544

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is a carrier for brain lipids and the most important genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). ApoE binds the receptor sortilin, which mediates uptake of apoE-bound cargo into neurons. The significance of this uptake route for brain lipid homeostasis and AD risk seen with apoE4, but not apoE3, remains unresolved. METHODS: Combining neurolipidomics in patient specimens with functional studies in mouse models, we interrogated apoE isoform-specific functions for sortilin in brain lipid metabolism and AD. RESULTS: Sortilin directs the uptake and conversion of polyunsaturated fatty acids into endocannabinoids, lipid-based neurotransmitters that act through nuclear receptors to sustain neuroprotective gene expression in the brain. This sortilin function requires apoE3, but is disrupted by binding of apoE4, compromising neuronal endocannabinoid metabolism and action. DISCUSSION: We uncovered the significance of neuronal apoE receptor sortilin in facilitating neuroprotective actions of brain lipids, and its relevance for AD risk seen with apoE4.


Assuntos
Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transporte Vesicular/metabolismo , Apolipoproteína E4 , Endocanabinoides/metabolismo , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , Neurônios/metabolismo , Neuroproteção , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Transporte Vesicular/genética , Doença de Alzheimer/genética , Doença de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Animais , Apolipoproteína E3/genética , Apolipoproteína E3/metabolismo , Apolipoproteína E4/genética , Apolipoproteína E4/metabolismo , Transporte Biológico , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Humanos , Camundongos , Transdução de Sinais
10.
Metabolites ; 10(6)2020 Jun 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32560109

RESUMO

NMR-based metabolomics investigations of human biofluids offer great potential to uncover new biomarkers. In contrast to protocols for sample collection and biobanking, procedures for sample preparation prior to NMR measurements are still heterogeneous, thus compromising the comparability of the resulting data. Herein, we present results of an investigation of the handling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples for NMR metabolomics research. Origins of commonly observed problems when conducting NMR experiments on this type of sample are addressed, and suitable experimental conditions in terms of sample preparation and pH control are discussed. Sample stability was assessed by monitoring the degradation of CSF samples by NMR, hereby identifying metabolite candidates, which are potentially affected by sample storage. A protocol was devised yielding consistent spectroscopic data as well as achieving overall sample stability for robust analysis. We present easy to adopt standard operating procedures with the aim to establish a shared sample handling strategy that facilitates and promotes inter-laboratory comparison, and the analysis of sample degradation provides new insights into sample stability.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA