Timing of Resection of Spinal Meningiomas and Its Influence on Quality of Life and Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The main treatment modality for spinal meningiomas (SM) is gross total resection (GTR). However, the optimal timing of surgery, especially in cases with absent or mild neurological symptoms, remains unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of early-stage resection on neurological outcome, quality of life (QoL), and quality of care. The primary objective is a favorable neurological outcome (McCormick scale 1). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent operations for SM between 2011 and 2021. Patients with mild neurological symptoms preoperatively (McCormick scale 1 and 2) were compared to those with more severe neurological symptoms (McCormick scale 3-5). Disabilities and QoL were assessed according to validated questionnaires (SF-36, ODI, NDI). RESULTS: Age, spinal cord edema, thoracic localization, and spinal canal occupancy ratio were associated with more severe neurological symptoms (all p < 0.05). Patients presenting with mild symptoms were associated with favorable neurological outcomes (OR: 14.778 (95%CI 3.918-55.746, p < 0.001)), which is associated with shorter hospitalization, better QoL, and fewer disabilities (p < 0.05). Quality of care was comparable in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Early surgical intervention for SM, before the development of severe neurological deficits, should be considered as it is associated with a favorable neurological outcome and quality of life.

Does 5-ALA Fluorescence Microscopy Improve Complete Resectability in Cerebral/Cerebellar Metastatic Surgery? A Retrospective Data Analysis from a Cranial Center.

(1) Background: In this study, the intraoperative fluorescence behavior of brain metastases after the administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was analyzed. The aim was to investigate whether the resection of brain metastases using 5-ALA fluorescence also leads to a more complete resections and thus to a prolongation of survival; (2) Methods: The following variables have been considered: age, sex, number of metastases, localization, involvement of eloquent area, correlation between fluorescence and primary tumor/subtype, resection, and survival time. The influence on the degree of resection was determined with a control MRI within the first three postoperative days; (3) Results: Brain metastases fluoresced in 57.5% of cases. The highest fluorescence rates of 73.3% were found in breast carcinoma metastases and the histologic subtype adenocarcinoma (68.1%). No correlation between fluorescence behavior and localization, primary tumor, or histological subtype was found. Complete resection was detected in 82.5%, of which 56.1% were fluorescence positive. There was a trend towards improved resectability (increase of 12.1%) and a significantly longer survival time (p = 0.009) in the fluorescence-positive group; (4) Conclusions: 5-ALA-assisted extirpation leads to a more complete resection and longer survival and can therefore represent a low-risk addition to modern surgery for brain metastases.

Interrater Agreement of Height Assessment by Rigid Proctoscopy/Rectoscopy for Rectal Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Some guidelines for rectal carcinoma consider 12 cm, measured by rigid endoscopy, to be the cutoff tumor height for optional neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Measuring differences of only a few centimeters may predetermine the choice of further therapy. However, rigid endoscopy may exhibit similar operator dependence to most other clinical examination methods. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of concordance of rigid rectoscopic tumor height measurements performed by 4 experienced examiners, 2 measuring with patients in the lithotomy position and 2 in the left lateral position. Assessment of tumor palpability and distance of the anal verge to the anocutaneous line were also evaluated. DESIGN: This study used a prospective observational design. SETTING: This study was conducted at an academic teaching hospital that is a referral center for colorectal surgery. PATIENTS: There were 50 patients, of whom 35 were men (70%). The median age was 72.5 years (53-88 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interrater agreement of tumor height assessment and tumor height of less than or greater than the 12-cm height limit. RESULTS: With an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.947 (95% CI, 0.918-0.967, p < 0.001), interrater reliability of tumor height assessment was statistically rated "excellent." Despite this, in 26% of patients, there was no agreement regarding the allocation of the tumor <12- or >12-cm height limit. Furthermore, there was also considerable disagreement concerning tumor palpability and the distance of the anal verge to the anocutaneous line. Patient positioning was not found to influence results. LIMITATIONS: Single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid rectal endoscopy may not be a sound pivotal basis for the consideration of optional chemoradiation therapy in rectal carcinoma. Application of a universally valid height limit ignores biological variability in body frame, gender, and acquired pelvic descent. Eligibility for neoadjuvant therapy should not rely on height measurements alone. Uniform MRI or CT imaging protocols, based on agreed upon terminology, including factors such as tumor height relative to the pelvic frame and peritoneal reflection, may be an important diagnostic addition to such a decision. See Video Abstract .Clinical trial registration: DRKS00012758 (German National Study Registry), ST-D 406 (German Cancer Society). ACUERDO ENTRE EVALUADORES EN LA EVALUACIN DE LA ALTURA MEDIANTE PROCTO/ RECTOSCOPIA RGIDA PARA EL CARCINOMA DE RECTO: ANTECEDENTES:Algunas guías para el carcinoma de recto consideran que 12 cm, medidos mediante endoscopia rígida, es la altura de corte del tumor para la quimiorradiación neoadyuvante opcional. Por lo tanto, una diferencia de medición de sólo unos pocos centímetros puede predeterminar la elección de una terapia adicional. Sin embargo, la endoscopia rígida puede presentar una dependencia del operador similar a la de la mayoría de los demás métodos de examen clínico.OBJETIVOS:Evaluación de la concordancia de las mediciones de la altura del tumor rectoscópico rígido realizadas por cuatro examinadores experimentados, dos en litotomía y dos en posición lateral izquierda. También se evaluó la evaluación de la palpabilidad del tumor y la distancia del borde anal a la línea anocutánea.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional prospectivo.LUGAR:Hospital universitario, centro de referencia para cirugía colorrectal.PACIENTES:50 pacientes, 35 varones (70%), mediana de edad 72,5 años (53-88 años).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Acuerdo entre evaluadores en la evaluación de la altura del tumor y la asignación del tumor por debajo o más allá del límite de altura de 12 cm.RESULTADOS:Con un coeficiente de correlación intraclase de 0,947 (IC del 95%: 0,918-0,967, p < 0,001), la confiabilidad entre evaluadores de la evaluación de la altura del tumor se calificó estadísticamente como "excelente". A pesar de esto, en el 26% de los pacientes no hubo acuerdo sobre la asignación del tumor por debajo o por encima del límite de 12 cm de altura. Además, también hubo un considerable desacuerdo con respecto a la palpabilidad del tumor y la distancia del borde anal a la línea anocutánea. No se encontró que la posición del paciente influyera en los resultados.LIMITACIONES:Estudio unicéntrico.CONCLUSIONES:La endoscopia rectal rígida puede no ser una base sólida y fundamental para considerar la quimiorradiación opcional en el carcinoma de recto. La aplicación de un límite de altura universalmente válido obviamente ignora la variabilidad biológica en la constitución corporal, el género y el descenso pélvico adquirido. La elegibilidad para la terapia neoadyuvante no debe depender únicamente de las mediciones de altura. Los protocolos uniformes de imágenes por resonancia magnética o tomografía computarizada, basados en una terminología acordada, incluidos factores como la altura del tumor en relación con la estructura pélvica y la reflexión peritoneal, pueden ser una adición diagnóstica importante para tal decisión. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil )Clinical trial registration: DRKS00012758 (German National Study Registry), ST-D 406 (German Cancer Society).

A Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Comparative Effectiveness of Unilateral Hemilaminectomy and Bilateral Laminectomy in the Resection of Spinal Meningiomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The primary treatment modality for spinal meningiomas (SM) is surgical resection. In recent years, minimal invasive spine surgery has gained considerable popularity, attributing its growth to advancements in surgical technologies and improved training of surgeons. Nonetheless, the suitability and effectiveness of minimal invasive spine surgery for intradural spinal tumor resection remain a subject of debate. In this cohort study, we aimed to compare the extent of resection of the unilateral hemilaminectomy approach, a less invasive technique, with the more traditional and invasive bilateral laminectomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients with SM who underwent surgery at our department between 1996 and 2020. Cohorts included patients who underwent tumor resection through bilateral laminectomy and patients who underwent a unilateral hemilaminectomy. The primary end point was extent of resection according to the Simpson classification. RESULTS: Of 131 with SM, 36 had a bilateral laminectomy and 95 were operated through a unilateral hemilaminectomy. In both groups, gross total resection, Simpson grades 1 and 2, was achieved in 94.44% and 94.74%, respectively (P = .999). The neurological outcome was also comparable in both cohorts (P = .356). Both length of hospital stay and estimated blood loss were significantly lower in the unilateral cohort (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the unilateral hemilaminectomy yields comparable results in both oncological and neurological outcome when compared with the bilateral laminectomy. Thus, unilateral hemilaminectomy may serve as a viable and safe alternative for the surgical removal of SM.

Does Early Mobilization Following Resection of Spinal Intra-Dural Pathology Increase the Risk of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks?-A Dual-Center Comparative Effectiveness Research.

Background and Objectives: Prolonged bed rest after the resection of spinal intradural tumors is postulated to mitigate the development of cerebrospinal fluid leaks (CSFLs), which is one of the feared postoperative complications. Nonetheless, the empirical evidence supporting this conjecture remains limited and requires further investigation. The goal of the study was to investigate whether prolonged bed rest lowers the risk of CSFL after the resection of spinal intradural tumors. The primary outcome was the rate of CSFL in each cohort. Materials and Methods: To validate this hypothesis, we conducted a comparative effectiveness research (CER) study at two distinct academic neurosurgical centers, wherein diverse postoperative treatment protocols were employed. Specifically, one center adopted a prolonged bed rest regimen lasting for three days, while the other implemented early postoperative mobilization. For statistical analysis, case-control matching was performed. Results: Out of an overall 451 cases, we matched 101 patients from each center. We analyzed clinical records and images from each case. In the bed rest center, two patients developed a CSFL (n = 2, 1.98%) compared to four patients (n = 4, 3.96%) in the early mobilization center (p = 0.683). Accordingly, CSFL development was not associated with early mobilization (OR 2.041, 95% CI 0.365-11.403; p = 0.416). Univariate and multivariate analysis identified expansion duraplasty as an independent risk factor for CSFL (OR 60.33, 95% CI: 0.015-0.447; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this CER, we demonstrate that early mobilization following the resection of spinal intradural tumors does not confer an increased risk of the development of CSFL.

Resection of Intramedullary Hemangioblastoma: Timing of Surgery and Its Impact on Neurological Outcome and Quality of Life.

Background and Objectives: Spinal intramedullary hemangioblastomas (SIMH) are benign vascular lesions that are pathological hallmarks of von Hippel-Lindau disease (vHL) and constitute the third most common intramedullary neoplasm in adults. So far, maximal and safe resection is the first choice of treatment. However, as SIMH show no malignant transformation, it remains unclear whether surgical resection is beneficial for all patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the surgical outcomes of 27 patients who were treated between 2014 and 2022 at our neurosurgical department and investigated potential risk factors that influence the surgical outcome. Pre- and postoperative neurological status were classified according to the McCormick scale. Furthermore, surgical quality indicators, such as length of hospital stay (LOS; days), 90-day readmissions, nosocomial infections, and potential risk factors that might influence the surgical outcome, such as tumor size and surgical approach, have been analyzed. In addition to that, patients were asked to fill out the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire to assess their quality of life after surgery. Results: Surgery on SIMH patients that display no or minor neurological deficits (McCormick scale I or II) is associated with a favorable postoperative outcome and overall higher quality of life compared to those patients that already suffer from severe neurological deficits (McCormick scale III or IV). Conclusion: Early surgical intervention prior to the development of severe neurological deficits may offer a better neurological outcome and quality of life.

Quality indicators and early adverse in surgery for atypical meningiomas: A 16-year single centre study and systematic review of the literature.

Introduction: Atypical meningiomas represent approximately 20% of all intracranial meningiomas and are characterized by distinct histopathological criteria and an increased risk of postoperative recurrence. Recently, quality indicators have been introduced to monitor quality of the delivered care. Research question: Which quality indicators/outcome measures are being applied in patients being operated for atypical meningiomas? What are risk factors associated with poor outcome? How is the surgical outcome and which quality indicators are reported in the literature? Material and methods: The primary outcomes of interest were 30-days readmission-, 30-day reoperation-, 30-day mortality-, 30-day nosocomial infection- and the 30-day surgical site infection (SSI) rate, CSF-leakage, new neurological deficit, medical complications, and lengths of stay. The secondary aim was the identification of prognostic factors for the mentioned primary outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was performed screening studies for the mentioned outcomes. Results: We included 52 patients. 30-days outcomes in terms of unplanned reoperation were 0%, unplanned readmission 7.7%, mortality 0%, nosocomial infection 17.3%, and SSI 0%. Any adverse event occurred in 30.8%. Preoperative C-reactive protein over 5 â€‹mg/l was independent factor for the occurrence of any postoperative adverse event (OR: 17.2, p â€‹= â€‹0.003). A total of 22 studies were included into the review. Discussion and conclusion: The 30-days outcomes at our department were comparable with reported outcomes in the literature. Currently applied quality indicators are helpful in determining the postoperative outcome but mainly report the indirect outcome after surgery and are influenced of patient, tumor and treatment related factors. Risk adjustment is vital.

Intraoperative MRI-Guided Resection Is Not Superior to 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Guidance in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Prospective Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Prospective data suggested a superiority of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) over 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) for achieving complete resections of contrast enhancement in glioblastoma surgery. We investigated this hypothesis in a prospective clinical trial and correlated residual disease volumes with clinical outcome in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: This is a prospective controlled multicenter parallel-group trial with two center-specific treatment arms (5-ALA and iMRI) and blinded evaluation. The primary end point was complete resection of contrast enhancement on early postoperative MRI. We assessed resectability and extent of resection by an independent blinded centralized review of preoperative and postoperative MRI with 1-mm slices. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), patient-reported quality of life, and clinical parameters. RESULTS: We recruited 314 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas at 11 German centers. A total of 127 patients in the 5-ALA and 150 in the iMRI arm were analyzed in the as-treated analysis. Complete resections, defined as a residual tumor ≤0.175 cm³, were achieved in 90 patients (78%) in the 5-ALA and 115 (81%) in the iMRI arm (P = .79). Incision-suture times (P < .001) were significantly longer in the iMRI arm (316 v 215 [5-ALA] minutes). Median PFS and OS were comparable in both arms. The lack of any residual contrast enhancing tumor (0 cm³) was a significant favorable prognostic factor for PFS (P < .001) and OS (P = .048), especially in methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase unmethylated tumors (P = .006). CONCLUSION: We could not confirm superiority of iMRI over 5-ALA for achieving complete resections. Neurosurgical interventions in newly diagnosed glioblastoma shall aim for safe complete resections with 0 cm³ contrast-enhancing residual disease, as any other residual tumor volume is a negative predictor for PFS and OS.

The Role of Prolonged Bed Rest in Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage After Surgery of Intradural Pathology-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL) is a feared complication after surgery on intradural pathologies and may cause postoperative complications and subsequently higher treatment costs. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether prolonged bed rest may lower the risk of CSFL. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients with intradural pathologies who underwent surgery at our department between 2013 and 2021. Cohorts included patients who completed 3 days of postoperative bed rest and patients who were mobilized earlier. The primary end point was the occurrence of clinically proven CSFL. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-three patients were included (female [51.7%], male [48.3%]) with a mean age of 48 years (SD ±20). Bed rest was ordered in 315 cases (72.7%). In 7 cases (N = 7/433, 1.6%), we identified a postoperative CSFL. Four of them (N = 4/118) did not preserve bed rest, showing no significant difference to the bed rest cohort (N = 3/315; P = .091). In univariate analysis, laminectomy (N = 4/61; odds ratio [OR] 8.632, 95% CI 1.883-39.573), expansion duraplasty (N = 6/70; OR 33.938, 95% CI 4.019-286.615), and recurrent surgery (N = 5/66; OR 14.959, 95% CI 2.838-78.838) were significant risk factors for developing CSFL. In multivariate analysis, expansion duraplasty was confirmed as independent risk factor (OR 33.937, 95% CI 4.018-286.615, P = .001). In addition, patients with CSFL had significant higher risk for meningitis (N = 3/7; 42.8%, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Prolonged bed rest did not protect patients from developing CSFL after surgery on intradural pathologies. Avoiding laminectomy, large voids, and minimal invasive approaches may play a role in preventing CSFL. Furthermore, special caution is indicated if expansion duraplasty was done.

Quality indicators for evaluating the 30-day postoperative outcome in pediatric brain tumor surgery: a 10-year single-center study and systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Surgery is the cornerstone in the management of pediatric brain tumors. To provide safe and effective health services, quantifying and evaluating quality of care are important. To do this, there is a need for universal measures in the form of indicators reflecting quality of the delivered care. The objective of this study was to analyze currently applied quality indicators in pediatric brain tumor surgery and identify factors associated with poor outcome at a tertiary neurosurgical referral center in western Norway. METHODS: All patients younger than 18 years of age who underwent surgery for an intracranial tumor at the Department of Neurosurgery at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, between 2009 and 2020 were included. The primary outcomes of interest were classic quality indicators: 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, 30-day mortality, 30-day nosocomial infection, and 30-day surgical site infection (SSI) rates; and length of stay. The secondary aim was the identification of risk factors related to unfavorable outcome. The authors also conducted a systematic literature review. Articles concerning pediatric brain tumor surgery reporting at least two quality indicators were of interest. RESULTS: The authors included 82 patients aged 0-17 years. The 30-day outcomes for unplanned reoperation, unplanned remission, mortality, nosocomial infection, and SSI were 9.8%, 14.6%, 0%, 6.1%, and 3.7%, respectively. Unplanned reoperation was associated with eloquent localization (p = 0.009), primary emergency surgery (p = 0.003), and CSF diversion procedures (p = 0.002). Greater tumor volume was associated with unplanned readmission (p = 0.008), nosocomial infection (p = 0.004), and CSF leakage (p = 0.005). In the systematic review, after full-text screening, 16 articles were included and provided outcome data for 1856 procedures. Overall, the 30-day mortality rate was low, varying from 0% to 9.3%. The 30-day reoperation rate varied from 1.5% to 12%. The SSI rate ranged between 0% and 3.9%, and 0% to 17.4% of patients developed CSF leakage. Four studies reported infratentorial tumor location as a risk factor for postoperative CSF leakage. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day outcomes in the authors' department were comparable to published outcomes. The most relevant factors related to unfavorable outcomes are tumor volume and location, both of which are not modifiable by the surgeon. This highlights the importance of risk adjustment. This evaluation of quality indicators reveals concerns related to the unclear and nonstandardized definitions of outcomes. Standardized outcome definitions and documentation in a large and multicentric database are needed in the future for further evaluation of quality indicators.