The new Mainz speech test for children 3-7 years old (MATCH) : Design, standardization, and validation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a new, German, age-appropriate speech audiometry test for children, by using 26 nouns that are most likely part of the lexicon of 2-year-olds. The test is a picture-pointing task with a four-option non-forced choice method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 179 children aged 2;11 to 6;9 y were included for standardizing and validating the speech test. Of these, 51 had a hearing impairment in both ears ranging up to 90 dB hearing level (HL). The normal-hearing collective was divided into three groups according to age. For each group, the speech reception threshold (SRT) and the slope of the psychometric function of intelligibility were determined. For validation, the test-retest reliability was measured in 85 ears, and the correlation between the pure tone average (PTA) at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz and the SRT was measured in 86 ears. RESULTS: The sound spectrum of the 26 items was in good accordance with the international long-term speech spectrum, and the relative frequency of phonemes matched the distribution of the 50 more frequent German phonemes. The SRTs ranged from 24.6 ± 0.6 dB sound pressure level (SPL) for the oldest group (> 5.5 y) to 29.3 ± 1.3 dB SPL for the youngest group (< 4.25 y). The slopes of the psychometric function ranged from 4.3 ± 0.5%/dB for the oldest group to 2.6 ± 0.4%/dB for the youngest. The test and retest showed good correlation (r  = 0.89, p < 0.0001) as did the PTA and SRT (r = 0.84, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The newly developed Mainz speech-test effectively measures age-related speech perception from the age of three years.

[The new Mainz speech test for children aged 3-7 years (MATCH) : Design, standardization, and validation. German version]. / Der neue Mainzer Sprachtest für Kinder 3­7 Jahre (MATCH) : Design, Normierung und Validierung.

OBJECTIVE: A new German speech audiometry test was developed using 26 nouns that are most likely part of the lexicon of 2­year-old children. The test was a picture-pointing task using a four-alternative non-forced choice method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 179 children aged 2 years 11 months to 6 years 9 months were included to standardize and validate the speech test. Of these children, 51 had a hearing impairment in both ears ranging up to 90 dB hearing level. The normal-hearing collective was divided into three groups according to age. For each group, the speech reception threshold (SRT) and the slope of the psychometric function of intelligibility were determined. For validation, the test-retest reliability was measured in 85 ears and the correlation between the pure-tone average (PTA) at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz and the SRT was determined in 86 ears. RESULTS: The sound spectrum of the 26 items was in good accordance with the international long-term speech spectrum and with the distribution of the 50 most frequent German phonemes. The SRT ranged from 24.6 ± 0.6 dB sound pressure level (SPL) for the oldest group (>5.5 years) to 29.3 ± 1.3 dB SPL for the youngest group (<4.25 years). The slopes of the psychometric function ranged from 4.3 ± 0.5%/dB for the oldest group to 2.6 ± 0.4%/dB for the youngest group. The test and retest showed good correlation (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001), as did the PTA and SRT (r = 0.84, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The newly developed test effectively measures age-related speech perception from the age of 2 years 11 months.

Adult hearing screening: follow-up and outcomes1.

PURPOSE: To screen hearing and evaluate outcomes in community-dwelling older adults. METHOD: Three thousand and twenty-five adults responded to an invitation to be screened by questionnaire, otoscopy, and pure-tone audiometry. Pure-tone average (PTA) >35 dB HL in the worse ear, unilateral hearing loss, or otoscopic findings were the criteria for referral for services. A questionnaire related to compliance with referral recommendations was completed by telephone interview for 160 randomly selected participants after 1-2 years from referral. RESULTS: The referral rate for audiologic/hearing aid evaluation was 46%, and referral for cerumen removal/medical evaluation was 17%. Of the people referred for audiologic/hearing aid evaluation, 18% tried a hearing aid; 2 years later, 11% were using a hearing aid. Screening recommendations affected participants' decision to seek help. Study participants stated that the screening was helpful, it should be offered to everybody, and they would participate in future screenings. CONCLUSION: Although adult hearing screening offered timely identification of hearing loss for adults seeking help, follow-up with hearing aid treatment was low.

e-Health Technologies for Adult Hearing Screening.

The development of hearing diagnosis methods and hearing screening methods are not isolated phenomena: they are intimately related to changes in the cultural background and to advances in fields of medicine and engineering. In the recent years, there has been a rapid evolution in the development of fast, easy and reliable techniques for low-cost hearing screening initiatives. Since adults and elderly people typically experience a reduced hearing ability in challenging listening situations [e.g., in background noise, in reverberation, or with competing speech (Pichora-Fuller & Souza, 2003)], these newly developed screening tests mainly rely on the recognition of speech stimuli in noise, so that the real experienced listening difficulties can be effectively targeted (Killion & Niquette, 2000). New tests based on the recognition of speech in noise are being developed on portable, battery-operated devices (see, for example, Paglialonga et al., 2011), or distributed diffusely using information and communication technologies. The evolutions of e-Health and telemedicine have shifted focus from patients coming to the hearing clinic for hearing health evaluation towards the possibility of evaluating the hearing status remotely at home. So far, two ways of distributing the hearing test have primarily been used: ordinary telephone networks (excluding mobile networks) and the internet. When using the telephone network for hearing screening, the predominantly test is a speech-in-noise test often referred to as the digit triplet test where the subjects hearing status is evaluated as the speech-to-noise threshold for spoken digits. This test is today available in some ten countries in Europe, North America and Australia. The use of internet as testing platform allows several different types of hearing assessment tests such as questionnaires, different types of speech in noise tests, temporal gap detection, sound localization (minimum audible angle), and spectral (un)masking tests. Also, the use of the internet allows audiovisual presentations as well as visual interaction and cues in the tests for a more ecological approach. Even if several new and novel approaches for hearing assessment using the internet are surfacing, the validated tests are based on questionnaires or speech-in-noise. Although the internet allows for a broader flora of pure auditory and audiovisual tests for hearing health assessment, calibration problems such as timing uncertainty, output levels and modes of presentation (speakers or earphones) limits the usability at present.