RESUMO
Background: Anatomic pulmonary resection is the preferred curative treatment in operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but is associated with postoperative complications and inevitable compromise in functional capacity. Preoperative enhancement of functional capacity can be achieved with prehabilitation, yet the window of opportunity in NSCLC patients is small because patients are required to undergo surgery within 3 weeks from diagnosis. The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of a prehabilitation programme in NSCLC within a 3-week timeframe and its effect on functional capacity-although the study was not powered to confirm improvements in functional capacity. Methods: Prehabilitation consisted of six interventions: exercise programme, nutritional support, mental support, smoking cessation, patient empowerment, and optimisation of respiratory status and was executed in two large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Assessments were scheduled at baseline (T0), end of program preoperatively (T1), and 6 weeks postoperatively (T2). Feasibility was defined as ≥80% of participants completing ≥80% of the programme. Functional capacity [6-minute walk test (6MWT), steep ramp test (SRT), one repetition maximum (1RM), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and hand grip strength (HGS)] was evaluated on T1 and T2 compared to T0 using mixed model analyses. Results: In total, 24 patients were included. In 95.8% of patients, the program proved feasible and preoperative functional capacity significantly improved in all pre-specified tests on T1. 1RM sustained improved at T2. Conclusions: Multimodal prehabilitation for lung surgery is feasible within a timeframe of 3 weeks. Even though this study was not powered to confirm it, prehabilitation may improve preoperative functional capacity.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of non-invasive home ventilation in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is lacking. Non-invasive home ventilation might be more effective when high ventilator settings are used. However, high ventilator settings might reduce patient adherence. We have developed a multidisciplinary approach (ventilation practitioners, 24 hours support of respiratory nurses, physicians) to non-invasive ventilation aimed at optimizing patient adherence using low ventilator settings in severe COPD patients with high disease burden irrespectively having hypercapnia. METHODS: We included in a proof of concept, prospective interventional study, 48 GOLD stage III-IV COPD patients with a high disease burden (≥2 exacerbations in a year, and Medical Research Council dyspnea scores ≥3). Outcome measures included hospital admissions, capillary pCO2, Medical Research Council dyspnea scores (MRC), Clinical COPD Questionnaire scores (CCQ) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: After 1 year 32 patients could be evaluated. Hospital admissions decreased by 1.0 admission (mean difference ± SD: 1.0 ± 1.48; p = 0.001). In-hospital days decreased by 10.0 days (10.0 ± 15.48; p = 0.001). Capillary pCO2 decreased by 0.33 kPa (0.33 ± 0.81: p = 0.03). The MRC dyspnea score decreased by 0.66 (0.66 ± 1.35; p = 0.02). The CCQ score decreased by 0.59 (0.59 ± 1.39; p = 0.03). The HADS anxiety score decreased by 1.64 (1.64 ± 3.12; p = 0.01). The HADS depression score decreased by 1.64 (1.64 ± 3.91; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: A proof of concept multidisciplinary approach, using low pressure domiciliary non-invasive ventilation, aimed at optimizing patient adherence in severe COPD patients regardless having hypercapnia, reduced hospital admissions and improved symptoms and quality of life measures. This may imply that severe COPD patients with high disease burden, irrespective being hypercapnic, are candidates to be treated with low pressure domiciliary non-invasive ventilation.