A High-Protein and Low-Glycemic Formula Diet Improves Blood Pressure and Other Hemodynamic Parameters in High-Risk Individuals.

Low-caloric formula diets can improve hemodynamic parameters of patients with type 2 diabetes. We, therefore, hypothesized that persons with overweight or obesity can benefit from a high-protein, low-glycemic but moderate-caloric formula diet. This post-hoc analysis of the Almased Concept against Overweight and Obesity and Related Health Risk- (ACOORH) trial investigated the impact of a lifestyle intervention combined with a formula diet (INT, n = 308) compared to a control group with lifestyle intervention alone (CON, n = 155) on hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), resting heart rate (HR), and pulse wave velocity (PWV)) in high-risk individuals with prehypertension or hypertension. INT replaced meals during the first 6 months (1 week: 3 meals/day; 2−4 weeks: 2 meals/day; 5−26 weeks: 1 meal/day). Study duration was 12 months. From the starting cohort, 304 (68.3%, INT: n = 216; CON: n = 101) participants had a complete dataset. Compared to CON, INT significantly reduced more SBP (−7.3 mmHg 95% CI [−9.2; −5.3] vs. −3.3 mmHg [−5.9; −0.8], p < 0.049) and DBP (−3.7 mmHg [−4.9; −2.5] vs. −1.4 mmHg [−3.1; 0.2], p < 0.028) after 12 months. Compared to CON, INT showed a pronounced reduction in resting HR and PWV after 6 months but both lost significance after 12 months. Changes in SBP, DBP, and PWV were significantly associated positively with changes in body weight and fat mass (all p < 0.05) and resting HR correlated positively with fasting insulin (p < 0.001) after 12 months. Combining a lifestyle intervention with a high-protein and low-glycemic formula diet improves hemodynamic parameters to a greater extent than lifestyle intervention alone in high-risk individuals with overweight and obesity.

Meal replacement by formula diet reduces weight more than a lifestyle intervention alone in patients with overweight or obesity and accompanied cardiovascular risk factors-the ACOORH trial.

BACKGROUND: As formula diets have demonstrated to be effective in reducing weight, we hypothesised that in patients with overweight or obesity and accompanied cardiovascular risk factors, combining a liquid formula diet with a lifestyle intervention is superior in reducing weight and improving cardiovascular risk factors than lifestyle intervention alone. METHODS: In this multicenter RCT 463 participants with overweight or obesity (BMI: 27-35 kg/m²; at least one additional co-morbidity of the metabolic syndrome) were randomised (1:2) into either a control group with lifestyle intervention only (CON, n = 155) or a lifestyle intervention group including a liquid meal replacement (INT, n = 308). Both groups used telemonitoring devices (scales and pedometers), received information on healthy diet and were instructed to increase physical activity. Telemonitoring devices automatically transferred data into a personalised online portal and acquired data were discussed. INT obtained a liquid meal replacement substituting three meals/day (~1200 kcal) within the first week. During weeks 2-4, participants replaced two meals/day and during weeks 5-26 only one meal/day was substituted (1300-1500 kcal/day). Follow-up was conducted after 52 weeks. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. Primary outcome was weight change. Secondary outcomes comprised changes in cardiometabolic risk factors including body composition and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: From the starting cohort 360 (78%, INT: n = 244; CON: n = 116) and 317 (68%, INT: n = 216; CON: n = 101) participants completed the 26-weeks intervention phase and the 52-weeks follow-up. The estimated treatment difference (ETD) between both groups was -3.2 kg [-4.0; -2.5] (P < 0.001) after 12 weeks and -1.8 kg [-2.8; -0.8] (P < 0.001) after 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: A low-intensity lifestyle intervention combined with a liquid meal replacement is superior regarding weight reduction and improvement of cardiovascular risk factors than lifestyle intervention alone.

Prediabetes Conversion to Normoglycemia Is Superior Adding a Low-Carbohydrate and Energy Deficit Formula Diet to Lifestyle Intervention-A 12-Month Subanalysis of the ACOORH Trial.

Lifestyle interventions have been shown to reverse hyperglycemia to normoglycemia. However, these effects are not long-lasting and are accompanied with high dropout rates. As formula diets have been shown to be simple in usage and effective in improving glycemic control, we hypothesised that adding a low-carbohydrate and energy deficit formula diet to a low-intensity lifestyle intervention is superior in reversing prediabetes compared with lifestyle intervention alone. In this predefined subanalysis of an international, multicenter randomised controlled trial (Almased Concept against Overweight and Obesity and Related Health Risk (ACOORH) study (ID DRKS00006811)), 141 persons with prediabetes were randomised (1:2) into either a control group with lifestyle intervention only (CON, n = 45) or a lifestyle intervention group accompanied with a formula diet (INT, n = 96). Both groups were equipped with telemonitoring devices. INT received a low-carbohydrate formula diet substituting three meals/day (~1200 kcal/day) within the first week, two meals/day during week 2-4, and one meal/day during week 5-26 (1300-1500 kcal/day). Follow-up was performed after 52 weeks and 105 participants (75%, INT: n = 74; CON: n = 31) finished the 26-week intervention phase. Follow-up data after 52 weeks were available from 93 participants (66%, INT: n = 65; CON: n = 28). Compared with CON, significantly more INT participants converted to normoglycemia after 52 weeks (50% vs. 31%; p < 0.05). The risk reduction led to a number-needed-to-treat of 5.3 for INT. Lifestyle intervention with a low-carbohydrate formula diet reduces prediabetes prevalence stronger than lifestyle intervention alone and is effective for type 2 diabetes prevention.

Single-Pill Triple Fixed Dose Combination Therapy with Single Component Drug Monitoring in Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Single-pill fixed dose combination (FDC) therapies are widely used in the treatment of arterial hypertension. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the effects of a FDC therapy combined with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on blood pressure (BP) in patients with treatment resistant hypertension. METHOD: The study population included patients with suspected treatment-resistant hypertension during treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs. We evaluated the effect of switching all patients to a regime including a single-pill triple FDC containing olmesartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide. Adherence was evaluated by measuring serum concentrations of amlodipine in a single-blinded fashion. RESULTS: We enrolled 13 patients (mean age 57.2±9.1 years, 8 males) with resistant hypertension (office systolic and diastolic BP 158.3±17.3 and 94.8±11.1 mmHg); mean use of antihypertensive drugs was 3.8±1.1. Medication intake of FDC was confirmed in all patients at 18 weeks. Systolic and diastolic office BP were significantly lower (-22.8 and -13.6 mmHg) after 18 weeks of treatment with triple FDC (135.5±20.1 and 81.2±6.3 mmHg, p<0.01, respectively); mean use of antihypertensive drugs was 3.8±0.9. In 9 patients with 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) both at baseline and after 18 weeks, 24-h mean arterial pressure decreased (-9.3 mmHg, p=0.055). Overall, 9 (69%) patients achieved BP control in office BP and 4 (31%) in 24-h ABPM. CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of single-pill triple FDC therapy in combination with TDM for the management of patients with suspected treatment-resistant hypertension and further testing in clinical studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Cathine (Nor-Pseudoephedrine) in the Treatment of Obesity: A Randomized Dose-Finding Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of increasing doses of cathine (nor-pseudoephedrine) as a weight-lowering agent in patients with obesity. METHODS: Overweight and obese patients (n = 241, mean BMI 34.6 ± 3.4 kg/m²) were randomly allocated to one of three doses of cathine (16 mg, 32 mg, 53.3 mg) or placebo in addition to a multimodal lifestyle intervention program in a multicenter, double-blind, controlled, dose-finding study for 24 weeks. Primary outcome was weight loss. RESULTS: Treatment with the 3 doses of cathine resulted in a significantly greater weight loss compared to placebo over 24 weeks: 6.5 ± 4.2 kg for 16 mg cathine, 6.2 ± 4.7 kg for 32 mg cathine, and 9.1 ± 5.4 kg for 53.3 mg cathine versus 2.4 ± 4.4 kg for placebo (each p < 0.01, ANCOVA). The percentage of patients losing > 5% / >10% of initial body weight was significantly greater for all doses of cathine than for placebo (each p < 0.01, chi-square test). Heart rate increased dose-dependently (by 1.2 bpm under 16 mg, 5.8 bpm under 32 mg, and 6.2 bpm under 53.3 mg cathine), but no suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions were noted. The overall dropout rate was 24.9%, with the highest rate in the placebo group (42.3%). CONCLUSION: Cathine appears to be an effective weight-lowering agent for adjunct treatment of obesity, but additional clinical studies on its efficacy and safety are required.

Adding Hydrochlorothiazide to Olmesartan/Amlodipine Increases Efficacy in Patients With Inadequate Blood Pressure Control on Dual-Combination Therapy.

This randomized, parallel-group study in patients inadequately controlled on olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine (OLM/AML) 40/10 mg assessed the effects of adding hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg and 25 mg, using seated blood pressure (SeBP) measurements and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Enrolled patients were screened and tapered off of therapy if required. All patients received OLM/AML 40/10 mg and those with mean seated BP (SeBP) ≥140/90 mm Hg after 8 weeks (n=808) were randomized (1:1:1) to continue with OLM/AML 40/10 mg or receive OLM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 or 40/10/25 mg for a further 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) from the start to the end of the randomized treatment period. The addition of HCTZ 25 mg significantly reduced SeDBP (-2.8 mm Hg; P<.0001), lowered seated systolic BP (SeSBP) and ambulatory DBP and SBP, and improved BP goal rates. In patients uncontrolled on OLM/AML 40/10 mg, adding HCTZ led to further BP reductions, particularly in ambulatory BP.

Impact of socio-economic factors on the long-term effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment with an angiotensin II receptor blocker: an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of socio-economic factors on the therapeutic effectiveness of and therapeutic adherence to the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan (OM) alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of arterial hypertension. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a multi-center, open-label, prospective and long-term observational study, data from hypertensive patients treated with OM were analyzed at baseline, month 3 and month 12 within the context of patients' socio-economic status (SES), determined using pre-defined criteria by physicians in outpatient practices and including multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 7724 patients were assigned to three subgroups representing low, medium and high socio-economic status. Baseline conditions differed significantly between the subgroups. Patients of low SES had worse nutritional habits, less physical activity and more concomitant medication compared to patients of high SES. Cardiovascular risk factors were more common in the low SES group as were concomitant diseases such as heart failure, coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis and renal failure. OM therapy led to a significant decrease in blood pressure (23.0/11.6 mmHg) in all patients. The blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved in about 70% of the documented population. Effectiveness was comparable between patients with low, medium or high SES. Treatment adherence was high in the overall population with only minor differences between the subgroups. In total the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 1.6% documented in 98 patents (1.3%) during the course of the study. Of this total number only 1.0% was related to the drug, matching the percentage expressed in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). CONCLUSIONS: The ARB OM is effective and well tolerated in all patients, irrespective of their socio-economic status. The risk status and the established cardiovascular disease of hypertensive patients are strongly influenced by the SES. To validate these interesting data a randomized controlled trial is needed.

Endothelial progenitor cells in systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune-mediated disease, characterized by inflammation of small arteries and arterioles. Patients with SLE suffer from a 17-fold higher risk for developing atherosclerosis than healthy individuals. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been shown to be critically involved in microvascular repair under both physiological and pathological conditions. The aim of the present study was to analyze EPC regeneration and mobilization in SLE patients with variable disease activity and undergoing different treatment regimens. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with SLE were analyzed. Healthy, age- and sex-matched individuals served as controls. Total circulating EPCs were enumerated by FACS analysis, and regenerative activity of the cells was analyzed by a colony-forming assay. Vasomodulatory mediators were quantified by ELISA. RESULTS: SLE patients did not show lower or higher percentages of total circulating EPCs, but they displayed significantly lower colony numbers as compared with healthy controls, indicating impaired EPC regeneration and mobilization. Low and high disease activity were associated with decreased EPC regeneration, while moderate disease activity was not. Hypertension and, to some extent, renal involvement were associated with reduced colony formation. Patients not receiving hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment and those undergoing glucocorticoid therapy showed impaired EPC regeneration as well. CONCLUSIONS: SLE patients suffer from both defective regeneration and mobilization of EPCs. Such an impairment of the EPC system, as one key regulatory element in the process of vasorepair, could potentially promote microvascular damage in SLE. Long-term glucocorticoid therapy may further suppress the EPC system, while HCQ may prevent regeneration of the cells.

Genetics of melatonin receptor type 2 is associated with left ventricular function in hypertensive patients treated according to guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Melatonin exerts multiple biological effects with potential impact on human diseases. This is underscored by genetic studies that demonstrated associations between melatonin receptor type 2 gene (MTNR1B) polymorphisms and characteristics of type 2 diabetes. We set out to test the hypothesis whether genetic variants at MTNR1B are also relevant for other disease phenotypes within the cardiovascular continuum. We thus investigated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of MTNR1B in relation to blood pressure (BP) and cardiac parameters in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Patients (n=605, mean age 56.2±9.4years, 82.3% male) with arterial hypertension and cardiac ejection fraction (EF) ≥40% were studied. Cardiac parameters were assessed by echocardiography. RESULTS: The cohort comprised subjects with coronary heart disease (73.1%) and myocardial infarction (48.1%) with a mean EF of 63.7±8.9%. Analysis of SNPs rs10830962, rs4753426, rs12804291, rs10830963, and rs3781638 revealed two haplotypes 1 and 2 with frequencies of 0.402 and 0.277, respectively. Carriers with haplotype 1 (CTCCC) showed compared to non-carriers a higher mean 24-hour systolic BP (difference BP: 2.4mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3 to 4.5mmHg, p=0.023). Haplotype 2 (GCCGA) was significantly related to EF with an absolute increase of 1.8% (CI: 0.45 to 3.14%) in carriers versus non-carriers (p=0.009). CONCLUSION: Genetics of MTNR1B point to impact of the melatonin signalling pathway for BP and left ventricular function. This may support the importance of the melatonin system as a potential therapeutic target.

Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of lercanidipine and enalapril in daily practice. A comparison of office, self-measured and ambulatory blood pressure.

BACKGROUND: A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of enalapril and lercanidipine has been shown to be effective and safe in reducing blood pressure in randomized clinical trials. This study aims to determine effectiveness and safety in daily practice. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, uncontrolled multicenter study, with a 3-month follow-up at general practitioners and internists. Patients were treated with an FDC of 20 mg enalapril maleate and 10 mg lercanidipine hydrochloride, and blood pressure was determined in the office (OBPM) and by discretionary self- (SBPM) and ambulatory- (ABPM) measurements. RESULTS: Out of 622 patients (mean age 61.3 ± 13.3 years, 54.2% male): blood pressure was reduced by -29.2/-14.2 mmHg (OBPM) from baseline (164.4/95.2 mmHg). Pulse pressure was reduced by -15.0 ± 16.4 mmHg. Prevalence of microalbuminuria was reduced from 14.6% at baseline to 6.5% (p < 0.001). SBPM data were available for 71% of patients and ABPM for 12%. In the latter patients, blood pressure variability index was significantly reduced compared with baseline over 24 h (14.2 ± 4.2 vs 16.3 ± 4.0; p < 0.001) and with nighttime ABPM (13.7 ± 4.9 vs 15.2 ± 4.4; p = 0.022). Treatment was associated with a low incidence of adverse events (3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The FDC of 20 mg enalapril-maleate and 10 mg lercanidipine-hydrochloride seems to be effective and well tolerated in clinical practice. It improved vascular surrogate end points, including pulse pressure, blood pressure variability and microalbuminuria.

High-dose treatment with telmisartan induces monocytic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ target genes in patients with the metabolic syndrome.

The present study aimed to explore the anti-inflammatory effects and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ)-activating properties of the angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker telmisartan by analysis of serum interleukin 6 levels and monocytic PPARγ target gene expression in drug-naïve patients with the metabolic syndrome. This was a 14-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2-center study with telmisartan 80 mg/d and telmisartan 160 mg/d in 54 patients with the metabolic syndrome. In addition to clinical laboratory measurements, peripheral monocytes were extracted by negative isolation using a Dynal Monocyte kit to evaluate ligand-activated PPARγ target gene expression (CD36 and CD163) at baseline and study end using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. In this low-risk patient population, telmisartan (80 and 160 mg) treatment did not significantly affect serum interleukin 6 levels. Expression of the PPARγ target gene CD36 in monocytes was markedly induced by telmisartan from baseline to study end (telmisartan 80 mg: 2.3±1.5-fold change versus placebo [P value not significant]; telmisartan 160 mg: 3.5±0.9-fold change versus placebo [P<0.05]). The recently reported PPARγ target gene CD163 was slightly induced by telmisartan (telmisartan 80 mg: 1.1±0.3-fold change versus placebo [P value not significant]; telmisartan 160 mg: 1.4±0.4-fold change versus placebo [P value not significant]), which did not reach statistical significance. This is the first clinical description of monocytic PPARγ target gene regulation with high-dose telmisartan treatment. These data implicate that the angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker telmisartan activates PPARγ in circulating monocytes of patients with the metabolic syndrome.

Safety and efficacy of olmesartan: an observational pooled-analysis of 156,682 hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers are recommended for first-line antihypertensive treatment. METHODS: We performed a pooled-analysis of 20 post-authorization surveys of olmesartan involving 156,682 hypertensive patients. Olmesartan was used as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs, for example, hydrochlorothiazide. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety of olmesartan by monitoring adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The number of patients achieving systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) targets (< 140/90 mmHg in the overall population, < 130/80 mmHg in high-risk patients) or responding to treatment (BP decrease of ≥ 20/10 mmHg) was also determined. RESULTS: In all, 43.8% of patients received olmesartan monotherapy, 29% olmesartan with hydrochlorothiazide and 27.2% olmesartan in combination with other antihypertensives. The frequency of ADRs was 0.4% and not altered by dose, age ≥ 65 years or presence of co-morbidities. About 90% of patients were responders. Blood pressure targets were achieved in 52.8 and 35.7% of patients without risk factors and in the overall cohort, but only in 8.1 and 27.5% of patients with renal dysfunction or taking NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: Olmesartan was very well tolerated. Responder rates to olmesartan were high, although BP targets were only achieved in a minority of patients at high risk, with renal dysfunction or taking NSAIDs.

Modelling the costs of care of hypertension in patients with metabolic syndrome and its consequences, in Germany, Spain and Italy.

The presence of metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and mortality. Our aim is to estimate the economic burden to the health service of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in patients with hypertension and its consequences, in three European countries in 2008, and to forecast future economic burden in 2020 using projected demographic estimates and assumptions around the growth of MetS. An age-, sex- and risk group-structured prevalence-based cost of illness model was developed using the United States Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program criteria to define MetS. Data sources included published information and public use databases on disease prevalence, incidence of cardiovascular events, prevalence of type 2 diabetes, treatment patterns and cost of management in Germany, Spain and Italy. The economic burden to the health service of MetS in patients with hypertension has been estimated at 24,427 euro, 1,900 euro and 4,877 euro million in Germany, Spain and Italy, and is forecast to rise by 59, 179 and 157%, respectively, by 2020. The largest components of costs included the management of prevalent type 2 diabetes and incident cardiovascular events. Mean annual costs per hypertensive patient were around three-fold higher in subjects with MetS compared to those without and rose incrementally with the additional number of MetS components present. In conclusion, the presence of MetS in patients with hypertension significantly inflates economic burden, and costs are likely to increase in the future due to an aging population and an increase in the prevalence of components of MetS.

Epidemiological and economic burden of metabolic syndrome and its consequences in patients with hypertension in Germany, Spain and Italy; a prevalence-based model.

BACKGROUND: The presence of metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and mortality. Our aim is to estimate the epidemiological and economic burden to the health service of metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension in three European countries in 2008 and 2020. METHODS: An age, sex and risk group structured prevalence based cost of illness model was developed using the United States Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program criteria to define metabolic syndrome. Data sources included published information and public use databases on disease prevalence, incidence of cardiovascular events, prevalence of type 2 diabetes, treatment patterns and cost of management in Germany, Spain and Italy. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypertension with metabolic syndrome in the general population of Germany, Spain and Italy was 36%, 11% and 10% respectively. In subjects with hypertension 61%, 22% and 21% also had metabolic syndrome. Incident cardiovascular events and attributable mortality were around two fold higher in subjects with metabolic syndrome and prevalence of type 2 diabetes was around six-fold higher. The economic burden to the health service of metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension was been estimated at €24,427, €1,900 and €4,877 million in Germany, Spain and Italy and forecast to rise by 59%, 179% and 157% respectively by 2020. The largest components of costs included the management of prevalent type 2 diabetes and incident cardiovascular events. Mean annual costs per hypertensive patient were around three-fold higher in subjects with metabolic syndrome compared to those without and rose incrementally with the additional number of metabolic syndrome components present. CONCLUSION: The presence of metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension significantly inflates economic burden and costs are likely to increase in the future due to an aging population and an increase in the prevalence of components of metabolic syndrome.

Effect of high-dose valsartan on inflammatory and lipid parameters in patients with Type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

AIMS: The present study aimed to explore the impact of the angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker valsartan (VAL) on inflammatory-/lipid-/glucose parameters in hypertensive diabetic patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: This was a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled two-center study with VAL 320 mg/d in 109 hypertensive diabetic patients (n=56 non-CAD; n=53 CAD). RESULTS: VAL treatment did not significantly affect serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) levels in the overall study population but significantly reduced serum IL-6 in the subgroup with high inflammatory load at baseline (IL-6>median (2.0 ng/L), n=54: [median, ng/L]): VAL: from 3.5 to 2.4; placebo: from 3.2 to 3.5; p=0.035). VAL significantly lowered total- and LDL-cholesterol in the whole study population: [median, mg/dL]: total cholesterol: VAL: from 178 to 168; placebo: from 174 to 173, p=0.039; LDL-cholesterol: VAL: from 96 to 90, placebo: from 102 to 103, p=0.006, whereas glycemic parameters were not affected. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates significant anti-inflammatory efficacy of VAL in hypertensive diabetic patients with enhanced inflammatory burden. High-dose VAL therapy significantly lowered total- and LDL-cholesterol levels. The combined actions of cholesterol and blood pressure lowering by VAL may provide additional clinical benefits for these high-risk patients.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in combination with either amlodipine or atenolol compared to respective monotherapies in healthy subjects.

The aim of this study was to investigate any influence on olmesartan plasma pharmacokinetics from amlodipine or atenolol. We analysed pharmacokinetics and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in combination with either amlodipine or atenolol compared to respective monotherapies in two separate studies. In one study, 18 subjects received once daily treatment for 7 days with olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg alone or with amlodipine 5 mg or amlodipine 5 mg alone. In the other study, atenolol 50 mg once daily replaced amlodipine. Concentration vs. time profiles for olmesartan monotherapy were similar to combination therapy. Mean olmesartan AUC(ss,tau) for olmesartan alone and with amlodipine were 2439 and 2388 ng h/mL and for olmesartan alone and with atenolol were 2340 and 2247 ng h/mL. Corresponding olmesartan C(ss,max) values were 465.7 and 439.5 ng/mL for amlodipine, and 447.4 and 423.8 ng/mL for atenolol. Median t(max) values for olmesartan were 1.5 h for each group in each study. Bioequivalence was established for all pharmacokinetic parameters. Lack of significant pharmacokinetic interactions between olmesartan and amlodipine or atenolol provides a basis for combination therapy.

Short-term treatment with a beta-blocker with vasodilative capacities improves intrarenal endothelial function in experimental renal failure.

AIMS: In patients with renal disease the cardiovascular risk is greatly increased, and endothelial dysfunction is assumed to play a pivotal role in this process. Therefore we compared treatment effects of a beta-blocker with additional vasodilatory capacities (nebivolol) and a beta-blocker lacking these actions (metoprolol) on intrarenal and coronary vascular function in a rat model of renal failure with hypertension. MAIN METHODS: Renal failure was induced by 5/6-nephrectomy (Nx) and analyzed after 4 weeks in Wistar rats. Untreated Nx, Nx/nebivolol 6 mg/d (Nx-Nebi); Nx/metoprolol 60 mg/d (Nx-Meto) and sham-operated (Sham) animals were studied. Isolated small renal and coronary arteries were investigated for endothelium-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine (ACh) and for the contribution of the endothelial mediators NO and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). KEY FINDINGS: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly increased in Nx, Nx-Nebi, and Nx-Meto (168+/-5, 153+/-3, and 162+/-6 mmHg) compared to Sham (138+/-3 mmHg, p<0.05, respectively). The increase in albuminuria of Nx (120-fold vs. Sham, p<0.0001) was almost (-85%) normalized by nebivolol compared to Sham (p<0.05), whereas metoprolol induced no significant effect. Renal arteries showed significantly increased Ach-relaxation in Nx and Nx-Nebi (Emax 86+/-4% and 76+/-7%, p<0.05) due to an increase in EDHF-mediated dilation (Emax_EDHF 78+/-7% and 73+/-6%) compared to Sham (Emax 54+/-4% and Emax_EDHF 44+/-6%) and Nx-Meto (Emax 42+/-12% and Emax_EDHF 18+/-5%). ACh-relaxation in coronary arteries was similar between groups but the contribution of NO (relative to EDHF) was strongly increased by nebivolol. SIGNIFICANCE: The present findings offer an explanation of the nephroprotective effect of intrarenal endothelial function in renal failure.