RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Comfort gloves are used in the management of hand dermatoses. OBJECTIVES: To compare the acceptance and tolerability of comfort gloves made of different materials in patients with hand dermatoses and their effects on skin lesions. METHODS: In a prospective multicenter study, 284 patients with hand dermatoses were invited to wear either a cotton glove (COT) or a semipermeable Sympatex glove underneath a cotton glove (SYM/COT) for two subsequent phases of 19 consecutive nights each. A total of 88 controls were asked not to wear any comfort gloves overnight. The severity of skin lesions over time was examined. Questionnaires were used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and acceptance and tolerability of the gloves. RESULTS: The hand dermatoses improved in all groups. No substantial intergroup differences regarding severity and HRQoL were observed. SYM/COT received better ratings regarding climate conditions and tactility while COT showed superiority in fit, wearing comfort, and practicality. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that SYM/COT and COT are well tolerated and accepted suggesting that SYM/COT is a good alternative for COT as comfort gloves in patients with hand dermatoses. Individual requirements, needs, and preferences may direct the material choice.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mainly women work as foot care specialists (FCS). They are at risk to develop occupational dermatitis (OD). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to describe the contact sensitisation pattern of female FCS with OD. METHODS: In a retrospective study, patch test and clinical data collected by the Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) from 2008 to 2022 were analysed. Data of 116 female FCS with OD were compared with data of 13 930 female patients with OD working in other professions and 78 612 female patients without OD. RESULTS: Hand dermatitis (93.1%) was significantly more common and face dermatitis (0.9%) significantly less common in female FCS with OD compared to other female patients with or without OD. Frequent suspected allergen sources were disinfectants, gloves, leave-on and nail cosmetics. Occlusion and wetness were important co-factors. The most common diagnoses were irritant contact dermatitis (26.7%) and allergic contact dermatitis (21.6%). No sensitisation to any of the baseline series allergens was significantly more frequent in female FCS with OD than in the two control groups. However, sensitisations to allergens which FCS are abundantly exposed to, including fragrances, preservatives, rubber ingredients and disinfectants, were most common. CONCLUSIONS: FCS should be aware of the OD risk and prevention should be promoted.
Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Irritante , Dermatite Ocupacional , Dermatoses da Mão , Testes do Emplastro , Humanos , Feminino , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Mão/etiologia , Dermatite Irritante/epidemiologia , Dermatite Irritante/etiologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatoses Faciais/epidemiologia , Dermatoses Faciais/etiologia , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Desinfetantes/efeitos adversos , Luvas Protetoras/efeitos adversos , Dermatoses do Pé/epidemiologiaRESUMO
In daily dermatological practice, the distinction between eczema and psoriasis in dermatoses of the hands can be difficult. However, a clear diagnosis is necessary to initiate optimal therapy and management. In recent years, the so-called molecular classifier has been developed for optimized differentiation of eczema and psoriasis. An occupational dermatological cohort has been established at Heidelberg University Hospital since 2020. It is funded by the German Statutory Accident Insurance. The aim is to follow-up patients over 3 years where this new diagnostic method is used and to compare the results with a retrospective occupational dermatological cohort. Recruitment ended in December 2022. The current analysis reports participants' occupational activity, insurance status, disease progression, and number of sick days. A total of 287 patients were included; mean age was 50.4 years and 63.5% (nâ¯= 181) were undergoing treatment at the expense of the liable statutory accident insurance at the start of the study. About 50% of the patients worked in health professions, metal industry, or construction. The average duration of occupational dermatosis was 6.5 years. In 38.9% of the patients, the clinical diagnosis had been classified as unclear by the treating dermatologist. By using the molecular classifier, the diagnosis could be clarified in 98% of the cases (eczema vs. psoriasis). The first analyses demonstrate that the molecular classifier contributes to improving therapy by optimizing the diagnosis.
Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional , Dermatologia , Eczema , Dermatoses da Mão , Psoríase , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Eczema/diagnóstico , Psoríase/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Massage therapists are particularly exposed to constituents of massage preparations, wet work and mechanical strain and therefore, at high risk to develop occupational dermatitis (OD). OBJECTIVES: To describe the sensitization spectrum of massage therapists with OD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, patch test data of patients with OD (128 massage therapists and 24 374 patients working in other professions) collected by the Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK, 2008-2020) were analysed. RESULTS: Hand dermatitis (91.4%) and allergic contact dermatitis (34.4%) were common in massage therapists with OD. Most frequent were sensitizations to fragrances/essential oils which were found in 54 (42.2%) massage therapists and thus, more often than in other patients with OD. Concomitant positivity to several fragrances/essential oils was frequent. In 8 (14.8%) of the 54 massage therapists, sensitizations to fragrances/essential oils were not detected with the baseline series, but only with special fragrance series. CONCLUSIONS: Allergic contact dermatitis is common in massage therapists with OD and is mainly caused by fragrances and essential oils. Hence, massage therapists should be aware of this risk. When OD is suspected, not only the baseline series, but also special fragrance series should be patch tested in this occupational group.
Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Dermatologia , Óleos Voláteis , Perfumes , Humanos , Testes do Emplastro/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Óleos Voláteis/efeitos adversos , Serviços de Informação , Massagem , AlérgenosAssuntos
Alérgenos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Humanos , Fenol , Fenóis , Resinas Epóxi , Testes do EmplastroRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patch test (PT) readings are recommended after 48 h and 72 h (D3). An additional day 7 (D7) reading has been suggested by some, although data on efficient patient selection are scarce. We investigated positive D7 reactions regarding (i) allergens in the baseline series and additional PT series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) and (ii) characteristics of the patients tested. METHODS: Retrospective, multicentre analysis of 190 allergens derived from 17 DKG test series in 4687 patients with an additional D7 reading. Patients were patch tested with the baseline series and additional series, if required. Occurrence of novel D7 reactions as well as increasing skin reactions from D3 to D7 was analysed separately. RESULTS: Depending on the allergen tested, waiving D7 readings would have missed 4.4-26.8% of positive PT results. Patch test series with the highest number of novel D7 reactions were baseline series, metal series, and leather/shoe series. New positive reactions on D7 were associated with age over 50 years and with a negative irritant control containing sodium lauryl sulphate. Of note, application of the PT allergens for 48 h instead of 24 h was positively associated with late PT reactions. CONCLUSION: Within the most frequently tested allergens, without late readings, on average 11.7% of sensitizations would have been missed. Novel late reacting allergens were identified. This study comprehensively dissects patient-, allergen- and test-dependent parameters in support for D7 readings. We propose to always consider late readings individually based on effort-benefit considerations.
Assuntos
Alérgenos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false-positive, or the breakdown test is false-negative. OBJECTIVES: To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790). RESULTS: Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non-fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I. CONCLUSIONS: Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false-positive. There may be false-negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.
Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Odorantes , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Adulto , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Humanos , Dermatoses da Perna/diagnóstico , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Metalworkers are exposed to a variety of contact allergens by handling tools, metals, metalworking fluids (MWFs), oils and greases, rubber materials, and so on. Most large-scale reports on contact allergy due to MWFs are more than 10-years-old, and there are only few studies on contact allergy in mechanics and other metal workers not exposed to MWFs. OBJECTIVES: To describe a current spectrum of contact sensitization in metalworkers with occupational dermatitis (OD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patch test data collected by the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK; 2010-2018), stratifying for 804 cutting metalworkers, 2197 mechanics, and 355 other metalworkers. RESULTS: Cutting metalworkers were most frequently sensitized to monoethanolamine (12.6%), colophonium/abietic acid (11.4%) and formaldehyde releasers (up to 8.5%) from the MWF series, and formaldehyde (4.6%) and iodopropynyl butylcarbamate (4.6%) from the baseline series. Sensitization among mechanics and other metalworkers indicates possible occupational exposure to MWFs, glues, and resins, although this may not be expected from their job titles. CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of MWF contact allergens remained largely unchanged during the last years. Taking a comprehensive occupational history is indispensable in order to not miss relevant allergen exposures.
Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Óleos Industriais/efeitos adversos , Metalurgia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Feminino , Alemanha , Dermatoses da Mão/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases (OSDs). Its prevalence and the causative allergens differ between occupations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of ACD and the pattern of patch test results of patients taking part in a tertiary individual prevention programme (TIP) for OSD in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, the data of 3411 TIP patients patch tested between 2007 and 2016 were analysed. RESULTS: In 2687 (78.8%) patients, work-related skin disease was diagnosed, mostly hand dermatitis. The highest proportion of face dermatitis was seen in painters (8.1%). ACD was most common in painters (56.8%), hairdressers (45.8%), construction workers (31.5%), gardeners/florists (26.7%), and metalworkers (26.5%). On average, hairdressers had the youngest age (31.4 ± 12.6 years, P < 0.0001) and the shortest time in the profession prior to the TIP (mean 13.7 years). The pattern of patch test reactivity showed occupation-specific differences related to work exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of occupational groups at risk for ACD and relevant allergens may help in the development and implementation of targeted prevention strategies. Our data suggest that there should be a particular focus on hairdressers and painters.
Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatoses Faciais/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Indústria da Beleza , Estudos de Coortes , Indústria da Construção , Feminino , Jardinagem , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Metalurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pinturas , Testes do Emplastro , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prevenção Terciária , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hereditary factors may influence individual susceptibility to contact allergy. OBJECTIVES: To investigate genetic variants with impacts on early inflammatory reactions and T cell functions that possibly increase the risk of contact allergy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and seventy two patients undergoing patch testing were recruited from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Of these, 133 were monosensitized and 239 were polysensitized, defined as reacting to three or more unrelated sensitizers. Within the polysensitized individuals, a subgroup with at least one particularly strong patch test reaction (strong reactors; n = 194) was considered. Three hundred and forty-seven blood bank donors served as controls. Fifteen genetic variants in 13 genes were analysed. RESULTS: The homozygous variant CXCL11 AA genotype (rs6817952) was significantly more frequent among polysensitized patients (10 of 239 = 4.2%; p = 0.0048; odds ratio 7.49; 95%CI: 1.7-36.1) than among monosensitized patients (2.2%) and in the control group (0.6%). None of the remaining genetic variants investigated were characterized by similarly strong associations. However, the significance was lost after correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The homozygous variant CXCL11 genotype is associated with an increased risk of contact allergy. To confirm this exploratory finding, further independent studies are needed.
Assuntos
Quimiocina CXCL11/genética , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Citocinas/genética , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Homozigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Testes do Emplastro , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Sulfur mustard (SM) is a chemical warfare agent (CWA) that was first used in World War I and in several military conflicts afterwards. The threat by SM is still present even today due to remaining stockpiles, old and abandoned remainders all over the world as well as to its ease of synthesis. CWA are banned by the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) interdicting their development, production, transport, stockpiling and use and are subjected to controlled destruction. The present case report describes an accidental exposure of three workers that occurred during the destruction of SM. All exposed workers presented a characteristic SM-related clinical picture that started about 4h after exposure with erythema and feeling of tension of the skin at the upper part of the body. Later on, superficial blister and a burning phenomenon of the affected skin areas developed. Similar symptoms occurred in all three patients differing severity. One patient presented sustained skin affections at the gluteal region while another patient came up with affections of the axilla and genital region. Fortunately, full recovery was observed on day 56 after exposure except some little pigmentation changes that were evident even on day 154 in two of the patients. SM-exposure was verified for all three patients using bioanalytical GC MS and LC MS/MS based methods applied to urine and plasma. Urinary biotransformation products of the ß-lyase pathway were detected until 5 days after poisoning whereas albumin-SM adducts could be found until day 29 underlining the beneficial role of adduct detection for post-exposure verification. In addition, we provide general recommendations for management and therapy in case of SM poisoning.