A prediction model for lung metastases in patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary teams treating patients with newly diagnosed Colorectal Cancer (CRC) often encounter the appearance of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules (IPNs) that warrants follow-up with repetitive medical imaging and anxiety for patients. We determined the incidence of IPNs in patients with newly diagnosed CRC and developed and validated a model for individualized risk prediction of IPNs being lung metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed CRC who underwent surgery between November 2011 to June 2014 were included to create the risk model, developed using both clinical experience and statistical selection. Discrimination and calibration slopes of the risk score were evaluated in an independent temporal validation sample. A nomogram is presented to assist clinicians in estimating an individual risk score. RESULTS: Out of 2111 CRC patients staged with chest CT, 204 (9.6%) had IPNs and 54/204 (26%) had lung metastases. We identified 4 predictors: "location of primary tumour", "pathological nodal stage", "size of the largest nodule" and "extrapulmonary synchronous metastases at diagnosis". Discrimination of the final model in the validation sample was demonstrated by the difference in mean predicted risk between progressed cases en non-progressed cases (49% versus 21%, p = <0.001). CONCLUSION: A prediction model with 4 clinical risk factors can be used to assist multidisciplinary teams in the prediction of individualized risk of lung metastases and imaging strategy in patients with IPNs and newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. The model performed well in new patients not included in the model development.

Colorectal Pulmonary Metastases: Pulmonary Metastasectomy or Stereotactic Radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastasectomy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are both guideline-recommended treatments for selected patients with oligometastatic colorectal pulmonary metastases. However, there is limited evidence comparing these local treatment modalities in similar patient groups. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of consecutive patients treated for colorectal pulmonary metastases with surgical metastasectomy or SABR from 2012 to 2019 at two Dutch referral hospitals that had different approaches toward the local treatment of colorectal pulmonary metastases, one preferring surgery, the other preferring SABR. Two comparable patient groups were identified based on tumor and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: The metastasectomy group comprised 40 patients treated for 69 metastases, and the SABR group had 60 patients who were treated for 90 metastases. Median follow-up was 38 months (IQR: 26-67) in the surgery group and 46 months (IQR: 30-79) in the SABR group. Median OS was 58 months (CI: 20-94) in the metastasectomy group and 70 months (CI: 29-111) in the SABR group (p = 0.23). Five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 44% after metastasectomy and 30% after SABR (p = 0.16). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months (CI: 3-26) in the metastasectomy group and 10 months (CI: 6-13) in the SABR group (p = 0.049). Local recurrence rate was 12.5/7.2% of patients/metastases respectively after metastasectomy and 38.3/31.1% after SABR (p < 0.001). Lower BED Gy10 was correlated with an increased likelihood of recurrence (p = 0.025). Clavien Dindo grade III-V complication rates were 2.5% after metastasectomy and 0% after SABR (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort study, pulmonary metastasectomy and SABR had comparable overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and complication rates, despite patients in the SABR group having a significantly lower progression-free survival and local control rate. These data would support a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery and SABR in operable patients with radically resectable colorectal pulmonary metastases.

Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting.

BACKGROUND: Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in an untrained setting at a national level. METHODS: Patients who underwent additional LLN surgery were selected from a national cross-sectional cohort study regarding patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 69 Dutch hospitals in 2016. LLN surgery consisted of either 'node-picking' (the removal of an individual LLN) or 'partial regional node dissection' (PRND; an incomplete resection of the LLN area). For all patients with primarily enlarged (≥7 mm) LLNs, those undergoing rectal surgery with an additional LLN procedure were compared to those  undergoing only rectal resection. RESULTS: Out of 3057 patients, 64 underwent additional LLN surgery, with 4-year LR and LLR rates of 26% and 15%, respectively. Forty-eight patients (75%) had enlarged LLNs, with corresponding recurrence rates of 26% and 19%, respectively. Node-picking (n = 40) resulted in a 20% 4-year LLR, and a 14% LLR after PRND (n = 8; p = 0.677). Multivariable analysis of 158 patients with enlarged LLNs undergoing additional LLN surgery (n = 48) or rectal resection alone (n = 110) showed no significant association of LLN surgery with 4-year LR or LLR, but suggested higher recurrence risks after LLN surgery (LR: hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-3.2, p = 0.264; LLR: HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.2-2.5, p = 0.874). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of Dutch practice in 2016 revealed that approximately one-third of patients with primarily enlarged LLNs underwent surgical treatment, mostly consisting of node-picking. Recurrence rates were not significantly affected by LLN surgery, but did suggest worse outcomes. Outcomes of LLN surgery after adequate training requires further research.

Pulmonary metastasectomy and repeat metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: outcomes from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of recurrent pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal cancer is an established treatment option; however, the evidence for repeat resection is limited. The aim of this study was to analyse long-term outcomes from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery. METHODS: Data from the mandatory Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery were used to analyse all patients after metastasectomy or repeat metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases from January 2012 to December 2019 in the Netherlands. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine the difference in survival. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS: A total of 1237 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 127 patients underwent repeat metastasectomy. Five-year overall survival was 53 per cent after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases and 52 per cent after repeat metastasectomy (P = 0.852). The median follow-up was 42 (range 0-285) months. More patients experienced postoperative complications after repeat metastasectomy compared with the first metastasectomy (18.1 per cent versus 11.6 per cent respectively; P = 0.033). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 1 (HR 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.08 to 1.65; P = 0.008), multiple metastases (HR 1.30, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 1.67; P = 0.038), and bilateral metastases (HR 1.50, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 2.22; P = 0.045) were prognostic factors on multivariable analysis for pulmonary metastasectomy. Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide less than 80 per cent (HR 1.04, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 1.06; P = 0.004) was the only prognostic factor on multivariable analysis for repeat metastasectomy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases have comparable median and 5-year overall survival rates after primary or recurrent pulmonary metastasectomy. However, repeat metastasectomy has a higher risk of postoperative complications.

Metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: a survey among members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical management of pulmonary metastases in colorectal cancer patients is a debated topic. There is currently no consensus on this matter, which sparks considerable risk for international practice variation. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) ran a survey to assess current clinical practices and to determine criteria for resection among ESTS members. METHODS: All ESTS members were invited to complete an online questionnaire of 38 questions on current practice and management of pulmonary metastases in colorectal cancer patients. RESULTS: In total, 308 complete responses were received (response rate: 22%) from 62 countries. Most respondents consider that pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases improves disease control (97%) and improves patients' survival (92%). Invasive mediastinal staging in case of suspicious hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes is indicated (82%). Wedge resection is the preferred type of resection for a peripheral metastasis (87%). Minimally invasive approach is the preferred approach (72%). For a centrally located colorectal pulmonary metastasis, the preferred form of treatment is a minimally invasive anatomical resection (56%). During metastasectomy, 67% of respondents perform mediastinal lymph node sampling or dissection. Routine chemotherapy is rarely or never given following metastasectomy (57% of respondents). CONCLUSIONS: This survey among the ESTS members underlines the change in practice of pulmonary metastasectomy with an increasing tendency in favour of minimally invasive metastasectomy and surgical resection is preferred over other types of local treatment. Criteria for resectability vary and controversy remains regarding lymph node assessment and the role of adjuvant treatment.

Clinical outcomes of open abdominal wall reconstruction with the use of a polypropylene reinforced tissue matrix: a multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess mesh behaviour and clinical outcomes of open complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) with the use of a polypropylene reinforced tissue matrix. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of adult patients who underwent open CAWR with the use of a permanent polypropylene reinforced tissue matrix (OviTex®) between June 2019 and January 2021. RESULTS: Fifty-five consecutive patients from four hospitals in the Netherlands were analysed; 46 patients with a ventral hernia and 9 patients with an open abdomen. Most patients with a ventral hernia had one or more complicating comorbidities (91.3%) and one or more complicating hernia characteristics (95.7%). Most procedures were performed in a (clean) contaminated surgical field (69.6% CDC 2-4; 41.3% CDC 3-4). All nine patients with an open abdomen underwent semi-emergent surgery. Twelve out of 46 patients with a ventral hernia (26.1%) and 4 of 9 patients with an open abdomen (44.4%) developed a postoperative surgical site infection that made direct contact with the mesh as confirmed on computed tomography (CT), suspicious of mesh infection. No patient needed mesh explantation for persistent infection of the mesh. During a median follow-up of 13 months, 4 of 46 ventral hernia patients (8.7%) developed a CT confirmed hernia recurrence. CONCLUSION: Polypropylene reinforced tissue matrix can withstand infectious complications and provides acceptable mid-term recurrence rates in this retrospective study on open complex abdominal wall reconstructions. Longer follow-up data from prospective studies are required to determine further risk of hernia recurrence.

Multicenter cohort study on the presentation and treatment of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: Current studies have demonstrated conflicting results regarding surgical care for acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to assess trends in diagnosis as well as treatment of acute appendicitis in the Netherlands during the first and second COVID-19 infection wave. METHODS: All consecutive patients that had an appendectomy for acute appendicitis in nine hospitals from January 2019 to December 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the number of appendectomies for acute appendicitis. Secondary outcomes included time between onset of symptoms and hospital admission, proportion of complex appendicitis, postoperative length of stay and postoperative infectious complications. Outcomes were compared between the pre-COVID group and COVID group. RESULTS: A total of 4401 patients were included. The mean weekly rate of appendectomies during the COVID period was 44.0, compared to 40.9 in the pre-COVID period. The proportion of patients with complex appendicitis and mean postoperative length of stay in days were similar in the pre-COVID and COVID group (respectively 35.5% vs 36.8%, p = 0.36 and 2.0 ± 2.2 vs 2.0 ± 2.6, p = 0.93). There were no differences in postoperative infectious complications. A computed tomography scan was used more frequently as a diagnostic tool after the onset of COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID (13.8% vs 9.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: No differences were observed in number of appendectomies, proportion of complex appendicitis, postoperative length of stay or postoperative infectious complications before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A CT scan was used more frequently during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to elucidate determinants for succesful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) protocol for perioperative care for surgical lung cancer patients in the Netherlands. SETTING: Lung cancer operations are performed in both academic and regional hospitals, either by cardiothoracic or general thoracic surgeons. Limiting the impact of these operations by optimising and standardising perioperative care with the ERATS protocol is thought to enable reduction in length of stay, complications and costs. PARTICIPANTS: A broad spectrum of stakeholders in perioperative care for patients with lung resection participated in this study, ranging from patient representatives, healthcare professionals to an insurance company representative. INTERVENTIONS: Semistructured interviews (N=14) were conducted with the stakeholders (N=18). The interviews were conducted one on one by telephone and two times, face to face, in small groups. Verbatim transcriptions of these interviews were coded for the purpose of thematic analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Determinants for successful implementation of the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Several determinants correspond with previous publications: having a multidisciplinary team, leadership from a senior clinician and support from an ERAS-coordinator as facilitators; lack of feedback on performance and absence of management support as barriers. Our study underscores the potential detrimental effect of inconsistent communication, the lack of support in the transition from hospital to home and the barrier posed by lack of accessible audit data. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a structured problem analysis among a wide selection of stakeholders, this study provides a solid basis for choosing adequate implementation strategies to introduce the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. Emphasis on consistent and sufficient communication, support in the transition from hospital to home and adequate audit and feedback data, in addition to established implementation strategies for ERAS-type programmes, will enable a tailored approach to implementation of ERATS in the Dutch context.

Optimization of transmural care by implementation of an online expert panel to assess treatment strategy in patients suffering from colorectal cancer liver metastases: A prospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Centralization of oncological care results in a growing demand for specialized consultations and referrals. Improved telemedicine solutions are needed to facilitate access to specialist care and select patients eligible for referral. The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to optimize transmural care for patients suffering from colorectal cancer liver metastases through implementation of an online expert panel. METHODS: A digital communication platform was developed to share medical data, including high-quality diagnostic imaging of patients suffering from colorectal cancer liver metastases. Feasibility of local treatment strategies was assessed by a panel of liver specialists to select patients for referral. After implementation, an observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate quality improvement in transmural care using revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guidelines. RESULTS: From September 2016-September 2018, eight hospitals were connected to the platform, covering a population of 3 m. In total, 123 cases were assessed, of which 54 (43.9%) were prevented from needless physical referral. Assessment of treatment strategy by an online expert panel significantly reduced the average lead time during multidisciplinary team meetings from 3.73 min to 2.12 min per patient (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an online expert panel is an innovative, accessible and user-friendly way to provide cancer-specific expertise to regional hospitals. E-consultation of such panels may result in more efficient multidisciplinary team meetings and prevent fragile patients from needless referral. Sustainability of these panels however is subject to structural financial compensation, so a cost-effectiveness analysis is warranted.

Variation in incidence, prevention and treatment of persistent air leak after lung cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Persistent air leak (PAL; >5 days after surgery) is the most common complication after pulmonary resection and associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased morbidity. Literature is contradictory about the prevention and treatment of PAL. Variation is therefore hypothesized. The aim of this study is to understand the variation in the incidence, preventive management and treatment of PAL. METHODS: Data from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery were combined with results of an online survey among Dutch thoracic surgeons. The national incidence of PAL and case-mix corrected between-hospital variation were calculated in patients who underwent an oncological (bi)lobectomy or segmentectomy between January 2012 and December 2018. By multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with PAL were assessed. A survey was designed to assess variation in (preventive) management and analysed using descriptive statistics. Hospital-level associations between management strategies and PAL were assessed by univariable linear regression. RESULTS: Of 12 382 included patients, 9.0% had PAL, with a between-hospital range of 2.6-19.3%. Factors associated with PAL were male sex, poor lung function, low body mass index, high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, pulmonary comorbidity, upper lobe resection, (bi)lobectomy (vs segmentectomy), right-sided tumour and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. Perioperative (preventive) management of PAL differed widely between hospitals. When using water seal compared to suction drainage, the average incidence of PAL decreased 2.9%. CONCLUSIONS: In the Netherlands, incidence and perioperative (preventive) management of PAL vary widely. Using water seal instead of suction drainage and increasing awareness are potential measures to reduce this variation.

Indeterminate Liver Lesions in Patients With Early Stage Rectal Cancer: Can They Be Ignored?

PURPOSE: Small, hypoattenuating, indeterminate liver lesions are often encountered during staging computed tomography (CT) in patients with early-stage rectal cancer. This study aimed to determine the incidence and prognostic significance of these lesions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single institution's colorectal cancer (CRC) database was searched for patients with early-stage rectal cancer, defined as a cT1-2N0 tumor on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Abdominal CT scans of these patients were assessed for the presence of liver lesions and categorized according to their morphology. Preoperative MRI scans of the liver and abdominal follow-up imaging were assessed to determine whether the liver lesions found during staging CT appeared to be CRC metastases or not. RESULTS: In a consecutive cohort of 1232 patients with CRC who had undergone surgery, 84 patients with early-stage rectal cancer (cT1-2N0 on MRI) were identified. Of those 84 patients, 45 (54%) had 1 or more liver lesions on staging CT; a total of 122 liver lesions were observed, consisting of 95 indeterminate lesions (78%), 25 cysts (20%), and 2 hemangiomas (2%). Preoperative MRI of the liver and regular follow-up imaging revealed no synchronous or metachronous liver metastases in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, small, hypoattenuating, indeterminate lesions of the liver were common in patients diagnosed with early rectal cancer and seemed to have no clinical significance. Additional preoperative imaging or follow-up imaging for indeterminate liver lesions in such patients may be unnecessary.

Improving postoperative outcome in rectal cancer surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in an era of increasing laparoscopic resection.

PURPOSE: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces complications and length of stay (LOS) in colon cancer, but implementation in rectal cancer is different because of neo-adjuvant therapy and surgical differences. Laparoscopic resection may further improve outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of introducing ERAS on postoperative outcome after rectal cancer resection in an era of increasing laparoscopic resections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent elective rectal cancer surgery from 2009 till 2015 were included in this observational cohort study. In 2010, ERAS was introduced and adherence to the protocol was registered. Open and laparoscopic resections were compared. With regression analysis, predictive factors for postoperative outcome and LOS were identified. RESULTS: A total of 499 patients were included. The LOS decreased from 12.3 days in 2009 to 5.7 days in 2015 (p = 0.000). Surgical site infections were reduced from 24% in 2009 to 5% in 2015 (p = 0.013) and postoperative ileus from 39% in 2009 to 6% in 2015 (p = 0.000). Only postoperative ERAS items and laparoscopic surgery were associated with an improved postoperative outcome and shorter LOS. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS proved to be feasible, safe, and contributed to improving short-term outcome in rectal cancer resections. The benefits of laparoscopic surgery may in part be explained by reaching better ERAS adherence rates. However, the laparoscopic approach was also associated with anastomotic leakage. Despite the potential of bias, this study provides an insight in effects of ERAS and laparoscopic surgery in a non-randomized real-time setting.

Dealing with indeterminate pulmonary nodules in colorectal cancer patients; a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) are frequently encountered on staging computed tomography (CT) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and they create diagnostic dilemmas. This systematic review and pooled analysis aims to estimate the incidence and risk of malignancy of IPNs and provide an overview of the existing literature on IPNs in CRC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EMBASE, Pubmed and the Cochrane database were searched for papers published between January 2005 and April 2020. Studies describing the incidence of IPNs and the risk of malignancy in CRC patients and where the full text was available in the English language were considered for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included studies that used chest X-ray instead of CT, liver metastasis cohorts, studies with less than 60 CRC patients and reviews. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 8637 patients. Pooled analysis revealed IPNs on staging chest CT in 1327 (15%) of the CRC patients. IPNs appeared to be metastatic disease during follow up in 16% of these patients. Regional lymph node metastases, liver metastases, location of the primary tumour in the rectum, larger IPN size and multiple IPNs are the five most frequently reported parameters predicting the risk of malignancy of IPNs. CONCLUSION: A risk stratification model for CRC patients with IPNs is warranted to enable an adequate selection of high risk patients for IPN follow up and to diminish the use of unnecessary repetitive chest CT-scans in the many low risk patients.

Textbook outcome as a composite outcome measure in non-small-cell lung cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Quality assessment is an important element in providing surgical cancer care. The main objective of this study was to develop a new composite measure 'textbook outcome', to evaluate and improve quality of surgical care for patients undergoing a resection for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: All patients undergoing an anatomical resection for NSCLC from 2012 to 2016 registered in the nationwide Dutch Lung Cancer Audit were included in an analysis to assess usefulness of a composite measure as a quality indicator. Based on expert opinion, textbook outcome was defined as having a complete resection (negative resection margins and sufficient lymph node dissection), plus no 30-day or in-hospital mortality, no reintervention in 30 days, no readmission to the intensive care unit, no prolonged hospital stay (<14 days), no hospital readmission after discharge and no major complications. The percentage of patients with a textbook outcome was calculated per hospital. Between-hospital variation in textbook outcome was analysed using case-mix adjustment models. RESULTS: In total, 5513 patients were included in this study. Textbook outcome was achieved in 26.4% of patients. Insufficient lymph node dissection had the most substantial effect on not realizing textbook outcome. If 'sufficient lymph node dissection' was not included as a criterion, textbook outcome would be 60.7%. Case-mix adjusted textbook outcome proportions per hospitals varied between 13.2% and 37.7%. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to focusing on a single aspect, the composite measure textbook outcome provides insight into comprehensive performance in NSCLC surgery. It can be used to evaluate both individual hospitals and national performance and provides the opportunity to give benchmarked feedback to thoracic surgeons.

Variation Between Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards in Clinical Staging and Treatment Recommendations for Patients With Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis and staging are crucial to ensure uniform allocation to the optimal treatment methods for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but may differ among multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs). Discordance between clinical and pathologic TNM stage is particularly important for patients with locally advanced NSCLC (stage IIIA) because it may influence their chance of allocation to curative-intent treatment. We therefore aimed to study agreement on staging and treatment to gain insight into MDT decision-making. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the level of agreement on clinical staging and treatment recommendations among MDTs in stage IIIA NSCLC patients? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven MDTs each evaluated the same 10 pathologic stage IIIA NSCLC patients in their weekly meeting (n = 110). Patients were selected purposively for their challenging nature. All MDTs received exactly the same clinical information and images per patient. We tested agreement in cT stage, cN stage, cM stage (TNM 8th edition), and treatment proposal among MDTs using Randolph's free-marginal multirater kappa. RESULTS: Considerable variation among the MDTs was seen in T staging (κ, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.34-0.75]), N staging (κ, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35-0.83]), overall TNM staging (κ, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.35-0.72]), and treatment recommendations (κ, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.32-0.56]). Most variation in T stage was seen in patients with suspicion of invasion of surrounding structures, which influenced such treatment recommendations as induction therapy and type. For N stage, distinction between N1 and N2 disease was an important source of discordance among MDTs. Variation occurred between 2 patients even regarding M stage. A wide range of additional diagnostics was proposed by the MDTs. INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrated high variation in staging and treatment of patients with stage IIIA NSCLC among MDTs in different hospitals. Although some variation may be unavoidable in these challenging patients, we should strive for more uniformity.

Wide Variation in Perioperative Care in Anatomical Lung Resections in the Netherlands: A National Survey.

This study aimed to describe perioperative care after anatomical lung resection in the Netherlands, before publication of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ERAS/ESTS) guidelines in 2019. An online survey was sent to all 43 Dutch lung surgical centers in December 2017, addressing topics in the 4 phases of perioperative care (preoperative, admission, perioperative, postoperative). Respondents were requested to report care that would be delivered to a standardized patient without perioperative complications. To compare current care with ERAS/ESTS guidelines, we assigned an ERAS/ESTS score per hospital, weighted for evidence level per recommendation. Higher scores indicate higher application of recommendations. Response rate of centers was 100%, median response rate per question was 98% (interquartile range 94-100). Some perioperative recommendations are commonly applied (>85%), such as minimally invasive surgery and regional anesthesia; others, such as admission carbohydrate drinks, are not (<35%). Wide variation was observed regarding patient counselling, pre- and postoperative admission logistics, anemia correction, fluid management, pain management, and chest drain management. Median 62% (interquartile range 53%-72%) of the maximum ERAS/ESTS score was achieved. Large variation in ERAS/ESTS score between hospitals were found in all phases (preoperative: 6.0 [6.5-10.5] points, admission: 5.0 [1.0-6.0] points, perioperative: 21.5.0 [16.0-22.5] points, postoperative: 8.0 [5.0-8.5] points). Large variation exists in perioperative care after anatomical lung resection in the Netherlands. Given previously published data linking variation in perioperative care to variation in outcomes, standardization of perioperative care in lung surgery, preferably based on the ERAS/ESTS guidelines, may be warranted but requires further study.