Qualitative study of the factors impacting antimicrobial stewardship programme delivery in regional and remote hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Many regional and remote ('regional') hospitals are without the specialist services that support antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes in hospitals in major cities. This can impact their ability to implement AMS activities. AIM: To identify factors that impact on the delivery of AMS programmes in regional hospitals. METHODS: Healthcare clinicians who have primary AMS responsibilities or provide AMS support to a health service or across health services with an Australian Statistical Geography Standard Remoteness classification of inner regional, outer regional, remote or very remote were recruited purposively and via snowballing. A series of focus groups and interviews were held, and the discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were coded by two researchers, and thematic analysis was undertaken using a framework method. FINDINGS: Four focus groups and one interview were conducted (22 participants). Six main themes that impacted on AMS programme delivery were identified: culture of independence and self-reliance by local clinicians, personal relationships, geographical location of the hospital influencing antimicrobial choice, local context, inability to meaningfully benchmark performance, and lack of resources. Possible strategies to support the delivery of AMS programmes in regional hospitals proposed by participants were categorized into two main themes: those that may be best developed or managed centrally, and those that should be a local responsibility. CONCLUSION: AMS programme delivery in regional hospitals is influenced by factors that are not present in hospitals in major cities. These findings provide a strong basis for the development of strategies to support regional hospitals to implement sustainable AMS programmes.

Regional challenges: evaluation of a hepatitis outreach programme using transient elastography (FibroScan) in Victoria.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of an outreach programme using a mobile transient elastography (TE) device (FibroScan) to improve liver disease assessment in different clinical settings. AIMS: To evaluate a programme of liver fibrosis assessment by TE and to compare fibrosis scores between different sites and patient groups. METHODS: Prospective cohort study. TE was conducted at a tertiary hospital and during outreach clinics in three different settings: community clinics, clinics for people who use drugs (PWUD) and regional clinics in rural Victoria. All patients referred for TE at the participating locations were eligible during the study period. RESULTS: A total of 200 of 623 patients was assessed and evaluated during outreach sessions (regional 100; PWUD 18; community 82). While the majority of patients in community centres were infected with hepatitis B (68%), most patients in regional clinics and in PWUD settings had hepatitis C virus (HCV) (81 and 100%, respectively). Significantly more patients assessed at regional clinics and PWUD settings presented with severe fibrosis (F3-F4, F4): regional clinics 39%; PWUD 31%; tertiary 11%; community 7%, (P <0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that older age, alcohol consumption, male sex, increased alanine transferase levels, HCV infection and importantly, evaluation at regional sites were independently associated with severe fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: A TE-based outreach programme allows for assessment of liver fibrosis in varied and regional populations. The finding that patients in regional settings and PWUD presented with more advanced fibrosis should prompt improvements in healthcare to improve access for these populations.

Telehealth: experience of the first 120 consultations delivered from a new refugee telehealth clinic.

BACKGROUND: In 2011, the Australian Government introduced Medicare item numbers for telehealth consultations. This is a rapidly expanding method of healthcare provision. AIMS: We assessed the demographic and disease profile of refugee patients attending a new telehealth clinic, and calculated the patient travel avoided. We examined technical challenges and assessed the performance of two videoconferencing solutions using different bandwidth and latencies. METHODS: We audited the first 120 patients attending the telehealth clinic. During consultations, the patient was with the general practitioner (GP) and linked by internet videoconference using VIDYO, GoToMeeting or Skype, to the specialist at a tertiary referral hospital. Travel avoided was calculated and technical problems were assessed by the participating specialist. Bandwidth and latency variations were examined within a university broadband testing facility. RESULTS: The two most frequently managed conditions were hepatitis C and latent tuberculosis. Twenty-nine different GP were included and 42 consultations required an interpreter. Nearly 500 km of travel and 127 kg of CO(2) production was avoided per consultation. Technical issues were faced in 25% of consultations, most frequently sound problems and connections dropping out. A bandwidth of at least 512 kbps and latency of no more than 300 ms was necessary to conduct an adequate multipoint videoconference. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth using videoconferencing adds a new component to care of refugee and immigrant patients settling in regional areas. Telehealth will be improved by changes to improve simplicity and standardisation of videoconferencing, but requires ongoing Medicare funding to allow sufficient administrative support.