A Novel Provider Education Module to Enhance Detection of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency.

Background: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is the most common genetic risk factor for early-onset emphysema. However, AATD continues to be underrecognized and underdiagnosed. Provider awareness about AATD, concerns with testing costs, and limited understanding about therapeutic options contribute to its underdiagnosis. We hypothesized that provider education would improve awareness of AATD and improve screening. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a targeted provider education module on AATD screening. Methods: We developed a web-based education module to address barriers to screening for AATD, deployed the education module using the Medscape Education platform, assessed perceived healthcare provider confidence in AATD screening, and conducted a prospective pre and postintervention study of AATD testing practices at a high-volume academic outpatient subspecialty pulmonary clinic. Results: A total of 11,385 healthcare providers, including eight pulmonologists at our institution, completed the web-based education module. Confidence in identifying patients at high risk for AATD improved after completing the module ("not confident" in AATD screening was 7.7% postintervention compared with 19.4% preintervention). The rate of screening patients at high risk for AATD improved more than twofold (AATD screening rate 9.7% preintervention vs. 20.4% postintervention; P = 0.004). Among patients screened for AATD in our cohort, 27.2% had a genotype/phenotype or low alpha-1 antitrypsin concentration consistent with AATD. Conclusion: Targeted healthcare provider education can improve the confidence in testing for AATD. Improvements in provider confidence corresponded to improvements in AATD screening in a subspecialty pulmonary clinic. More than one-fourth of screening tests suggested AATD, underpinning the value of testing in high-risk individuals.

Appropriateness of Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Transfer: A Multicenter Study of Medicare ACO Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVES: There is wide variation in long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) use nationwide, the most intensive and expensive post-acute care setting, although appropriateness of use is uncertain. Therefore, we examined the appropriateness and reasons for transfer in a high-use region, and how Medicare criteria for LTACH payment identifies appropriate transfers. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational cohort. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries transferred to an LTACH from 2017 to 2018 from an accountable care organization in Texas. METHODS: The primary outcome was clinical appropriateness of transfer ascertained by 2 physician reviewers. We abstracted patients' characteristics and primary reasons for transfer. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of meeting Medicare criteria for full LTACH payment [preceding intensive care unit (ICU) stay ≥3 days or prolonged mechanical ventilation] for identifying appropriate transfers, and how this differed if Medicare adopted an 8-day minimum ICU stay criterion recommended by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). RESULTS: Of 105 LTACH transfers, 33 (31.4%) were clinically appropriate. The most common reason among appropriate transfers was respiratory care (58%), but 42% had other indications. Inappropriate transfers most commonly were for wound care (28%), intravenous medication infusions (28%), or patient (17%) and physician preference (26%). The PPV for meeting Medicare LTACH payment criteria was 55%. The PPV improved to 77% if Medicare adopted the 8-day minimum ICU stay criterion, with only a modest absolute increase in appropriate transfers not meeting the more stringent criteria (12% to 17%). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Two-thirds of LTACH transfers in a high-LTACH-use region are clinically inappropriate, and are most commonly transferred for wound care, intravenous infusions, or patient and physician preference. Medicare payment criteria modestly distinguished between appropriate and inappropriate transfers. Adoption of MedPAC's recommended 8-day minimum ICU stay criterion could safely reduce inappropriate transfers, although generalizability to low LTACH-use regions is uncertain.

Inclusion of Performance Parameters and Patient Context in the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: To facilitate evidence-based medicine (EBM) on an individual level, it may be important for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to incorporate the performance parameters of diagnostic studies and therapeutic interventions (such as likelihood ratio and absolute benefit or harm), and to incorporate relevant patient contexts that may influence decision-making. We sought to determine the extent to which heart failure CPGs currently incorporate this information. METHODS: We reviewed the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association (ACCF/AHA) 2013 Heart Failure CPG, the 2017 ACCF/AHA/HFSA update, and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2016 Heart Failure CPG. We abstracted variables for each CPG recommendation from the following domains: quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, diagnostic and therapeutic performance parameters, and patient context. RESULTS: We examined 169 recommendations from the ACCF/AHA 2013 CPGs and 2017 update and 187 recommendations from the 2016 ESC CPGs. Performance parameters for diagnostic studies (2013 ACCF/AHA: 13%; 2017 ACCF/AHA/HFSA update: 0%; 2016 ESC: 0%) and therapeutic interventions (2013 ACCF/AHA: 65%; 2017 ACCF/AHA/HFSA update: 64%; 2016 ESC: 16%) were not commonly included in CPGs. Patient context was included in about half of ACCF/AHA recommendations and a quarter of ESC recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of recommendations from heart failure CPGs lack information on diagnostic and therapeutic performance parameters and patient context. Given the importance of these components to effectively implement EBM, particularly for a heterogeneous heart failure population, innovative strategies are needed to optimize CPGs so they provide comprehensive yet succinct recommendations that can improve population-level outcomes and ensure optimal patient-centered care.