Detectability and Volumetric Accuracy of Pulmonary Nodules in Low-Dose Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study.

The aim of this phantom study was to assess the detectability and volumetric accuracy of pulmonary nodules on photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) at different low-dose levels compared to conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). In-house fabricated artificial nodules of different shapes (spherical, lobulated, spiculated), sizes (2.5-10 mm and 5-1222 mm3), and densities (-330 HU and 100 HU) were randomly inserted into an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. The phantom was scanned with a low-dose chest protocol with PCD-CT and EID-CT, in which the dose with PCD-CT was lowered from 100% to 10% with respect to the EID-CT reference dose. Two blinded observers independently assessed the CT examinations of the nodules. A third observer measured the nodule volumes using commercial software. The influence of the scanner type, dose, observer, physical nodule volume, shape, and density on the detectability and volumetric accuracy was assessed by a multivariable regression analysis. In 120 CT examinations, 642 nodules were present. Observer 1 and 2 detected 367 (57%) and 289 nodules (45%), respectively. With PCD-CT and EID-CT, the nodule detectability was similar. The physical nodule volumes were underestimated by 20% (range 8-52%) with PCD-CT and 24% (range 9-52%) with EID-CT. With PCD-CT, no significant decrease in the detectability and volumetric accuracy was found at dose reductions down to 10% of the reference dose (p > 0.05). The detectability and volumetric accuracy were significantly influenced by the observer, nodule volume, and a spiculated nodule shape (p < 0.05), but not by dose, CT scanner type, and nodule density (p > 0.05). Low-dose PCD-CT demonstrates potential to detect and assess the volumes of pulmonary nodules, even with a radiation dose reduction of up to 90%.

Development and multicenter validation of a multiparametric imaging model to predict treatment response in rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a multiparametric model to predict neoadjuvant treatment response in rectal cancer at baseline using a heterogeneous multicenter MRI dataset. METHODS: Baseline staging MRIs (T2W (T2-weighted)-MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) / apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)) of 509 patients (9 centres) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were collected. Response was defined as (1) complete versus incomplete response, or (2) good (Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) 1-2) versus poor response (TRG3-5). Prediction models were developed using combinations of the following variable groups: (1) Non-imaging: age/sex/tumor-location/tumor-morphology/CRT-surgery interval (2) Basic staging: cT-stage/cN-stage/mesorectal fascia involvement, derived from (2a) original staging reports, or (2b) expert re-evaluation (3) Advanced staging: variables from 2b combined with cTN-substaging/invasion depth/extramural vascular invasion/tumor length (4) Quantitative imaging: tumour volume + first-order histogram features (from T2W-MRI and DWI/ADC) Models were developed with data from 6 centers (n = 412) using logistic regression with the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operator (LASSO) feature selection, internally validated using repeated (n = 100) random hold-out validation, and externally validated using data from 3 centers (n = 97). RESULTS: After external validation, the best model (including non-imaging and advanced staging variables) achieved an area under the curve of 0.60 (95%CI=0.48-0.72) to predict complete response and 0.65 (95%CI=0.53-0.76) to predict a good response. Quantitative variables did not improve model performance. Basic staging variables consistently achieved lower performance compared to advanced staging variables. CONCLUSIONS: Overall model performance was moderate. Best results were obtained using advanced staging variables, highlighting the importance of good-quality staging according to current guidelines. Quantitative imaging features had no added value (in this heterogeneous dataset). CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Predicting tumour response at baseline could aid in tailoring neoadjuvant therapies for rectal cancer. This study shows that image-based prediction models are promising, though are negatively affected by variations in staging quality and MRI acquisition, urging the need for harmonization. KEY POINTS: This multicenter study combining clinical information and features derived from MRI rendered disappointing performance to predict response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. Best results were obtained with the combination of clinical baseline information and state-of-the-art image-based staging variables, highlighting the importance of good quality staging according to current guidelines and staging templates. No added value was found for quantitative imaging features in this multicenter retrospective study. This is likely related to acquisition variations, which is a major problem for feature reproducibility and thus model generalizability.

Pelvic CT in addition to MRI to differentiate between rectal and sigmoid cancer on imaging using the sigmoid take-off as a landmark.

BACKGROUND: The sigmoid take-off (STO) is a recently established landmark to discern rectal from sigmoid cancer on imaging. STO-assessment can be challenging on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to varying axial planes. PURPOSE: To establish the benefit of using computed tomography (CT; with consistent axial planes), in addition to MRI, to anatomically classify rectal versus sigmoid cancer using the STO. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A senior and junior radiologist retrospectively classified 40 patients with rectal/rectosigmoid cancers using the STO, first on MRI-only (sagittal and oblique-axial views) and then using a combination of MRI and axial CT. Tumors were classified as rectal/rectosigmoid/sigmoid (according to published STO definitions) and then dichotomized into rectal versus sigmoid. Diagnostic confidence was documented using a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Adding CT resulted in a change in anatomical tumor classification in 4/40 cases (10%) for the junior reader and in 6/40 cases (15%) for the senior reader. Diagnostic confidence increased significantly after adding CT for the junior reader (mean score 3.85 vs. 4.27; P < 0.001); confidence of the senior reader was not affected (4.28 vs. 4.25; P = 0.80). Inter-observer agreement was similarly good for MRI only (κ=0.77) and MRI + CT (κ=0.76). Readers reached consensus on the classification of rectal versus sigmoid cancer in 78%-85% of cases. CONCLUSION: Availability of a consistent axial imaging plane - in the case of this study provided by CT - in addition to a standard MRI protocol with sagittal and oblique-axial imaging views can be helpful to more confidently localize tumors using the STO as a landmark, especially for more junior readers.

Evolutions in rectal cancer MRI staging and risk stratification in The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To analyze how the MRI reporting of rectal cancer has evolved (following guideline updates) in The Netherlands. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 712 patients (2011-2018) from 8 teaching hospitals in The Netherlands with available original radiological staging reports that were re-evaluated by a dedicated MR expert using updated guideline criteria. Original reports were classified as "free-text," "semi-structured," or "template" and completeness of reporting was documented. Patients were categorized as low versus high risk, first based on the original reports (high risk = cT3-4, cN+, and/or cMRF+) and then based on the expert re-evaluations (high risk = cT3cd-4, cN+, MRF+, and/or EMVI+). Evolutions over time were studied by splitting the inclusion period in 3 equal time periods. RESULTS: A significant increase in template reporting was observed (from 1.6 to 17.6-29.6%; p < 0.001), along with a significant increase in the reporting of cT-substage, number of N+ and extramesorectal nodes, MRF invasion and tumor-MRF distance, EMVI, anal sphincter involvement, and tumor morphology and circumference. Expert re-evaluation changed the risk classification from high to low risk in 18.0% of cases and from low to high risk in 1.7% (total 19.7%). In the majority (17.9%) of these cases, the changed risk classification was likely (at least in part) related to use of updated guideline criteria, which mainly led to a reduction in high-risk cT-stage and nodal downstaging. CONCLUSION: Updated concepts of risk stratification have increasingly been adopted, accompanied by an increase in template reporting and improved completeness of reporting. Use of updated guideline criteria resulted in considerable downstaging (of mainly high-risk cT-stage and nodal stage).

Sources of variation in multicenter rectal MRI data and their effect on radiomics feature reproducibility.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate sources of variation in a multicenter rectal cancer MRI dataset focusing on hardware and image acquisition, segmentation methodology, and radiomics feature extraction software. METHODS: T2W and DWI/ADC MRIs from 649 rectal cancer patients were retrospectively acquired in 9 centers. Fifty-two imaging features (14 first-order/6 shape/32 higher-order) were extracted from each scan using whole-volume (expert/non-expert) and single-slice segmentations using two different software packages (PyRadiomics/CapTk). Influence of hardware, acquisition, and patient-intrinsic factors (age/gender/cTN-stage) on ADC was assessed using linear regression. Feature reproducibility was assessed between segmentation methods and software packages using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Image features differed significantly (p < 0.001) between centers with more substantial variations in ADC compared to T2W-MRI. In total, 64.3% of the variation in mean ADC was explained by differences in hardware and acquisition, compared to 0.4% by patient-intrinsic factors. Feature reproducibility between expert and non-expert segmentations was good to excellent (median ICC 0.89-0.90). Reproducibility for single-slice versus whole-volume segmentations was substantially poorer (median ICC 0.40-0.58). Between software packages, reproducibility was good to excellent (median ICC 0.99) for most features (first-order/shape/GLCM/GLRLM) but poor for higher-order (GLSZM/NGTDM) features (median ICC 0.00-0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variations are present in multicenter MRI data, particularly related to differences in hardware and acquisition, which will likely negatively influence subsequent analysis if not corrected for. Segmentation variations had a minor impact when using whole volume segmentations. Between software packages, higher-order features were less reproducible and caution is warranted when implementing these in prediction models. KEY POINTS: • Features derived from T2W-MRI and in particular ADC differ significantly between centers when performing multicenter data analysis. • Variations in ADC are mainly (> 60%) caused by hardware and image acquisition differences and less so (< 1%) by patient- or tumor-intrinsic variations. • Features derived using different image segmentations (expert/non-expert) were reproducible, provided that whole-volume segmentations were used. When using different feature extraction software packages with similar settings, higher-order features were less reproducible.

Studying local tumour heterogeneity on MRI and FDG-PET/CT to predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether quantifying local tumour heterogeneity has added benefit compared to global tumour features to predict response to chemoradiotherapy using pre-treatment multiparametric PET and MRI data. METHODS: Sixty-one locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and staged at baseline with MRI and FDG-PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed. Whole-tumour volumes were segmented on the MRI and PET/CT scans from which global tumour features (T2Wvolume/T2Wentropy/ADCmean/SUVmean/TLG/CTmean-HU) and local texture features (histogram features derived from local entropy/mean/standard deviation maps) were calculated. These respective feature sets were combined with clinical baseline parameters (e.g. age/gender/TN-stage) to build multivariable prediction models to predict a good (Mandard TRG1-2) versus poor (Mandard TRG3-5) response to chemoradiotherapy. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) with bootstrapping was performed to estimate performance in an 'independent' dataset. RESULTS: When using only imaging features, local texture features showed an AUC = 0.81 versus AUC = 0.74 for global tumour features. After internal cross-validation (LOOCV), AUC to predict a good response was the highest for the combination of clinical baseline variables + global tumour features (AUC = 0.83), compared to AUC = 0.79 for baseline + local texture and AUC = 0.76 for all combined (baseline + global + local texture). CONCLUSION: In imaging-based prediction models, local texture analysis has potential added value compared to global tumour features to predict response. However, when combined with clinical baseline parameters such as cTN-stage, the added value of local texture analysis appears to be limited. The overall performance to predict response when combining baseline variables with quantitative imaging parameters is promising and warrants further research. KEY POINTS: • Quantification of local tumour texture on pre-therapy FDG-PET/CT and MRI has potential added value compared to global tumour features to predict response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. • However, when combined with clinical baseline parameters such as cTN-stage, the added value of local texture over global tumour features is limited. • Predictive performance of our optimal model-combining clinical baseline variables with global quantitative tumour features-was encouraging (AUC 0.83), warranting further research in this direction on a larger scale.

Value of combined multiparametric MRI and FDG-PET/CT to identify well-responding rectal cancer patients before the start of neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the value of multiparametric MRI combined with FDG-PET/CT to identify well-responding rectal cancer patients before the start of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS: Sixty-one locally advanced rectal cancer patients who underwent a baseline FDG-PET/CT and MRI (T2W + DWI) and received long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analysed. Tumours were delineated on MRI and PET/CT from which the following quantitative parameters were calculated: T2W volume and entropy, ADC mean and entropy, CT density (mean-HU), SUV maximum and mean, metabolic tumour volume (MTV42%) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). These features, together with sex, age, mrTN-stage ("baseline parameters") and the CRT-surgery interval were analysed using multivariable stepwise logistic regression. Outcome was a good (TRG 1-2) versus poor histopathological response. Performance (AUC) to predict response was compared for different combinations of baseline ± quantitative imaging parameters and performance in an 'independent' dataset was estimated using bootstrapped leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). RESULTS: The optimal multivariable prediction model consisted of a combination of baseline + quantitative imaging parameters and included mrT-stage (OR 0.004, p < 0.001), T2W-signal entropy (OR 7.81, p = 0.0079) and T2W volume (OR 1.028, p = 0.0389) as the selected predictors. AUC in the study dataset was 0.88 and 0.83 after LOOCV. No PET/CT features were selected as predictors. CONCLUSIONS: A multivariable model incorporating mrT-stage and quantitative parameters from baseline MRI can aid in identifying well-responding patients before the start of treatment. Addition of FDG-PET/CT is not beneficial. KEY POINTS: • A multivariable model incorporating the mrT-stage and quantitative features derived from baseline MRI can aid in identifying well-responding patients before the start of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. • mrT-stage was the strongest predictor in the model and was complemented by the tumour volume and signal entropy calculated from T2W-MRI. • Adding quantitative features derived from pre-treatment PET/CT or DWI did not contribute to the model's predictive performance.

Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer: current applications and future perspectives.

This review summarizes current applications and clinical utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for rectal cancer and in addition provides a brief overview of more recent developments (including intravoxel incoherent motion imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging, and novel postprocessing tools) that are still in more early stages of research. More than 140 papers have been published in the last decade, during which period the use of DWI have slowly moved from mainly qualitative (visual) image interpretation to increasingly advanced methods of quantitative analysis. So far, the largest body of evidence exists for assessment of tumour response to neoadjuvant treatment. In this setting, particularly the benefit of DWI for visual assessment of residual tumour in post-radiation fibrosis has been established and is now increasingly adopted in clinics. Quantitative DWI analysis (mainly the apparent diffusion coefficient) has potential, both for response prediction as well as for tumour prognostication, but protocols require standardization and results need to be prospectively confirmed on larger scale. The role of DWI for further clinical tumour and nodal staging is less well-defined, although there could be a benefit for DWI to help detect lymph nodes. Novel methods of DWI analysis and post-processing are still being developed and optimized; the clinical potential of these tools remains to be established in the upcoming years.