Comparison of a formatted versus traditional sign out process for physicians in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Frequent interruptions, critically ill patients, and high patient turnover can make Emergency Department (ED) physician transitions of care (TOCs) challenging. Currently, there is no strict format for TOC in the ED. We structured a formatted ED TOC and evaluated the comparative effects from traditional TOC practice on the perceived quality of sign-out among physicians working in the ED. METHODS: We performed a prospective pre/post-interventional study utilizing convenience sampling in an urban community teaching hospital. The primary outcome was perceived quality of sign-out, as evaluated by the incoming physician one-hour after TOC, using the handoff-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (h-CEX) score with a 9-point scale for each category: Organized/Efficient, Communications Skills, Included Pertinent Information, Clinical Judgment, Patient Focused, Setting, and Overall Sign-Out Quality. Additional evaluation of unexpected tasks and errors from TOC w performed. RESULTS: We included 344 patient TOC observed, of which 147 (43%) were formatted interventions while 197 (57%) were standard TOCs. After analysis in a random effects model, statistically significant improvements among resident physicians were seen for the formatted TOC: patient focused (mean difference 0.40), setting (mean difference 1.05), and overall (mean difference 0.68). The rate of unexpected tasks and errors were higher in the standard TOC, though not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Resident physicians saw improvement in several h-CEX categories with a formatted TOC. Consistent with prior studies, a formatted TOC for emergency medicine should be strongly considered, especially among learners.

Emergency Department Drug Surveillance (EDDS) hospital's urinalysis results compared with expanded re-testing by an independent laboratory, a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Most hospital urine toxicology screens detect a fixed, limited set of common substances. These tests are fast and accurate but may miss emerging trends in substance use in the community and clinical acumen alone is insufficient for identifying new substances. METHODS: This prospective cohort study examined de-identified urine specimens obtained from patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED) at Prince George's Hospital Center (PGHC), between October 15, 2019 to November 6, 2019 and tested positive for one or more substances. The Emergency Department Drug Surveillance System (EDDS) collects quarterly exports from de-identified electronic health records (EHRs) containing urinalysis results for drug related ED visits. We performed a feasibility study of a new urine specimen submission by collecting a stratified sample of 151 urine specimens from PGHC ED patients. The specimens were tested for 240 drugs using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). This paper presents a comparison between the PGHC and expanded testing results. RESULTS: The expanded urinalysis panel found more cocaine (37% vs. 20%; p < 0.01) and benzodiazepine positives (21% vs. 11%; p < 0.05) than would have been detected by the hospital screen. Additionally, the expanded toxicology panel identified fentanyl in 4-14% of the samples. CONCLUSION: The EHR data submitted to EDDS from the hospital urine toxicology screen correctly identified hospital substance use patterns over the approximate 1 month study period. The expanded testing also uncovered drugs that the hospital might consider adding to their routine screen. EDDS is a feasible system for monitoring and confirming recent substance use trends among ED patients.

Manual Palpation vs. Femoral Arterial Doppler Ultrasound for Comparison of Pulse Check Time During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Manual palpation (MP) is frequently employed for pulse checks, but studies have shown that trained medical personnel have difficulty accurately identifying pulselessness or return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) using MP. Any delays in identifying pulselessness can lead to significant delays in starting or resuming high-quality chest compressions. OBJECTIVES: This study explored whether femoral arterial Doppler ultrasound (FADU) decreases pulse check duration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared with MP among patients in the emergency department (ED) receiving CPR directed by emergency medicine physicians who had received minimal additional didactic ultrasound training. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational cohort study from October 2018 to May 2019 at an urban community ED. Using convenience sampling, we enrolled patients arriving at our ED or who decompensated during their ED stay and received CPR. For continuous data, median (interquartile range [IQR]) were calculated, and medians were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Fifty-two eligible patients were enrolled and 135 pulse checks via MP and 35 via FADU were recorded. MP observations had a median (IQR) of 11.00 (7.36-15.48) s, whereas FADU had a median (IQR) of 8.98 (5.45-13.85) s. There was a difference between the two medians of 2.02 s (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the use of FADU was superior to MP in achieving shorter pulse check times. Further research is needed to confirm the accuracy of FADU for identifying ROSC as well as to determine whether FADU can improve clinical outcomes.