Differences in gut microbiota between Dutch and South-Asian Surinamese: potential implications for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Gut microbiota, or the collection of diverse microorganisms in a specific ecological niche, are known to significantly impact human health. Decreased gut microbiota production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) has been implicated in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) disease progression. Most microbiome studies focus on ethnic majorities. This study aims to understand how the microbiome differs between an ethnic majority (the Dutch) and minority (the South-Asian Surinamese (SAS)) group with a lower and higher prevalence of T2DM, respectively. Microbiome data from the Healthy Life in an Urban Setting (HELIUS) cohort were used. Two age- and gender-matched groups were compared: the Dutch (n = 41) and SAS (n = 43). Microbial community compositions were generated via DADA2. Metrics of microbial diversity and similarity between groups were computed. Biomarker analyses were performed to determine discriminating taxa. Bacterial co-occurrence networks were constructed to examine ecological patterns. A tight microbiota cluster was observed in the Dutch women, which overlapped with some of the SAS microbiota. The Dutch gut contained a more interconnected microbial ecology, whereas the SAS network was dispersed, i.e., contained fewer inter-taxonomic correlational relationships. Bacteroides caccae, Butyricicoccus, Alistipes putredinis, Coprococcus comes, Odoribacter splanchnicus, and Lachnospira were enriched in the Dutch gut. Haemophilus, Bifidobacterium, and Anaerostipes hadrus discriminated the SAS gut. All but Lachnospira and certain strains of Haemophilus are known to produce SCFAs. The Dutch gut microbiome was distinguished from the SAS by diverse, differentially abundant SCFA-producing taxa with significant cooperation. The dynamic ecology observed in the Dutch was not detected in the SAS. Among several potential gut microbial biomarkers, Haemophilus parainfluenzae likely best characterizes the ethnic minority group, which is more predisposed to T2DM. The higher prevalence of T2DM in the SAS may be associated with the gut dysbiosis observed.

Microbiome depiction through user-adapted bioinformatic pipelines and parameters.

Introduction. The role of the microbiome in health and disease continues to be increasingly recognized. However, there is significant variability in the bioinformatic protocols for analysing genomic data. This, in part, has impeded the potential incorporation of microbiomics into the clinical setting and has challenged interstudy reproducibility. In microbial compositional analysis, there is a growing recognition for the need to move away from a one-size-fits-all approach to data processing.Gap Statement. Few evidence-based recommendations exist for setting parameters of programs that infer microbiota community profiles despite these parameters significantly impacting the accuracy of taxonomic inference.Aim. To compare three commonly used programs (DADA2, QIIME2, and mothur) and optimize them into four user-adapted pipelines for processing paired-end amplicon reads. We aim to increase the accuracy of compositional inference and help standardize microbiomic protocol.Methods. Two key parameters were isolated across four pipelines: filtering sequence reads based on a whole-number error threshold (maxEE) and truncating read ends based on a quality score threshold (QTrim). Closeness of sample inference was then evaluated using a mock community of known composition.Results. We observed that raw genomic data lost were proportionate to how stringently parameters were set. Exactly how much data were lost varied by pipeline. Accuracy of sample inference correlated with increased sequence read retention. Falsely detected taxa and unaccounted for microbial constituents were unique to pipeline and parameter. Implementation of optimized parameter values led to better approximation of the known mock community.Conclusions. Microbial compositions generated based on the 16S rRNA marker gene should be interpreted with caution. To improve microbial community profiling, bioinformatic protocols must be user-adapted. Analysis should be performed with consideration for the select target amplicon, pipelines and parameters used, and taxa of interest.