Distinguishing Authentic Voices in the Age of ChatGPT: Comparing AI-Generated and Applicant-Written Personal Statements for Plastic Surgery Residency Application.

BACKGROUND: ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence model, may be used by future applicants in the plastic surgery residency match. METHODS: Ten personal statements (5 generated by ChatGPT, 5 written by applicants) were rated by 10 reviewers, blinded to the source of the essay. RESULTS: A total of a 100 evaluations were collected. There was no significant difference in ratings for readability, originality, authenticity, and overall quality (all P > 0.05) when comparing computer-generated and applicant essays. CONCLUSION: Personal statements prepared by ChatGPT are indistinguishable from essays written by actual applicants. This finding suggests that the current plastic surgery application format be reevaluated to better aid in holistic evaluation of students.

Risk of Complications in Combined Plastic Surgery Procedures Using the Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons Database.

BACKGROUND: Combining multiple surgical procedures into a single operative session is widespread in the field of plastic surgery; however, the implications of this practice are not fully understood. OBJECTIVES: This study compared 30-day complication rates associated with combined plastic surgery procedures with the rates for index procedures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis utilized the Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons database from 2016 to 2020 to identify the 3 most frequent combinations of augmentation mammaplasty, reduction mammaplasty, trunk liposuction, mastopexy, and abdominoplasty. RESULTS: The 30-day overall complication rate was 5.0% (1400 of 26,771 patients), with a higher complication rate for combined procedures compared with index (7.6% vs 4.2%, adjusted odd ratio [aOR], 1.91 [95% CI, 1.61-2.27], P < .001). There were no significant differences in complication rates for abdominoplasty or mastopexy combinations compared with index. Complication rates for reduction mammaplasty combinations compared with index were not statistically different after controlling for demographics (aOR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.61-1.64], P = .93). Higher rates of minor and major complications were observed for combinations of trunk liposuction (aOR, 4.84 [95% CI, 3.31-7.21), P < .001) and augmentation mammaplasty (aOR, 1.60 [95% CI 1.13-2.22], P = .007) compared with index. CONCLUSIONS: Combinations with trunk liposuction or augmentation mammaplasty present with increased risk of complications compared with index, controlling for demographics. Abdominoplasty and mastopexy may be combined with other plastic surgery procedures without increased risk to patients. The complication risk of reduction mammaplasty combinations is mediated by other variables, suggesting the need for shared surgical decision-making when recommending these combinations to patients.

Long-term efficacy of lymphovenous anastomosis for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymphangiectasia: A case report and a review of literature.

Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) represents an alternative treatment for retroperitoneal lymphangiectasia. In contrast to sclerotherapy or excision, which may risk lymphatic obstruction and subsequent lymphedema, LVA preserves existing lymphatic architecture and transit. This report shows long-term efficacy of LVA for functional decompression of a symptomatic pathologically dilatated retroperitoneal lymphatics. A 47-year-old female with retroperitoneal lymphangiectasia refractory to multiple percutaneous drainages and treatments with sclerosing agents underwent LVA with anastomosis of a dominant segment of retroperitoneal lymphangiectasia to the deep inferior epigastric vein. Postoperative serial magnetic resonance imaging with 3-dimensional volume calculation over the 27 months follow-up showed evidence of decompression of the lesion with patent bypass. There were no known immediate complications nor requirement of further interventions. The patient's subjective pain also decreased substantially. This report confirms long-term efficacy of LVA for retroperitoneal lymphangiectasia as an alternative to sclerotherapy and surgical excision in the setting of previously failed treatments.

Bioimpedance spectroscopy for breast cancer-related lymphedema assessment: clinical practice guidelines.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a significant concern for patients following breast cancer treatment, and assessment for BCRL represents a key component of survivorship efforts. Growing data has demonstrated the benefits of early detection and treatment of BCRL. Traditional diagnostic modalities are less able to detect reversible subclinical BCRL while newer techniques such as bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) have shown the ability to detect subclinical BCRL, allowing for early intervention and low rates of chronic BCRL with level I evidence. We present updated clinical practice guidelines for BIS utilization to assess for BCRL. METHODS AND RESULTS: Review of the literature identified a randomized controlled trial and other published data which form the basis for the recommendations made. The final results of the PREVENT trial, with 3-year follow-up, demonstrated an absolute reduction of 11.3% and relative reduction of 59% in chronic BCRL (through utilization of compression garment therapy) with BIS as compared to tape measurement. This is in keeping with real-world data demonstrating the effectiveness of BIS in a prospective surveillance model. For optimal outcomes patients should receive an initial pre-treatment measurement and subsequently be followed at a minimum quarterly for first 3 years then biannually for years 4-5, then annually as appropriate, consistent with previous guidelines; the target for intervention has been changed from a change in L-Dex of 10 to 6.5. The lack of pre-operative measure does not preclude inclusion in the prospective surveillance model of care. CONCLUSION: The updated clinical practice guidelines present a standardized approach for a prospective model of care using BIS for BCRL assessment and supported by evidence from a randomized controlled trial as well as real-world data.

Oncologic safety of axillary lymph node dissection with immediate lymphatic reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can reduce the incidence of lymphedema in patients with breast cancer. The oncologic safety of ILR is unknown and has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if ILR is associated with increased breast cancer recurrence rates. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer who underwent ALND with ILR from September 2016 to December 2020 were identified from a prospective institutional database. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and operative details were recorded. Follow-up included the development of local recurrence as well as distant metastasis. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients underwent ALND with ILR. At cancer presentation, 122 patients (89%) had clinically node positive primary breast cancer, 10 patients (7.3%) had recurrent breast cancer involving the axillary lymph nodes, 3 patients (2.2%) had recurrent breast cancer involving both the breast and axillary nodes, and 2 patients (1.5%) presented with axillary disease/occult breast cancer. For surgical management, 103 patients (75.2%) underwent a mastectomy, 22 patients (16%) underwent lumpectomy and 12 patients (8.8%) had axillary surgery only. The ALND procedure, yielded a median of 15 lymph nodes pathologically identified (range 3-41). At a median follow-up of 32.9 months (range 6-63 months), 17 patients (12.4%) developed a local (n = 1) or distant recurrence (n = 16), however, no axillary recurrences were identified. CONCLUSION: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing ALND is not associated with short term axillary recurrence and appears oncologically safe.

A retrospective review of submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction: The influence of dermal matrix (ADM) on complications and aesthetic outcomes.

PURPOSE: The use of acellular dermal matrix changed the breast reconstruction algorithm facilitating implant coverage and direct to implant technique. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the ADM surgical complications, breast aesthetics, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: In a tertiary hospital, patients that underwent implant-based breast reconstructions during a three-year period had their charts retrospectively reviewed, received post-operative BreastQ, and had their post-operative photos evaluated by a three-member panel using a multi-parameter breast specific scale (scored 1-5). The complication information was analysed per reconstructed breast while the analysis of aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes was done per patient. RESULTS: A total of 501 patients (990 breasts) were evaluated. In the complication analysis group, 20.3% of the breasts had ADM. Overall complications and major complications were more frequent in the ADM group. During the first 30 postoperative days the most frequent complications were: skin necrosis/delayed wound healing and haematoma, after 30 days was infection, and complications after 1 year being less than 1%. On the outcome analysis group, ADM was used in 21.5% patients, 44% had post-operative photos, and 29% answered the BreastQ. Factors associated with higher appearance score were bilateral reconstruction, prophylactic surgery, and nipple presence. ADM demonstrated no difference in satisfaction with breasts. CONCLUSION: In implant-based breast reconstructions ADM has been shown to increase rate of complications. The use of acellular dermal matrix did not influence the overall appearance or the patient-reported outcome. A good aesthetic outcome is positively influenced by bilateral reconstructions with preservation of the nipple.

Dual Fluorescent Tracers for Surgical Guidance: Preventing Donor-site Lymphedema in Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer.

Introduction: Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) restores physiological lymphatic function. Although effective, postoperative impairment of donor-site lymphatic function and iatrogenic lymphedema following lymph node transfer remains a pressing concern. Methods: Prospective analysis of VLNT patients undergoing dual fluorescent tracers-assisted harvest was performed at our institution from September 2013 to April 2022. Reverse lymphatic mapping of the lower extremity was performed with indocyanine green (ICG). Blue dye was utilized in both white light and near-infrared spectra for visualization of donor-site lymphatic structures. Demographics, intraoperative details, and surgical outcomes were recorded. Results: Twenty-five patients were included. Median age was 52.9 years with a body mass index of 29.1 kg/m2 and mean follow-up of 44 months (range 24 to 90 months). Lymphedema stage ranged from Campisi 2 to 4. Inguinal VLNT was performed in 13 patients, and 12 patients received combined VLNT and free flap breast reconstruction. No patients required change in lymph node donor site intraoperatively. All ICG stained nodes were preserved in situ. No cases of iatrogenic lower extremity lymphedema were observed. Postoperative bioimpedance spectroscopy, circumferential, and volumetric measurements of the donor-site limb did not show evidence of subclinical or clinical lymphedema. The donor site healed appropriately in 92% of patients; one patient developed methylene blue-induced skin necrosis. Conclusion: Reverse lymphatic mapping and surgical guidance with dual ICG and blue dye fluorescent tracers provides surgeons with real-time surgical guidance without radioisotope, improves surgical visualization in both white light and near-infrared spectra, and avoids iatrogenic lymphatic dysfunction in the donor limb.

Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Factors Influencing Disparity in Perceptions of Breast Reconstruction Aesthetic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes are the primary measurement of breast reconstruction success, but results may be affected by nontechnical factors such as socioemotional determinants. Third-party observers provide an independent assessment of aesthetic outcomes. Factors associated with disparity between patient and observer perceptions of outcomes are not well understood. METHODS: One hundred forty-seven patients underwent breast reconstruction at the authors' institution between 2009 and 2011, completed the BREAST-Q, and had photographs graded by a diverse panel using the Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale. Patient satisfaction with breasts scores that aligned with observer scores were categorized as group 2; patient satisfaction that exceeded observer scores were group 1; and those lower than observer scores were group 3. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, with values of p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (19 percent) were categorized as group 1, 93 (63 percent) in group 2, and 26 (18 percent) in group 3. Median overall appearance was highest in group 3 (median, 4.0; interquartile range, 4 to 4) and lowest in group 1 (median, 3.0; interquartile range, 2 to 3) ( p < 0.001). Psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being were significantly associated with disparity (group 1 or 3 status) ( p < 0.01). Satisfaction with outcomes, nipples, abdomen, and breasts were significantly associated with disparity. Factors not significantly associated with disparity include age, body mass index, autologous or implant-based, adjuvant therapies, and timing of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Incongruously high patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction aesthetics relative to third-party perception of aesthetic outcomes is associated with high quality-of-life scores. Incongruously low patient satisfaction with breast cosmesis compared with higher third-party perceptions was associated with low quality-of-life scores. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

A Novel Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale.

BACKGROUND: Breast aesthetics impacts patients' quality of life after breast reconstruction, but patients and surgeons frequently disagree on the final aesthetic evaluation. The need for a comprehensive, validated tool to evaluate breast aesthetics independently from the patient motivated this study. METHODS: The 13-item Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale was developed after several internal meetings, and worded to be understood by a nonspecialist. Three items are common for both breasts, with the remaining being side-specific. To test the internal consistency of the scale subitems, postoperative photographs after different breast reconstruction techniques were graded by a six-member panel. To test interrater and intrarater correlation across time, four physicians evaluated the results of abdominally based breast reconstructions following nipple-sparing mastectomies. RESULTS: Graded aesthetic outcomes of 53 patients showed that the Cronbach alpha of the subitems of the scale was 0.926, with no single item that, if excluded, would increase it. Twenty-two patients underwent aesthetic outcomes grading at four different time points. The mean overall appearance was 3.71 ± 0.62. The mean grade for overall nipple appearance was 4.0 ± 0.57. The coefficient alpha of the panel overall aesthetic grade across different time points was 0.957; whereas intragrader reliability for graders 1 through 4 individually showed alpha coefficients of 0.894, 0.9, 0.898, and 0.688, respectively. Similar results were found for the other items of the scale. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed aesthetic scale evaluates different aspects of the breast reconstruction aesthetic result with excellent internal consistency among its subitems. Grading by a gender-balanced, diverse four-member panel using postoperative photographs showed higher reliability and reproducibility compared to single graders.

Neurotization Does not Prolong Operative Time in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Neurotization during the breast reconstruction process can improve patient quality-of-life and satisfaction with reconstructive outcomes. One concern with neurotization is increased total operative time due to the need for additional dissection and nerve coaptation. The purpose of this study was to compare total operative time between neurotized and non-neurotized abdominal-based, free flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent unilateral, abdominal-based, free flap breast reconstruction between 2016 and 2018 at a single tertiary care center. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical techniques, and length of surgery. Data analysis was performed using chi-square test, independent t-test, and multivariate linear regression analysis. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included in this study. Twenty-three patients (31.50%) underwent flap neurotization (N group) and 50 (68.49%) underwent standard breast reconstruction without neurotization (NO group). The groups were similar in age, BMI, smoking status, and ASA class. No difference was found between the two groups in timing of reconstruction (p = 0.388). Average operative times were 467.73 ± 145.52 minutes and 455.28 ± 111.19 minutes for the N and NO groups, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (two-tailed p-value = 0.72). CONCLUSION: Seamless integration of neurotization in abdominal-based, free flap breast reconstruction is possible without significant prolongation of total operative time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Skeletal and Dental Outcomes after Facial Allotransplantation: The Cleveland Clinic Experience and Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Most of the literature surrounding face transplantation focuses on technique, immunology, and psychology. Dental and skeletal outcomes remain persistently underreported. This study critically examined the worldwide face transplant experience to evaluate such outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of all composite allografts containing midface and/or mandible was performed. Dental and skeletal complications were recorded. Formal imaging and photographs available in the literature were analyzed using skeletal measurements, soft-tissue cephalometrics, and the Angle classification. Outcomes of our face transplant patients, including condylar assessment and airway volume measurements, is also presented. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients received allografts containing midface (n = 7) or mandible (n = 2), whereas 16 contained a double-jaw. All midface-only transplants developed skeletal deformity; 57 percent developed a palatal fistula. Both partial and full arch transplantation patients developed skeletal deformity. Among double-jaw transplants, 69 percent developed palatal fistula or floor-of-mouth dehiscence, 66 percent developed malocclusion, 50 percent developed trismus, and 31 percent required corrective orthognathic surgery. In 40 percent of patients, malocclusion recurred after corrective orthognathic surgery. Forty percent of all patients developed dental cavities or periodontal disease. All of our patients received midface and/or mandible. One patient required corrective orthognathic surgery. Midfacial segments showed clockwise rotation. Airway volumes decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal and dental complications remain extremely common after facial allotransplantation involving either single- or double-jaw composites. Corrective orthognathic surgery and dental extraction is often necessitated. These data will aid face transplant teams during surgical planning and preoperative counseling. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Mixed Reality and 3D Printed Models for Planning and Execution of Face Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel holographic craniofacial surgical planning application and its implementation throughout the planning and operative stages of facial transplantation by performing a critical analysis of comparative utility, cost, and limitations of MR and 3D printing. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Face transplantation is a highly complex form of craniofacial reconstruction requiring significant planning, knowledge of patient-specific spatial relationships, and time-sensitive decision making. Computer-aided 3D modeling has improved efficiency and outcomes of complex craniofacial reconstruction by enabling virtual surgical planning and 3D printed model generation. MR technology can enhance surgical planning, improve visualization, and allow manipulation of virtual craniofacial biomodels within the operative field. METHODS: Accounting for the time-sensitive nature of face transplantation, a unique, highly coordinated workflow for image acquisition and processing was designed to facilitate rapid holographic rendering and 3D printing. During recent face transplantation, both holographic and 3D printed models were utilized, and the time and cost of fabrication were compared. RESULTS: Holographic models required less time and cost for fabrication. They provided both comprehensive visualization of 3D spatial relationships and novel means to perform VSP and virtual face transplantation by interacting with and manipulating patient-specific, anatomic holograms. CONCLUSION: Time efficiency, low-cost biomodel production, provision of unlimited preoperative surgical rehearsal, and potential for intraoperative surgical guidance makes holographic VSP and MR highly promising technology for use in complex craniofacial surgery.

Lymphedema Prevention Surgery: Improved Operating Efficiency Over Time.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema prevention surgery (LPS), which identifies, preserves, and restores lymphatic flow via lymphaticovenous bypasses (LVB), has demonstrated potential to decrease lymphedema in breast cancer patients requiring axillary lymph node dissection. Implementing this new operating technique requires additional operating room (OR) time and coordination. This study sought to evaluate the improvement of LPS technique and OR duration over time. METHODS: A prospective database of patients who underwent LPS at our institution from 2016 to 2019 was queried. Type of breast and reconstruction surgery, number of LVB performed, and OR times were collected. LPS details were compared by surgical group and year performed. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients underwent LPS, and 88 had complete OR time data available for analysis. Average age was 51 years, body mass index of 28, with an average of 15 lymph nodes removed. Reconstructive treatment groups included prosthetic reconstruction 56% (49), oncoplastic reduction 10% (9), and no reconstruction 34% (30). The number of patients undergoing LPS increased significantly from 2016 to 2019, and average number of LVB per patient doubled. In patients without reconstruction, the average time for LPS improved significantly from 212 to 87 min from 2016 to 2019 (p = 0.015) and similarly in patients undergoing LPS with prosthetic reconstruction from 238 to 160 min (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: LVB is an emerging surgical lymphedema prevention technique. While requiring additional surgical time, our results show that with refinement of technique, over 4 years, we were able to perform double the number of LVB per patient in half the OR time.

Advances and current concepts in reconstructive surgery for breast cancer.

In this article, we report on recent advancements in reconstructive care of the breast cancer patient. New developments in sensate breast reconstruction to help address the problem of numbness after mastectomy have emerged and show promise. Methods to restore lymphatic physiologic flow after axillary lymphadenectomy using supermicrosurgical techniques have begun to show benefit by reducing the short-term incidence of breast cancer related lymphedema (BRCL). Breast implant safety has received significant recent attention and we explore the emergence of BIA-ALCL (Breast Implant Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma) and its implications for the breast cancer patient and their multidisciplinary care team.

Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Surgical vs Nonsurgical Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review.

Importance: Secondary lymphedema is a debilitating complication of breast cancer therapy and affects more than 1 in 5 breast cancer survivors. Patient-reported outcomes may be more important in predicting long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than clinician-measured outcomes. Objective: To summarize published evidence on HRQoL outcomes for vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) and complex decongestive therapy (CDT) used in the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Evidence Review: A literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase was conducted to identify articles on HRQoL in patients undergoing lymphedema treatment with CDT or VLNT published from January 1980 through April 2019. Studies using validated measurement instruments to assess HRQoL in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema relative to baseline were included. This review is reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Findings: A total of 16 articles were included in this review. Evidence regarding VLNT was reviewed from 2 studies involving 65 patients, and HRQoL was evaluated using the Lymphoedema Quality of Life Study questionnaire. Data on VLNT indicated favorable HRQoL outcomes at 12-month postoperative follow-up. Evidence regarding CDT was reviewed from 14 studies involving 569 patients, and HRQoL was evaluated using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, and Functional Living Index-Cancer measures. Data on CDT demonstrated variable association with HRQoL, and a majority of articles reported improvement in at least 1 subscale. The use of diverse patient-reported outcome measures and variability in CDT protocol limited interpretation of results in this population and between treatment modalities. Conclusions and Relevance: According to this review, in deciding among breast cancer-related lymphedema treatment modalities, HRQoL outcomes are an important consideration that cannot be compared based on currently available data. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes obtained through coordinated use of preference-based health utility measures may be required to compare outcomes among patients undergoing surgical and nonsurgical treatments of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Additional studies are needed to better understand the best lymphedema treatment options and direct evidence-based care.

Factors Influencing the Aesthetic Outcome and Quality of Life After Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The most important purpose of reconstruction is to increase or restore the patient's quality of life (QOL). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the QOL and aesthetic outcomes of patients after autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: Patients who underwent breast reconstruction between 2009 and 2011 were included. The Breast-Q, a validated breast reconstruction QOL questionnaire, was used along with postoperative photographs panel analyses using a multiparameter breast-specific aesthetic outcome scale and retrospective evaluation of demographic and treatment data. RESULTS: Of 820 patients, 261 complete questionnaires were evaluated. On the multivariable linear regression, the "satisfaction with breasts" was positively influenced by autologous and bilateral reconstructions, whereas radiation therapy (RTx), the time between the reconstruction and the questionnaire, and the number of surgeries due to complications were negative factors (adjusted R = 0.183; P < 0.001). The same factors influenced the "satisfaction with the outcomes." The mean "overall breast appearance" was also positively influenced by autologous and bilateral reconstructions, and RTx and the total number of surgeries were negative predictive factors (adjusted R = 0.311, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The aesthetic result and QOL after breast reconstruction for breast cancer treatment are positively influenced by the use of autologous tissue and bilaterality. Factors that negatively influenced the aesthetic result and the QOL include use of RTx, a higher number of surgeries needed for the reconstruction, reoperations due to complications, higher body mass index, and a longer time elapsed between reconstruction and the questionnaire.